UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
[ ] | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
[X] | Definitive Proxy Statement |
[ ] | Definitive Additional Materials |
[ ] | Soliciting Material Under §240.14a-12 |
Capital One Financial Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] | No fee required. |
[ ] | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
(5) | Total fee paid: |
[ ] | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
[ ] | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
(3) | Filing Party: |
(4) | Date Filed: |
Notice of Capital One Financial Corporation’s
20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for
The Stockholder Meeting To Be Held On May 6, 20215, 2022
The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com
The 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting of Capital One Financial Corporation (“Capital One” or “Company”) will be a virtual meeting conducted exclusively via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/COF2021COF2022 on May 6, 2021,5, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time.
Items of Business
As a stockholder, you will be asked to:
➊ | Elect |
➋ |
|
Approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, our |
|
Stockholders also will transact other business that may properly come before the meeting.
Record Date
You may vote if you held shares of Capital One common stock as of the close of business on March 10, 20219, 2022 (“Record Date”).
Proxy Voting
Your vote is important. You may vote your shares in advance of the meeting via the Internet, by telephone, or by mail, or by attending and voting online at the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting. Please refer to the section “How do I vote?” in the proxy statement for detailed voting instructions. If you vote via the Internet, by telephone or plan to vote electronically during the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting, you do not need to mail in a proxy card.
20212022 Virtual Annual Stockholder Meeting
In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and after careful consideration, the Board of Directors (“Board”) has determined to hold a virtual annual meeting in order to facilitate stockholder attendance and participation by enabling stockholders to participate from any location and at no cost. We believe this is the right choice for Capital One at this time, as it enables engagement with our stockholders, regardless of size, resources, or physical location while safeguarding the health of our stockholders, Board, and management. We are committed to ensuring that stockholders will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. You will be able to attend the meeting online, vote your shares electronically, and submit questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/COF2021.COF2022. To participate in the virtual meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice,notice, proxy card, or voting instruction form. The meeting webcast will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. Online check-in will begin at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time, and you should allow ample time for the check-in procedures. If you experience technical difficulties during the check-in process or during the meeting please call 1-844-986-0822 (U.S.) or 1-303-562-9302 (International) for assistance.
We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.
On behalf of the Board,
John G. Finneran, Jr.Matthew W. Cooper
Corporate Secretary
March 24, 202121, 2022
Proxy Summary
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all the information you should consider in voting your shares. Please read the complete proxy statement and our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20202021 (“Annual Report”) carefully before voting.
Meeting Information | ||
Date: |
Thursday, May | |
Time: |
10:00 a.m. Eastern Time | |
Virtual Meeting: |
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ | |
Record Date: |
March |
How to Vote |
Your vote is important. You may vote your shares in advance of the meeting via the Internet, by telephone, or by mail, or during the meeting by attending the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting and voting electronically. Please refer to the section “How do I vote?” on page 130125 for detailed voting instructions. If you vote via the Internet, by telephone, or plan to vote electronically during the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting, you do not need to mail in a proxy card.
INTERNET | TELEPHONE | |||
To vote before the meeting,
To vote at the meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ You will need the control number printed on your notice, proxy card, or voting instruction form. | If you received a paper copy of the proxy
or the telephone number on your voting instruction form. You will need the control number printed on your proxy card or voting instruction form. | If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials, send your completed and signed proxy card or voting instruction form using the enclosed postage- paid envelope. |
On March 24, 2021,21, 2022, we began sending our stockholders a Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 1 |
Voting Item 1: Election of Directors
Item 1 | Election of Directors
You are being asked to elect the following
✓ Our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” each of these director nominees. |
|
|
Corporate Governance Highlights
Board Members and Leadership | Board Governance Best Practices | |||
∎ Appointment of
∎
∎ Active and empowered Lead Independent Director elected annually by the independent members of our Board (“Independent Directors”)
∎ Active and empowered committee chairs, all of whom are independent
∎ Directors have a mix of tenures, including long-standing members, relatively new members, and others at different points along the tenure continuum
∎ Directors reflect a variety of experiences and skills that match the Company’s complexity and strategic direction and give the Board the collective capability necessary to oversee the Company’s activities
∎ Regular discussions regarding Board recruiting, succession, and refreshment, including director skills and qualifications, that support the Company’s long-term strategic objectives |
∎ Frequent executive sessions of Independent Directors that regularly include separate meetings with our CEO, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Chief Risk Officer, Chief Audit Officer, Chief
∎ Annual assessments of the Board and each of its committees, the Independent Directors, and the Lead Independent Director
∎ Active engagement and oversight of Company
∎ Direct access by the Board to
∎ Annual CEO evaluation process led by the Lead Independent Director
∎ Regular talent and succession planning discussions regarding the CEO
∎ Regular meetings between the Board and federal banking regulators |
2
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Stockholder Engagement and Stockholder Role in Governance |
∎ Regular outreach and engagement throughout the year by our CEO, CFO, and Investor Relations team with stockholders regarding Company strategy and performance
∎ Formal outreach and engagement with governance representatives of our largest stockholders at least two times per year
∎ Feedback from investors regularly shared with our Board and its committees to ensure that our Board has insight on investor views
∎ Board and Governance and Nominating Committee review extensive briefings and benchmarking reports on corporate governance practices and emerging corporate governance issues
∎ Majority voting for directors with resignation policy in uncontested elections
∎ Stockholders holding at least 25% of outstanding common stock may request a special meeting
∎ Stockholders are able to act by written consent, subject to certain procedural and other safeguards that the Board believes are in the best interests of Capital One and our stockholders
∎
∎ No supermajority vote provisions for amendments to Bylaws and Certificate of Incorporation or
∎ No stockholder rights plan (commonly referred to as a “poison pill”)
|
Voting Item 2: Advisory Vote on Our Named Executive Officer Compensation (“Say on Pay”)
|
|
Item 2 |
|
Advisory Vote on Our Named Executive Officer Compensation (“Say on Pay”)
You are being asked to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”). For additional information regarding our executive compensation program and our NEO compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page
✓ Our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the advisory approval of our
|
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain, motivate, and reward leaders who can foster strong business results and promote our long-term success. We believe our executive compensation program strongly links rewards with both business and individual performance over multiple time horizons, which alignshorizons. We aim to align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders while supporting safety and soundness and appropriately balancing risk.
20202021 Company Performance
Each year the Compensation Committee (“Committee”) and the Independent Directors review and evaluate the Company’s qualitative and quantitative performance andto make determinations regarding the compensation of our NEOs based on Capital One’s pay-for-performance philosophy. The Committee seeks to directly link the compensation of the NEOs with the Company’s performance, and the executives’ contributions to that performance over appropriate time horizons. The Committee and the Independent Directors have the flexibility to adjust compensation decisions from year to year to take into account Company and individual performance, as well as evolving market practices.
In 2020,2021, Capital One delivered solid financial and operating results in the face of unprecedented challenges and uncertainty. The extraordinary events of the COVID-19 pandemic shaped our 2020record financial results which reflected the near-shutdown of the global economyand made significant progress on our long-term strategic objectives, including investments in transformation, talent, growth, and our own choicestechnology and digital capabilities. We reached all-time highs in revenues, profits, earnings per share, capital distribution, share price, and market value. After taking appropriate actions in 2020 to drive resiliencereduce risk, support customers, and manage risk. The significant shrinkagereact swiftly to uncertain economic and market conditions, we returned to growth in our Credit Card business and delivered solid growth across each of our other major lines of business that drove higher revenues. An increase in credit card loan balances in the industry, and at Capital One, drove a decrease in Company revenues. In addition, the sharp economic downturn at the outset of the pandemic, combined with significant uncertainty about future recovery, drove large additions to our reserve for expected credit losses in the first half of the year and lower earnings in 2020 as compared to 2019. However, cautious consumer behavior, government stimulus, customer forbearance programs, and our own underwriting choices resulted in historically low realized credit losses. Our stockholders saw their investment in Capital One decrease slightly in 2020; however, our stock price outpaced most large banks and outperformed the largest benchmark of our bank peers, the KBW Bank Index, by ten percentage points.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 3
|
purchase volumes drove revenues in our Credit Card business to reach the highest level in our history. Similarly, our Auto Finance business posted solid top-line originations and loan growth. We continued to expand our national retail bank franchise with solid 6% deposit growth, and our Commercial Banking business outpaced the growth of the industry. Solid underwriting and strikingly strong credit results drove improvement in customer charge-offs and resulted in large releases from our reserve for expected credit losses. Operating expenses grew at a slower rate than revenues, leading to an improvement in operating efficiency ratio(1)(2) by 213 basis points to 45.0%. Operating efficiency ratio, net of adjustments, improved by 133 basis points to 44.7%.
In addition, management stayed keenly focused on delivering shareholder value. Strong capital levels and record earnings supported $8.7 billion of capital distribution to common stockholders through a combination of share repurchases and common dividends, including a special dividend in the third quarter and an increase in the quarterly common dividend from $0.40 to $0.60 beginning in the third quarter. Capital One’s share price ended the year at $145.09, up 46.8% from year-end 2020. Our stock price growth significantly outperformed the largest benchmark of our bank peers, the KBW Bank Index, and our Total Shareholder Return outperformed the KBW Bank Index by 11 percentage points.
We also made substantial progress onachieved exceptional 2021 financial performance while continuing to invest in transformation, talent, growth, and our long-term technology transformation. Our long-termcapabilities. We earned a number of external awards and accolades related to our products and customer experiences and continued to be recognized for our customer satisfaction and advocacy. Net Promoter Scores, which measure how likely a customer is to recommend our products and services, reached record highs across a number of our major businesses. Despite increased investments in technology, talent, infrastructure, data, products and capabilities are driving innovation and will increasingly support growth and efficiency over time. In 2020, these long-term investments continuedareas, we began to drive results as we exited allharness the power of our migration to the cloud and realize cost benefits of our exits from data centers,centers. We also strengthened our risk and control environment and executed on key strategic imperatives. Our multi-year transformation, combined with strong execution during the year, enabled the Company’s swiftcontinued to enhance cybersecurity.
We invested heavily in recruiting, developing, and effective response to the pandemic, including a seamless transition to remote work for almost allretaining talent and we welcomed thousands of our non-branch and non-essentialnew associates and proved critical as customers increasingly relied on digital solutions for engagement and servicing.
During 2020, we welcomed millions of new customers to Capital One, deepened our engagement with existing customers, and our customer advocacy scores remain strong. We attracted talented new associates andhave maintained strong associate morale and engagement despite ongoing stresses related to the stress and challenges of 2020, hit record highs.pandemic. We also supported non-profit organizations and communities through both philanthropy and service and continued to makemade progress on our diversity and inclusion efforts.efforts and invested in the community through our Capital One Impact Initiative. We became the first of the top-ten retail banks in the United States to announce a no-fee overdraft policy for all consumer checking customers. We believe our portfolio of structurally-attractive businesses, andcoupled with our disciplinedlong-term investments in growthtechnology, talent, and transformation, will result in a company with the scale, brand,digital capabilities, and talent that positionpositions us well for future growth and to deliver sustainable financial performance andthe creation of long-term value to stockholders.stockholder value.
In particular, the Committee and the Independent Directors specifically considered the following quantitative and qualitative Company performance when awarding compensation for the 20202021 performance year to our NEOs(1):
∎ | Diluted Earnings Per Share (“ |
∎ | Net Revenue |
∎ |
|
∎ |
|
∎ |
|
|
|
|
|
4
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
∎ | Risk Management and Control Environment. We invested heavily in talent, technology, and improvements to business processes |
∎ |
|
∎ | Progress on Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) Initiatives. We continued to make |
See “Executive Summary” beginning on page 5558 and “Year-End Incentive Opportunity” beginning on page 6872 for more information regarding the Company’s 20202021 performance.
(1) | The Committee considers these metrics to be key financial performance measures in its assessment of the Company’s performance, including certain non-GAAP measures. While certain of our non-GAAP measures are widely used by investors, analysts, and bank regulatory agencies to assess the capital position of financial services companies, they may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. See Appendix A for our definition and reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the applicable amounts measured in accordance with GAAP. |
(2) |
|
|
ROTCE is a non-GAAP measure that the Committee believes is indicative of the Company’s performance and helps investors and users of our financial information understand the effect of these adjustments on our selected reported results and provide alternate measurements of our performance. See Appendix A for our definition and reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to the applicable amounts measured in accordance with GAAP. |
|
|
|
Highlights of Our 20202021 Compensation Programs
We believe that our NEO compensation programs balance risk and financial results, reward NEOs for their achievements, promote our overall compensation objectives, and encourage appropriate, but not excessive, risk-taking. Our compensation programs are structured to encourage our executives to deliver strong results over the short term while making decisions that create sustained value for our stockholders over the long term. In this
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 5 |
section, the term “NEOs” excludes our former CFO, R. Scott Blackley, who left the Company in March 2021, and, as a result, did not receive a year-end incentive award for the 2021 performance year. Key features of our 20202021 compensation programs include:
∎ | No CEO Cash Salary. Our CEO does not receive a cash salary and 100% of his compensation is deferred for at least three years. |
∎ | The Payout of 71% of CEO Year-End Incentive Compensation Determined by Formula.71% of our CEO’s year-end incentive compensation for the |
∎ | 25% of CEO |
∎ | Awards Based on Company and Individual Performance. All NEOs receive incentive awards based on Company and/or individual performance. For |
∎ | NEO Compensation is Primarily Equity-Based and Determined after Performance Year-End. |
∎ | All Equity and Equity-Based Awards Contain Performance and Recovery Provisions. All equity awards contain performance and recovery provisions that are designed to further enhance alignment between pay and performance and to balance risk. See “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” beginning on page |
|
20202021 Compensation Decisions
20202021 CEO Performance Year Compensation.Compensation
The CEO’s compensation for the 20202021 performance year was composed of an equity awardsaward designed to provide the CEO with an incentive to focus on long-term performance and the opportunity for a year-end incentive award based on the Committee’s evaluation of the Company’s performance and the CEO’s contributions to that performance. Mr. Fairbank’s total compensation for performance year 20202021 was $18.75$27.5 million a decrease of 5% compared to performance year 2019, and consisted of:
∎ | Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) granted in |
∎ | Year-End Incentive Award totaling $25.75 million granted in February 2022 in recognition of the Company’s performance and the CEO’s contribution to that performance in 2021 and consisting of: |
∎ | Performance Share Units. Performance share unit awards with an aggregate value of $18.2 million, for which the CEO may receive from 0% to 150% of a total target number of 122,734 shares of the Company’s common stock based on the Company’s TSR (with respect to 30,684 shares, or $4.55 million of the awards) and financial performance (with respect to 92,050 shares, or $13.65 million of the awards) over a three-year period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024. |
6
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
∎ | Restricted Stock Units. |
∎ | Deferred Cash Bonus. A deferred cash bonus of |
The chart below shows Mr. Fairbank’s actual total compensation for performance year 2020:2021:
The table below shows Mr. Fairbank’s compensation awards as they are attributable to the performance years indicated. The table shows how the Committee views compensation actions and to which year the compensation awards relate. This table differs substantially from the Summary Compensation Table required for this proxy statement beginning on page 9298 and is therefore not a substitute for the information required in that table.See “Chief Executive Officer Compensation” beginning on page 6570 for a description of the compensation paid to our CEO and “2020“2021 CEO Compensation Program”Program and Components” beginning on page 6570 for additional information regarding Mr. Fairbank’s 20202021 performance year compensation.
Performance Year | Cash Salary |
Long-Term Incentive |
Year-End Incentive | Total | Cash Salary | Long-Term Incentive | Year-End Incentive | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash- Settled RSUs | Performance Shares | Deferred Cash Bonus | Cash- Settled RSUs | Performance Shares1 | Cash-Settled RSUs | Deferred Cash Bonus | Cash- Settled RSUs | Performance Shares(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | $— | $1,750,060 | $4,550,000 | $3,000,055 | $18,200,225 | $27,500,340 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020
| $—
| $1,750,070
| $—
| $3,000,000
| $2,000,053
| $12,000,093
| $18,750,216
| $— | $1,750,070 | $3,000,000 | $2,000,053 | $12,000,093 | $18,750,216 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019
| $—
| $1,750,012
| $—
| $3,000,000
| $2,000,080
| $13,000,009
| $19,750,101
| $— | $1,750,012 | $3,000,000 | $2,000,080 | $13,000,009 | $19,750,101 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018
| $—
| $—
| $10,500,065
| $4,200,000
| $2,800,019
| $—
| $17,500,084
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
20202021 NEO Performance Year Compensation.Compensation
NEO (other than the CEO) compensation for the 20202021 performance year was composed of a mix of cash and equity-based compensation and consisted of (i) a base salary and (ii) an annual year-end incentive opportunity which consisted of a cash incentive and a long-term incentive opportunity. The long-term incentive opportunity was comprised of performance shares and stock-settled RSUs as determined by the Committee and the
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 7 |
Independent Directors. Mr. Blackley, our former CFO, left the Company in March 2021 and did not receive a year-end incentive for the 2021 performance year. The chart below shows the elements of NEO (other than the CEO)CEO and the former CFO) compensation as an approximate percentage of NEO 20202021 actual total compensation:
See “NEO Compensation” beginning on page 7984 for a description of compensation to the NEOs (other than the CEO).
Say on Pay and Response to Stockholder Feedback
The Committee and the Board value the input of our stockholders. At our 20202021 Annual Stockholder Meeting, approximately 69%93% of our stockholders supported Capital One’sour NEO compensation. See “Consideration of Stockholder Feedback and 20202021 Say on Pay Vote” beginning on page 6165 for additional information regarding our Say on Pay vote.
In 2020, we engagedrecent years, in direct outreach and discussions with stockholders representing approximately 70% of our outstanding shares. In response to feedback received from our stockholders, the Committee and the Independent Directors have made significant improvements to Capital One’sour executive compensation program, practices, and disclosures. The changes aim to simplify the program structure, further align our executive compensation practices with best practices and principles and enhance the transparency of our disclosures. In 2021, directly as a result of the feedback received from investors during the 2020 outreach and in consideration of the 2020 Say on Pay vote, the Committee and the Independent Directors made the following changes to our executive compensation programs and disclosure:
∎ | Linked a Portion of CEO Compensation Directly to TSR. Beginning with the 2020 performance year, the Committee and the Independent Directors determined to award a portion of the CEO’s |
∎ | Disclosure of Performance Share Awards Realized Compensation. We added disclosure regarding the settlement value resulting from the performance share awards that vested |
∎ | Enhanced Disclosure of Compensation Committee Decision Processes. We enhanced |
|
|
∎ | Increased the Size and Diversity of Our Peer Group. In July 2020, the Committee and the Independent Directors increased the size and diversity of the Company’s peer group used to determine the level and components of NEO compensation to add seven additional peers, including diversified financial institutions and payment companies with whom we compete for executive talent. See “Peer Groups” beginning on page |
8 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Voting Item 3: Ratification of Selection of Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Item |
You are being asked to
✓Our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 9
|
11 | ||||
13 | ||||
13 | ||||
13 | ||||
20 | ||||
26 | ||||
28 | ||||
35 | ||||
38 | ||||
42 | ||||
44 | ||||
46 | ||||
51 | ||||
52 | ||||
52 | ||||
52 | ||||
52 | ||||
53 | ||||
54 | ||||
55 | ||||
56 | ||||
57 | ||||
58 | ||||
67 | ||||
69 | ||||
70 | ||||
84 | ||||
90 | ||||
92 | ||||
94 | ||||
96 | ||||
98 | ||||
98 | ||||
100 | ||||
102 | ||||
103 | ||||
104 |
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this proxy statement may constitute forward-looking statements, which involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Capital One cautions readers that any forward-looking information is not a guarantee of future performance and that actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking information due to a number of factors, including those listed from time to time in reports that Capital One files with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, but not limited to, the Annual Report on the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (“Form 10-K”).
10
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains “forward-looking statements” —Section I - Proposal 1: Election of Directors
All of Capital One’s directors are elected at each annual meeting of stockholders and hold such office until the next annual meeting of stockholders, and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Our Board is presenting the following thirteen nominees for election as directors at the 2022 Annual Stockholder Meeting. Each nominee is a current Board member who was elected by stockholders at the 2021 Annual Stockholder Meeting, other than Christine Detrick, who was appointed to the Board effective November 5, 2021, and was recommended to the Governance and Nominating Committee by Spencer Stuart, a third-party director search firm. Each nominee has consented to serve a one-year term. Information about the proposed nominees for election as directors is set forth under “Biographies of Director Nominees” beginning on page 20 of this proxy statement.
In the event a nominee becomes unable to serve or for good cause will not serve as a director, the Board may designate a substitute as a nominee or reduce the size of the Board. If the Board designates a substitute nominee, proxies will be voted for the election of such substitute. As of the date of this proxy statement, the Board has no reason to believe that is, statements relatedany of the nominees will be unable or unwilling to future events that by their nature address matters that are, to different degrees, uncertain. For details onserve as a director.
The nominees for election as directors at the uncertainties that may cause our actual future results to be materially different than those expressed in our forward-looking statements, see the Forward-Looking Statements in our annual reports on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements. This document also includes certain forward-looking projected financial information that is based on current estimates and forecasts. Actual results could differ materially.2022 Annual Stockholder Meeting are:
Name | Age | Occupation | Director Since | Independent | Other Public Boards(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank | 71 |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Capital One Financial Corporation
| 1994 | No | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ime Archibong | 40 |
Head of New Product Experimentation, Meta
| 2021 | ✓ | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Christine Detrick | 63 |
Former Director, Head of the Americas Financial Services Practice; Former Senior Advisor, Bain & Company
| 2021 | ✓ | 3 | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Fritz Hackett | 68 |
Former Strategy Consulting Partner
| 2004 | ✓ | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter Thomas Killalea | 54 | �� |
Former Vice President of Technology, Amazon.com
| 2016 | ✓ | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Eli Leenaars | 60 |
Group Chief Operating Officer, Quintet Private Bank
| 2019 | ✓ | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
François Locoh-Donou | 50 | President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director, F5 Networks, Inc.
| 2019 | ✓ | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter E. Raskind | 65 |
Former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, National City Corporation
| 2012 | ✓ | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eileen Serra | 67 |
Former Senior Advisor, JP Morgan Chase & Co.; Former Chief Executive Officer, Chase Card Services
| 2020 | ✓ | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mayo A. Shattuck III | 67 |
Chairman, Exelon Corporation; Former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Constellation Energy Group
| 2003 | ✓ | 2 | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Bradford H. Warner | 70 |
Former President of Premier and Small Business Banking, Bank of America Corporation
| 2008 | ✓ | 0 |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 11
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section I - Proposal 1: Election of Directors |
Name | Age | Occupation | Director Since | Independent | Other Public Boards(1) | |||||||||||||||
Catherine G. West | 62 |
Former Special Advisor, Promontory Financial Group; Former Associate Director and Chief Operating Officer, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
| 2013 | ✓ | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Craig Anthony Williams
| 52
|
President, Jordan Brand, Nike, Inc.
| 2021
| ✓
| 0
|
(1) | Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines limit the allowable board seats for our non-executive officer directors to four public company boards, including the Capital One Board, and for executive officer directors to two public company boards, including the Capital One Board, in each case absent Board approval. Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines also limit Capital One Audit Committee members to simultaneous service on three public company audit committees, absent Board approval. |
(2) | Ms. Detrick will not stand for re-election at the annual meeting of Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. shareholders in 2022. Accordingly, after Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.’s 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, the number of Ms. Detrick’s other public boards will be reduced to two. |
(3) | Mr. Shattuck will not stand for re-election at the annual meeting of Exelon Corporation shareholders in 2022. Accordingly, after Exelon Corporation’s 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, the number of Mr. Shattuck’s other public boards will be reduced to one. |
***
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” each of these director nominees.
12 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section III - Corporate Governance at Capital One
Capital One is dedicated to strong and effective corporate governance that provides our Board with the appropriate framework to engage in ongoing oversight of the Company. We and our Board believe that robust, dynamic corporate governance policies and practices are the foundation of an effective and well-functioning board, and are vital to preserving the trust of our stakeholders, including customers, stockholders, regulators, suppliers, associates, our communities, and the general public.
Information About Our Corporate Governance Policies and Guidelines
The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to formalize its governance practices and provide its view of effective governance. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines embody many of our long-standing practices, policies, and procedures, which collectively form a corporate governance framework that promotes the long-term interests of our stockholders, promotes responsible decision-making and accountability, and fosters a culture that allows our Board and management to pursue Capital One’s strategic objectives.
To maintain and enhance independent oversight, our Board regularly renews and refreshes its governance policies and practices as changes in corporate strategy, the regulatory environment and financial market conditions occur, and in response to stakeholder feedback and engagement.
The Board has also adopted Capital One’s Code of Conduct, which applies to Capital One’s directors, executives and associates, including Capital One’s CEO, CFO, Principal Accounting Officer, and other persons performing similar functions. The Code of Conduct reflects Capital One’s commitment to honesty, fair dealing, and integrity, and guides the ethical actions and working relationships of Capital One’s directors, executives, and associates in their interactions with investors, current and potential customers, fellow associates, competitors, governmental entities, the media, and other third parties with whom Capital One has contact.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Conduct, Committee Charters, Certificate of Incorporation, and Amended and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”) are available at www.capitalone.com under “Investors” then “Governance and Leadership” then “Board of Directors and Committee Documents” and “Organizational and Governance Documents.” For a description of the key governance practices of our Board, see “Key Board Governance Practices” beginning on page 28.
Key Corporate Governance Documents
The following documents are available at www.capitalone.com under “Investors,” then “Governance and Leadership,” then “Board of Directors and Committee Documents” or “Organizational and Governance Documents,” as applicable.
∎ | Amended and Restated Bylaws |
∎ |
Corporate Governance Guidelines |
∎ | Committee Charters |
∎ | Certificate of Incorporation |
∎ | Code of Conduct |
Our Perspectives on Overall Board Composition and Refreshment
In recent years, the investor community hasinvestors have become increasingly focused on the composition of corporate boards and policies and practices that encourage board refreshment. At Capital One, we appreciate that our investors share our passion for cultivating a board that encompasses the optimal mix of diverse backgrounds, experiences, skills, expertise, qualifications, and an unwavering commitment to integrity and good judgment, all in order to thoughtfully advise and guide management as they work to achieve our long-term strategic objectives.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 13 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
The Governance and Nominating Committee, under the direction of its chair, who also currently serves as the Company’s Lead Independent Director, assesses the composition of, and criteria for, membership on the Board and its committees on an ongoing basis. In fulfilling this responsibility, the Governance and Nominating Committee has taken a long-term view and continuously assesses the resiliency of the Board over the next ten to fifteen years in alignment with the Company’s strategic direction to determine what actions may be desirable to best position the Board and the Company for success. The
In assessing Board resiliency, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers a variety of factors, including the Company’s long-term strategy, the skills and experiences that directors provide to the Board (including in the context of the Company’s strategy), the performance of the Board and the Company, the Board’s director retirement policy (as described in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines), the Board’s view that a resilient board should include members across a continuum of tenure, and the belief that valuable insights can be gained from diversity among the Board’s members across gender and race/ethnicity.
|
|
Over the last few years, the Governance and Nominating Committee has held discussions regarding director recruiting plans on a quarterly basis, and has provided regular updates to the Board on those plans. In support of the Board’s long-term resiliency and refreshment efforts, six new independent directors have been appointed in the last five years. As a result of these long-term strategic resiliency assessments, the Governance and Nominating Committee has articulated a set of principles on board composition, which include:
Board Skills | ∎ Consider the collective set of skills that allows the Board to cover all vectors of effective challenge of management, especially in the areas of business strategy, financial performance, enterprise risk management, cybersecurity risk, technology innovation, and executive talent and leadership
∎ Ensure collective Board skill sets evolve with corporate strategy | |||||
Industry Experience | ∎ Seek and retain Board members with industry experience, both banking and technology, that align with our long-term strategy, understanding that such experience is critical to providing effective challenge
∎ Recognize that the financial services industry is complex and understand the importance of having directors who have witnessed the extended nature of the banking business and credit cycles and can share the wisdom of those experiences | |||||
Diversity | ∎ Believe having a Board with members who demonstrate a diversity of thought, perspectives, skills, backgrounds, and experiences is important to building an effective and resilient board, and as a result, have a goal of identifying candidates that can contribute to that diversity in a variety of ways, including racially/ethnically- and gender-diverse candidates | |||||
Board Size | ∎ Consider the appropriate size of the Board in relation to promoting active engagement, open discussion and effective challenge of management
∎ Continuously assess the depth of successors available to assume Board leadership positions for both expected and unexpected departures | |||||
Tenure | ||||||
∎ Believe that it is critical to have members across a continuum of director tenure in order to ensure the effective oversight of a large financial institution, which must simultaneously embrace innovation and changing market and customer expectations and prudently preserve the safety and soundness of the institution through long-term business and credit cycles
∎ Seek to have a mix of long-standing members, relatively new members, and remaining members at different points along the tenure continuum to cultivate Board membership that collectively represents members who have actively overseen the Company’s strategic journey through various business cycles, who have sufficient experience to assume Board leadership positions, and who bring fresh ideas and perspectives |
14
| ||||||||
| 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Evergreen Recruiting | ∎ Engage in a continuous process of identifying and assessing potential director candidates in light of the Board’s collective set of skills and future needs
∎ Recognize that recruiting new directors is not one-dimensional and that effective Board members are those who have relevant backgrounds and expertise combined with a broad business acumen; strategic leadership; a commitment to risk management; an understanding of the intricacies of a large, public company; and a dedication to the Company and its stockholders, the Board as a whole, and to the individual members that comprise the Board | |||||
Staged Refreshment | ||||||
| ∎ Take a long-term perspective to enable thoughtful director refreshment that meets strategic needs while avoiding disruption
∎ Take a planned approach to changes in board membership, considering the timing of new director onboarding relative to planned retirements and departures
∎ Recognize that new directors need time to become familiar with the Company’s business model and strategy and become deeply grounded in these matters to be well-positioned to challenge management effectively
∎ Acknowledge that relationships among Board members develop organically over time and recognize the importance of protecting and nurturing the open, values-based culture that the Board enjoys to appropriately oversee and challenge management |
|
|
The Board leverages several long-standing practices and processes to support Board refreshment in keeping with the principles articulated above, including:
∎ | Annual assessments of the Lead Independent Director (see “Annual Assessment of the Lead Independent Director” |
∎ | Annual evaluations of the Board and its committees (see “Annual Board and Committee Evaluations” beginning on page 29 for more information). |
∎ | Annual assessments of individual directors (see “Annual Assessment of Individual Director Nominees” on page |
Our Director Nominees
Our Board is presentingOver the following twelve nominees for election as directors atlast few years, the 2021 Annual Stockholder Meeting. All of the nominees currently serve as directorsGovernance and Nominating Committee has discussed director recruiting plans on our Board and, other than Ime Archibong and Craig Anthony Williams (who were appointed to our Board effective February 26, 2021), all were elected by our stockholders at our 2020 Annual Stockholder Meeting. For a description of the specific experience and qualifications of each of our nominees, see “Biographies of Director Nominees” beginning on page 20.
Name | Age | Occupation | Director Since | Independent | Other Public Boards | |||||||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank
|
|
70
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Capital One Financial Corporation
|
|
1994
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
0
|
| |||||
Ime Archibong
|
|
39
|
|
Head of New Product Experimentation, Facebook
|
|
2021
|
|
|
✓
|
|
|
0
|
| |||||
Ann Fritz Hackett
|
|
67
|
|
Former Strategy Consulting Partner
|
|
2004
|
|
|
✓
|
|
|
1
|
| |||||
Peter Thomas Killalea
|
|
53
|
|
Owner and President, Aoinle, LLC; Former Vice President of Technology, Amazon.com
|
|
2016
|
|
|
✓
|
|
|
2
|
| |||||
Eli Leenaars
|
|
59
|
|
Vice Chairman of the Global Wealth Management Division, UBS Group AG
|
|
2019
|
|
|
✓
|
|
|
0
|
| |||||
François Locoh-Donou
|
|
49
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director, F5 Networks, Inc.
|
|
2019
|
|
|
✓
|
|
|
1
|
| |||||
Peter E. Raskind
|
|
64
|
|
Former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, National City Corporation
|
|
2012
|
|
|
✓
|
|
|
0
|
| |||||
Eileen Serra
|
|
66
|
|
Former Senior Advisor, JP Morgan Chase & Co.; Former Chief Executive Officer, Chase Card Services
|
|
2020
|
|
|
✓
|
|
|
2
|
| |||||
Mayo A. Shattuck III
|
|
66
|
|
Chairman, Exelon Corporation; Former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Constellation Energy Group
|
|
2003
|
|
|
✓
|
|
|
3*
|
| |||||
Bradford H. Warner
|
|
69
|
|
Former President of Premier and Small Business Banking, Bank of America Corporation
|
|
2008
|
|
|
✓
|
|
|
0
|
| |||||
Catherine G. West
|
|
61
|
|
Former Special Advisor, Promontory Financial Group; Former Associate Director and Chief Operating Officer, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
|
|
2013
|
|
|
✓
|
|
|
0
|
| |||||
Craig Anthony Williams
|
|
51
|
|
President, Jordan Brand, Nike, Inc.
|
|
2021
|
|
|
✓
|
|
|
0
|
| |||||
|
|
|
We would like to extend our appreciation to director Pierre E. Leroy, who will retire from our Board effective May 6, 2021, in accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Mr. Leroy has been a director of Capital One since 2005,quarterly basis, and has provided our Board and management with tremendous value during his service onregular updates to the Board leveraging his extensive knowledgeon those plans. In support of the Board’s long-term resiliency and keen insights on technology transformation, business operations and complex financial requirements. Werefreshment efforts, seven new independent directors have been appointed in the last five years, six of whom are deeply grateful to Mr. Leroy for his many contributions to Capital One and wish him well in his future endeavors.
We would also like to extend our appreciation tocurrent director Aparna Chennapragada, who resigned from the Board effective March 18, 2021 due to a change in her principal occupation. Ms. Chennapragada has been a director of Capital One since 2018, providing our Board and management with valuable insights on technology innovation, software development, artificial intelligence, product management, and our businesses. We thank Ms. Chennapragada for her many contributions to Capital One and wish her well in her future endeavors.
Director Nominee Highlights (excluding our CEO)
nominees.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 15
|
Section II - |
Director Nominee Highlights (excluding our CEO)
What We Look for in Individual Director Nominees
The evaluation and selection of director nominees is a key aspect of the Governance and Nominating Committee’s regular evaluation of the composition of, and criteria for membership on, the Board. When considering director nominees, including incumbent directors eligiblestanding for re-election, nominees to fill vacancies on the Board, and nominees recommended by stockholders, the Governance and Nominating Committee focuses on the development of a Board composed of directors that meet the criteria set forth below.
Personal Characteristics | ||||
| Commitment to the Company | |||
∎ High personal and professional ethics, integrity and honesty, good character, and judgment
∎ Independence and absence of any actual or perceived conflicts of interest
∎ The ability to be an independent thinker and willingness to provide effective challenge to management | ∎ A willingness to commit the time and energy to satisfy the requirements of Board and committee membership, including the ability to attend and participate in meetings of the Board and committees of which they are a member and the annual meeting of stockholders and be available to management to provide advice and counsel
∎ A willingness to rigorously prepare prior to each meeting and actively participate in the meeting
∎ Possess, or be willing to develop, a broad knowledge of both critical issues affecting the Company and a director’s roles and responsibilities
∎ A willingness to comply with |
Diversity | ||||
| Skills and Experience | |||
∎ Capital One considers diversity along a variety of dimensions, including the candidate’s professional and personal experience, background, perspective, and viewpoint, as well as the candidate’s gender and race/ethnicity, as described in greater
∎ The Governance and Nominating Committee recognizes that Capital One serves diverse communities and customers, and has instructed the third-party search firm used in director recruiting efforts to seek highly qualified women and people of color to include in its pool of nominees | ∎ The value derived from each nominee’s skills, qualifications, experience, and ability to impact Capital One’s long-term strategic objectives
∎ Substantial tenure and breadth of experience in leadership capacities
∎ Business and financial acumen
∎ Understanding of the intricacies of a public company
∎ Experience in risk management ∎ Strong educational background |
16 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
The Governance and Nominating Committee reviews its effectiveness in balancingbalances these considerations when assessing the composition of the Board, and has determined that all of our director nominees possess the personal characteristics, level of commitment to the Company, diversity, and skills and experience that align with the Company’s long-term strategy and that enable the Board to operate in an engaged and effective manner.
|
|
Specific Skills and Experience
The Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board regularly review the Board’s membership in light of Capital One’s business model and strategic goals and objectives, the regulatory environment, and financial market conditions. In its review, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers whether the Board continues to possess the appropriate mix of skills and experience to oversee the Company in achieving these goals, and may seek additional directors as a result of this consideration.review. Our director nominees have specificthe requisite experiences that, in the aggregate, meet an articulated set of director skills established by the Governance and Nominating Committee. These skills are not one-dimensional. Instead, these skills collectively allow our director nominees to leverage strategic and forward thinking, pattern recognition, and strong business acumen to inform Board discussionseffectively oversee the Company and create an engaged, effective, and strategically orientedstrategically-oriented Board.
Skills and Experience of Our Non-Management Director Nominees
|
|
Strategic Planning and Transformation | Experience setting a long-term corporate vision or direction, developing desirable products and customer segments, assessing geographies in which to operate, and evaluating competitive positioning | |||||
10 Directors | ||||||
Banking and Financial Services | Extended board experience or management experience in Retail Banking, Commercial Banking, Consumer Lending, Small Business Banking, Investment Banking, and/or other financial services | |||||
7 Directors | ||||||
Consumer Lending, Retail Banking and/or Commercial Banking Executive | Executive level experience and oversight of Consumer Lending, Retail Banking and/or Commercial Banking | 6 Directors | ||||
Digital, Technology, and Cybersecurity | Leadership and understanding of technology, digital platforms, and cyber risk | |||||
8
| ||||||
Technology Executive | Executive-level experience with direct oversight and expertise in technology, digital platforms, and cyber risk | |||||
4 Directors | ||||||
Risk Management and Compliance | Significant understanding with respect to the identification, assessment, and oversight of risk management programs and practices | |||||
8 Directors | ||||||
Public Company Senior Executive Management | Experience as a CEO or other senior executive at a public company | |||||
9 Directors | ||||||
Public Accounting and Financial Reporting | Experience overseeing or assessing the performance of companies or public accountants with respect to the preparation, auditing, or evaluation of financial statements | |||||
3 Directors | ||||||
Talent Management, Compensation, and Succession Planning | Understanding of the issues involved with executive compensation, succession planning, human capital management, and talent management and development | |||||
10 Directors
| ||||||
Public Company Governance | Extended experience serving as a director on a large public company board and/or experience with public company governance issues and policies, including governance best practices | |||||
9
| ||||||
Regulated Industries and Regulatory Issues | Experience with regulated businesses, regulatory requirements, and relationships with state and federal agencies | 7 Directors | ||||
Marketing | Experience in brand management and using advertising channels to communicate compelling consumer experiences | 6 Directors |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
| 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 17 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Other Considerations
For new nominees,candidates, the Governance and Nominating Committee may also consider the results of the nominee’scandidate’s interviews with directors and/or members of senior management and any background checks the Governance and Nominating Committee deems appropriate. In 2020,2021, Capital One continued its engagement with Spencer Stuart, a third-party director search firm to identify and evaluate potentialnon-incumbent director candidates based on the criteria and principles described above.
When evaluating incumbent directors, the Governance and Nominating Committee also considers the director’s performance throughout the year, including the director’s attendance, preparation for, and participation in Board and committee meetings, the director’s annual evaluation, feedback received from fellow Board members, and the director’s willingness to serve for an additional term, as further described in the section “Annual Assessment of Individual Director Nominees” on page 31.30.
Process for Stockholder Recommendations of Director Candidates
Stockholders may propose nominees for consideration by the Governance and Nominating Committee by submitting the names and other relevant information as required by, and in compliance with, Capital One’s Bylaws, and further described in Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, to the Corporate Secretary at Capital One’s address set forth in the section “How to Contact Us” on page 50.51. Capital One’s Corporate
|
|
Governance Guidelines require the Corporate Secretary to deliver a copy of the submitted information to the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee will consider potential nominees proposed by stockholders on the same basis as it considers other potential nominees.
In addition, an eligible stockholder or group of stockholders may use Capital One’s “proxy access” bylaws to include stockholder-nominated director candidates in the Company’s proxy materials for annual meetings of stockholders. Our Bylaws permit up to 20 stockholders owning 3% or more of the Company’s outstanding common shares of voting stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials director nominees constituting up to two individuals or 20% of the Board (whichever is greater) provided that the stockholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in the Bylaws.
Director Independence
Except for our CEO, who is the Company’s founder, the Board has affirmatively determined that the other members of our Board are independent under Capital One’s Director Independence Standards (the “Independence Standards”), which have been adopted by the Board as part of Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board has concluded this based on a thorough assessment of whether each of its non-management members is “independent” under these standards. These standardsIndependence Standards reflect the director independence requirements set forth in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and other applicable legal and regulatory rules, and also describe certain categorical relationships that the Board has determined to be immaterial for purposes of determining director independence.
The categorical relationships the Board has deemed immaterial for purposes of determining director independence are: (i) relationships between Capital One and an entity where the director serves solely as a non-management director; (ii) transactions between Capital One and a director or a director’s immediate family (or their primary business affiliations) that fall below the numerical thresholds in the NYSE listing standards (or do not otherwise preclude independence under those standards), and that are ordinary course, on arm’s-length market terms, and, in the case of extensions of credit, followed usual underwriting procedures, present no more than the normal collectability risk or other unfavorable features and are in compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements; and (iii) discretionary contributions made by Capital One to charitablenot-for-profit organizations, foundations, or universities in which a director (or immediate family member) serves as an executive officer that in any ofsingle fiscal year within the last three fiscal years do not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of the organization’sthat entity’s consolidated gross revenues.
The Board has determined that each of the director nominees (excluding our CEO) is independent under these standards. The Board has also determined that Aparna Chennapragada and Pierre E. Leroy are independent under these standards during the period in 2020 during which they served on the Board. Ms. Chennapragada resigned from the Board effective March 18, 2021 and Mr. Leroy will retire from the Board effective May 6, 2021.
18 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
In making these determinations,its independence recommendations, the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board reviewed certainevaluate information obtained from non-management directors’ responses to a questionnaire askinginquiring about their relationships with Capital One, and those of their immediate family members and primary business or charitable affiliations and other potential conflicts of interest, as well as certain information obtained through internal diligence conducted on Capital One’s businesses related to transactions, relationships, or arrangements between Capital One and a non-management director or their immediate family members, primary business, or charitable affiliations. Following this review, the Board determined that the relationships orand transactions complied with the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the related NYSE standards.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 19
|
Biographies of Director Nominees
Director Since: 1994 Age:
Capital One Committees:
∎ None
Capital One Companies:
∎ Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. ∎ Capital One,
| Richard D. Fairbank
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Mr. Fairbank is the founder, Mr. Fairbank’s vision and leadership have positioned Capital One as a leading data and technology company and the company has been recognized as one of the most cloud-forward companies in the world. The Company serves more than 100 million customers, has built an iconic and respected brand, and has been recognized for being one of the best places to work. Mr. Fairbank has
Additional Public Directorships (current):
∎ None
|
Director Since: 2021 Age:
Capital One Committees:
∎
Capital One Companies:
∎
| Ime Archibong
Head of New Product Experimentation,
Mr. Archibong is a seasoned product and business development technology executive. He has served as the Head of New Product Experimentation at Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly known as Facebook, Inc.) since August 2019, where he leads an internal constituency of entrepreneurs testing new standalone experiences. From November 2010 to June 2020, Mr. Archibong served as
Prior to joining
Additional Public Directorships (current):
∎ None
|
20
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Director Since: 2021 Age: 63 Capital One Committees: ∎ Audit Committee ∎ Risk Committee Capital One Companies: ∎ None | Christine Detrick Former Director, Head of the Americas Financial Services Practice; Former Senior Advisor, Bain & Company Ms. Detrick is a financial services industry veteran with more than 35 years of senior operating and executive leadership experience. She has deep expertise in the banking and insurance industries across a wide array of sectors, including asset management, credit cards, property and casualty, and life insurance, payments, and other consumer finance segments. From 2002 until 2012, Christine Detrick was a Senior Partner, Leader of the Financial Services Practice, and a Senior Advisor at Bain & Company, a management consulting firm. Before joining Bain, she served for 10 years at A.T. Kearney, Inc., a management consulting firm, including as Leader of the Global Financial Institutions group and a member of the Board of Management and Board of Directors. At Bain and A.T. Kearney, Ms. Detrick served banks on issues of strategy, operational transformation, risk management, and technology. Prior to those roles, she was a founding member of a venture capital firm specializing in savings and loan institution turnarounds and served as the chief executive officer of St. Louis Bank for Savings. She was also a consultant at McKinsey and Company earlier in her career. Ms. Detrick also serves on the board of Hartford Mutual Funds, a mutual fund company, as chairman of the board and chair of their Investment Committee. She also previously served on the board of directors of Forest City Realty Trust, a public real estate investment trust, as chair of the Compensation Committee. She received her B.S. in Economics from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Additional Public Directorships (current): ∎ Altus Power America, Inc. ∎ CRA International, Inc. ∎ Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. (ending on the date of Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.’s 2022 annual shareholder meeting) |
Lead Independent Director
Director Since: 2004 Age:
Capital One Committees:
∎ Compensation Committee ∎ Governance and Nominating ∎ Risk Committee
Capital One Companies:
∎ Capital One, N.A.
| Ann Fritz Hackett
Former Strategy Consulting Partner
Ms. Hackett has extensive experience in leading companies that provide strategic, organizational and human resource consulting services to boards of directors and senior management teams. She has experience leading change initiatives, risk management, talent management, and succession planning and in creating performance-based compensation programs, as well as significant international experience and technology experience. Ms. Hackett also has extensive board experience.
Ms. Hackett is a former Strategy Consulting Partner. From 2015 through January 2020 she was a Partner and Co-founder of Personal Pathways, LLC, a technology company providing a web-based enterprise collaboration insights platform to better advance high performance professional relationships and support the kind of complex problem-solving required in today’s distributed workplace. Prior to her role at Personal Pathways, she was President of Horizon Consulting Group, LLC, a strategic and human resource consulting firm founded by Ms. Hackett in 1996, providing global consumer product and service companies with innovative strategy and human capital initiatives. Prior to launching Horizon Consulting, Ms. Hackett spent 11 years at a leading national strategy consulting firm where she served as Vice President and Partner, served on the Management Committee, led Human Resources, and developed her expertise in strategy, change management, creating performance management processes and a performance-based culture, developing leadership talent, and planning for executive succession. Ms. Hackett is also a member of Tapestry Networks’ Lead Director Network, a select group of lead directors who collaborate on matters regarding board leadership. She also previously served as a director of Beam, Inc. (formerly Fortune Brands, Inc.) from December 2007 until April 2014.
Additional Public Directorships (current):
∎ Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc.
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 21 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Director Since: 2016 Age:
Capital One Committees:
∎ Compensation Committee ∎ Risk Committee
Capital One Companies:
∎ Capital One, N.A.
| Peter Thomas Killalea
Mr. Killalea, a seasoned technology executive and advisor, has deep expertise in product development, digital innovation, customer experience, and security.
Mr. Killalea is
Mr. Killalea also currently serves on the editorial board of ACM Queue (Association for Computing Machinery). He previously served on the board of Xoom Corporation (acquired by PayPal Inc.) from March 2015 to November 2015 and Carbon Black, Inc. (acquired by VMware) from April 2017 to October 2019.
Additional Public Directorships (current):
∎ Akamai Technologies, Inc. ∎ MongoDB, Inc.
|
|
|
Director Since: 2019 Age:
Capital One Committees:
∎ Audit Committee ∎ Compensation Committee ∎ Risk Committee
Capital One Companies:
∎ Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
| Eli Leenaars
Mr. Leenaars has over 30 years of experience in the financial services sector, including institutional and investment banking, asset management, corporate and retail banking, and in cultivating sophisticated client relationships. A respected expert on the future of digital banking, as well as global industry trends in finance, investment, banking, and leadership, Mr. Leenaars has experience managing businesses through a wide range of matters including mergers and acquisitions, complex corporate restructuring, strategic initiatives, and challenging financial environments.
Mr. Leenaars
Prior to joining UBS, Mr. Leenaars enjoyed a 24-year career at ING Group N.V., a Dutch multinational banking and financial services company, and various of its subsidiaries. From January 2010 until March 2015, he served as the CEO of ING Retail Banking Direct and International for ING, where he was responsible for Retail Banking and Private Banking worldwide. This included serving as CEO of ING Direct N.V., the parent company of ING Direct in the U.S., which pioneered the national direct deposit platform. Between 2004 and 2010, Mr. Leenaars was also member of ING’s Executive Board with responsibility for ING’s Global Retail and Private Banking operations and Group Technology and Operations. In addition, Mr. Leenaars previously served as a member of our Board from May 2012 to September 2012 in connection with Capital One’s acquisition of ING Direct.
Mr. Leenaars is a member of the Executive Committee of the Trilateral Commission (Paris, Tokyo, and Washington, DC).
Additional Public Directorships (current):
∎ None
|
22 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Director Since: 2019 Age:
Capital One Committees:
∎ Compensation Committee ∎ Governance and Nominating
Capital One Companies:
∎ Capital One, N.A.
| François Locoh-Donou
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director, F5 Networks, Inc.
Mr. Locoh-Donou has nearly two decades of enterprise technology experience, building a wide range of product teams, and operations around the world. He is well known for his ability to envision where industries are going and inspire organizations to identify and execute on future growth
In April 2017, Mr. Locoh-Donou was hired as the President and Chief Executive Officer of F5 Networks, where he has refocused the company on Applications Services Software (including Security) for Multi-Cloud environments. He is also the only management member of the F5 Board of Directors. Prior to joining F5, Mr. Locoh-Donou held successive leadership positions at Ciena Corporation (from 2002 to March 2017), a network strategy and technology company, including Chief Operating Officer; Senior Vice President, Global Products Group; Vice President and General Manager, EMEA; Vice President International Sales; and Vice President and Marketing. Prior to joining Ciena, Mr. Locoh-Donou held research and development roles with Photonetics, a French opto-electronics company.
Mr. Locoh-Donou is also the co-founder and Chairman of Cajou Espoir, a cashew-processing facility that employs several hundred people in rural Togo, 80 percent of whom are women.
Additional Public Directorships (current):
∎ F5 Networks, Inc.
|
|
|
Director Since: 2012 Age:
Capital One Committees:
∎ Governance and Nominating ∎ Risk Committee (Chair)
Capital One Companies:
∎ Capital One, N.A.
| Peter E. Raskind
Former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, National City Corporation
Mr. Raskind has more than 40 years of banking experience, including in corporate banking, retail banking, wealth management/trust, mortgage, operations, technology, strategy, product management, asset/liability management, risk management and acquisition integration. Through his extensive banking career, he has served in a number of senior executive leadership roles and held positions of successively greater responsibility in a broad range of consumer and commercial banking disciplines, including cash management services, corporate finance, international banking, wealth management and corporate trust, retail and small business banking, operations and strategic planning.
Most recently, Mr. Raskind was a consultant to banks and equity bank investors as the owner of JMB Consulting, LLC, which he established in February 2009 and managed through 2017. Prior to founding JMB Consulting, Mr. Raskind served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of National City Corporation, one of the largest banks in the United States, until its merger with PNC Financial Services Group in December 2008. Mr. Raskind has served as a director of United Community Banks, Inc. and Visa USA and Visa International. He also served on the board of directors of the Consumer Bankers Association, was a member of the Financial Services Roundtable, and on the executive committee of the National Automated Clearing House Association. In addition, Mr. Raskind served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Cleveland Metropolitan School District in 2011, and in 2010, he served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority.
Additional Public Directorships (current):
∎ None
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 23 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Director Since: 2020 Age:
Capital One Committees:
∎ Audit Committee ∎ Risk Committee
Capital One Companies:
∎ Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
| Eileen Serra
Former Senior Advisor, JP Morgan Chase & Co.; Former Chief Executive Officer, Chase Card Services
Ms. Serra served in various leadership roles over the course of her more than 20 years in the financial services industry, which included responsibility for operations, product development, customer engagement, digital transformation, strategic and growth initiatives, and talent management.
A seasoned credit card industry executive, Ms. Serra served in a variety of executive positions at JP Morgan Chase & Co., including as Chief Executive Officer of Chase Card Services from 2012 to 2016. While at Chase, Ms. Serra established and developed successful consumer credit card products and brands, loyalty programs, partner relationships, and digital mobile payment solutions. Most recently, from 2016 until her retirement in February 2018, she served as Senior Advisor focusing on strategic growth initiatives.
Prior to joining JP Morgan Chase in 2006, Ms. Serra was a Managing Director and Head of Private Client Banking Solutions at Merrill Lynch. She also served as Senior Vice President at American Express where, among other responsibilities, she led the Small Business Credit Card and Lending businesses. Prior to American Express, she was a partner at McKinsey & Company. Ms. Serra currently serves as a director and member of the compensation committee of Gartner, Inc. and
Additional Public Directorships (current):
∎ Gartner, Inc. ∎
|
|
|
Director Since: 2003 Age:
Capital One Committees:
∎ Compensation Committee ∎ Governance and Nominating
Capital One Companies:
∎ Capital One, N.A.
| Mayo A. Shattuck III
Chairman, Exelon Corporation; Former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Constellation Energy Group
Mr. Shattuck has decades of experience in global corporate finance and lending, corporate strategy, capital markets, risk management, executive compensation and private banking, has led two large, publicly held companies and has served on other public company boards.
Since 2013, Mr. Shattuck has served as Chairman of the Board of Chicago-based Exelon Corporation, a Fortune 100 company that owns six utilities and is the nation’s largest competitive energy provider and commercial nuclear plant operator. Previously, Mr. Shattuck was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Constellation Energy Group, a position he held from 2001 to 2012. Mr. Shattuck is also Chairman of the Board of Johns Hopkins Hospital.
Mr. Shattuck has extensive experience in the financial services industry. He was previously at Deutsche Bank, where he served as Global Head of Investment Banking, Global Head of Private Banking and was Chairman of Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Shattuck served as Vice Chairman of Bankers Trust Corporation, which merged with Deutsche Bank in 1999. In addition, from 1991 to 1997, Mr. Shattuck was President and Chief Operating Officer and a director of Alex. Brown & Sons, a major investment bank, which merged with Bankers Trust in 1997. Mr. Shattuck is the former Chairman of the Institute of Nuclear Power Operators.
Additional Public Directorships (current):
∎
∎ Gap, Inc.
|
24 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Director Since: 2008 Age:
Capital One Committees:
∎ Audit Committee (Chair) ∎ Risk Committee
Capital One Companies:
∎ Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
| Bradford H. Warner
Former President of Premier and Small Business Banking, Bank of America Corporation
Mr. Warner has deep experience in a broad range of commercial, consumer, investment and international banking leadership roles, as well as in corporate banking functions, customer relationships, corporate culture change management, enterprise risk management, and technology.
Mr. Warner served in a variety of executive positions at BankBoston, FleetBoston and Bank of America from 1975 until his retirement in 2004. These positions included President of Premier and Small Business Banking, Executive Vice President of Personal Financial Services, and Vice Chairman of Regional Bank.
Throughout his banking career, Mr. Warner served in leadership roles for many of the major business lines and functional disciplines that constitute commercial banking, including leadership of retail and branch banking, consumer lending (credit cards, mortgage and home equity), student lending and small business; various corporate banking functions, including community banking and capital markets businesses, such as underwriting, trading and sales of domestic and international fixed income securities, foreign exchange and derivatives; international banking businesses in Asia, northern Latin America and Mexico; and several investment-related businesses, including private banking, asset management and brokerage. He also served on the most senior management policy and governance committees at BankBoston, FleetBoston, and Bank of America.
Additional Public Directorships (current):
∎ None
|
|
|
Director Since: 2013 Age:
Capital One Committees:
∎ Audit Committee ∎ Risk Committee
Capital One Companies:
∎ Capital One Bank (USA),
| Catherine G. West
Former Special Advisor, Promontory Financial Group; Former Associate Director and Chief Operating Officer, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Ms. West has a multifaceted background in financial services with more than 30 years of experience in financial services operations, business line management (P&L), regulatory matters, technology platform conversions, process automation and innovation, and strategy development. She has experience in initial public offerings, and mergers and acquisitions, and has a keen understanding of business strategy, operations, and the regulatory perspective in the financial services industry.
Ms. West served as a Special Advisor to Promontory Financial Group, a financial services consulting firm, from May 2013 until her departure in October 2013, and as Managing Director from April 2012 until April 2013. From March 2011 to April 2012, Ms. West was the Associate Director and Chief Operating Officer of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) a federal agency tasked with regulating U.S. consumer protection with regard to financial services and products, where she led the start-up of the agency’s infrastructure. While at the CFPB, Ms. West also played an integral part in implementing a Consumer Response unit designed to solicit views from consumers regarding their experiences with financial institutions and leveraged those views to effect policy change. Prior to joining the CFPB, she served as the Chief Operating Officer of J.C. Penney from August 2006 to December 2006. Ms. West was an executive officer at Capital One Financial Corporation from March 2000 to July 2006, where she served in roles that included President of the U.S. Card business and Executive Vice President of U.S. Consumer Operations. Prior to her time at Capital One, Ms. West spent over 10 years primarily in consumer card banking at several institutions.
Additional Public Directorships (current):
∎ None
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 25 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Director Since: 2021 Age:
Capital One Committees:
∎
Capital One Companies:
∎
| Craig Anthony Williams
President, Jordan Brand, Nike, Inc.
Mr. Williams, a seasoned marketing executive, has extensive experience in product development, leading cross-functional teams and driving global strategy and operations. He has served as the President of Jordan Brand at Nike, Inc. since January 2019, where he leads a cross-functional team focused on the brand’s vision, strategy and global growth.
Prior to joining
Additional Public Directorships (current):
∎ None
|
|
The Independent Directors, each year in conjunction with the Board’s self-assessment, evaluate the continued effectiveness of the Board’s leadership structure in the context of Capital One’s specific circumstances, culture, strategic objectives, and challenges. The diverse backgrounds and experiences of our directors provide the Board with broad perspectives from which to determine the leadership structure best suited for Capital One and the long-term interests of Capital One’s stockholders and other stakeholders.
We believe that our existing Board leadership structure, with Mr. Fairbank acting as CEO and Chairman of the Board, provides the most effective governance framework and allows our Company to benefit from Mr. Fairbank’s talent, knowledge, and leadership as the founder of Capital One and allows him to use the in-depth focus and perspective gained in running the Company to effectively and efficiently lead our Board. Capital One appropriately maintains strong independent and effective oversight of our business and affairs through our empowered Lead Independent Director; all-independent Board committees with independent chairs that oversee the Company’s operations, risks, performance, and business strategy; experienced and committed directors; and frequent executive sessions without management (including Mr. Fairbank) in attendance.
Lead Independent Director
Our Board believes that an active, empowered Lead Independent Director is key to providing strong, independent leadership for the Board. The Lead Independent Director position, elected annually by the other disinterested independent directors upon the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, is a critical aspect of our corporate governance framework.
26
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
The Lead Independent Director’s responsibilities include:
Board Leadership |
∎ Organizing and presiding over executive sessions
∎ Setting the agendas for and leading executive sessions
∎
∎ Soliciting feedback for and engaging the CEO on executive sessions
∎ Advising the Chairman of the Board on the retention of advisors and consultants who report directly to the Board
∎ Advising the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Chairman of the Board on the membership of Board committees and the selection of committee chairs
∎ Acting as a key advisor to the CEO on a wide variety of Company matters |
Board Culture
|
∎ Serving as liaison between the Chairman of the Board and the Independent Directors
∎ Facilitating discussion among the
∎ Ensuring Board discussions demonstrate appropriate effective challenge of management
∎ Facilitating teamwork and communication among the Independent Directors
∎ Fostering an environment that allows for engagement by and commitment of Board members |
Board Meetings
|
∎ |
|
∎ |
|
∎ |
|
∎ |
|
Performance and Development
|
∎ |
|
∎ |
|
∎ |
|
Stockholder Engagement
|
∎ |
|
∎ |
|
In evaluating candidates for Lead Independent Director, the Independent Directors consider several factors, including each candidate’s corporate governance experience, Board service and tenure, leadership roles, and ability to meet the necessary time commitment. For an incumbent Lead Independent Director, the Independent Directors also consider the results of the candidate’s annual Lead Independent Director assessment. For a description of the Lead Independent Director annual assessment as described inprocess, see “Annual Assessment of the Lead Independent Director” below.
Annual Assessment of the Lead Independent Director
To support the Independent Directors in electing a Lead Independent Director, the Governance and Nominating Committee oversees an annual process to evaluate the effectiveness of the Lead Independent Director. Eachbeginning on page 31.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 27
|
year the Governance and Nominating Committee designates one Independent Director as the facilitator, who solicits input and feedback from all directors on the performance and effectiveness of the Lead Independent Director. The facilitator shares the results with the Governance and Nominating Committee and, as appropriate, the Board, without the Lead Independent Director present. The Independent Directors consider the results of this assessment in the annual election of the Lead Independent Director.
Our Lead Independent Director is currently Ms. Hackett. As Lead Independent Director, Ms. Hackett has a strong record of active engagement both inside and outside the boardroom, including regular meetings with federal regulators and company executives in one-on-one and group settings. Ms. Hackett is also an active member of Tapestry Networks’ Lead Director Network, a select group of lead independent directors from America’s most successful companies who share a commitment to improving corporate performance and earning stockholder trust through more effective board leadership. Leveraging her significant experience serving in leadership capacities in a variety of environments, Ms. Hackett has fostered a culture of collaboration, diligence, trust and mutual respect that allows the Board to work effectively to provide oversight of and effective challenge to management. Based on her performance, the independent directors unanimously supported Ms. Hackett’s re-election as Lead Independent Director for a one-year term beginning May 2021.
Key Board Governance Practices
20202021 Board Meetings and Attendance
∎ | The Board held 16 meetings and the Board’s committees collectively held |
∎ | All directors then serving attended the |
∎ | Each of our current directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of the meetings of the Board and the committees on which they served during the period the director was on the Board or committee |
Director Onboarding and Education
The Company, in consultation with the Governance and Nominating Committee, has established a director onboarding and continuing director education programprograms to support our directors in fulfilling their responsibilities as members of the Board and to assist them in keeping current on industry, corporate, regulatory, and other developments relevant to their work as directors. First, alldevelopments.
All new directors participate in the Company’s director onboarding program to familiarize themselves withfacilitate director learning relating to the Company’s values, strategic plans, accounting policies, financial reporting, risk management, code of ethics, key regulatory issues, competition, and industry dynamics. DuringAs part of this onboarding program, over a period of approximately 18 months, new directors meet with members of senior management from all of the businessserving in various roles and staff areas,functions, as well as Board committee chairs, the Lead Independent Director, and individual directors, to review and discuss information about the Company, the business, the boardroom, and individual director roles and responsibilities. Additionally, new directors are assigned an experienced director to serve as a mentor to facilitate their onboarding to the Board and the Company.
Our continuing director education program then helps keep directors current on industry, corporate and other developments relevantis designed to their work as directors by providing:provide: (i) monthlyregular updates on directorexternal opportunities for continuing education programs offered by applicable regulators, professional organizations, and academic institutions; (ii) internal director education programs; (iii) various board-related publications to Board members;publications; and (iv) access to peer-to-peer networks. Our directors are also encouraged to pursue other educational opportunities, at the Company’s expense, that may enable them to betterenhance directors’ ability to perform their duties.
Executive Sessions
Executive sessions ofOur Independent Directors areregularly convene executive sessions led by the Lead Independent Director at Board and are an important governance practice because they enablecommittee meetings as needed. The executive sessions allow the BoardIndependent Directors to discuss matters, such as strategy, CEO and senior management performance and compensation, succession planning, Board effectiveness, and board effectivenessother matters without management present. Our Independent Directors meet in executive session without management at least once annually and, in 2020,
In 2021, the Independent Directors met fourteen13 times in executive session. During these executive sessions, the Independent Directors have complete access to suchall the members of the Company’s senior executive management
|
|
as they may request, including but not limited tosuch as the CEO, CFO, Corporate Secretary, General Counsel, Chief Risk Officer, Chief Audit Officer, Chief Information Security Officer, Chief Technology Risk Officer, Chief Credit Review Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, and Chief Information SecurityCompliance Officer. The Lead Independent Director and/or any director may request additional executive sessions of Independent Directors.
Directors Are Actively Engaged Outside of Board Meetings
Engagement outside of Board meetings provides our directors with additional insight into our business and our industry. It also provides our Board with valuable perspective on the performance of our Company, Board, CEO, and other members of senior management.
∎ | Our committee chairs and Lead Independent Director meet and |
28 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
∎ | Our committee chairs and Lead Independent Director conduct pre-meeting reviews of agendas and provide feedback directly to management. After Board meetings, the committee chairs and Lead Independent Director conduct post-meeting debriefs with management to discuss any follow-up items. |
∎ | Individual directors confer with each other and with our CEO, members of our senior management team, and other key associates as needed. |
Annual Board and Committee Evaluations
InAnnually, in compliance with the NYSE listed company rules and in order to monitorother applicable laws, rules, and improve their effectiveness, and to solicit and act upon feedback received,regulations, the Board and its committees hold an annualconduct formal self-evaluation processself-evaluations to assess and improve the Board’s effectiveness and functionality. Furthermore, the Board and its committees periodically may further assess their effectiveness outside of the annual self-evaluation process. The Board believes that in addition to serving as a tool to evaluate and improve performance, evaluations can serve several other purposes, including the promotion of good governance and the integrity of financial reporting, reduction of risk, informing the Board refreshment process, strengthening the board-managementBoard-management partnership, and helping set and oversee boardBoard expectations of management. In assessing their performance, the Board and its committees take a multi-year perspective to identify and evaluate trends and assure themselves that areas identified for improvement are appropriately and timely addressed.
To ensure the process stays fresh and continues to generate rich insights, the Board follows a cyclical, programmatic approach when conducting Board and committee evaluations. This approach includes regular, holistic reviews of the evaluation framework, methodology, and form. While the Board and each of its committees conducts a formal evaluation annually, the Board considers its performance and that of its committees continuously throughout the year and shares feedback with management.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 29
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
As part of the Board’s self-evaluation process, directors consider various topics related to Board composition, effectiveness, structure, effectiveness and responsibilitiesperformance and the overall mix of director skills, experience, and background. Specifically, topics considered during the 20202021 annual Board and committee self-evaluations process included:
∎ | Board engagement, culture, and setting the “tone at the top” |
∎ | Board leadership, including the roles of the Lead Independent |
∎ | Oversight of and engagement in corporate strategy (both short- and long-term strategic objectives) and Company performance |
∎ | Oversight of the CEO, executive compensation, and evaluation |
∎ | CEO and executive talent development and succession planning |
∎ | Access to Company executives and associates |
∎ | Board and committee composition, including director skills, background, diversity, and new director recruiting activities |
∎ | Oversight of enterprise and technology risk, including the stature of the risk management function and appropriateness of the Company’s risk appetites and risk management in light of the scale and complexity of the Company’s business |
∎ | Overall Board governance including quality and quantity of materials and information, conduct of meetings, and support for those activities from management |
Each year, the Board and its committees may conduct their annual evaluations through one or a combination of evaluative approaches, including written surveys, individual director interviews, group discussions in executive session, and/or engagement of a third-party facilitator.
|
|
Annual Assessment of Individual Director Nominees
Each year the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee conducts an individual director assessment process. This process includes candid, one-on-one discussions between the Governance and Nominating Committee’s Chair and each Board member regarding the individual performance and effectiveness of the directors nominated by the Board for re-election by Capital One’s stockholders. Directors may also provide feedback on any other individual director’s performance at any time, regardless of whether it is part of the formal assessment process. The Lead Independent Director is also assessed annually through a process facilitated by another independent member of the Board. See “Annual
30 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Annual Assessment of the Lead Independent Director” beginningDirector
To support the Independent directors in selecting the Lead Independent Director, the Governance and Nominating Committee oversees an annual process to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of the Lead Independent Director. Each year the Governance and Nominating Committee designates one Independent Director as a facilitator, who solicits feedback and perspectives from all directors on page 27the Lead Independent Director. The facilitator then shares the results with the Governance and Nominating Committee and, as appropriate, the Board, without the Lead Independent Director present. The Independent Directors consider the results of this assessment in the annual selection of the Lead Independent Director.
Our Lead Independent Director is currently Ms. Hackett. As Lead Independent Director, Ms. Hackett has a strong record of active engagement both inside and outside the boardroom, including regular meetings with federal regulators and company executives in one-on-one and group settings. Ms. Hackett is also an active member of Tapestry Networks’ Lead Director Network, a select group of lead independent directors from America’s most successful companies who share a commitment to improving corporate performance and earning stockholder trust through more effective board leadership. Leveraging her significant experience serving in leadership capacities in a variety of environments, Ms. Hackett has fostered a culture of collaboration, diligence, trust, and mutual respect that allows the Board to work effectively to provide oversight of and effective challenge to management. Based on her performance, the Independent Directors unanimously supported Ms. Hackett’s re-election as Lead Independent Director for a description of that process.
one-year term beginning May 2021.
Annual Performance Assessment of the CEO
UnderLed by the direction of our Lead Independent Director, the Independent Directors annually assess the performance of Mr. Fairbank as Capital One’s CEO. TheCEO through a process developed and overseen by the Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for developing and overseeing the process, facilitated by the Lead Independent Director and involving all Independent Directors, for conducting the CEO’s annual performance evaluation.Committee. This process includes an in-depth discussion of the CEO’s performance by the Independent Directors in executive session during which directors consider a variety of factors to evaluate Mr. Fairbank’s performance. The Board viewsfactors. For example, cultural values and ethical conduct as aare critical component offactors in both selecting and evaluating the CEO, and as such, as part of this annual performance evaluation,therefore, the BoardIndependent Directors specifically considersconsider the CEO’s efforts to establishin establishing and maintainmaintaining Capital One’s culture, brand, and reputation, with a strategic focus on products and services thatto build an enduring customer franchise and on embedding Capital One’s culture throughout the organization. The Independent Directors also consider feedback raised throughfrom the Board discussion and self-assessment materials provided by Mr. Fairbank to the Board regarding his and the Company’s performance and achievements of various subjective and objective metrics. For additional information, see “Chief Executive Officer Compensation” beginning on page 65.70.
The annual CEO performance assessment is completed as part of the end-of-yearyear-end compensation process. The Compensation Committee manages end-of-yearyear-end compensation decisions within the context of such assessment,
|
|
and the Lead Independent Director and Chair of the Compensation Committee jointly share the input and feedback of the CEO performance assessment with Mr. Fairbank in a closed session.
The Board’s Role in Corporate Oversight
Our Board is accountable for oversight of Capital One’s business affairs and operations. In carrying out this responsibility, among other things, the Board oversees management’s development and implementation of the Company’s (i) corporate culture; (ii) corporate strategy; (iii) financial performance and associated risks; (iv) the enterprise-wide risk management framework, including cybersecurity risk; and (v) succession planning for the Company’s CEO and other key executives.executives; and (vi) policies, programs, and strategies related to environmental, social, and governance matters. For information regarding the Board’s role in oversight of the Company’s policies, programs, and strategies related to environmental and social practices, see “Environmental, Social, and Governance Practices” beginning on page 46.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 31 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
COVID-19 Pandemic
During 2020,2021, the Board was deeply engaged in the Company’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. As the COVID-19 pandemic developed, a cross-functional team of Company management was assembled to continuously monitor the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and implement necessary measures to appropriately manage risk. The Board has received frequent updates on the pandemic’s impact on market conditions and the Company’s business and associates, and reviewed with management the Company’s risk mitigation strategies and business contingency plans. Since mid-March 2020, this Board oversight included both formal and informal Board meetings and updates regarding the Company’s pandemic response.
Corporate Culture
Capital One believes that a strong ethical corporate culture is a key element of sound and sustainable corporate governance practices, beginning at the top with senior leadership. The Board plays a critical role in supporting and overseeing Capital One’s corporate culture, mission, values, and setting the “tone at the top” by adopting policies, codes of ethics, and a philosophy for hiring and compensation practices that promote ethical behavior, compliance with laws and regulations, including those pertaining to consumer protection and privacy, effective internal controls and risk management, and sound governance. The Company’s governance and risk management programs also support a strong and sustainable culture in several ways, including through the governance framework, risk management program, ethics program, and talent management and compensation policies and practices.
The Board and its committees have many opportunities to oversee and engage with management on the Company’s culture throughout the year including through, among other things, (i) reviewing and overseeing Capital One’s strategy, including by engaging in constructive dialogue with the CEO and senior executives on the alignment of the Company’s culture with its long-term strategy during the annual Board Strategy Meeting (which is further discussed below under “Corporate Strategy”), (ii) reviewing and adopting employment policies, compensation plans and incentive structures that promote effective internal controls and governance practices and overall ethical behavior; (iii) reviewing and discussing with the Chief Human Resources Officer the results of associate engagement surveys (which include associate feedback on the Company’s culture, mission, and values), associate retention and turnover rates, and the Company’s diversity and inclusion efforts, and (iv) approvingthings:
∎ | Reviewing and overseeing Capital One’s strategy, including by engaging in constructive dialogue with the CEO and senior executives on the alignment of the Company’s culture, mission, and values with its long-term strategy, including during the annual Board Strategy Meeting (which is further discussed below under “Corporate Strategy”); |
∎ | Reviewing and adopting employment policies, compensation plans and incentive structures that promote effective internal controls and governance practices and overall ethical behavior; |
∎ | Engaging with the Chief Human Resources Officer and reviewing and discussing the results of associate engagement surveys (which include associate feedback on the Company’s culture, mission, and values), associate retention and turnover metrics, employment policies and benefits, and the Company’s diversity and inclusion efforts and results; and |
∎ | Approving and overseeing adherence to the Company’s Code of Conduct, and receiving regular reporting from the Chief Compliance Officer on the Company’s ethics program and associate conduct. |
Corporate Strategy
The Board, in fulfilling its responsibility to manage risk and maximize long-term stockholder value, is accountable for reviewing and overseeing the creation and implementation of Capital One’s corporate strategy. The Board expects management, with input from the Board, to develop, communicate, and implement a strategy that allows Capital One to: (i) invest in long-term capabilities and opportunities; (ii) secure competitive, endgame positions in our key businesses; (iii) attract and retain customers; (iv) grow resiliently; (v) promote ethical behavior and compliance with applicable laws and regulations; (vi) withstand economic stress and market volatility; and (vii) conform to the Board’s established risk tolerance. These strategies should deliver long-term benefits and returns to our stakeholders, including our stockholders, regulators, customers, associates, and communities in which we operate.
32
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
The development of Capital One’s strategy is an ongoing, iterative process that includes engagement from and between the CEO, Division Presidents, the CFO, the General Counsel, the Corporate Secretary, the Chief Risk Officer, the Chief Audit Officer, and the Board. Each year, the full Board participates in an annual Board Strategy Meeting that provides an opportunity for the Board to engage with the CEO and key senior leaders in assessing the competitive environment and Capital One’s enterprise and divisional strategies, and to provide effective challenge, feedback, and input on the Company’s long-term strategy and investments. In addition,Following the Board Strategy Meeting, the Chief Risk Officer meets with the full Board to provide a risk assessment of Capital One’s strategic imperatives. Afterwards, the Board reviews and approves the long-term strategic plan. As the year progresses, the Board remains engaged in overseeing the implementation and monitoring of Capital One’s strategy through updates by the CEO on enterprise corporate strategy and by Division Presidents on business line strategies and results. These updates typically include business line performance and outlook, external and competitive trends, key investment opportunities, and risk evaluation and mitigation strategies. This approach allows the Board to engage in informed discussions with management regarding financial performance and trajectory, capital allocation, strategy implementation, and risk-mitigation plans, where appropriate.
Financial Performance and Associated Risks
The Board oversees the Company’s financial performance by reviewing with management, on a regular basis, the Company’s quarterly and annual financial statements. The Audit Committee oversees the integrity of the Company’s financial statements by, among other things, obtaining independent assurance as to the completeness and accuracy of its financial statements from an independent registered public accounting firm, whose qualifications, independence, and performance it reviews on an annual basis. The Audit Committee also oversees the integrity of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting by, among other things, reviewing periodic assessments of the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s financial controls performed by both the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and internal audit function. In addition, the Board, either directly or through the Risk Committee, plays an integral role in the oversight of capital planning and adequacy, funding and liquidity risk management, market risk management, investment portfolio management, and other asset liability management matters.
Risk Oversight
The Board believes that effective risk management and control processes are critical to Capital One’s safety and soundness, our ability to predict and manage the challenges that Capital One and the financial services industry face, and, ultimately, Capital One’s long-term corporate success.
The enterprise-wide risk management framework defines the Board’s appetite for risk taking and enables senior management to understand, manage, and report on risk. The risk management framework is implemented enterprise-wide and includes seven risk categories: compliance, credit, liquidity, market, operational, reputation, and strategic. Management has developed risk appetite statements with accompanying metrics which are meaningful to the organization and reflect the aggregate level and types of risk Capital One is willing to accept in order to achieve its business objectives, clarifying both risks the Company is actively taking and risks that are purposely avoided.
The Risk Committee is responsible for the oversight of enterpriseenterprise-wide risk management for the Company, and is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Board for approval certain risk tolerances taking into account the Company’s structure, risk profile, complexity, activities, size, and other appropriate risk-related factors. Within management, enterpriseenterprise-wide risk management is generally the responsibility of the Chief Risk Officer, who has accountability for proposing risk tolerance and reporting levels related to all seven risk categories. The Chief Risk Officer is also responsible for ensuring that the Company has an overall enterprise risk framework and that it routinely assesses and reports on enterprise level risks. The Chief Risk Officer reports both to the CEO and to the Risk Committee. The Audit Committee also plays an important risk oversight function, and oversees elements of compliance. The Compensation Committee oversees compensation policies and practices to ensure balanced risk-taking as further described in “Risk Assessment of Compensation Policies and Practices” beginning on page 34 below. Finally, the Board as a whole oversees the entire enterpriseenterprise-wide risk framework for the Company, including the oversight of strategic risk.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 33
|
Section II - |
Cybersecurity and Technology Risk
As a financial services company entrusted with the safeguarding of sensitive information, our Board believes that a strong enterprise cyber program is vital to effective risk management. As part of its program of regular oversight, the Risk Committee of the Board is responsible for overseeing cyber risk, information security, and technology risk, including management’s actions to identify, assess, mitigate, and remediate material cyber issues and risks. The Risk Committee receives quarterly reports from the Chief Information Security Officer and the Chief Technology Risk Officer on the Company’s technology and cyber risk profile, enterprise cyber program, and key enterprise cyber initiatives. In addition, the Risk Committee discusses matters escalated to it by the Technology and Cyber Risk Committee, a management-level committee dedicated to the discussion of enterprise-wide cybersecurity and technology risk issues whose responsibilities include, among other things, discussion of cyber and technology risks. The Risk Committee coordinates with the full Board regarding the strategic implications of cyber and technology risks.
The Chief Information Officer, Chief Information Security Officer, and Chief Technology Risk Officer also follow a risk-based escalation process to notify the Risk Committee outside of the quarterly reporting cycle when they identify an emerging risk or material issue. The Risk Committee annually reviews and recommends the Company’s information security policy and information security program to the Board for approval. At least annually, the Board reviews and discusses the Company’s technology strategy with the Chief Information Officer; reviews and discusses the Company’s cybersecurity strategy with the Chief Information Security Officer and Chief Technology Risk Officer; and approves the Company’s technology strategic plan. In addition, the Risk Committee participates in quarterlyperiodic cyber education sessions.
Succession Planning
Under the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board is responsible for maintaining a succession plan for the CEO and othercertain key executive roles. The Board has in place anAn effective planning process has been developed and maintained to identify, develop, and assess successors to the CEO and othercertain key executives, and annuallyexecutives. The Board reviews these succession plans.plans at least annually. Our Board believes that the directors and the CEO should work together on executive succession planning and that the entire Board should be involved. Each year, as part of its succession planning process, our CEO provides the Board with recommendations on, and evaluations of, potential CEO successors. The Board reviewsconsiders a number of factors such as experience, skills, competencies, diversity, and potential in its review of the senior executive team’s experience, skills, competencies and potentialteam to assess which executives possess or can develop the attributes that the Board believes are necessary to lead and achieve the Company’s goals. Among other steps taken to promote this process throughout the year, each of theexecutives one and two levels of executives below the CEO which include the CEO’s direct reports, often attend Board meetings and present to the Board, providing the Board with numerous opportunities to interact with our senior management and assess their leadership capabilities. Additionally, each line of business engages in succession planning for key roles at least once per year. The Chief Human Resources Officer reviews the line of business succession plans.
Our Board proactively reviewed plans for temporary emergency successors across key roles in late 2021. The temporary emergency succession plan is intended to identify the leaders who can assume the responsibilities in the immediate short term to ensure business continuity, day-to-day management of the team and business for our senior management and key roles. Our Board also has established steps to address emergency CEO succession planning for an unplanned CEO succession event. Our emergency CEO succession planning is intended to enable our Company to respond to an unexpected CEO transition by continuing our Company’s safe and sound operation and minimizing potential disruption or loss of continuity to our Company’s operations and strategy. There is also available, on a continuing basis as a result of the process described above, the CEO’s recommendation on a successor should the CEO become unexpectedly unable to serve. The Board also reviews annually the CEO’s emergency successor recommendations.
As the risks related to the COVID-19 pandemic became more apparent, our Board proactively reviewed plans for temporary emergency successors across key roles in the first quarter of 2020. The temporary emergency succession plan is intended to identify the leaders who can assume the responsibilities in the immediate short term to ensure business continuity, day-to-day management of the team and business for our senior management and key roles.
Risk Assessment of Compensation Policies and Practices
The Compensation Committee oversees all of our compensation policies and practices, including our incentive compensation policies and practices, with a view toward ensuring that such policies and practices encourage
34 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
balanced risk-taking, are compatible with effective controls and risk management, and align with our business strategy.strategy, and enable the Company to attract and retain top talent, especially in key job functions. Every two years, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves the Incentive Compensation Governance Policy, which applies to all Company associates and governs incentive compensation decisions. The Incentive Compensation Governance Policy provides the framework for oversight of the design of incentive compensation programs. In setting executive compensation, the Compensation Committee assesses each of the named executive officersNEOs against one or more performance objectives specifically designed to evaluate the degree to which the named executive officers balanced risks inherent in their specific roles. The Compensation Committee also implements additional risk-balancing features for certain equity awards, as described in more detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 54.
|
|
57.
In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews the Company’s NEO and other senior executive compensation programs as well as any other material incentive compensation programs. During these reviews, the Compensation Committee discusses the Company’s most significant risks, including the Company’s status with respect to managing those risks and the relationship of those risks to compensation programs. The review includes discussion and analysis of risk-balancing features embedded in these incentive compensation programs and other actions taken by the Company to appropriately balance risk and achieve conformance with regulatory guidance. The Compensation Committee also discusses these programs with the Company’s Chief Risk Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer, and the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, as appropriate. Based on these discussions, the Compensation Committee believes these compensation programs are consistent with safety and soundness, and operate in a manner that appropriately balances risk.risk, and are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
The Compensation Committee’s active oversight, together with the Company’s interactions and discussions with its regulators, has further enhanced the Company’s risk management and control processes with respect to incentive compensation at the Company and supported our continued compliance with the interagency guidance on sound incentive compensation practices.
We value the input and insights of our stockholders and are committed to continued meaningful engagement with investors. As a result, we engage in continuous outreach throughout the year to discuss with our stockholders the issues that are important to them, listen to their expectations for us, and share our views. During our discussions, we also seek to provide visibility and transparency into our business, our performance, and our governance and compensation practices. We report stockholder feedback to our Board to help them respond to stockholders’ concerns and feedback.
Stockholder Engagement Program
In 2020,2021, we engaged in direct outreach and discussions with stockholders representing approximately 70% of our outstanding shares. Key topics of focus included environmental, social, and governance matters, companyCompany strategy and results, board composition stockholder action by written consent,and refreshment, and executive compensation. Key features of our stockholder engagement program include: (i) continuous, year-round outreach; (ii) meaningful board-driven engagement; (iii) regular board reporting; and (iv) stockholder-driven improvements.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 35 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Continuous Outreach
Our CEO, CFO, and Investor Relations team meet frequently with stockholders and the investment community.community regarding Company strategy and performance. In addition, members of management, including our Investor Relations, Corporate Governance and Securities, and Executive Compensation teams, as well as our General Counsel and Corporate Secretary and our CFO, meet with key governance contacts at our larger stockholders throughout the year.
Meaningful Engagement
Our goal is to engage with our stockholders in a manner characterized by both transparency and respect, fostering collaborative and mutually beneficial discussions. Depending on the topics discussed with investors, our engagement with stockholders may include our Lead Independent Director, the Chair of the Compensation Committee, or the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee (if different from our Lead Independent Director).
Regular Board Reporting
The Governance and Nominating Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Board request and receive reports several times a year from our Investor Relations team and members of management and actively discuss stockholders’ feedback and insights. Our Board and management review and evaluate stockholder input to identify issues and concerns that may require Board action or enhancements to our policies, practices, or disclosure.
|
|
Board’s Response to Stockholder Feedback
In recent years, in response to stockholder feedback, we have made the following improvements to our corporate governance and executive compensation practices and disclosures:
∎ | Following engagement with stockholders, in 2020, the Company amended its Certificate of Incorporation to permit stockholders to act by written consent, subject to certain procedural and other safeguards that the Board believes are in the best interests of Capital One and our stockholders. |
∎ | Beginning with the 2020 performance year, the Compensation Committee and the Independent Directors determined to award a portion of the CEO’s |
∎ | Added disclosure regarding the settlement |
∎ | Enhanced our description of the Compensation Committee and Independent |
∎ | In July 2020, the Compensation Committee and the Independent Directors increased the size and diversity of the Company’s peer group used to determine the level and components of NEO compensation to add seven additional peers, including diversified financial institutions and payment companies, with whom we compete for executive talent. See “Peer Groups” beginning on page |
36 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
∎ | Beginning with the 2019 performance year, the Compensation Committee and the Independent Directors increased the alignment of CEO compensation with Company performance and stockholder interests by decreasing the amount of the CEO’s compensation awarded at the beginning of the performance year such that the vast majority of CEO compensation is tied to a year-end evaluation of CEO and Company performance. See |
∎ | Expanded disclosure in our proxy statement regarding our approach to environmental, social, and governance matters in response to discussions held with investors during the Company’s formal stockholder outreach and as a result of management’s and the Board’s continuous benchmarking against emerging governance practices. See “Environmental, Social, and Governance Practices” beginning on page |
|
|
Stockholder Engagement Cycle
While our Investor Relations team and management meet continuously throughout the year, the following graph describes the typical annual cycle of our formal stockholder engagement.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 37
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
We Engage Across Many Channels
Company-Led Engagement | Stockholder-Led Engagement | |||
∎ Dedicated Investor Relations Department.Our Investor Relations professionals are dedicated full-time to responding to questions from stockholders about the Company, its strategy, performance, and
∎ Formal Outreach Program.In addition to continuous outreach on a broad set of topics, our formal outreach program includes proactive outreach to our largest stockholders at least twice a year focused on governance, compensation, and related issues. Through our formal outreach program, our Board and management gain stockholder insights and an opportunity to assess and respond to stockholder sentiment.
∎ Quarterly Earnings Conference Calls.In addition to prepared remarks, our management team participates in a question-and-answer session aimed at allowing stockholders to gain further insight into the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
∎ Regular Investor Conferences and Road Shows. Management and our Investor Relations team routinely engage with investors at conferences and other forums. During | ∎ Meetings with Directors. If requested, our directors are available for consultation and direct communication with our stockholders.
∎ Voting. Our stockholders have the opportunity to vote for the election of all of our directors on an annual basis using a majority voting standard, and, through our annual vote on executive compensation, to regularly express their opinion on our compensation programs.
∎ Annual Stockholder Meeting. Our directors are expected to, and do, attend the annual meeting of stockholders, where all of our stockholders are invited to attend, ask questions, and express their views.
∎ Written Correspondence. Stockholders may write to the Board through the Corporate Secretary at the address provided below in “How to Contact Us” on page
∎ Special Meetings.A stockholder or group of stockholders that hold at least 25% of our outstanding common stock may request a special meeting of stockholders.
∎ Proxy Access. A stockholder or group of up to 20 stockholders who have owned at least 3% of the Company’s outstanding common shares of voting stock continuously for at least three years may nominate and include in the Company’s proxy statement the greater of two director candidates or 20% of the total Board.
∎ Written Consent.The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation permits stockholders to act by written consent, subject to certain procedural and other safeguards. |
Our Board has four standing committees: Audit, Risk,Compensation, Governance and Nominating, and Compensation.Risk. Each of our committees:
∎ | Is led by an active, empowered, and independent |
∎ | Is comprised of all independent members |
∎ | Operates in accordance with a written charter, which is reviewed annually |
∎ | Assesses its performance annually |
∎ | Has authority to retain outside advisors, as desired |
38
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Information About Our Current Board Committee Membership and 20202021 Committee Meetings
Director
|
|
| Governance and Nominating
|
| ||||
Richard D. Fairbank | ||||||||
Ime Archibong(2) | ||||||||
Ann Fritz Hackett |
|
| ||||||
Peter Thomas Killalea |
| |||||||
Eli Leenaars(3) |
|
| ||||||
Pierre E. Leroy |
|
|
| |||||
François Locoh-Donou |
|
| ||||||
Peter E. Raskind |
|
| ||||||
Eileen Serra |
|
| ||||||
Mayo A. Shattuck III |
|
| ||||||
Bradford H. Warner(3) |
|
| ||||||
Catherine G. West |
|
| ||||||
Craig Anthony Williams(2) | ||||||||
# MEETINGS HELD IN 2020
| 11 | 6 | 6 | 12 | ||||
Chair Member
Director | Audit(1) | Compensation | Governance and Nominating | Risk | ||||
Richard D. Fairbank | ||||||||
Ime Archibong |
| |||||||
Christine Detrick |
|
| ||||||
Ann Fritz Hackett |
|
|
| |||||
Peter Thomas Killalea |
|
| ||||||
Eli Leenaars(2) |
|
|
| |||||
François Locoh-Donou |
|
| ||||||
Peter E. Raskind |
|
| ||||||
Eileen Serra(2) |
|
| ||||||
Mayo A. Shattuck III |
|
| ||||||
Bradford H. Warner(2) |
|
| ||||||
Catherine G. West |
|
| ||||||
Craig Anthony Williams |
| |||||||
# MEETINGS HELD IN 2021 | 11 | 6 | 7 | 9 | ||||
| Member |
(1) | The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee |
(2) |
|
The Board has determined that Mr. Leenaars, Ms. Serra, and Mr. Warner |
Committee Membership Determinations
Annually, the Governance and Nominating Committee assesses and considers membership for each of the Board’s standing committees. This review takes into account, among other factors, committee needs, director experience, committee succession planning, and the desire to balance membership continuity with new insights.
The Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee facilitates discussions with management, committee chairs, the Chairman of the Board, and individual directors, as needed, and shares that feedback with the Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee makes recommendations for committee membership and chairs to the full Board.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 39
|
Section II - |
Audit Committee | Compensation Committee | |
Primary Responsibilities:
∎ Assist our Board with the oversight of the qualifications, independence, and performance of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm
∎ Oversee the appointment, compensation, retention, and work of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm
∎ Assist our Board with the oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, including matters related to internal controls over financial reporting
∎ Review and discuss with management their assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and whether any changes are necessary in light of such assessment
∎ In consultation with the Risk Committee, review and discuss with the Chief Risk Officer and management (i) the key guidelines and policies governing the Company’s significant processes for risk assessment and risk management; and (ii) the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures
∎ Oversee the Chief Audit Officer and the internal audit function
∎ Approve or replace the Chief Audit Officer, as appropriate, and annually review the performance, independence, and compensation of the Chief Audit Officer
∎ Oversee compliance by the Company with legal and regulatory requirements
∎ Perform the fiduciary audit function as the audit committee of our bank subsidiaries in accordance with federal banking regulations
∎ Review the Company’s ethics program that monitors compliance with the Company’s Code of Conduct and the record of such compliance
∎ Review and recommend to the Board (or disinterested members of the Board, as appropriate) approval of (i) the Company’s Code of Conduct and any material changes thereto; and (ii) any waiver of the Code of Conduct for directors and certain executive officers
| Primary Responsibilities:
∎ Evaluate, approve, and recommend to the Independent Directors the CEO’s compensation, including any salary, incentive awards, perquisites, and termination arrangements, in light of the Compensation Committee’s assessment of his performance and anticipated contributions with respect to the Company’s strategy and objectives
∎ Review, approve, and recommend the salary levels, incentive awards, perquisites, and termination arrangements for Senior Management, other than the CEO, to the Independent Directors
∎ Review and approve the Company’s goals and objectives relevant to compensation, oversee the Company’s policies and programs relating to compensation and benefits available to Senior Management with a goal of aligning the policies and programs with such goals and objectives, and review relevant market data relating to compensation and benefits
∎ Oversee incentive compensation programs for Senior Management and others who can expose the Company to material risk with a goal that such programs be designed and operated in a manner that achieves balance and is consistent with safety and soundness
∎ Review data and analyses to allow an assessment of whether the design and operation of incentive compensation programs is consistent with the Company’s safety and soundness as provided under applicable regulatory guidance
∎ Administer Capital One’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, 2002 Associate Stock Purchase Plan, and other compensation and benefits plans
∎ Periodically review and recommend director compensation to the Board
∎ Based on a review and discussion with management, recommend the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in our annual proxy statement
The Compensation Committee may delegate authority as it deems appropriate in furtherance of its responsibilities to one or more subcommittees of directors consisting of one or more members of the Compensation Committee as appropriate, or to management. The Independent Directors may meet with the Compensation Committee, as appropriate, to review and approve compensation for the CEO and Senior Management. |
40
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Governance and Nominating Committee | Risk Committee | |
Primary Responsibilities:
∎ Plan for director succession and assist our Board by identifying and recommending nominees for election to our Board and review the qualifications of potential Board members
∎ Review and recommend committee membership
∎ Lead the Company’s corporate governance policies and practices, including recommending to the Board the Corporate Governance Guidelines
∎ Oversee the Board and CEO’s annual evaluation
∎ Oversee management’s stockholder engagement program and practices and evaluate stockholder proposals and other correspondence
∎ Establish and oversee processes for annual individual director and Board assessments and oversee that committee chairs perform annual committee evaluations
∎ Keep informed regarding external governance trends, including reviewing benchmarking research conducted by management
∎ Oversee the Company’s policies, programs, and strategies related to environmental, social, and/or governance matters in coordination with other committees of the Board, as applicable | Primary Responsibilities:
∎ Assist our Board with oversight of the Company’s enterprise-wide risk management framework, including policies and practices established by management to identify, assess, measure, and manage key risks facing the Company across all of the Company’s risk categories: strategic, compliance, operational, reputation, credit, market, and liquidity risk
∎ Discuss with management the enterprise’s risk appetite and tolerance, and at least annually recommend to the full Board the statement of risk appetite and tolerance to be communicated throughout the Company
∎ Review and approve annually the credit review plans and policies, and any significant changes to such plans
∎ Review and recommend to the Board the Company’s liquidity risk tolerance at least annually, taking into account the Company’s capital structure, risk profile, complexity, activities, and size. Senior management reports to the Risk Committee or the Board regarding the Company’s liquidity risk profile and liquidity risk tolerance at least quarterly
∎ Oversee the Company’s technology and cyber risk profile, top technology and cyber risks, enterprise cyber program and key enterprise cyber initiatives |
The Charters of the Audit, Compensation, Governance and Nominating, and Risk Committees are available on our website at www.capitalone.com, under “Investors,” then “Governance & Leadership,” then “Board of Directors and Committee Documents.”
Compensation Committee Consultant
The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain and terminate legal counsel and other consultants and to approve such consultants’ fees and other retention terms. The Compensation Committee has retained the services of Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”), an independent executive compensation consulting firm. FW Cook reports to the Compensation Committee and its engagement may be terminated by the Compensation Committee at any time.
The Compensation Committee determines the scope and nature of FW Cook’s assignments. In 2020,2021, FW Cook performed the following work for the Compensation Committee:
∎ | Provided independent competitive market data and advice related to the compensation for the CEO and the other executive officers, including the evolution of the Company’s peer comparator group used for competitive analyses |
∎ | Reviewed management-provided market data and recommendations on the design of compensation programs for senior executives other than the CEO |
∎ | Reviewed Capital One’s executive compensation levels, performance, and the design of incentive programs |
∎ | Reviewed the Company’s non-management director compensation program and provided competitive compensation data and director compensation program recommendations for review and consideration |
∎ | Provided information on executive and director compensation trends and analyses of the implications of such trends for Capital One |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 41
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Consultants from FW Cook typically attend Compensation Committee meetings and executive sessions of the Compensation Committee upon request of the Compensation Committee Chair, including meetings held jointly with the Independent Directors to review or approve the compensation for the CEO and the other executive officers and to provide an independent perspective regarding such compensation practices.
FW Cook does not provide any additional services to the Company or its management other than the services provided to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has considered factors relevant to FW Cook’s independence from management under SEC and NYSE rules and has determined that FW Cook is independent from management.
The following individuals served as the Company’s executive officers as of March 21, 2022:
Robert M. Alexander
Chief Information Officer
Age: | Mr. Alexander has served as our Chief Information Officer since May 2007, and is responsible for overseeing all technology activities for Capital One. Mr. Alexander joined Capital One in April 1998. From April 1998 to May 2007, Mr. Alexander had responsibility at various times for a number of Capital One’s lending businesses, including the U.S. consumer credit card and installment loan businesses. | |||
Age: | Mr. | |||
Kevin S. Borgmann
Senior Advisor to the CEO
Age: | Mr. Borgmann has served as a Senior Advisor to the CEO and executive team since February 2018, with a focus on strategy, risk management, and executive recruiting matters. Mr. Borgmann joined Capital One in August 2001. Since that time he has served in a variety of roles at Capital One, including Senior Vice President with the Credit Card business from March 2008 until September 2010, President of Capital One Auto Finance from September 2010 until October 2012, Deputy Chief Risk Officer from October 2012 to January 2013, and Chief Risk Officer from January 2013 through January 2018. | |||
Matthew W. Cooper
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Age: | Mr. Cooper has served as our General Counsel since February 2018, and is responsible for overseeing Capital One’s Legal Department. As of March 2022, Mr. Cooper also serves as our Corporate Secretary. Mr. Cooper joined Capital One in January 2009. From January 2009 to January 2018, Mr. Cooper held a variety of roles within Capital One’s Legal Department, including Chief Counsel, Litigation from January 2009 to February 2014, Chief Counsel, Global Card from July 2012 to January 2017, and Chief Counsel, Legal from January 2016 to February 2018. Prior to joining Capital One, Mr. Cooper served in various executive roles within the legal department of the General Electric Company and one of its successor companies, Genworth Financial. | |||
42 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Lia N. Dean
President, Retail Bank & Premium Card Products
Age: | Ms. Dean has served as President, Retail Bank & Premium Card Products since November 2020, and is responsible for leading Capital One’s Retail Bank strategy, customer experience and end-to-end operations. Ms. Dean also oversees Capital One’s upmarket credit cards, leads marketing for the Card and Retail Bank businesses, and manages the Card digital experience. Ms. Dean joined Capital One in April 2014. From April 2014 to June 2018, Ms. Dean served as Senior Vice President, Strategy for Capital One’s Retail and Direct Bank businesses, where she led the national expansion of Capital One Cafés. From June 2018 to June 2020, Ms. Dean served as our Head of Bank Marketing and Retail, and from June 2020 to November 2020, Ms. Dean served as Head of Upmarket, Card Customer Experience & Bank Marketing. Prior to joining Capital One, she was a partner with McKinsey & Company, a management consulting firm. In addition, Ms. Dean was a founding member of CashEdge, a fintech venture, which was acquired by FiServ in 2011. |
|
|
|
| |||
Kaitlin Haggerty Chief Human Resources Officer Age: 37 | Ms. Haggerty has served as our Chief Human Resources Officer since February 2022, and is responsible for overseeing Capital One’s Human Resources strategy, recruitment efforts, and development programs. Ms. Haggerty joined Capital One in October 2017 as a Senior Director in Corporate Strategy. From October 2017 to June 2020, Ms. Haggerty served in roles of increasing responsibility in our Corporate Strategy Group, where she partnered with the Card leadership team on product and growth strategies. In June of 2020, she transitioned from her role as Managing Vice President in Corporate Strategy to become the head of the Walmart Partnership. From July 2020 to November 2021, Ms. Haggerty led the Walmart Partnership program within our Card business before transitioning to the HR organization as a Senior Vice President. Prior to joining Capital One, Ms. Haggerty served as the chief executive officer of Blu Homes, a startup focused on improving homebuilding through technology. Earlier in her career, Ms. Haggerty served as a management consultant at Bain & Company. | |||
Sheldon “Trip” Hall
Chief Risk Officer
Age: | Mr. Hall has served as our Chief Risk Officer since August 2018, and is responsible for all aspects of Capital One’s risk management function, including oversight of risk management activities in areas such as credit risk, operational risk, compliance risk, and technology risk. Mr. Hall joined Capital One in June 1997. Since that time, he has served in a variety of roles in Capital One’s Installment Loans, Credit Card, National Small Business Lending, Auto Finance and Mainstreet Card businesses, including serving as President of Capital One Auto Finance from November 2012 to March 2017 and Executive Vice President of Domestic Consumer Card from March 2017 to July 2018. | |||
Celia S. Karam
Card Chief
Age: | Ms. Karam has served as our Card Chief Ms. Karam also served as the company’s Chief Audit Officer from June 2018 to July 2021. | |||
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 43 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Frank G. LaPrade, III
Chief Enterprise Services Officer
the CEO
Age: 54 | Mr. LaPrade has served as our Chief Enterprise Services Officer since 2010 and Chief of Staff to the CEO since 2004, and is responsible for managing Enterprise Services for Capital One, including Technology, Digital, Design, Enterprise AI/ML Product, Capital One Software, Growth Ventures, Brand, Enterprise Supplier Management, External Affairs, Workplace Solutions, and Corporate Security. Mr. LaPrade joined Capital One in February 1996. Since that time he has served in various positions, including as Capital One’s Deputy General Counsel from 1996 to 2004, responsible for managing the company’s litigation, employment, intellectual property and transactional practice areas. | |||
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Wassmer
President, Card
Age: | Mr. Wassmer has served as President, Card since June 2020, and is responsible for leading the Company’s consumer and small business credit card business in the United States and internationally. Mr. Wassmer joined Capital One in July 1994. Since that time, Mr. Wassmer has served in roles of increasing responsibility across the Company, expanding his leadership scope and experience driving strategy and analysis, finance, operations and risk management across all of our consumer and small business, domestic and international card businesses. From 2013 to November 2016, Mr. Wassmer served as Executive Vice President of the Company’s U.S. Branded Card business. From November 2016 to May 2020, Mr. Wassmer served as President, U.S. Card. | |||
Sanjiv Yajnik
President, Financial Services
Age: | Mr. Yajnik has served as our President, Financial Services since June 2009, and is responsible for overseeing Capital One’s Auto Finance business and Wealth Management business. Mr. Yajnik joined Capital One in July 1998. From July 1998 to June 2009, Mr. Yajnik led several businesses within Capital One, including Capital One Europe, Capital One Canada, and Capital One Small Business Services. Mr. Yajnik became President, Financial Services in June 2009. Prior to joining Capital One, Mr. Yajnik held leadership positions at PepsiCo, Circuit City and Mobil Oil. | |||
Andrew M. Young
Chief Financial Officer
Age: | Mr. Young has served as our Chief Financial Officer since March 2021, and is responsible for overseeing Capital One’s finance team and the overall financial management of the Company. Mr. Young joined Capital One in June 1996. Since that time, he has served in a variety of roles at Capital |
Our Board has approved a written Related Person Transaction policy, which sets forth policies and procedures for reviewing, and approving or ratifying, transactions with directors, director nominees, executive officers, stockholders holding 5% or more of Capital One’s voting securities, or any of their immediate family members or affiliated entities (collectively, “Related Persons”). The policy covers transactions, arrangements, and relationships where Capital One is a participant, the aggregate amount exceeds $120,000, and a Related Person has a direct or indirect material interest (“Related Person Transactions”). Under the policy, Related Person Transactions must be approved or ratified by the Governance and Nominating Committee, and may only be ratified or approved if the committee determines the Related Person Transaction isTransactions are not inconsistent with the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
44 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
In reviewing Related Person Transactions, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers all relevant facts and circumstances, which may include: the benefits to the Company from the transaction; the nature and extent of the Related Person’s interest in the transaction; the impact, if any, on a director’s independence; any implications under Capital One’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (including whether the transaction would create a conflict of interest or the appearance thereof); any concerns with respect to reputation risk; the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; and the terms of the transaction as compared to the terms available to unrelated third parties or to Capital One’s associates, generally.
The Governance and Nominating Committee has pre-approved the following types of Related Person Transactions as being not inconsistent with the best interests of Capital One and its stockholders: director and executive compensation otherwise disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement and/or approved by the Compensation Committee or the Board; transactions in amounts that are not material and where the relationship
|
|
arises only from a Related Person’s position as an employee (other than as an executive officer) or a director of, or having immaterial financial holdings in, another entity; and financial services, including loans, extensions of credit, or other financial services and products provided by Capital One to a Related Person that are in the ordinary course, non-preferential, do not involve features unfavorable to the Company, and comply with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations (including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Regulation O of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Guidelines).
From time to time in the ordinary course of its business, Capital One issues loans and provides other financial services and products to directors, executive officers, and/or nominees for director, or to a director’s, executive officer’s, or director nominee’s immediate family member, including persons sharing the household of such director, executive officer, or director nominee (other than a tenant or employee). Such loans and other financial services and products are made in the ordinary course of business; are on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans and financial services and products with persons not related to the Company; and do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other features unfavorable to the Company.
Matthew W. Cooper is Capital One’s General Counsel.Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Mr. Cooper’s brother-in-law is a partner at the international law firm of McGuireWoods LLP (“McGuireWoods”). Capital One has engaged McGuireWoods from time to time in the ordinary course of business and on an arm’s-length basis. The relationship between Capital One and McGuireWoods began before Mr. Cooper was employed by Capital One and also pre-dates Mr. Cooper’s brother-in-law’s association with McGuireWoods. Mr. Cooper’s brother-in-law does not work on any Capital One matters and his ownership in the firm is less than 1%. In 2020,2021, Capital One made aggregate payments to McGuireWoods of approximately $11$8 million for legal services. This relationship was ratified by the Governance and Nominating Committee.
Trip Hall is Capital One’s Chief Risk Officer. In 20202021, Mr. Hall’s spouse was a Senior DirectorVice President in our Human Resources department and hasdepartment. She worked for Capital One for over 19 years.20 years and left the Company during 2021. Mr. Hall’s spouse received compensation of approximately $353,600$250,000 in 2020,2021, including an annual salary and incentive awardsaward commensurate with her qualifications, responsibilities, and other employees holding similar positions. She doesdid not report directly or indirectly to Mr. Hall. This relationship was ratified by the Governance and Nominating Committee.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 45 |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Environmental, Social, and Governance Practices
At Capital One, we embrace the idea that we do well as a company by doing good in the communities we serve. While our approach to corporate social responsibility continues to evolve, each year we remain focused on three core elements: our people, our community, and our environmental footprint. The Governance and Nominating Committee (“GNC”) of the Board has primary oversight responsibility for the Company’s policies, programs and strategies related to environmental and social practices, as well as governance matters. Highlights of our environmental and social programs are summarized below.
Oversight of Environmental, Social, and Governance Matters
Our Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”)ESG approach is integrated into each of our lines of business and helps define how we pursue business opportunities and manage risk. Our Corporate Social Responsibility (“CSR”) team works with colleagues throughout the Company on an ongoing basis to shape our efforts and monitor progress on key ESG issues. To strengthen our oversight of ESG issues, in 2020 we established a cross-functional ESG Advisory Committee, which is a management-level committee led by senior executives from across the Company and chaired by our General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, that meets monthly to help guide our Company’s ESG initiatives. In August 2021, we published a stand-alone ESG Fact Sheet containing certain disclosures aligned with frameworks developed by the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the Value Reporting Foundation’s Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB).
At the Board level, the GNCGovernance and Nominating Committee has overall responsibility for overseeing policies, programs and strategies related to ESG matters.matters in coordination with other committees and the full Board, as appropriate, including the Risk Committee, which oversees risks such as those associated with climate. In addition, our Board takes ESG issues into consideration in making decisions about executive compensation. See “Company Performance Assessment” beginning on page 74.78. The GNC receives updates,Governance and Nominating Committee engages on ESG matters with management at least annually, on ESG matters from management, including receiving updates on investor sentiment, the Company’s Corporate Social Responsibility Report, and other ESG initiatives.
|
|
Our People
Since Capital One’s founding, our success has been rooted in our culture of putting people first. For our customers, we believe that our products are innovative, simple to use, and deliver tremendous value for individuals of all backgrounds. For ourOur more than 51,00050,000 associates unleashingunleash their talents enables us to deliver on our mission to bring ingenuity, simplicity, and humanity to banking. We strive to empower our talented associates to grow in their careers as they take on new roles, learn valuable skills, receive candid and actionable feedback, and meet personalized development goals. We’ve invested significantly in learning programs, resources, and technology with the goal of developing people to reach their highest potential, cultivate role expertise, create the workforce of the future, and accelerate business impact.
U.S. Workforce by the Numbers (as of December 31, 2020)For Our Associates
U.S. Workforce by the Numbers (as of December 31, 2021) | ||||
|
|
| ||
50% people of color | 52% women | 91% of surveyed associates are proud to work for Capital One |
Highlights of “Our People” programs for our associates include the following:
∎ | Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging (“DIB”). We strive to make Capital One a place where everyone feels seen, heard, and valued, and where each associate has an equal opportunity to succeed. We empower our associates to do great work by creating an inclusive culture of belonging that values diverse perspectives, |
46 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
fosters collaboration, and encourages innovative ideas, with all diversity and inclusion efforts overseen by our Chief Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging Officer, who engages regularly with our CEO, Board, and senior management team. Growing the diversity of our workforce at all levels, with an emphasis on leader and executive roles, is an important component of our comprehensive DIB strategy. We remain focused on recruiting, developing and elevating exceptionally diverse talent on our journey to full representation. In 2021, the Compensation Committee added DIB to the Performance Factors (as defined on page 81) used to determine the year-end incentive for our named executive officers. |
∎ | Continued Response to COVID-19 Pandemic. We increased family care time, relaxed our vacation policies, and waived the new hire waiting periods for benefits. We introduced new and enhanced programs to help associates with childcare. We invested in mental health services and expanded our health coverage for COVID-related illnesses. Associates on Capital One’s health insurance plan also have mental health covered at 100%, which allows them to seek support at no cost. |
∎ | Business Resource Groups. We believe in creating a culture that values and celebrates all perspectives, and we encourage all associates to participate in our seven Business Resource Groups (“BRGs”) as a member or as an ally. BRGs are associate-led organizations committed to attracting, developing, engaging and retaining our diverse workforce and enhancing the richness of our workplace for all associates. Each BRG has an Executive Committee sponsor. There are currently more than 100 local BRG chapters across our footprint, with 63% of U.S. associates and 57% of associates globally belonging to at least one BRG. |
∎ | Competitive Pay and Benefits. Capital One is proud to offer our Total Rewards program, combining unique benefits and compensation offerings to attract and retain the world’s best talent. Our competitive benefits, such as generous parental leave benefits, on-site health centers, flexible work solutions, market-leading company contributions to associates’ 401(k) plans, educational assistance and other physical and mental health, wellness, and financial benefits, are all designed to help associates grow and develop inside and outside of the workplace and empower them in their lives. |
∎ | Pay Equity. Pay equity has long been a core tenet of our pay philosophy and is central to our values. We review groups of associates in similar roles, accounting for factors that appropriately explain differences in pay such as job location and experience. Based on this analysis, our aggregated adjusted pay gap results show that as of February 2022, we paid women in the U.S. 100% of what men are paid, and we paid people of color in the U.S. 100% of what white associates were paid. |
∎ | Learning and Development. At Capital One, we celebrate curiosity, lifelong learning and the growth potential of all our associates. We’ve set out to build a world-class development culture designed to empower all to learn and lead. In 2021, Capital One delivered 3.5 million online and instructor-led courses for our associates and contractors through our intuitive learning platforms—One Learn and Learning Hive—that enable associates to search and engage with a variety of learning plans and online training. |
For Our Customers
Highlights of “Our People” programs for our customers include the following:
∎ | Innovative Products that Help Customers Succeed.We seek our customers’ insights and stay attuned to their candid feedback to deliver innovative products and tools that meet their changing needs and help them succeed financially. We are making it easier for our customers to use credit wisely with customer alerts from our CreditWise tool, available for customers and non-customers, which helps them understand, monitor, and improve their credit scores; and with our Capital One mobile application, which includes purchase alerts and enhanced controls for security and fraud prevention. Building on these tools and resources, we launched Eno, our intelligent financial assistant, which delivers proactive insights that help users save money and detect fraud |
|
|
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 47 |
|
∎ |
|
|
Business Ethics and Responsible Business Practices. Our Code of Conduct memorializes Capital One’s commitment to comply with applicable laws and regulations governing our operations, and to earn our reputation for honesty, fair dealing, and integrity every day. In addition, the Corporate Compliance team develops training courses on a range of related topics such as compliance awareness training, ethical business practices and combating illegal conduct, including |
∎ | Consumer Privacy. As a business that relies on trust, Capital One is committed to protecting consumer privacy and confidence in our ability to safeguard their personal and financial information. We collect information to better serve our customers and potential customers. Depending on how consumers interact with us, they have the ability to make certain choices regarding our collection, use and sharing of their information. In addition, some of their data is made available for copy, download, or deletion, upon consumer request. |
∎ | Elimination of Overdraft Fees. In 2021, we became the first top-ten retail bank to provide free overdraft protection and eliminate all overdraft and non-sufficient funds fees for all consumer banking customers. Overdraft protection is a valuable and convenient feature and can be an important safety net for families. |
Awards and Recognition
Our people, practices, and policies continue to be recognized by a wide range of publications and benchmarking institutes. These awards are often based on what our associates say about working at Capital One:
Fortune “100 Best Companies to Work For” | Human Rights Campaign Foundation “Corporate Equality Index” (100%)
| |
2021 PEOPLE “Companies That Care®” | CAREERS & the disABLED Magazine “Top 50 Employers”
| |
Great Place to Work’s “ | A “Best-of-the-Best Corporation for Inclusion” by the National Business Inclusion Consortium
| |
DiversityInc Top 50 Companies for Diversity | Hispanic Association on Corporate Responsibility (HACR) “Corporate Inclusion Index”
| |
Fortune “ | Black EOE Journal
| |
G.I. | Seramount “100 Best Companies” | |
Fortune Best Workplaces in Financial Services & Insurance™ | Fortune Best Workplaces for Women™ | |
2022 Military Spouse Friendly® Employers | 2022 Military Friendly® Supplier Diversity Program | |
NOD Leading Disability Employer | Seramount Best Companies for Multicultural Women | |
Wall Street Journal “Best-Managed Companies of 2021” | Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption® Best Adoption-Friendly Workplaces™ | |
Wall Street Journal “Top Companies for Innovation” |
48 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Our Community
The community programs and partnerships we pursue integrate Capital One’s core strengths with the skills, expertise, and experiences of others to make real and lasting change. We are an engaged partner with a network of nonprofit organizations and local leaders who develop workforce opportunity, support small and micro-businesses, develop affordable housing and work to improve financial well-being.
207,000+ hours | $ opportunity in our communities | Points of Light program highlighting America’s most community-minded companies |
Highlights of our community engagement efforts include the following:
∎ | Commitment to Socioeconomic Mobility. Capital One’s One Impact Initiative is an initial $200 million, five-year commitment to support growth in underserved communities and advance socioeconomic mobility by closing gaps in equity and opportunity. The Impact Initiative reflects Capital One’s core mission to |
∎ | In partnership with local public schools and organizations, our Capital One Coders program helps middle school students develop a greater interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) during a critical period in their education. Through the ten-week program, Capital One associate volunteers teach students in schools across the country about problem solving, teamwork, and the basic principles of software development and coding. More than 6,500 volunteers from Capital One have contributed more than 130,000 hours in pro bono volunteerism through the Capital One Coders program since its launch in 2014. |
∎ | We provide low-interest, community development loans to Community Development Finance Institutions to |
∎ | Additionally, in partnership with the Association for Enterprise Opportunity—a national organization that helps create economic opportunities for underserved entrepreneurs throughout the U.S.—Capital One is supporting 150 Black-owned businesses throughout the U.S. through $1.5 million in grant funding. Selected from a pool of more than 2,000 applicants, each business owner will receive $10,000 for their business. Of the businesses selected, 60% of the grants will go to support the resiliency of Black women-owned businesses and 30% of the grants will support the resiliency of the service industry. |
∎ | Other workforce development programs supported include Per Scholas, |
∎ | Affordable Housing and Community Development. We provide a comprehensive approach toaffordable housing, which is a central part of our focus on building healthy, thriving communities. We manage a $6 billion loan and investment portfolio focused on affordable rental housing through which we provide capital to finance affordable housing developments built by nonprofits, local agencies, and specialty developers. We bring financial expertise to developments with multiple public and private funding sources. |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 49 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
This allows us to address critical community needs through customization and innovation. Since the inception of the Community Finance team in 2007, nearly 161,000 households have benefited from units financed by Capital One, creating more than 185,000 jobs along the way. In 2021, Capital One’s Community Finance team invested $1.85 billion in affordable housing, financed over 11,000 affordable housing units and created more than 14,000 jobs. Additionally, we created the Blueprints to Buildings Fund in 2015, which provides grant support to nonprofit affordable housing developers. |
∎ | Additionally, we are committed to supporting residents of the properties we finance through Capital One Digital Access, an initiative launched in 2020 that seeks to create opportunities for growth through funding internet access, facilitating the donation of devices such as Chromebooks and tablets, and supporting training programs to help residents of all ages at properties financed by Capital One effectively connect with online resources. |
∎ | The program has funded 11 properties in Houma, LA, Los Angeles, CA, New Orleans, LA, New York, NY, Seattle, WA, and the Washington, D.C. area—impacting more than 1,000 families. Survey results indicate that before this program, 60% of those residents reported having low-grade or no internet. |
∎ | Commitment to Social Justice. |
∎ |
|
∎ |
|
|
|
|
∎ | Community Advisory Council. We continue to consult with our Community Advisory Council which directly engages our senior leadership with civic leaders, community representatives and consumer advocates from nearly 25 organizations, providing a variety of perspectives and facilitating informed dialogue on the company’s strategy, products and |
|
Our Environmental Footprint
Our environmental efforts are rooted in our sense of accountability for our actions, both to our stakeholders and society as a whole. We are committed to continuously improving the environmental sustainability of our business, to reducing the impact of our operations, and doing our part to using resources and materials thoughtfully.address climate change. We continue to engage our associates, customers, suppliers, and other stakeholders in our environmental efforts.
Annually purchase 100% renewable energy | Reducing greenhouse gas emissions |
Highlights of our environmental sustainability efforts including our 2020 climate program consist of the following:
by 20% by 2025 |
|
50 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Highlights of our environmental sustainability efforts include:
∎ | Reducing Greenhouse Gas (“GHG”) Emissions. Capital One has set GHG reduction targets for over a decade and we continue to evaluate our GHG reduction targets in light of the most recent climate science and industry or market best practice. We recognize that for the world to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 we must implement decarbonization strategies through real business change and innovations and offset only what is impossible to eliminate. |
∎ |
|
Supporting Renewable Energy. Capital One met its ongoing annual commitment to 100% renewable energy by |
∎ | Reducing Water Consumption. In 2020, we set a goal to reduce the amount of water we use at our facilities by 20% by 2025. |
∎ |
|
Paper Policy. We instituted a corporate paper policy in 2009 to increase the percentage of environmentally preferred paper in our supply chain. Our current goal is that 95% of the paper purchased for Capital One operations is certified by the Forest Stewardship Council or contains 30% post-consumer waste recycled content. |
∎ | Our Offices. We pursue the U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Silver (or higher) certification for all new office construction and comprehensive renovations. |
∎ |
|
∎ | Internal Price on Carbon. Capital One has established an internal price on carbon starting at $15.00 per metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent, or CO2e, for Scope 1, 2, and verified Scope 3 (in categories 1-14) emissions. This carbon fee creates a monetary value on emissions in our carbon footprint, which can enable greater visibility and incentive alignment in the future. |
Our Directors | Investor Relations | |||
Communicate with our directors, including our Lead Independent Director,
Mail correspondence to: Board of Directors / Lead Independent Director c/o Corporate Secretary’s Office Capital One Financial Corporation 1600 Capital One Drive McLean, Virginia 22102 |
Reach out to our Investor Relations team at any time
Email:
|
The Corporate Secretary will review all communications sent to the Board, the Lead Independent Director, committee chairs, or individual directors and forwards all substantive communications to the appropriate parties. Communications to the Board, the Independent Directors, or any individual director that relate to Capital One’s accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters are referred to the Chair of the Audit Committee and Capital One’s Chief Audit Officer. Other communications are referred to the Lead Independent Director. Please continue to share your thoughts or concerns with us. We value your input and your investment.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 51 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section II - Director Compensation
Section III - Director Compensation
Director Compensation Objectives
The Board approves the compensation for non-management directors based on recommendations made by the Committee.Compensation Committee (“Committee”). The Board has designed the director compensation program to achieve four primary objectives:
∎ | Attract and retain talented directors with the skills and capabilities to perpetuate Capital One’s success |
∎ | Fairly compensate directors for the work required in a company of Capital One’s size and scope |
∎ | Recognize the individual roles and responsibilities of the directors |
∎ | Align directors’ interests with the long-term interests of Capital One stockholders |
Management directors do not receive compensation for their service on the Board. In 2020,2021, Mr. Fairbank was Capital One’s only management director.
Director Compensation Procedures
The Committee annually reviews the compensation program for Capital One’s non-management directors. FW Cook provides competitive compensation data and director compensation program recommendations to the Committee to assist in determining its recommendation. The competitive compensation data includes information regarding the compensation (cash, equity, and other benefits) of the non-management directors within Capital One’s peer comparator group. The Committee considers this information and FW Cook’s recommendations, and finalizes a proposed director compensation structure for review and approval by the full Board, typically in the second quarter of each year. See the discussion under “Compensation Committee Consultant” beginning on page 41 for further information on the role and responsibilities of FW Cook and “Peer Groups” beginning on page 8793 for further information on the selection of the Company’s peer comparator group.
Based on theirits review of competitive market data and guidance from FW Cook in the second quarter of 2020,2021, the Committee determined that the Company’s director compensation program meets the objectives listed above.
Director Compensation Structure
On April 29, 2020,May 6, 2021, the Board approved a compensation program for Capital One’s non-management directors for the period from April 30, 2020May 6, 2021 through Capital One’s 2021our 2022 Annual Stockholder Meeting that is similar to the program for the preceding year. The compensation program consists of an annual cash retainer of $90,000 for service on the Board. Annual cash retainers for service as a member of the Board have not increased since 2013. In addition, directors receive annual cash retainers for committee service and for service as committee chairs and Lead Independent Director. Under the most recently approved director compensation program, the annual cash retainers are as follows:
∎ | Lead Independent Director: $50,000 |
∎ | Chair of the Audit Committee or Risk Committee: $60,000 |
∎ | Chair of the Compensation |
∎ | Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee: $35,000 |
52 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section III - Director Compensation |
∎ | Member of the Audit Committee or Risk Committee (other than the chair): $30,000 |
∎ | Member of the Compensation Committee or Governance and Nominating Committee (other than the chair): $15,000 |
∎ | Member of the Capital One, |
The annual cash retainer for service as Chair of the Compensation Committee reflects an increase of $5,000 over the previous year to recognize the demands of service as the Chair of the Compensation Committee and to further align compensation for such service with the Company’s peer group and the relative positioning of compensation for other committee chairs.
In addition, each non-management director serving on April 30, 2020,May 6, 2021, other than Mr. Leroy, received on such date an award of 2,7801,279 RSUs under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan with a grant date fair value of $180,033$200,087 valued at $64.76$156.44 per share.
|
|
Mr. Leroy retired from the Board, effective May 6, 2021, and did not stand for re-election. The RSU award reflects an approximate $20,000 increase in value over the previous year, which was intended to better align director compensation with the Company’s peer group. The RSUs were valued based on the fair market value of a share of Capital One common stock on the date of grant and vest one year from the date of grant, with the delivery of the underlying shares deferred until the director’s service with the Board ends in order to enhance the alignment of interests between our non-management directors and stockholders. On November 5, 2021, Ms. Detrick received a pro-rated award of RSUs under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan for service from the date of her appointment through our 2022 Annual Stockholder Meeting.
Under the Capital One Financial Corporation Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, non-management directors may voluntarily defer all or a portion of their cash compensation and receive deferred income benefits. Participants in the plan can direct their individual deferrals among ten investments available through the plan. Participating directors receive their deferred income benefits in cash when they cease serving as directors, upon certain other distribution events specified in the plan, or at such earlier time as authorized by the Committee. Upon a change of control, Capital One will pay to each director within 30 days of the change of control a lump sum cash payment equal to such director’s account balance as of the date of the change of control.
Capital One offers non-management directors the opportunity to direct a contribution of up to $10,000 annually from Capital One to charitable organization(s) of their choice. EightThirteen of the elevenfourteen non-management directors serving on April 30, 2020who served during 2021 elected to make such a charitable contribution in 2020.2021. In addition, all directors serving on April 30, 2020who served during 2021 were eligible, and ninefive directors elected, to participate in a Capital One broad-based charitable contribution program, which is available to Capital One associates, under which Capital One made a contribution of $5,000 per director to a charitable organization of their choice.
Directors also receive reimbursements for certain board-related expenses, including external educational seminars and travel-related costs incurred to attend Board meetings. Such reimbursements are not included as compensation for the directors in the table below.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 53 |
Section III - Director Compensation |
Directors of Capital One received the following compensation in 2020:2021:
Director Name
|
Fees Earned or
|
Stock
|
All Other Compensation(3)
| Total
|
Fees Earned or
|
Stock
|
All Other Compensation(3)
| Total
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank(4)
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ime Archibong(5)
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$75,000
|
$245,158
|
$10,000
|
$330,158
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aparna Chennapragada(6)
|
$135,000
|
$180,033
| $0
|
$315,033
|
$67,500
|
$—
| $3,701
|
$71,201
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Christine Detrick(7)
|
$37,500
|
$100,046
|
$10,000
|
$147,546
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Fritz Hackett
|
$220,000
|
$180,033
|
$15,000
|
$415,033
|
$220,000
|
$200,087
|
$15,000
|
$435,087
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter Thomas Killalea
|
$135,000
|
$180,033
|
$10,000
|
$325,033
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter T. Killalea
|
$135,000
|
$200,087
|
$10,000
|
$345,087
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eli Leenaars
|
$190,000
|
$180,033
|
$10,000
|
$380,033
| $190,000
|
$200,087
|
$10,000
|
$400,087
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pierre E. Leroy
| $165,000
|
$180,033
|
$15,000
|
$360,033
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pierre E. Leroy(8)
|
$82,500
|
$—
|
$19,701
|
$102,201
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
François Locoh-Donou
|
$112,500
|
$180,033
|
$15,000
|
$307,533
|
$132,500
|
$200,087
|
$15,000
|
$347,587
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter E. Raskind
|
$165,000
|
$180,033
|
$15,000
|
$360,033
|
$165,000
|
$200,087
|
$15,000
|
$380,087
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eileen Serra(7)
|
$ 97,500
|
$225,051
|
$15,000
|
$337,551
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eileen Serra
|
$150,000
|
$200,087
|
$10,000
|
$360,087
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mayo A. Shattuck III
|
$150,000
|
$180,033
|
$15,000
|
$345,033
|
$140,000
|
$200,087
|
$15,000
|
$355,087
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bradford H. Warner
|
$180,000
|
$180,033
|
$15,000
|
$375,033
|
$180,000
|
$200,087
|
$10,000
|
$390,087
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catherine G. West
|
$150,000
|
$180,033
|
$ 5,000
|
$335,033
|
$150,000
|
$200,087
|
$10,000
|
$360,087
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Craig Anthony Williams(5)
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$82,500
|
$245,158
|
$10,000
|
$337,658
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(1) | Represents cash payments made during |
|
|
(2) | Represents the grant date fair value of RSUs granted during |
(3) | Amounts shown represent contributions made by Capital One |
(4) | Management directors do not receive compensation for their service on the Board. In |
(5) |
|
(6) | Ms. Chennapragada resigned from the Board, effective March 18, 2021. Amounts shown represent cash compensation received for her service on the Board in 2021 through the date of her resignation. |
(7) |
|
(8) | Amounts shown represent cash compensation received by Mr. Leroy for his 2021 service through the date of his retirement from the Board. |
54 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Section III - Director Compensation |
The following table shows the number of RSUs outstanding and the total number of stock options outstanding for each non-management director as of December 31, 2020:2021:
Director Name | Number of Outstanding RSUs | Number of Outstanding Stock Options(1) | Number of Outstanding Restricted Stock Units | Number of Outstanding Stock Options(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ime Archibong | — | — | 1,654 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Aparna Chennapragada | 7,066 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Christine Detrick(2) | 646 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Fritz Hackett | 48,986 | — | 50,265 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Peter Thomas Killalea | 11,776 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter T. Killalea | 13,055 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Eli Leenaars | 5,655 | — | 6,934 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Pierre E. Leroy | 47,986 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
François Locoh-Donou | 5,223 | — | 6,502 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Peter E. Raskind | 22,817 | 10,425 | 24,096 | 7,709 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Eileen Serra | 3,265 | — | 4,544 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mayo A. Shattuck III | 48,986 | 15,085 | 50,265 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bradford H. Warner | 42,210 | — | 43,489 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Catherine G. West | 19,233 | — | 20,512 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Craig Anthony Williams(2) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Craig Anthony Williams | 1,654 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(1) | Prior to 2013, directors were offered the opportunity to elect to forgo their cash retainers for a grant of non-qualified stock options under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. The outstanding options expire ten years from the date of grant. In 2013, the Committee determined to no longer include stock options as part of the director compensation program. Upon termination from Board service (other than by removal for cause), a director will have the remainder of the full option term to exercise any vested stock options. |
(2) |
|
Capital One requires non-management directors to retain all shares underlying RSUs granted to them by Capital One until their service with the Board ends. The Board may grant an exception for any case where this requirement would impose a financial hardship on a director. In 2020,2021, no directors were granted an exception to this requirement for any outstanding awards of RSUs. Beginning in 2019, our non-management director stock ownership policies also require our non-management directors to hold a number of shares of Capital One’s common stock with a fair market value of at least five times the director’s annual cash retainer for Board service. For purposes of this policy, unvested RSUs and vested deferred RSUs held by a Board member are counted as shares when determining the number of shares owned. All of the directors are currently in compliance with this requirement.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section IV - Proposal 2: Advisory Approval of Capital One’s 2021 Named Executive Officer Compensation (Item 2 on Proxy Card)
We are offering to our stockholders a non-binding advisory vote to approve our 2021 named executive officer compensation, pursuant to Section III14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). While the vote is non-binding, the Board of Directors values the opinions that stockholders express through their votes and in any additional dialogue. The Board of Directors will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions.
As discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on page 57, our Board of Directors generally has provided compensation programs for the CEO and the other NEOs that are competitive with the market, performance-based, and transparent and that align with our stockholders’ interests over multiple time horizons. Our CEO’s and other NEOs’ compensation programs generally have consisted primarily of performance-based incentive opportunities, including multiple types of equity instruments with multi-year vesting schedules. The ultimate value of these equity-based awards is subject to Capital One’s sustained performance over time, both on an absolute basis and relative to our peers.
For the 2021 performance year, approximately 83% of the CEO’s total compensation is equity-based and at-risk to the performance of the Company’s stock price, and 100% of his compensation is deferred for a three-year period. As discussed under “NEO Compensation” beginning on page 84, under the 2021 NEO compensation program applicable to our other NEOs (other than our former CFO), approximately 51% of total compensation is provided through equity-based vehicles which were all at-risk based on the performance of the Company’s stock price and subject to vesting over multiple time horizons.
Additional information relevant to your vote can be found under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on pages 57 to 97 and “Named Executive Officer Compensation” section on pages 98 to 114.
We ask for your approval of the following resolution:
“Resolved, that Capital One’s stockholders hereby provide their advisory approval of the 2021 Named Executive Officer compensation as disclosed pursuant to the rules of the SEC in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table, the other compensation tables and the related notes and narratives in this proxy statement.”
The Board of Directors has resolved to hold annual advisory votes to approve executive compensation. Accordingly, the next advisory vote to approve executive compensation will occur at the 2023 Annual Stockholder Meeting, unless the Board of Directors modifies its policy on the frequency of holding such advisory votes.
***
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” approval, on an advisory basis, of our 2021 Named Executive Officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement.
56 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Key Topics Covered in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
CEO Compensation by Performance Year
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
NEO Compensation by Performance Year
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Performance-Based Vesting Provisions
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Misconduct Clawback Provisions
|
|
|
| |
Financial Restatement Clawbacks
|
|
|
| |
Use of Outside Consultants for NEO Compensation
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Pension and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Post-Employment Compensation Practices
|
|
|
| |
Stock Ownership and Retention Requirements
|
|
|
| |
Prohibition of Hedging, Speculative Trading Activities and Pledging
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 57 |
Capital One’s executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain, motivate, and reward leaders who can foster strong business results and promote the long-term success of the Company. The Compensation Committee (“Committee”) is responsible for, among other matters, developing, approving, monitoring, and managing the compensation of all of our executive officers, including the named executive officers defined below. Final decisions regarding the compensation of our executive officers, including our CEO, are made by the Committee and the Independent Directors. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis will review the compensation of the following executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table for 2020:2021:
Named Executive Officer | Position | |
Richard D. Fairbank
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | |
Andrew M. Young | Chief Financial Officer
| |
R. Scott Blackley
|
Former Chief Financial Officer(1) | |
Sanjiv Yajnik | President, Financial Services | |
Michael J. Wassmer | President, Card
| |
Frank G. LaPrade, III
|
Chief Enterprise Services Officer and Chief of Staff to the CEO
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(1) | As of March 1, 2021, Mr. Blackley no longer |
Except as otherwise indicated, as used throughout this proxy statement, “NEOs” means the CEO and the fourfive executive officers listed above, collectively.
20202021 Company Performance and Compensation Highlights
In 2020,2021, Capital One delivered solid financial and operating results in the face of unprecedented challenges and uncertainty. The extraordinary events of the COVID-19 pandemic shaped our 2020record financial results which reflected the the near-shutdown of the global economyand made significant progress on our long-term strategic objectives, including investments in transformation, talent, growth, and our own choicestechnology and digital capabilities. We reached all-time highs in revenues, profits, earnings per share, capital distribution, share price, and market value. After taking appropriate actions in 2020 to drive resiliencereduce risk, support customers, and manage risk. The significant shrinkagereact swiftly to uncertain economic and market conditions, we returned to growth in our Credit Card business and delivered solid growth across each of our other major lines of business that drove higher revenues. Growth was driven by deepening engagement with existing customers as well as an expansion in new customer relationships as we launched new products and experiences in our Retail Banking, Credit Card, and Auto Finance franchises. An increase in credit card loan balances and purchase volumes drove revenues in our Credit Card business to reach the industry,highest level in our history. Similarly, our Auto Finance business posted solid top-line originations and at Capital One, drove a decrease in Company revenues. In addition,loan growth. We continued to expand our national retail bank franchise with solid 6% deposit growth, and our Commercial Banking business outpaced the sharp economic downturn at the outsetgrowth of the pandemic, combined with significant uncertainty about future recovery,industry. Solid underwriting and strikingly strong credit results drove improvement in customer charge-offs and resulted in large additions toreleases from our reserve for expected credit losseslosses. Operating expenses grew at a slower rate than revenues, leading to an improvement in operating efficiency ratio(1)(2)(3) by 213 basis points to 45.0%. Operating efficiency ratio, net of adjustments, improved by 133 basis points to 44.7%.
In addition, management stayed keenly focused on delivering shareholder value. Strong capital levels and record earnings supported about $8.7 billion of capital distribution to common stockholders through a combination of share repurchases and common dividends, including a special dividend in the first half ofthird quarter and an increase in the quarterly common dividend from $0.40 to $0.60 beginning in the third quarter. Capital One’s share price ended the year and lower earnings in 2020 as compared to 2019. However, cautious consumer behavior, government stimulus, customer forbearance programs, and our own underwriting choices resulted in historically low realized credit losses. Capital One showed only moderate changes across other measures of financial performance compared to 2019, and each of our major lines of business remained resilient under stress. We reimagined how we worked, accommodated customer and associate needs, and played an important role in sustaining economic activity for our customers and communities.at $145.09, up 46.8% from year-end 2020. Our stockholders saw their investment in Capital One decrease slightly in 2020; however, our stock price outpaced most large banks andgrowth significantly outperformed the largest benchmark of our bank peers, the KBW Bank Index, and our TSR outperformed the KBW Bank Index by ten11 percentage points.
We also made substantial progress on our technology transformation. Our long-term investments in technology, talent, infrastructure, data, products and capabilities are driving innovation and will increasingly support growth and efficiency over time. In 2020, these long-term investments continued to drive results as we exited all of our data centers, strengthened our risk and control environment and executed on key strategic imperatives. Our multi-year transformation combined with strong execution during the year enabled the Company’s swift and effective response to the pandemic, including a seamless transition to remote work for almost all of our non-branch and non-essential associates, and proved critical as customers increasingly relied on digital solutions for engagement and servicing.
58 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section V - |
During 2020,We achieved exceptional 2021 financial performance while continuing to invest in transformation, talent, growth, and our long-term technology capabilities. Our long-term investments in modern infrastructure, technology tools, and enterprise transformation are driving growth, speed-to-market, and improvements to the customer experience. In 2021, we also invested significantly in marketing and advertising to support new products and experiences across our major consumer franchises and welcomed millions of new customers to Capital One, deepenedOne. We earned a number of external awards and accolades related to our engagement with existing customers,products and customer experiences and continued to be recognized for our customer advocacy scores remain strong.satisfaction and advocacy. Net Promoter Scores, which measure how likely a customer is to recommend our products and services, reached record highs across a number of our major businesses. Despite increased investments in these areas, we began to harness the power of our migration to the cloud and realize cost benefits of our exits from data centers. Our technology capabilities delivered significant cost savings in areas like fraud. We attracted talentedalso strengthened our risk and control environment and continued to enhance cybersecurity.
We invested heavily in recruiting, developing, and retaining talent and we welcomed thousands of new associates and invested in newhave maintained strong associate benefitmorale and well-being programs such as increased family care time and expanded health coverage for COVID-related illnesses.engagement despite ongoing stresses related to the pandemic. We supported non-profit organizations and communities through both philanthropy and service. We also continued to makemade progress on our diversity and inclusion efforts, relatedand self-reported surveys of inclusion remain very high. We were recognized as one of the best-managed companies in America and ranked #9 on Fortune magazine’s prestigious Best Places to growing executive representation, increasing diversity awarenessWork list, our highest ranking ever. We invested in the community through our Capital One Impact Initiative, putting particular emphasis on advancing socioeconomic mobility and capabilities among associates and leaders, and supporting community partners who specialize in racial equity. Capital One continuesWe became the first of the top-ten retail banks in the United States to be recognized as beingannounce a great place to work, and associate morale and engagement, despite the stress and challenges of 2020, hit record highs.no-fee overdraft policy for all consumer checking customers. We believe our portfolio of structurally-attractive businesses, andcoupled with our disciplinedlong-term investments in growthtechnology, talent, and transformation, will result in a company with the scale, brand,digital capabilities, and talent to positionpositions us well for future growth and deliver sustainable financial performance andthe creation of long-term value to stockholders.stockholder value.
Each year the Committee and the Independent Directors review and evaluate the Company’s qualitative and quantitative performance and make determinations regarding the compensation of our named executive officersNEOs based on Capital One’s pay-for-performance philosophy. The Committee’s top priority is to implement a compensation program that aligns the interests of our named executive officersNEOs with the interests of our stockholders. See “Consideration of Stockholder Feedback and 20202021 Say on Pay Vote” beginning on page 6165 for information regarding enhancements made to our executive compensation programs and disclosures as a result of stockholder feedback. The Committee also seeks to directly link the compensation of the NEOs with the Company’s performance, and the executives’ contributions to that performance over appropriate time horizons, while supporting safety, soundness and appropriately balancing risk. The Committee and the Independent Directors have the flexibility to adjust compensation decisions from year to year to take into account Company and individual performance, as well as evolving market practices and external benchmarks.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 59 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Company Performance Highlights
The tables below show our reported year-over-year performance across key financial metrics (dollar amounts in billions other than per share amounts)(1):
Diluted EPS(2) | Average Loans Held for Investment | |
|
| |
Net Revenue(2) |
Operating Efficiency Ratio(2) | |
|
| |
ROTCE(4) | Tangible Book Value / Common Share | |
In particular, the Committee and the Independent Directors specifically considered the following quantitative and qualitative Company performance when awarding compensation for the 2021 performance year to our NEOs(1):
∎ | Diluted EPS of $26.94, an increase of 420% from 2020, driven by strong growth in loans and revenues, exceptional credit performance, and the significant decrease to the allowance for credit losses. 2021 EPS was more than double the next-highest level of annual earnings in Capital One’s history. |
∎ | Net Revenue of $30.4 billion, an increase of 6.7% from 2020 and the highest in the Company’s history. This revenue increase outpaced the industry average and was driven primarily by record purchase volume growth in our Domestic Card business and very strong loan growth in our Auto Finance business. |
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
| |
The Committee and the Independent Directors considered the Company’s performance on both a quantitative and qualitative basis and specifically recognized the following when awarding compensation for the 2020 performance year to our NEOs(1):
|
|
|
∎ | Credit Risk Management. |
∎ | Operating Efficiency Ratio |
∎ | Efficiency Ratio(2)(3) of 54.4% in 2021, an increase from 52.8% in 2020, |
∎ | ROTCE |
∎ |
|
∎ | Continued Balance Sheet Strength with a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio(5) of 13.1% in 2021, down from 13.7% in 2020 |
|
|
∎ |
|
∎ | Risk Management and Control Environment. We invested heavily in talent, technology, and improvements to business processes |
∎ | Execution Against Strategic Imperatives.We continued to make significant but disciplined investments to |
The Committee believes that the actions taken by the NEOs throughout 2020 contributed greatly to the Company’s strong results and have positioned the Company to deliver resilient, sustainable financial performance over the long term.
∎ | Elimination of Overdraft Fees. In 2021, we became the first top-ten retail bank to provide free overdraft protection and eliminate all overdraft and non-sufficient funds fees for all consumer banking customers. Overdraft protection is a valuable and convenient feature and can be an important safety net for families. This decision serves as yet another example of how we are reimagining banking and helping customers succeed. |
∎ | Progress on ESG Initiatives. We continued to make progress on ESG initiatives in 2021, launching our first external ESG Fact Sheet. We introduced our first external sustainability website and we established |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 61 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
internal initiatives to track our own greenhouse gas inventory and that of our suppliers. We also established an engagement platform to encourage associates to take action on climate change. In addition, as part of the five-year, $200 million Impact Initiative commitment, we facilitated $78 million in grants to local, regional, and national non-profits, building our reputation with external stakeholders and helping advance socioeconomic mobility in our communities. See “Environmental, Social, and Governance Practices” beginning on page 46 for more information regarding our policies, programs and strategies related to ESG and our 2021 accomplishments. |
(1) | The Committee considers these metrics to be key financial performance measures in its assessment of the Company’s performance, including certain non-GAAP measures. While certain of our non-GAAP measures are widely used by investors, analysts and bank regulatory agencies to assess the capital position of financial services companies, they may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. See Appendix A for our definition and reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the applicable amounts measured in accordance with GAAP. |
(2) |
|
(3) |
|
(4) | ROTCE is a non-GAAP measure that the Committee believes is indicative of the Company’s performance and helps investors and users of our financial information understand the effect of these adjustments on our selected reported results and provide alternate measurements of our performance. See Appendix A for our definition and reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to the applicable amounts measured in accordance with GAAP. |
(5) | Calculated under the Basel Pillar III Standardized Approach, as of December 31 of each year. |
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Compensation Highlights
We believe that our NEO compensation programs balance risk and financial results, reward NEOs for their achievements, promote our overall compensation objectives, and encourage appropriate but not excessive risk-taking. Our compensation programs are structured to encourage our executives to deliver strong results over the short term while making decisions that create sustained value for our stockholders over the long term.
CEO | NEO (other than
| |
|
∎ | No CEO Cash Salary. Our CEO does not receive a cash salary and 100% of his compensation is deferred for at least three years. |
∎ | The Payout of 71% of CEO Year-End Incentive Compensation Determined by Formula.71% of our CEO’s year-end incentive compensation for the |
∎ | 25% of CEO |
∎ | Awards Based on Company and Individual Performance.All NEOs receive incentive awards based on Company and/or individual performance. For |
∎NEO Compensation Is Primarily Equity-Based and Determined after Performance Year-End. |
∎All Equity and Equity-Based Awards Contain Performance and Recovery Provisions. All equity awards contain performance and recovery provisions that are designed to further enhance alignment between pay and performance and to balance risk. See “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” beginning on page |
∎ | No Compensation Program or Company Performance Adjustments for the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic.No adjustments were made to our executive compensation programs or the evaluation of our Company performance for the |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
Section V - |
20202021 Compensation Decisions
The information below is presented to show how the Committee and the Independent Directors viewed compensation awarded for the 2020 performance year2021 and is not intended as a substitute for the Summary Compensation Table, which is required by the SEC. See “2020“2021 Summary Compensation Table” beginning on page 9298 for a description of how the information above differs from the Summary Compensation Table. The Committee and the Independent Directors approved the following awards attributable to the 20202021 performance year for our NEOs:
20202021 CEO Performance Year Compensation.Mr. Fairbank’s total compensation for performance year 20202021 was $18.75$27.5 million a decrease of 5% compared to performance year 2019, and consisted of:
∎ | RSUs granted in |
∎ | Year-End Incentive Award totaling |
∎ | Performance |
∎ | Restricted Stock Units. |
∎ | Deferred Cash Bonus. A deferred cash bonus of |
Name | Cash Salary | Long-Term Incentive | Year-End Incentive | Total | Cash Salary | Long-Term Incentive | Year-End Incentive | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash- Settled RSUs | Deferred Cash Bonus | Cash- Settled RSUs | Performance Shares(1) | Cash-Settled RSUs | Deferred Cash Bonus | Cash-Settled RSUs | Performance Shares(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank | $— | $1,750,070 | $3,000,000 | $2,000,053 | $12,000,093 | $18,750,216 | $— | $1,750,060 | $4,550,000 | $3,000,055 | $18,200,225 | $27,500,340 |
(1) | $ |
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section V - |
20202021 NEO Performance Year Compensation. The compensation for NEOs (other than the CEO) for 20202021 performance is set forth below. The compensation received by these named executive officersNEOs consisted of: (i) cash salary and (ii) a year-end incentive granted in February 20212022 in recognition of the Company’s and each executive’s performance in 2020.2021. The year-end incentive consisted of a cash incentive and a long-term incentive comprised of stock-settled RSUs and performance shares. The performance shares provide an opportunity for the executive to receive from 0% to 150% of a target number of shares of the Company’s common stock based on the Company’s performance over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2021.2022.
Name | Cash Salary | Cash Incentive | Long-Term Incentive
| Total | Cash Salary | Cash Incentive | Long-Term Incentive | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock- Settled RSUs | Performance Shares | Stock- Settled RSUs | Performance Shares | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. Scott Blackley | $1,082,000 | $1,353,000 | $1,351,469 | $1,621,741 | $5,408,210 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew M. Young | $894,815 | $1,687,500 | $1,125,076 | $1,350,032 | $5,057,423 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | $1,106,000 | $1,383,000 | $1,382,338 | $1,658,806 | $5,530,144 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. Scott Blackley(1) | $233,046 | $— | $— | $— | $233,046 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | $1,136,231 | $2,139,822 | $1,495,653 | $1,794,754 | $6,566,460 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | $1,100,000 | $1,376,000 | $1,374,565 | $1,649,455 | $5,500,020 | $1,218,462 | $2,311,110 | $1,770,583 | $2,124,551 | $7,424,706 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | $1,088,000 | $1,360,000 | $1,492,520 | $1,791,069 | $5,731,589 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | $1,155,538 | $2,175,822 | $1,595,156 | $1,914,127 | $6,840,643 |
(1) | Mr. Blackley left the Company in March 2021 and ceased to be our CFO as of March 1, 2021 and therefore did not receive year-end incentive compensation for the 2021 performance year. |
Consideration of Stockholder Feedback and 20202021 Say on Pay Vote
The Committee and the Board value the input of our stockholders and strive to foster a constructive dialogue with stockholders on matters of executive compensation and corporate governance. At our 20202021 Annual Stockholder Meeting, 69%93% of our stockholders supported our executive compensation program by approving our non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation (“20202021 Say on Pay Vote”). Recognizing thatThough the 2020Committee recognized the 2021 Say on Pay voteVote reflected some level of investor concernstrong support for the Company’s executive compensation programs, the Committee remains committed to stockholder engagement. In 2021, we continued to strengthen our outreach to stockholders to maintain strong lines of communication with our stockholders and shared stockholders’ perspectives with the Committee and the Board.
In 2020,2021, management directly engaged with stockholders representing approximately 70% of our outstanding shares in over 150170 interactions with investors. See “Stockholder Engagement Program” beginning on page 35 for more information. From this outreach, the Committee and the Board gained valuable insight into our investors’ views about the Company, including our executive compensation programs. The Committee and the Independent Directors considered these views and feedback in approving year-end incentive awards for 20202021 and structuring and approving the 20212022 compensation programs for the NEOs. For 2021,
In recent years, as a direct result of the feedback received from investors, during the 2020 outreach, the Committee made the following changesenhancements to our executive compensation programs and disclosure:
∎ | Linked a Portion of CEO Compensation Directly to Relative TSR. Several stockholders expressed that TSR is an important element of Company performance and asked that the Company consider a more direct link between CEO compensation and the Company’s TSR over time. Beginning with the 2020 performance year, the Committee and the Independent Directors determined to award a portion of the CEO’s |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 65 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
∎ | Disclosure of Performance Share Awards Realized Compensation. Several stockholders expressed a desire for clearer information regarding the realized pay associated with the performance share awards granted to the NEOs. We added disclosure regarding the settlement value resulting from the performance share awards that vested |
|
|
∎ | Enhanced Disclosure of Compensation Committee Decision Processes. We received suggestions from stockholders that we provide additional details regarding the processes utilized by the Compensation Committee to make compensation decisions. We enhanced our description of the Committee and Independent Directors processes for considering Company performance throughout the year and determining the level and pay mix associated with the year-end incentive awards granted to our NEOs. See “Compensation Committee Process to Determine Year-End Incentive” on page |
∎ | Increased the Size and Diversity of Our Peer Group.We received feedback from stockholders regarding the composition of our Board-approved peer group used to determine the level and components of NEO compensation. In July 2020, the Committee and the Independent Directors increased the size and diversity of the Company’s peer group to add seven additional peers, including diversified financial institutions and payment companies with whom we compete for executive talent. See “Peer Groups” beginning on page |
In recent years, as a result of the feedback received from investors, the Committee has made the following enhancements to our executive compensation programs and disclosure:
∎ | Increased Alignment of CEO Pay and Performance. Beginning with the 2019 performance year, the Committee and the Independent Directors increased the alignment of CEO compensation with Company performance and stockholder interests by decreasing the amount of the CEO’s compensation awarded at the beginning of the performance year such that the vast majority of CEO compensation is tied to a year-end evaluation of CEO and Company performance. The Committee and the Independent Directors believe that this structure further aligns Mr. Fairbank’s compensation with that of the Company’s peers and provides a greater opportunity for the Committee and the Independent Directors to assess the Company and the CEO’s performance after the completion of the performance year. In addition, this structure enhances the Committee and the Independent Directors’ ability to incorporate feedback from stockholders received during the year to ensure that the CEO’s performance year compensation appropriately reflects the Company’s compensation philosophy and principles and business results. See |
|
|
The Committee remains committed to active and ongoing stockholder engagement and continues to engage with our stockholders with respect to executive compensation matters and other governance matters.
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Our Compensation Principles and Objectives
Highlights of Our 20202021 Compensation Programs
What We Do | What We Don’t Do | |||||||||||
✓ | We provide the majority of NEO compensation as long-term, equity, or equity-based compensation | û | We do not pay a cash salary to our CEO | |||||||||
✓ | We provide our CEO with compensation consisting entirely of equity or equity-based awards and deferred payouts | û | We do not guarantee incentive awards | |||||||||
✓ | We link a portion of our CEO year-end incentive to relative TSR | û | We do not permit our NEOs to place their Company securities in a margin account or to pledge their Company securities as collateral for a loan | |||||||||
✓ | We grant our NEOs performance-based cash incentive and equity-based awards | û | We do not provide compensation or awards to our NEOs on terms and conditions that are more favorable than compensation and awards granted to other executive officers | |||||||||
✓ | We apply risk balancing so as not to jeopardize the safety and soundness of Capital One | û | We do not permit our NEOs to engage in short sales, hedging transactions, or speculative trading in derivatives of our securities | |||||||||
✓ | We apply performance thresholds to NEO grants to determine the amount of equity delivered at vesting | û | We do not reprice stock options | |||||||||
✓ | We reduce performance share award values at vesting if the Company does not achieve positive Adjusted ROTCE | û | Generally, we do not utilize employment agreements, and none of our current NEOs has an employment agreement | |||||||||
✓ | We have clawback provisions in our equity award agreements to promote accountability | û | We do not provide excise tax gross-up payments | |||||||||
✓ | We require both a change of control event and a termination before we accelerate the vesting of equity and equity-based awards (double trigger) | |||||||||||
✓ | We have an independent compensation consultant advising the Committee | |||||||||||
✓ | We use a mix of pre-established relative and absolute performance metrics in our incentive awards |
All of the terms and features described above, including the performance-based vesting and clawback provisions, apply to awards granted to all executive officers and not just the NEOs.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 67 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Compensation Program Objectives
Capital One’s executive compensation program has four primary objectives.
Strongly link pay and performance by providing compensation based on both business and individual performance while appropriately balancing risk
Capital One emphasizes pay-for-performance at all organizational levels. Typically, as an executive’s level of responsibility increases, so does the proportion of the executive’s pay that is subject to performance criteria. Therefore, the NEOs have the highest proportion of their pay directly linked to Company and individual performance, as compared to other associates. Awards made to the NEOs in February 20212022 for the 20202021 performance year were based on Company and individual performance, and on demonstrating specific leadership competencies assessed through a comprehensive performance management process that included an individual assessment specifically designed to evaluate the degree to which the executive balanced risks inherent to his or her role. The Chief Risk Officer compiled these risk assessments and the Chief Human Resources Officer
|
|
reviewed the assessments for the NEOs. Separately, the Chief AuditorAudit Officer compiled and reviewed the risk assessment for the Chief Risk Officer. The Committee considered the assessments in making its determinations regarding individual performance and compensation levels.
Align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders
The Committee and the Independent Directors are committed to designing incentive compensation programs that reward individual and Company performance and that are aligned with the creation of stockholder value over the long term. Beginning with the 2020 performance year, a portion of the CEO’s performance share award will beis linked to the Company’s relative TSR over a three-year period. Because NEO compensation is primarily delivered through deferred, equity-based vehicles that vest over multiple time horizons, the NEOs have a significant stake in the success of the Company. The Committee and the Independent Directors also have the flexibility to adjust compensation decisions from year to year to take into account the Company’s performance and evolving market practices. In addition, we have established specific stock ownership policies that the NEOs must meet and stock retention provisions applicable to certain equity awards.
Reward performance over multiple time horizons
Our compensation programs are structured to encourage our executives to deliver strong results over the short term while making decisions that create sustained value for our stockholders over the long term. For 2020,2021, approximately 84%83% of the CEO’s total compensation was equity-based and at-risk to the performance of the Company’s stock price, and 100% of his compensation was deferred for a three-year period. In addition, approximately 55%51% of total compensation for NEOs other than the CEO and the former CFO was provided through equity-based vehicles which were at-risk to the performance of the Company’s stock price and subject to vesting over multiple time horizons. The use of deferred, equity-based compensation vehicles with multi-year vesting terms advances our goal of aligning the ultimate value realized by the NEOs with the performance of the Company’s stock over time because the value of these compensation vehicles increases and decreases based on the performance of the Company’s stock price in both current and future periods.
Attract, retain, and motivate top executive talent
To attract, retain, and motivate exceptional leaders, we believe that compensation opportunities at Capital One must be competitive with the marketplace for talent. The Committee and the Independent Directors strive to preserve a competitive pay mix and total target compensation values in the executive compensation program, as well as provide competitive total rewards based on our selected peer group. See “Peer Groups” beginning on page 8793 for information regarding how the Committee and the Independent Directors utilized the Company’s peer group in determining executive compensation.
68 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Use of Judgment
The Committee believes that exercising judgment is an important element in reaching balanced compensation decisions that are consistent with our strategy and reward both current-year performance and sustained long-term value creation, and supplements other aspects of Capital One’s pay-for-performance philosophy. By applying informed judgment, the Committee seeks to mitigate the risks associated with a rigid and strictly formulaic compensation program, which could unintentionally create incentives for our executives to focus only on certain performance metrics, encourage imprudent risk-taking, and not provide the best long-term results for stockholders. In addition, the use of judgment allows the Committee to respond to changes in economic conditions, our operating environment, and other significant factors that may affect the long-term performance of Capital One or our lines of business. The use of judgment also allows the Committee to adjust compensation based on factors that would not be appropriately reflected by a strictly formulaic approach, such as risk management, championing companyCompany values, and the discrepancies between absolute and relative performance levels or recognition of individual performance levels. There are certain performance conditions for which the Committee would not exercise judgment, for example where the minimum performance metric is not met in the award of performance shares or if the performance-based vesting requirements applicable to certain other stock-settled awards are not met.
|
The Committee is actively engaged throughout the year and members of the Committee regularly meet with management regarding the Company’s executive compensation programs and practices. In addition, the Committee receives updates, at least quarterly, at the Board level, regarding the Company’s financial and strategic performance, including information regarding the Company’s performance against the four categories of quantitative and qualitative performance factors related to: financial and operating performance, governance and risk management, strategic performance, and winning with our customers and associates (the “Performance Factors”) that are used by the Committee to determine the year-end incentive awards to the NEOs.
The Committee met sixthree times in 2020,2021, with each meeting concluding with an executive session without management present. In addition, the Committee held twothree joint meetings with the Board in 2020,2021, and an additional joint meeting was held at the beginning of 20212022 to assess Company and NEO performance and determine the year-end incentive awards for the NEOs. While specific topics may vary from meeting to meeting, the following graph describes the typical annual cycle of the Committee’s compensation-related activities.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 69 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Chief Executive Officer Compensation
20202021 CEO Compensation Program and Components
The Committee annually reviews and approves the form, timing, and amount of compensation for the CEO and makes recommendations regarding the CEO compensation structure to the Independent Directors for final approval. The Committee believes that the CEO’s compensation should be entirely at-risk based on his and the Company’s performance. The Committee considers the Company’s and the CEO’s historical performance and seeks to effectively align the CEO’s interests with the interests of our stockholders over time, support safety and soundness, and appropriately balance risk.
|
|
When determining the structure of Mr. Fairbank’s compensation program for the 20202021 performance year, the Committee and the Independent Directors considered:
∎ | the Company’s performance during |
∎ | the Company’s performance in |
∎ | the structure and amount of compensation awarded to the CEOs of the Company’s peers; |
∎ | the structure and amount of Mr. Fairbank’s compensation awards in prior years; |
∎ | the Company’s risk profile and the time horizon over which the deferred, equity-based awards will vest; |
∎ | the ultimate value of Mr. Fairbank’s deferred, equity-based awards (which will depend on the Company’s and Mr. Fairbank’s performance over time as well as the value of Capital One’s common stock at the time the awards |
∎ | the feedback received from stockholders regarding the Company’s executive compensation programs and the compensation awarded to Mr. Fairbank. |
After considering these factors, in January 2020,February 2021, the Committee and the Independent Directors determined that Mr. Fairbank’s 20202021 compensation program would continue to consist of two components: (i) an equity or equity-based award granted at the beginning of the performance year; and (ii) an opportunity for a year-end incentive award, with the amount granted based on CEO and Company performance in 2020.2021 (granted in February 2022). Any year-end incentive award granted to the CEO (i) would continue to consist primarily of a performance share award, under which he may receive 0% to 150% of a target number of shares of the Company’s common stock based on the Company’s performance over a three-year period; and (ii) may also consist of deferred cash, an equity-based award, or both. In this manner, the CEO’s compensation will continue to be completely at-risk based on the Company’s and Mr. Fairbank’s performance, and all CEO compensation continues to be subject to a three-year deferred vesting or payout. As in prior years, Mr. Fairbank did not receive any cash salary in 2020.2021.
The Committee and the Independent Directors determined not to establish a total target compensation amount for Mr. Fairbank’s 20202021 compensation program to further align Mr. Fairbank’s compensation program with that of the Company’s peers and increase the Committee and the Independent Directors’ ability to directly link the CEO’s compensation to the Company’s performance as well as the CEO’s contributions to that performance over the short, medium, and long term.
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section V - |
2021 CEO Compensation Components
The chart below represents the components and pay mix of the CEO’s compensation for the 2021 performance year. For performance year 2021, the award of RSUs granted at the beginning of 2021 and the year-end incentive (granted in February 2022) accounted for 6% and 94%, respectively, of the CEO’s total compensation. The year-end incentive was delivered in the form of performance shares, deferred cash, and cash-settled RSUs, representing 66%, 17%, and 11%, respectively, of the CEO’s total performance year compensation.
The table below summarizes the components of the CEO’s compensation program for the 20202021 performance year.
Compensation Element | Timing of Award | Basis for Award | Vesting Schedule | Performance and Recovery Provisions | ||||||||
Base Salary | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| |||||||
RSUs | February 2021 |
| Incentive for Long-Term Company Performance | Vest at the end of the three-year performance period; | ∎ Performance-based vesting provisions
∎ Misconduct clawback | |||||||
Year-End Incentive Opportunity | Financial Performance Shares | February | Reward for | Vest at the end of the three-year performance period based on achievement of financial performance factors | ∎ Performances share reduction
∎ Misconduct clawback
∎ Financial restatement clawback | |||||||
TSR | Vest at the end of the three-year performance period based on relative TSR | ∎ Misconduct clawback | ||||||||||
Year-End Incentive RSUs | Reward for | Vest at the end of the three-year performance period; | ∎ Performance-based vesting provisions
∎ Misconduct clawback
| |||||||||
Deferred Cash Bonus | Payout deferred for three years | ∎ Misconduct clawback |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
| 2022 PROXY STATEMENT
| 71
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
See “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” beginning on page 8490 for more details regarding the performance and recovery provisions applicable to each of the elements of compensation that the Committee approved for the 20202021 performance year for the NEOs.
2020 CEO Compensation Components
The CEO’s compensation for the 2020 performance year consisted of two components: (i) an award of RSUs granted at the beginning of the performance year; and (ii) a year-end incentive award granted in February 2021 based on the Company’s and the CEO’s performance in 2020. The chart below represents the components and pay mix of the CEO’s compensation for the 2020 performance year. For performance year 2020, the award of RSUs granted at the beginning of 2020 and the year-end incentive accounted for 9% and 91%, respectively, of the CEO’s total compensation. The year-end incentive was delivered in the form of performance shares, deferred cash and cash-settled RSUs, representing 64%, 16%, and 11%, respectively, of the CEO’s total compensation.
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
A portion of Mr. Fairbank’s 20202021 compensation consisted of RSUs granted as an incentive for long-term Company performance. The RSU award vests in full at the end of a three-year performance period beginning on January 1, 2020,2021, settles in cash based on the Company’s average stock price over the fifteen15 trading days preceding the vesting date, and is subject to performance-based vesting provisions and clawback provisions, each as described in more detail under “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” beginning on page 84.90.
Year-End Incentive Opportunity
A portion of Mr. Fairbank’s 20202021 compensation consisted of an opportunity for a year-end incentive based on the Committee’s evaluation of the Company’s performance during 20202021 and Mr. Fairbank’s contributions to that performance. For purposes of the year-end incentive, the Committee and the Independent Directors assess the Company’s performance based on the Performance Factors. The Committee believes that these factors appropriately reflect and balance near-term performance and long-term success for the Company’s customers, associates, and stockholders. The Company’s 20202021 performance against the Performance Factors is described in more detailed under “2020“2021 Year-End Incentive Determination” beginning on page 73.76.
The year-end incentive, if awarded, (i) will consist of an award of performance shares, and (ii) may also consist of deferred cash, an equity-based award, or both as determined by the Committee and the Independent Directors at the time the award is granted. The performance share awards, the equity-based award, and the deferred cash bonus each have a three-year cliff-vesting schedule and are subject to clawback provisions. The performance-based vesting provisions applicable to the equity-based award and the clawback provisions applicable to all three awards are described in more detail under “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” beginning on page 84.90.
The Committee and the Independent Directors believe the performance shares strengthen the alignment between the compensation of our NEOs and the Company’s performance by linking the ultimate payout to pre-established absolute and/or relative performance goals, with the value of the payout ranging from 0% to 150%. The ultimate value of the performance shares upon vesting is determined by the Company’s performance through its stock price. The CEO year-end incentive award consists primarily of performance shares. For the other NEOs, the performance share awards represent an anticipated range of between approximately 30% and 55% of total target compensation. For 2020,2021, the performance share awards were granted in two forms:
|
|
∎ | Total Shareholder Return Performance Share Units (“TSR Performance Shares”) that vest based on the Company’s TSR relative to the Performance Share Peers over a three-year period. The TSR Performance Shares were granted only to the CEO for the |
72 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
The metrics and formulas applicable to each of the performance share awards are described in more detail below under “Performance Share Award.”
Performance Share Award Metrics
. Each year, the Committee and the Independent Directors evaluate the structure and amount of the equity awards provided to our NEOs, including the Company performance metrics applicable to such awards.
Financial Performance Shares. A portion of the performance shares granted to our CEO and all of the performance shares granted to the NEOs other than the CEO for 2020 were granted in the form of Financial Performance Shares. The Committee and the Independent Directors began awarding the Financial Performance Shares in 2018 in order to further align our NEOs’ interests with those of our stockholders, as well as based on market practices and peer comparator information and in response to stockholder feedback. The Committee and the Independent Directors determined that the Financial Performance Share awards granted to the CEO and the other NEOs would be based on the following two metrics:
Common Dividends + Growth of Tangible Book Value per Share (D+TBV) | ∎ D+TBV rewards strong operational results, balanced stewardship of capital, and long-term stockholder value creation by measuring the value distributed to stockholders (common dividends per share) and the growth of company value created for common stockholders (tangible book value per share).
∎ D+TBV is calculated as the three-year average of the ratios, expressed as a percentage, of (i) the Company’s tangible book value per share at the end of each year within the performance period, plus total common dividends per share paid during such year, to (ii) the Company’s tangible book value per share at the beginning of each corresponding year within the performance period.
|
| ||
Adjusted Return on Tangible Common Equity (Adjusted ROTCE) |
∎ Adjusted ROTCE rewards balanced capital management and stewardship while capturing current and historical business performance and profitability as compared to the size of our stockholders’ investment in the Company. ROTCE is broadly used in banking as a key performance indicator and component in peer executive compensation programs.
∎ Adjusted ROTCE is calculated as the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of (i) the Company’s net income available to common stockholders, excluding, on a tax-adjusted basis, the impact of impairment, amortization and re-measurement of intangible assets, to (ii) the Company’s average tangible common equity.
|
|
|
The Committee and the Independent Directors believe that these two performance metrics, in combination, provide a rigorous measurement of Company performance by balancing the creation of long-term stockholder value and the returns generated on stockholders’ investment in the Company. To
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 73 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
appropriately incentivize long-term value creation in line with the Company’s strategic goals, two-thirds of each Financial Performance Share award will vest based on D+TBV, and one-third of each performance share award will vest based on Adjusted ROTCE.
TSR Performance Shares. Beginning in 2020, in response to stockholder feedback and to further align the interests of the CEO with the interests of stockholders, the Committee and the Independent Directors determined that a portion of the performance share awards granted to the CEO would be based on the Company’s TSR relative to the Performance Share Peers.
Total Shareholder Return (TSR) |
∎ TSR measures the change in the value of an investment by stockholders in the common shares of Capital One and is derived from the change in the Company’s stock price plus the value of any common dividends paid by the Company.
∎ TSR is calculated as the change in the value of the applicable common stock over the Performance Period, taking into account the reinvestment of common dividends on the ex-dividend date. The calculation of the stock price appreciation component of TSR = (Ending Stock Price – Beginning Stock Price) / Beginning Stock Price where (i) “Beginning Stock Price” means the average Stock Price for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the first day of the Performance Period; (ii) “Ending Stock Price” means the average Stock Price for the 20 trading days immediately preceding and including the last day of the Performance Period; and (iii) “Stock Price” means the closing price for the day as reported on the applicable exchange or market.
|
The Committee and the Independent Directors believe that linking a portion of the CEO’s year-end incentive to the Company’s TSR over a three-year period increases the alignment of the CEO’s compensation with the value delivered to stockholders over time. TSR is viewed by investors as a key indicator of the Company’s performance. The TSR Performance Shares create a direct link between CEO compensation and the Company’s stock price and value creation over time. In addition, a significant portion of CEO pay is delivered through equity-based awards, the ultimate value of which will increase or decrease based on the performance of the Company’s stock price in both current and future periods.
Performance Share Award Peer GroupGroup.
For both the Financial Performance Shares and the TSR Performance Shares, the Company’s performance on each metric is assessed over the three-year period relative to the Performance Share Peers which are the Company’s peers inconstituents of the KBW Bank Index, excluding three non-traditional banks that do not focus on lending to consumers and businesses (“KBW Index”). The Committee believes that the KBW Index is an appropriate index against which to assess the Company’s performance because it reflects institutions of a comparable size, risk profile, and business mix to the Company. After the end of the three-year performance period, the Committee will certify the Company’s performance and issue the corresponding number of shares of the Company’s common stock, if any, in accordance with the relative performance hurdles illustrated below. Each of the metrics will be calculated as indicated above, with the Committee excluding from such calculations the initial effects of changes in tax laws, accounting principles or regulations, or other laws or provisions affecting the reported results if the Committee determines that such adjustments are appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan as necessary or appropriate to comply with applicable laws, rules, or regulations.
Performance Share Award FormulaFormula.
For all performance share awards, the ultimate number of performance shares earned at vesting is determined by a formula based on relative performance and/or absolute performance (in the form of a performance share
|
|
reduction) measures, with the value of the payout ranging from 0% to 150%. of the target performance shares. In addition, the value of the performance shares upon vesting is determined by the Company’s stock price performance. All performance share awards are subject to the Relative Performance Measure (as described below). Only the Financial Performance Shares are subject to the Absolute Performance Measure (as
74 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
(as described below). The award agreements applicable to all performance share awards permit the Committee to exclude the initial effects of changes in tax laws, accounting principles or regulations, or other laws or provisions affecting the reported results if the Committee determines that such adjustments are appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan or necessary or appropriate to comply with applicable laws, rules, or regulations.
Relative Performance Measure.Measure - Financial Performance Shares and TSR Performance Shares. Each year, the Committee and the Independent Directors assess the Company’s performance on the basis of the performance share award metrics relative to the Performance Share Peers. The Company’s TSR or positive Adjusted ROTCE and D+TBV, as applicable, must be at least at the 25th percentile of the Performance Share Peers for any performance shares to vest; target payout will be achieved at the 55th percentile of the Performance Share Peers; and the maximum payout can only be achieved if the Company performs at the 80th percentile of the Performance Share Peers.Peers or greater. If the Company’s TSR or Adjusted ROTCE and D+TBV, as applicable, is under the 25th percentile, none of the shares will vest and no payout will be made with respect to the award. After the end of the three-year performance period, the Committee will certify the Company’s performance and issue the corresponding number of shares of the Company’s common stock, if any, in accordance with the graph below. Payouts will range between the values shown below for performance that falls between the points labeled in the graph.
Absolute Performance Measure (Performance Share Reduction) - Financial Performance Shares. The Financial Performance Shares are subject to a performance share reduction. Under the performance share reduction feature under which the number of shares issued at settlement will be reduced if the Company’s Adjusted ROTCE for one or more fiscal years completed during the performance period is not positive, no matter how well the Company performs compared to the Performance Share Peers. In each year that the Company does not achieve positive Adjusted ROTCE, the executive will forfeit 50% of that year’s worth of performance shares. If the Company’s Adjusted ROTCE is not positive in each of the three fiscal years in the performance period, the executive will forfeit the entire award of performance shares. See “Performance Share Reduction” on page 8691 and “Financial Restatement Clawbacks” on page 8692 for more information. The table below shows potential performance share reduction amounts based on the Company’s Adjusted ROTCE performance.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Number of Years During Performance ROTCE Is Not Positive
| Reduction in Number of Units Vesting and | |||
Zero | No reduction | |||
One |
One-sixth reduction | |||
Two
|
One-third reduction | |||
Three |
Entire award forfeited | |||
Equity-Based AwardAward.
A portion of the CEO year-end incentive may be granted in the form of an equity-based award based on the Company and CEO performance for the preceding performance year. For the 2018, 2019, 2020, and 20202021 performance years, the Committee and the Independent Directors have awarded RSUs to Mr. Fairbank. The vesting of the RSUs is deferred for three years and settlement is in cash based on the Company’s average stock price over the fifteen trading days preceding the vesting date. The RSUs are subject to performance-based vesting and clawback provisions, each as described in more detail under “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” beginning on page 84.90.
Deferred Cash BonusBonus.
A portion of the CEO year-end incentive may be granted in the form of a deferred cash bonus based on the Company and CEO performance for the preceding performance year. Any deferred cash bonus award is mandatorily deferred for three years into the Company’s VNQDCP.
20202021 CEO Compensation Decisions
For the 20202021 performance year, the Committee and Independent Directors determined the amount and form of the CEO’s compensation using a balanced approach in the context of our compensation principles and objectives, which encompass a pay-for-performance philosophy. The Committee and the Independent Directors believe that this pay-for-performance structure, which emphasizes variable pay, incentivizes the CEO to invest for the long-term, grow resiliently, manage risk, and deliver sustained stockholder value. In addition, the Committee and the Independent Directors believe this approach is in the best interests of the stockholders and provides the Committee and the Independent Directors a greater opportunity to determine the amount and form of compensation based on CEO and Company performance and stockholder feedback as well as being able to respond to then-current business conditions, the dynamic nature of executive compensation practices, and developments in our business and industry. For 2020 in particular, this structure allowed the Committee and Independent Directors to respond to the unique circumstances of the year and incorporate stockholder feedback received during the year that led to an award of a portion of the CEO’s year-end incentive in the form of performance shares that vest entirely based on the Company’s TSR.
20202021 Restricted Stock Unit Award
In January 2020,February 2021, the Committee and the Independent Directors awarded Mr. Fairbank 17,12915,534 RSUs, which had a total grant date value of approximately $1.75 million. The RSU award vests in full on February 15, 2023,2024, settles in cash based on the Company’s average stock price over the fifteen15 trading days preceding the vesting date, and is subject to performance-based vesting provisions and clawback provisions, each as described in more detail under “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” beginning on page 84.90.
2021 Year-End Incentive Determination
Compensation Committee Process to Determine Year-End Incentive
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section V - |
2020 Year-End Incentive Determination
Compensation Committee Process to Determine Year-End Incentive
In February 2021,2022, the Committee and the Independent Directors assessed the Company’s performance with respect to the Performance Factors set forth below under “Company Performance Assessment” and Mr. Fairbank’s contributions to that performance as described under “CEO Contribution to Company Performance.” Following the performance assessment, the Committee and Independent Directors determined the total 20202021 performance year compensation to be awarded to Mr. Fairbank would be $18.75$27.5 million, taking into account the $1.75 million in RSUs awarded to him at the beginning of the performance year. The remaining total compensation to be awarded to Mr. Fairbank for the 20202021 performance year was awarded in the form of the year-end incentive award totaling $17.0$25.75 million.
20202021 Year-End Incentive Awards
After considering the Company’s compensation philosophy and objectives, including the desire to align Mr. Fairbank’s interests with that of the Company’s stockholders and reward performance over multiple horizons, the Committee and the Independent Directors determined that the pay mix for the year-end incentive award would include the following three vehicles:
Performance Shares. 71% of the year-end incentive (66% of Mr. Fairbank’s total 2021 performance year compensation) was awarded in the form of performance shares, with a total grant date value of approximately $18.2 million, under which Mr. Fairbank may receive from 0% to 150% of a target number of 122,734 shares of the Company’s common stock based on the Company’s performance over a three-year period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024.
|
∎ | Financial Performance Shares. |
∎ | TSR Performance |
In order for the CEO to realize the target value of this award, the Company must achieve above-median financial performance and TSR on a relative basis versus the Performance Share Peers. In addition, the full value of the Financial Performance Share award remains at risk unless a threshold level of Company performance is achieved. The Committee believes that awarding a substantial portion of the year-end incentive in performance shares directly aligns the CEO’s interests with those of stockholders and encourages the CEO to focus on sustainable, long-term success and avoid excessive risk-taking.
Restricted Stock Units. 12% of the year-end incentive (11% of Mr. Fairbank’s total 2021 performance year compensation) was awarded in the form of 20,231 RSUs with a total grant date value of approximately $3.0 million.
Deferred Cash Bonus.18% of the year-end incentive (17% of Mr. Fairbank’s total 2021 performance year compensation) was awarded in the form a $4.55 million deferred cash bonus. |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
Section V - |
|
Company Performance Assessment
In February 2021,2022, the Committee assessed the Company’s 2021 quantitative and qualitative performance based on the Performance Factors. The Company performance assessment is used to determine the 2020 performance year2021 year-end incentive awards for all of the NEOs and compensation targets for the NEOs other(other than the CEOCEO) for the 20212022 performance year. In particular, the Committee considered:
Performance Factor
|
2020 Performance(1)
| |||||||||||||||||||
| ∎ Earnings and EPS
∎ Revenue
∎ Expense Management
∎ ROA and ROTCE
∎ Capital Management
∎ TSR | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||||
Net Revenue(2)
|
|
$28.5 billion
|
|
|
$28.7 billion
|
| ||||||||||||||
Pre-Provision Earnings
|
|
$13.5 billion
|
|
|
$13.1 billion
|
| ||||||||||||||
Diluted EPS
|
|
$5.79
|
|
|
$12.09
|
| ||||||||||||||
ROA
|
|
0.7%
|
|
|
1.5%
|
| ||||||||||||||
ROTCE(3)
|
|
6.2%
|
|
|
14.4%
|
| ||||||||||||||
∎ Net Revenue of $28.5 billion, net of adjustments, a decline of 0.9% from 2019
∎ Net Income of $3.0 billion and diluted EPS, net of adjustments, of $5.79
∎ Operating efficiency ratio(2) of 46.0%, net of adjustments for 2020, compared to 44.8% in 2019
∎ Tangible Book Value/Share growth (including the effect of common dividends) of 6.0%
∎ Allowance coverage ratio of 6.19% at December 31, 2020, compared to 2.71% at December 31, 2019
∎ Paid a quarterly common stock dividend of $0.40 per common share in the first two quarters of 2020 and $0.10 per common share in the last two quarters
∎ Stock price decreased by 3.9% in 2020, outpacing the largest benchmark of bank peers, the KBW Index, which was down 13.6%. TSR declined 2.7%, increased 4.2%, and increased 50.0% over one-, three-, and five-year periods ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the TSR of the KBW Index, which declined 10.3%, increased 0.5%, and increased 53.1% over the same time periods
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Financial and Operating Performance |
| |||||||||||||||
Performance Factor | 2021 Performance(1) |
| ||||||||||||||
∎ Earnings and EPS
∎ Revenue
∎ Expense Management
∎ ROA and ROTCE
∎ Capital Management
∎ TSR | ||||||||||||||||
2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
Net Revenue | $30.4 billion | $28.5 billion | ||||||||||||||
Pre-Provision Earnings | $13.9 billion | $13.5 billion | ||||||||||||||
Diluted EPS(2) | $27.11 | $5.79 | ||||||||||||||
ROA | 2.9% | 0.7% | ||||||||||||||
ROTCE(3) | 28.4% | 6.2% | ||||||||||||||
One-Year TSR | 49.3% | (2.7%) | ||||||||||||||
Operating Efficiency Ratio(2) | 44.7% | 46% | ||||||||||||||
∎ Net Revenue of $30.4 billion, an increase of 6.7% from 2020
∎ Net Income of $12 billion, a 300% increase from 2020
∎ Diluted EPS, net of adjustments, of $27.11, a 368% increase from 2020
∎ Operating efficiency ratio of 44.7%, net of adjustments for 2021, an improvement from 46% in 2020
∎ Tangible Book Value/Share (including the effect of common dividends) of $99.74, an increase of 15.8%
∎ Allowance coverage ratio of 4.12% at December 31, 2021, compared to 6.19% at December 31, 2020
∎ Paid a quarterly common stock dividend of $0.40 per common share in each of the first two quarters of 2021 and $0.60 per common share in each of the last two quarters. We also paid a special one-time common dividend of an additional $0.60 per common share in the third quarter
∎ Total capital distribution was about $8.7 billion, the highest in the Company’s history
∎ Stock price increased 46.8% in 2021, outpacing the largest benchmark of bank peers, the KBW Bank Index, which increased 35%. TSR was 49.3%, 101.4%, and 80.9% over one-, three-, and five-year periods, respectively, through the period ended December 31, 2021. This compares to the TSR of the KBW Bank Index, which was 38.3%, 68.8%, and 64.8% over the same time periods
∎ The market valuation of Capital One increased 36.6% to $61.75 billion in the calendar year 2021
|
| |||||||||||||||
(1) | The Committee considers these metrics to be key financial performance measures in its assessment of the Company’s performance, including certain non-GAAP measures. While certain of our non-GAAP measures are widely used by investors, analysts and bank regulatory agencies to assess the capital position of financial services companies, they may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. See Appendix A for our definition and reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the applicable amounts measured in accordance with GAAP. |
78 |
| 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
(2) | Diluted EPS and operating efficiency ratio are presented on |
(3) | ROTCE is a non-GAAP measure that the Committee believes is indicative of the Company’s performance and helps investors and users of our financial information understand the effect of these adjustments on our selected reported results and provide alternate measurements of our performance. See Appendix A for our definition and reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to the applicable amounts measured in accordance with GAAP. |
|
|
|
| |||||||
∎ Credit performance and underwriting quality
∎ Risk management and compliance
∎ Cybersecurity ∎Balance sheet strength
∎ Board and executive governance | ∎ Exceptional credit results, with a net charge-off rate of
∎ Provision for credit losses of $1.9 billion for 2021 compared to $10.3 billion
∎ Common equity Tier 1 capital ratio(1) of
∎ Significant investment in risk management capabilities, technology, talent,
∎ Continued enhancing cybersecurity and technology risk management, including completing management remediation of all milestones within the regulatory consent orders related to the 2019 cybersecurity incident ∎Active | |||||||
(1) | Calculated under the Basel Pillar III Standardized Approach, as of December 31, |
Strategic Performance | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
∎ Progress toward achievement of long-term strategy
∎ Execution against corporate imperatives
∎ Disciplined investments in infrastructure, technology and growth initiatives
∎ CEO leadership and performance of executive team | ∎ ∎ Launched new products and
∎ Continued
∎ Grew our national bank franchise through digital product innovation and brand advertising, including deposit growth of ∎ Expanded and enhanced our best-in-class digital experiences, including our mobile app, Auto Navigator platform, and Capital One Shopping ∎ Marketing expenses increased 78% to $2.9 billion as we debuted new products and took advantage of market opportunities across our customer franchise
| |||||||
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Winning with Our Customers and Associates | ||||||
Performance Factor | 2021 Performance | |||||
∎ Recruitment and development of world-class talent
∎ Associate engagement and retention
∎ Customer advocacy and brand
∎ Diversity, inclusion and belonging
∎ Corporate reputation and community engagement
∎ Live our values and champion our culture | ∎ Continued focus on investing in brand and attracting
∎ ∎ Earned the highest customer Net Promoter Scores in the Company’s history across a number of products and experiences, reflecting strong customer advocacy ∎ Announced free overdraft protection and the elimination of all overdraft and non-sufficient funds fees for all consumer banking customers, the first top-ten retail bank to make this move
∎ Continued to make progress on diversity, equity, and inclusion,
∎ ∎ Launched the Capital One Insights Center, which in its inaugural Fall publication explored disparate financial health outcomes during the pandemic
∎
∎ We maintained high associate engagement, inclusion, and morale as measured in our regular enterprise-wide surveys
|
|
|
CEO Contribution to Company Performance
In determining the CEO’s 20202021 year-end incentive awards, the Committee and the Independent Directors also assessed Mr. Fairbank’s contributions to the Company’s 20202021 performance. Under Mr. Fairbank’s leadership,stewardship, Capital One navigated through an unprecedentedachieved record financial results and demonstrated strong operating and risk performance. Mr. Fairbank successfully balanced and integrated Capital One’s investments in growth and long-term capabilities while achieving outstanding financial results and stewardship of stockholder capital.
In 2021, Capital One achieved record revenues, net income, earnings per share, and capital distribution. Our stock price ended the year up 46.8% from the year end 2020 and our one-year TSR outpaced the largest benchmark of changepeer banks, the KBW Bank Index, by 11 percentage points. After taking swift and uncertainty while delivering solid financial and operating performance and continued resilience, and respondeddecisive actions in 2020 to the needs of customers, associates and communities duringrespond to the COVID-19 pandemic and resultingsubsequent economic downturn. In addition,downturn, Mr. Fairbank guided the Company through difficult near-term operating decisions while continuing to drive and support long-term strategic priorities and investments. Those include attracting and developing top talent, investingled Capital One in technology and digital capabilities, growing Capital One’s major business franchises, strengthening the risk and control environment, prudently managing costs, and continuing to make necessary and disciplined investments to position the Company to deliver sustainabledelivering exceptional financial performance and long-term growth and value to stockholders.
The Committee and the Independent Directors believe thatacross all key lines of business while advancing the Company’s financial results reflect the unprecedented events of 2020long-term strategy and the appropriate choices made by Mr. Fairbank and the senior executive leadership of the Company to increase resilience, conservatively manage capital and liquidity, and to reduce risk. They acknowledged, however, that the Company’s earnings for the year decreased significantly compared to 2019 ascapabilities. As a result of an increase to the allowance for future potential credit losses. The Committee and the Independent Directors also recognized that Mr. Fairbank’s visionary leadership and oversight of thein driving transformational investments in technology, talent, infrastructure, data, products, and customer experience, our businesses thrived in 2021. We returned to growth in our Credit Card business and achieved record earnings and purchase volume. We launched, refreshed or scaled many products and services across our franchises and created new capabilities drove the Company’s swift and effective response to the pandemiccustomer experiences across our Credit Card and positionedConsumer Banking businesses. We delivered strong growth in both retail deposits and auto loan originations, and achieved record loan and deposit balances, revenues, and pre-provision income in our Commercial Banking business. Mr. Fairbank was also instrumental in positioning the Company to make the strategic choice to completely eliminate overdraft fees for the opportunities that lie ahead. all consumer checking customers.
80 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
In addition, Capital One accelerated its momentum toward the achievement of its long-term strategic objectives, including leveraging technology investments to drive results and innovation, adapting to a complex and changing competitive environment, and strengthening risk management and controls. Mr. Fairbank also continued to model and reinforce the Company’s culture, values, and valuesmission through strategic business choices and with key stakeholders, and led the Company’s pandemic response and social justice initiatives withincluding associates, partners, suppliers, investors and the community.investors. During 2021, Capital One recruited great talent in a competitive market and maintained high associate engagement and morale, as measured in our regular enterprise-wide surveys, and was recognized for being a great place to work.
The Committee and the Independent Directors also took into account Mr. Fairbank’s unique role as the founder of Capital One, as well as peer comparator group CEO compensation levels and structure, including the tenures of each of the peer companies’ CEOs, and the varying degrees of success those CEOs have had in leading their respective companies in 20202021 and over time. The Committee and the Independent Directors also recognized that Mr. Fairbank does not receive a cash salary, and 100% of his compensation is deferred for at least three years.
The Committee believesand the Independent Directors believe that the actions taken by Mr. Fairbank and the other NEOs throughout 2020, including their swift and decisive response to the COVID-19 pandemic,2021 drove the Company’s solidincredible financial results and advanced the Company’s long-term strategy.journey toward achieving its strategic objectives. These actions also harnessed the unique market opportunities that followed the initial pandemic, and have positioned Capital Onethe Company to regain momentum following the pandemic-driven challenges of 2020, towards deliveringdeliver strong and sustainable future financial performance achieving the Company’s strategic goals, and resilience while creating enduring value over the long term.
CEO Compensation by Performance Year
Below is a table showing Mr. Fairbank’s compensation awards as they are attributable to the performance years indicated. Mr. Fairbank’s actual total compensation for performance year 20202021 was $18.75 million, a 5% decrease compared to performance year 2019.$27.5 million. See “Year-End Incentive Opportunity” beginning on page 6872 for additional information regarding the year-end incentive granted to Mr. Fairbank for performance year 2020.2021.
Performance Year | Cash Salary | Long-Term Incentive | Year-End Incentive(1)
| Total | Cash Salary | Long-Term Incentive
| Year-End Incentive(1)
| Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash- Settled RSUs | Performance Shares | Deferred Bonus | Cash- Settled RSUs | Performance Shares(1) | Cash-Settled RSUs | Deferred Cash Bonus | Cash- Settled RSUs | Performance Shares(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | $— | $1,750,060 | $4,550,000 | $3,000,055 | $18,200,225 | $27,500,340 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | $— | $1,750,070 | $— | $3,000,000 | $2,000,053 | $12,000,093 | $18,750,216 | $— | $1,750,070 | $3,000,000 | $2,000,053 | $12,000,093 | $18,750,216 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | $— | $1,750,012 | $— | $3,000,000 | $2,000,080 | $13,000,009 | $19,750,101 | $— | $1,750,012 | $3,000,000 | $2,000,080 | $13,000,009 | $19,750,101 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | $— | $— | $10,500,065 | $4,200,000 | $2,800,019 | $— | $17,500,084 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | In 2019, the Committee and the Independent Directors increased the percentage of the CEO’s total target compensation tied to a year-end evaluation of CEO and Company performance from 40% to 90% and shifted the grant of performance shares to the year-end incentive. Beginning with performance year 2020, the CEO no longer has a target total compensation amount. |
|
|
Comparison to Summary Compensation Table Information
The table above is presented to show how the Committee views Mr. Fairbank’s compensation and to which year the compensation awards relate. This table differs substantially from the Summary Compensation Table beginning on page 9298 and is therefore not a substitute for the information required in that table. There are two principal differences between the Summary Compensation Table and the table above:
∎ | The table above reports equity-based awards as compensation for the performance year for which they were awarded, even if the award was granted in one year based on performance for the prior year. The Summary Compensation Table reports equity-based awards in the year in which they were granted. As a result, the performance share awards and cash-settled RSUs granted to Mr. Fairbank in |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 81 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
∎ | The Summary Compensation Table reports the change in pension value and non-qualified deferred compensation earnings and all other compensation. These amounts generally are not a result of current-year compensation determinations and are not shown above. |
Settlement of Performance Shares Granted in February 2018January 2019
In February 2018,January 2019, the Committee and the Independent Directors granted the NEOs Financial Performance Shares under which the NEOs could receive in 20212022 between 0% to 150% of a target number of shares of the Company’s common stock based on the Company’s financial performance between January 1, 20182019 and December 31, 20202021 (the “2018“2019 Financial Performance Shares”). Each year, the Committee and the Independent Directors assess the Company’s relative performance based on the applicable performance share award metrics relative to the Performance Share Peers over the three-year performance period, and where appropriate, apply a performance share reduction based on the Company’s absolute performance. See “Performance Share Award Formula” beginning on page 7074 for a description of the performance share award formula applicable to the 20182019 Financial Performance Shares.
Effective as
Based on the Committee and Independent Directors’ assessment of January 1, 2020, the Company adopted the Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) standard, a new accounting requirement by the Financial Accounting Standards Board that changed the recognition and measurement of credit losses for loans and debt securities. This adoption impacted the Company’s reported level of allowance for credit lossesrelative and shareholder’s equity, as described inabsolute performance over the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed withthree-year performance period, the SEC on May 1, 2020 (the “CECL Impact”). Specifically, the Company and the Performance Share Peers recognized a one-time increase or decrease in the allowance for credit losses and a corresponding reduction or increase in shareholder’s equity as of January 1, 2020 based upon the specific facts and circumstances of each institution. The CECL Impact applies to the 20182019 Financial Performance Shares as wellsettled at 150% of their target value. Two-thirds of each Financial Performance Share award vested based on D+TBV, and one-third of each performance share award vested based on Adjusted ROTCE. The Company performed at the 90th percentile relative to the KBW Index with respect to D+TBV and at the 85th percentile relative to the KBW Index with respect to Adjusted ROTCE. The Company achieved positive Adjusted ROTCE for each of the three years of the performance such that the 2019 Financial Performance Shares granted in 2019 and 2020settled without a performance share reduction. See “Absolute Performance Measure (Performance Share Reduction) — Financial Performance Shares” beginning on page 75 for which the the 2020 performance year is included in the applicable performance period (collectively, the “CECL Impacted Performance Shares”).
After considering that: (i)more information regarding the performance share awards granted to the NEOs are designed to reward Company performance over a three-year period of time; (ii) the CECL Impact was not anticipated at the time the awards were made and did not reflect the Company’s underlying business performance in 2020, and; the award agreementsreduction feature applicable to the CECL Impacted2019 Financial Performance Shares explicitly contemplate and permitShares.
As permitted under the exclusion of the initial effects of changes in accounting principles (as described under “Performance Share Award Peer Group” on page 70);applicable award agreements, the Committee determined it appropriate to evaluate Tangible Book Value (as defined on page 6973 under “Performance Share Award Metrics”) performance for the Company and the Performance Share Peers in fiscalfor performance year 2020, for purposes of the settlement of the CECL Impacted2019 Financial Performance Shares, in a manner that excludes, on a one-time basis, the CECL Impact. See “2020 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table on page 97 for disclosure regardinginitial impact of the outstanding performance share awards.Company’s adoption of the Current Expected Credit Loss standard, a new accounting requirement adopted in 2020 by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. The Compensation Committee and the Independent Directors did not make any adjustments to the Company’s performance associated with the performance shares or other compensation to reflect the impacts to the Company’s financial performance as a result of the economic downturn and other effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
82 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Based on the Committee and Independent Directors’ assessment of the Company’s relative and absolute performance over the three-year performance period, the 2018 Financial Performance Shares settled at 116.67% of their target value. Two-thirds of each Financial Performance Share award vested based on D+TBV, and one-third of each performance share award vested based on Adjusted ROTCE. The Company performed at the 90th percentile relative to the KBW Index with respect to D+TBV and at the 50th percentile relative to the KBW Index with respect to Adjusted ROTCE. The Company achieved positive Adjusted ROTCE for each of the three years of the performance such that the 2018 Financial Performance Shares settled without a performance share reduction. See “Absolute Performance Measure (Performance Share Reduction) — Financial Performance Shares” beginning on page 71 for more information regarding the performance share reduction feature applicable to the 2018 Financial Performance Shares.
As part of the CEO compensation program, the Committee and the Independent Directors also approved certain other programs intended to support Mr. Fairbank’s productivity, well-being, and security. These programs provide some level of personal benefit and are not generally available to all associates. For 2020,2021, these programs included the following:
∎ | Executive term life insurance with a benefit level of $5 million |
∎ | The ability to participate in a comprehensive voluntary annual health screening |
∎ | Maintenance for Mr. Fairbank’s home office |
∎ | Personal security detail that also provides transportation service for Mr. Fairbank |
∎ | The monitoring and maintenance of an electronic home security system |
∎ | Personal use of the corporate aircraft |
The Committee has determined that the nature and value of these programs are comparable to those offered to similarly situated executives at our peers. Additional details on these programs can be found in the “Named Executive Officer Compensation” section beginning on page 92.98.
20212022 CEO Compensation Program
Each year, the Committee and the Independent Directors perform a comprehensive review of the CEO compensation program in consideration of Company and CEO performance, peer comparator group performance, historical pay information, market practices and trends, the market for talent, stockholder and other stakeholder feedback, and other relevant points of information that the Committee and Independent Directors consider appropriate to assess the program and CEO compensation level and pay design. The Committee and the Independent Directors continue to believe that the CEO compensation program aligns Mr. Fairbank’s compensation with the Company’s performance over the appropriate time horizons, effectively balances risk, and supports the Company’s executive compensation goals and principles.
|
|
In February 2021,2022, the Committee and the Independent Directors reviewed the 20202021 compensation structure utilized for Mr. Fairbank and determined that, for 2021,2022, the CEO compensation program would be unchanged and continue to consist of two components:
∎ | An Equity or Equity-Based Award. The Committee and the Independent Directors granted to Mr. Fairbank |
∎ | A Year-End Incentive Opportunity.Mr. Fairbank will have an opportunity for a year-end incentive award, with the amount granted based on CEO and Company performance in |
In this manner, the CEO’s compensation will continue to be completely at-risk based on the Company’s and Mr. Fairbank’s performance, and all CEO compensation continues to be subject to a three-year deferred vesting or
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 83 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
payout. As in prior years, Mr. Fairbank will not receive any cash salary in 2021.2022. Any deferred cash or equity-based award will pay out or vest after a three-year deferral period. The Committee and the Independent Directors will use their judgment to determine whether to make the year-end incentive award, the form of the award and the value of the award. The Committee and the Independent Directors will base these determinations on the Committee’s evaluation of the Company’s performance in 20212022 relative to the same factors described earlier under “Year-End Incentive Opportunity” beginning on page 72, related to financial and operating performance, governance and risk management, strategic performance and winning with our customers and associates, and Mr. Fairbank’s contribution to that performance.
In this section, “NEO Compensation,” the term “NEO” refers to the NEOs other than the CEO.
20202021 NEO Compensation Program and Components
2021 NEO Compensation Program
The Committee annually reviews and approves the form, timing, and amount of compensation for all of our executive officers, including those who are ultimately reported as NEOs, and makes recommendations to the Independent Directors for final approval. The Committee takes into account each NEO’s historical performance, individual roles and responsibilities, and contributions expected from each NEO in the future as well as the recommendations of the CEO, including his assessment of each NEO’s performance. In January 2020,February 2021, the Committee and the Independent Directors approved the 20202021 compensation program, which is designed to be consistent with the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy.
Based on market practices and trends, a review of peer comparator information and in response to stockholder feedback, beginning with the 2018 performance year, NEO total target compensation is composed of 20% base salary, 25% cash incentive opportunity, and 55% long-term incentive opportunity, which will consist of performance shares and stock-settled RSUs as determined by the Committee. The Committee believes that this pay mix balances stockholder interests while effectively rewarding and motivating key talent.
For the 20202021 performance year, the NEOs (other than our former CFO) received a mix of approximately 45% cash and 55% equity-based compensation as follows: cash salary, determined at the beginning of the performance year; and a cash incentive and long-term incentive awards, determined following the end of the performance year based on the Committee’s evaluation of Company and individual performance during the past year. The long-term incentive awards granted for the 20202021 performance year consisted of performance shares (approximately 30% of total target compensation) and stock-settled RSUs (generally 25% of total target compensation). All of the equity awards vest over a three-year period. The terms of the performance share awards are substantially similar to the terms of the Financial
|
|
Performance Share awards granted to our CEO in 2020,2021, as described earlier under “Performance Share Awards” beginning on page 68.72. The table below summarizes the NEO compensation program that the Committee and the Independent Directors approved for the 20202021 performance year.
84 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
2021 NEO Compensation Components
The total target compensation of the NEOs for the 2021 performance year was composed of base salary awarded at the beginning of the performance year and a year-end incentive opportunity that, if granted, may consist of equity awards in the form of performance shares and/or RSUs, and a cash incentive. The chart below shows the 2021 components of NEO compensation as an approximate percentage of NEO total target compensation:
The table below summarizes the components of the NEO compensation program for the 2021 performance year:
Compensation Element |
Timing of Award Determination | Basis for Award | Vesting Schedule | Performance and Recovery Provisions | ||||
Base Salary
|
|
Overall experience, skills, performance, knowledge, and market data
|
Paid in cash throughout the performance year
|
Not applicable
| ||||
Cash Incentive
|
February
|
Reward for Company Performance
|
Paid in cash in February
|
Not applicable
| ||||
Performance Shares
|
February
|
Reward for Individual Performance and Incentive for Long- Term Company Performance
|
Vest at the end of the 3-year performance period based on achievement of performance factors
|
∎ Performance share reduction
∎ Misconduct clawback
∎ Financial restatement clawback
| ||||
Stock-Settled RSUs
|
3-year ratable vesting
|
∎ Performance-based vesting provisions
∎ Misconduct clawback
|
(1) | Following an annual enterprise-wide compensation review, the Committee and the Independent Directors approved an increase of approximately 4% to 2021 total target compensation for each of Messrs. LaPrade, Wassmer, and Yajnik, effective July 25, 2021. |
See “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” beginning on page 8490 for more details regarding the performance and recovery provisions applicable to each element of compensation that the Committee approved for the 20202021 performance year for the NEOs.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 85 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Based on the above framework, the Committee and the Independent Directors determined the 20202021 total target compensation for each NEO by considering the following factors:
∎ | each NEO’s performance relative to the Company’s strategic objectives |
∎ | Capital One’s financial performance |
∎ | the NEO’s appropriate management of risk |
∎ | the role and qualifications of each NEO (for example, the NEO’s scope of responsibility, experience, and tenure and the demonstration of competencies consistent with the Company’s values and the ability to deliver strong, sustainable business results) |
∎ | appropriate internal pay differentials and the desire to foster teamwork and collaboration |
∎ | historical pay levels |
∎ | available role-specific market compensation data from peer comparator companies |
∎ | available information on the structure of compensation packages for senior executives at peer comparator companies |
∎ | market trends in executive compensation (for example, current rates of pay and the prevalence and types of incentive vehicles) |
∎ | the overall structure of the executive compensation program |
|
|
2020 NEO Compensation Components
The total target compensation of the NEOs for the 2020 performance year was composed of base salary awarded at the beginning of the performance year and a year-end incentive opportunity that, if granted, may consist of equity awards in the form of performance shares and/or RSUs, and a cash incentive. The chart below shows the 2020 components of NEO compensation as an approximate percentage of NEO total target compensation:
Base Salaries
Beginning with the 2018 performance year, the Committee decreased the percentage of total target compensation paid to the NEOs in the form of a base salary from 35% to 20% and chose to defer a larger portion of each NEO’s compensation until the end of the year. In January 2020,2021, the Committee and the Independent Directors approved 20202021 cash base salaries for the NEOs ranging from $1.12$894,815 to $1.22 million, to $1.14 million.which include subsequent adjustments made as a result of an enterprise-wide compensation review. Individual details for each NEO are provided in the table below showing compensation by performance year.
Year-End Incentive Awards
A portion of the NEOs’ 20202021 compensation consisted of an opportunity for a year-end incentive award based on Company and the NEO’s individual performance in 2020.2021. This award, if granted, may consist of long-term incentive awards in the form of performance shares and/or RSUs, and a cash incentive award. In February 2021,2022, the Committee and the Independent Directors determined to award each NEO performance shares, a cash incentive award, and RSUs as recognition of Company and NEO individual performance in 2020.2021. For purposes of this section, the term “NEOs” excludes our former CFO, who left the Company in March 2021, and, as a result, did not receive a year-end incentive award for the 2021 performance year.
Cash Incentive Awards
The cash incentive awards provided to the NEOs are based on the Committee’s evaluation of the Company’s performance during 2020.2021. In January 2020,February 2021, the Committee and the Independent Directors established a target value for the cash incentive for each NEO consisting of approximately 25% of the NEOs’ total target compensation. The Committee and the Independent Directors may determine to award 0% to 150% of the cash incentive target value based on Company performance. For purposes of the cash incentive awards, the Committee and the Independent Directors assess the Company’s performance based on the Performance Factors. The Committee believes that these factors appropriately reflect and balance near-term performance and long-term success for the Company’s customers, associates, and stockholders. See “2020“2021 CEO Compensation Program”Program and Components” beginning on page 6570 for details regarding the Performance Factors.
86 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
In February 2021,2022, the Committee and the Independent Directors approved cash incentive awards for the NEOs ranging from $1.35$1.69 million to $1.38$2.31 million, representing a payout at 100%150% of the target award values established by the Committee in January 2020February 2021, as adjusted in July 2021, based on actual Company performance in 2020.2021. Individual details for each NEO are provided in the table below showing compensation by performance year. The assessment of Company performance for the NEOs is consistent with the assessment performed in connection with the CEO year-end incentive award. The Committee and the Independent Directors determined that these awards were appropriate in light of the Company’s performance as described under “Year-End Incentive Opportunity” beginning on page 6872 in connection with the determinations by the Committee and the Independent Directors relating to the CEO’s year-end incentive awards.
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Awards
Long-term incentive awards are designed to reward individual performance and align a significant portion of compensation with achievement of both annual and long-term performance goals. In determining the actual amounts to be awarded to each NEO, the Committee considered each NEO’s contribution to the Company’s performance for 2020,2021, as well as the individual performance of each NEO. The Committee also received input from the CEO on his assessment of each NEO’s individual performance and his recommendations for compensation of the NEOs. The CEO also assessed the degree to which the NEO balanced risks inherent in the NEO’s role. These assessments included the use of both quantitative and qualitative risk measures and were compiled by the Chief Risk Officer and reviewed by the Chief Human Resources Officer, and separately the Chief Audit Officer compiled and reviewed the assessment for the Chief Risk Officer, before such assessments were presented to the Committee and the Independent Directors for their consideration.
In February 2021,2022, the Committee and the Independent Directors granted long-term incentive awards, consisting of stock-settled RSUs and performance shares, to the NEOs, other than Mr. Blackley, as recognition for individual NEO performance in 20202021 and to drive further long-term performance. The Long-termlong-term incentive awards granted to thethese NEOs for performance year 20202021 ranged from $3.0$2.48 million to $3.3$3.89 million. Long-term incentive awards are linked to performance in two ways:
∎ | The size of the award is based on each NEO’s individual performance assessment for the year just completed |
∎ | The ultimate value of the award is dependent on Capital One’s performance over time |
The terms of the performance share awards are substantially similar to the terms of the Financial Performance Shares awarded to our CEO for performance year 2020,2021, as described earlier under “Performance Share Award Metrics” beginning on page 69.73. The NEOs do not receive TSR Performance Shares. The NEO stock-settled RSUs vest ratably in one-third increments starting on the first anniversary of the grant date and are subject to performance-based vesting and clawback provisions as discussed below under “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” beginning on page 84.90.
20202021 NEO Year-End Incentive Compensation Decisions
Scott BlackleyAndrew M. Young - Chief Financial Officer
Mr. BlackleyYoung was awarded a cash incentive of $1,353,000, 11,996$1,687,500 and long-term incentive awards consisting of 7,587 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 14,3959,104 performance shares with a total grant date fair value for both awards of $2,973,210.$2,475,108. The Committee and the Independent Directors determined to grant these awards based upon Mr. Blackley’sYoung’s leadership of the Company’s finance organization, his well-managed effortsdriving improvements in capital planning and financial forecasting, including an additional unplanned CCAR cycle and the implementation of CECL, as well as his ability to balance near-term financial results with the Company’s strategic growth agenda. In 2020, Mr. Blackley continued to leverageinvestment management, leveraging technology and digital tools to drive significant improvements and efficiencies in the Company’s internal and external financial reporting, including enhancing alignment with lines of businesses in forecasting and the management of disclosure and related controls.controls; and leading a robust investor outreach agenda, including the creation of an ESG Fact Sheet to respond to investors needs and drive effective dialogue. The Committee and the Independent Directors also considered Mr. Blackley’s collaborative partnership,Young’s deep financial acumenexpertise and market orientation, effortsknowledge of the enterprise, integrative problem solving, strategic financial oversight, and commitment to recruiting, managing and developing talent.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 87 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
R. Scott Blackley - Former Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Blackley left the Company in prioritizingMarch 2021 and cultivating talentceased to be our CFO as of March 1, 2021 and therefore did not receive year-end incentive compensation for the 2021 performance year.
Sanjiv Yajnik - President, Financial Services
Mr. Yajnik was awarded a cash incentive of $2,139,822 and long-term incentive awards consisting of 10,086 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 12,103 performance shares with a total grant date fair value for both awards of $3,290,407. The Committee and the Independent Directors determined to grant these awards based upon the very strong performance of the Auto Finance business in the finance organization,2021, including record loan originations and recognized his sound judgment,credit performance as well as his thoughtfulMr. Yajnik’s execution of the long-term strategy for our Auto Finance business and integrative advicestrategic enhancements to senior management to advancethe digital tools that improve and reimagine customer experience. The Committee and the Independent Directors also considered Mr. Yajnik’s motivational leadership, recruitment and development of strong talent, elevation of the Company’s brand as a community leader, and continued focus on driving innovation and transparency and satisfaction with customers and partners.
Michael J. Wassmer - President, Card
Mr. Wassmer was awarded a cash incentive of $2,311,110 and long-term incentive awards consisting of 11,940 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 14,327 performance shares with a total grant date fair value for both awards of $3,895,134. The Committee and the Independent Directors determined to grant these awards based upon the solid growth and incredibly strong financial performance operational executionof the Card business in 2021, including record revenue, earnings, and purchase volume. The Committee and the Independent Directors also considered Mr. Wassmer’s strategic investment decisions.leadership in accelerating sustainable growth in the core Card business while launching new flagship consumer and small business products and experiences; effective compliance and risk management, including achieving record low fraud levels; and maintaining strong customer satisfaction.
Frank G. LaPrade, III - Chief Enterprise Services Officer and Chief of Staff to the CEO
Mr. LaPrade was awarded a cash incentive of $1,383,000, 12,270$2,175,822 and long-term incentive awards consisting of 10,757 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 14,72412,908 performance shares with a total grant date fair value for both awards of $3,041,144.$3,509,283. The Committee and the Independent Directors determined to grant these awards based upon Mr. LaPrade’s strategic leadership in strengthening the strategic alignment between Tech and the lines of business; and driving the modernization of the Company’s technological infrastructure, including his leading role in the Company’s transition to work-from-home due to the COVID-19 pandemic while elevating the Company’s brandadvancing platform and reputation on key initiatives and championing the Company’s culture.customer experience capabilities. In addition, the Committee and the Independent Directors also considered Mr. LaPrade’s key role in strengthening the Company’s risk management programs, particularly management remediation of all milestones within the regulatory consent orders related to the 2019 cybersecurity incident, as well as his inspirational leadership, strategic problem solving, and his pivotal role in recruiting, retaining strong talent in key roles across the organization, and establishing the framework for the Company’s pending hybrid workforce transition.
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
programs, particularly in the areas of cyber and technology, as well as his inspirational leadership and strategic problem solving, and his focus on recruiting and retaining strong talent in key roles.
Michael Wassmer - President, Card
Mr. Wassmer was awarded a cash incentive of $1,376,000, 12,201 stock-settled RSUs, and a target amount of 14,641 performance shares with a total grant date fair value for both awards of $3,024,020. The Committee and the Independent Directors determined to grant these awards based upon the strong performance of the Card business in 2020, despite significant impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, including extraordinary credit performance. The Committee and the Independent Directors also considered Mr. Wassmer’s successful assumption of the International Card, Small Business Card and Walmart businesses, balanced leadership in compliance and risk management within the Card business, maintaining strong customer satisfaction, as well as his sound judgment and strategic leadership.
Sanjiv Yajnik - President, Financial Services
Mr. Yajnik was awarded a cash incentive of $1,360,000, 13,248 stock-settled RSUs, and a target amount of 15,898 performance shares with a total grant date fair value for both awards of $3,283,589. The Committee and the Independent Directors determined to grant these awards based upon the very strong performance of the Auto business in 2020 despite substantial disruptions to the business associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, including using digital tools to reimagine the customer experience, while maintaining strong focus on resilience and risk management, as well as Mr. Yajnik’s execution of the long-term strategy for financial services. The Committee and the Independent Directors also considered Mr. Yajnik’s motivational leadership, recruitment and development of strong talent, and continued focus on driving innovation and increased transparency and satisfaction to customers and partners.
NEO Compensation by Performance Year
The table below shows actual NEO compensation as it is attributable to the performance year indicated.
Base Salary
| Year-End
| Long-Term Incentive
| Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Performance Year | Cash Salary | Cash Incentive(1) | Stock- Settled RSUs | Performance Shares |
Performance |
Base Salary |
Year-End Incentive |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Cash Salary |
Cash Incentive |
Long-Term Incentive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock- Settled RSUs | Performance Shares | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. Scott Blackley
| 2020
| $1,082,000
| $1,353,000
| $1,351,469
| $1,621,741
| $5,408,210
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew M. Young(1) | 2021 | $894,815 | $1,687,500 | $1,125,076 | $1,350,032 | $5,057,423 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019
| $1,050,000
| $1,509,950
| $1,312,374
| $1,574,746
| $5,447,070
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018
| $1,000,000
| $1,500,000
| $1,250,031
| $1,500,022
| $5,250,053
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III
| 2020
| td,106,000
| td,383,000
| td,382,338
| td,658,806
| $5,530,144
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019
| td,074,000
| td,544,450
| td,140,626
| td,368,669
| $5,127,745
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018
| $1,043,000
| $1,564,800
| $1,302,737
| $1,563,285
| $5,473,822
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer
| 2020
| $1,100,000
| $1,376,000
| $1,374,565
| $1,649,455
| $5,500,020
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. Scott Blackley(2) | 2021 | $233,046 | $— | $— | $— | $233,046 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019
| $1,000,000
| $1,438,650
| $1,374,595
| $1,649,432
| $5,462,677
| 2020 | $1,082,000 | $1,353,000 | $1,351,469 | $1,621,741 | $5,408,210 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| 2019 | $1,050,000 | $1,509,950 | $1,312,374 | $1,574,746 | $5,447,070 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik
| 2020
| $1,088,000
| $1,360,000
| $1,492,520
| $1,791,069
| $5,731,589
| 2021 | $1,136,231 | $2,139,822 | $1,495,653 | $1,794,754 | $6,566,460 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019
| $1,056,000
| $1,518,000
| $1,317,789
| $1,581,285
| $5,473,074
| 2020 | $1,088,000 | $1,360,000 | $1,492,520 | $1,791,069 | $5,731,589 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018
| $1,025,000
| $1,537,200
| $1,407,504
| $1,689,005
| $5,658,709
| 2019 | $1,056,000 | $1,518,000 | $1,317,789 | $1,581,285 | $5,473,074 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | 2021 | $1,218,462 | $2,311,110 | $1,770,583 | $2,124,551 | $7,424,706 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | $1,100,000 | $1,376,000 | $1,374,565 | $1,649,455 | $5,500,020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | $1,000,000 | $1,438,650 | $1,374,595 | $1,649,432 | $5,462,677 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | 2021 | $1,155,538 | $2,175,822 | $1,595,156 | $1,914,127 | $6,840,643 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | $1,106,000 | $1,383,000 | $1,382,338 | $1,658,806 | $5,530,144 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | $1,074,000 | $1,544,450 | $1,140,626 | $1,368,669 | $5,127,745 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | No amounts are reported for Mr. Young for 2019 or 2020 because he was not an NEO in 2019 or 2020. |
(2) | Mr. Blackley left the Company in March 2021 and ceased to be our CFO as of March 1, 2021 and therefore did not receive year-end incentive compensation for the 2021 performance year. |
This table is presented to show how the Committee views compensation actions and to which year the compensation awards relate, but it differs substantially from the Summary Compensation Table beginning on page 9298 required to be included in this proxy statement and is therefore not a substitute for the information required in that table. There are two principal differences between the Summary Compensation Table and the above table:
∎ | The table above reports equity-based awards as compensation for the performance year for which they were awarded, even if the award was granted in one year based on performance for the prior year. As a |
|
|
result, the stock-settled RSUs and performance share awards granted in February |
∎ | The Summary Compensation Table reports the change in pension value and non-qualified deferred compensation earnings and all other compensation. These amounts generally are not a result of current-year compensation determinations and are not shown above. |
The Committee provides certain other programs intended to support the NEOs’ productivity, well-being, and security. These programs provide some level of personal benefit and are not generally available to all associates. For 2020,2021, these programs included the following:
∎ | Executive term life insurance with a benefit level of $5 million |
∎ | The ability to participate in a comprehensive voluntary annual health screening |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 89 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
∎ | An automobile lease or the use of transportation services |
∎ | The monitoring and maintenance of an electronic home security system |
∎ | Personal use of the corporate aircraft |
The Committee has determined that the nature and value of these programs are comparable to those offered to similarly situated executives at our peers. Additional details on these programs can be found in the “Named Executive Officer Compensation” section beginning on page 92.98.
20212022 NEO Compensation Program
Each year, the Committee reviews the NEO compensation program in light of Company performance data, peer comparator group performance data, historical pay information, data on specific market practices and trends, stockholder feedback, and other relevant points of information. The program consists of multiple compensation vehicles that directly link the NEOs’ compensation with the Company’s performance over multiple time horizons, align the NEOs’ interests with the interests of the Company’s stockholders, support safety and soundness, and encourage appropriate risk-taking. In February 2021,2022, the Committee and the Independent Directors approved the 20212022 compensation program for our NEOs, which is substantially similar to the 20202021 program.
The awards granted to our NEOs include the following provisions that are designed to further enhance alignment between pay and performance and balance the risks that our incentive compensation programs might otherwise encourage:
∎ | Performance-based vesting provisions |
∎ | Performance share reduction |
∎ | Misconduct clawback provisions |
∎ | Financial restatement clawbacks |
These terms and conditions apply to certain incentive awards granted to every executive officer and not just to the NEOs.
|
|
Performance-Based Vesting Provisions
Provisions |
We include performance-based vesting provisions in each award of stock options, if any, and stock-settled RSUs granted to NEOs and each award of cash-settled RSUs granted to the CEO. These provisions will reduce the total value delivered to the executive at vesting if the Company does not meet certain performance thresholds during the three-year vesting period. The total value can be reduced to zero if the performance threshold is not met in any of the three years in the performance period.
| |||||
The ultimate value that our NEOs receive from equity-based incentive awards is tied to our stock price performance over the vesting period. In addition, the Committee nevertheless determined that these awards should be subject to additional performance conditions so that the value received by the executives is also conditioned upon the Company continuing to meet certain operating performance thresholds for each and every fiscal year ending in the three-year vesting period. Any forfeitures will be cumulative over the three-year vesting period. In this manner, regardless of our executives’ past performance and our stock price performance, the awards subject to performance-based vesting remain at risk of complete forfeiture over the three-year vesting period.
90 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Performance-based vesting provisions apply to the following awards:
∎ | All NEO stock option awards |
∎ | All NEO stock-settled RSUs |
∎ | All CEO cash-settled RSUs |
These performance conditions do not present any upside potential for the NEOs’ compensation but instead create an additional at-risk element to the compensation that has been awarded to them. Imposing these additional performance conditions is designed to further reflect our approach of balancing risk and performance over the long term.
For awards granted since January 2014, vesting is conditioned on the Company achieving positive Core Earnings (as defined below). If Core Earnings are not positive for any fiscal year in the vesting period, the named executive officer will automatically forfeit 50% of one year’s worth of vesting (i.e., one-sixth of the total award). In addition, the Committee will determine the extent to which any named executive officer was accountable for the outcome and, based on such determination, the Committee will decide whether any or all of the remaining 50% of one year’s worth of vesting will also be forfeited. The Committee may also decide to delay the vesting of the applicable portion of the award not so forfeited. For the NEOs, these determinations will be made each year prior to the scheduled vesting date, based on the Core Earnings for the fiscal year ended prior to such vesting date. For the CEO, these determinations will be made prior to the scheduled vesting date at the end of the three-year vesting period, taking into account Core Earnings for each fiscal year within the period.
Core Earnings focuses on whether profits are being generated by our basic business, as opposed to other factors that may not reflect business fundamentals. The terms of the applicable award agreements define “Core Earnings” to mean the Company’s net income available to common stockholders, excluding, on a tax-adjusted basis, the impact of (i) impairment or amortization of goodwill and intangible assets, and (ii) the build or release of the allowance for loan and leasecredit losses, calculated as the difference between the provision for loan and leasecredit losses and charge-offs, net of recoveries, and (iii) the change in the combined uncollectible finance charge and fee reserve.recoveries. The Committee believes that Core Earnings is an appropriate performance metric to employ for these performance-based vesting provisions because the metric captures major operational costs and risks to the Company’s business, including charge-offs, operating expenses, market and competitive risks, and costs to maintain adequate levels of capital and liquidity. Because the metric is based on net income available to common stockholders, it also includes the impact of discontinued operations.
|
|
Performance Share Reduction |
Each performance share award granted to the NEOs provides that the total value delivered at vesting will be reduced if for any year in the three-year performance period the Company does not achieve positive Adjusted ROTCE. The total value can be reduced to zero if positive Adjusted ROTCE is not achieved in all of the three years in the performance period. This reduction can occur regardless of where Adjusted ROTCE ranks relative to a comparator group.
| |||||
Each of the performance share awards granted to the NEOs in 20212022 that vest based on the Company’s relative performance of Common Dividends plus Growth of Tangible Book Value per share and Adjusted ROTCE over a three-year period is subject to reduction in the event that the Company’s Adjusted ROTCE for any fiscal year in the three-year performance period is not positive. These reductions will occur regardless of how well the Company’s Adjusted ROTCE compares to the Performance Share Peers. If the Company does not achieve positive Adjusted ROTCE for one year in the performance period, the total number of shares issued on the vesting date will be reduced by one-sixth. If the Company does not achieve positive Adjusted ROTCE for two years in the performance period, the total number of shares issued on the vesting date will be reduced by one-third. If the Company does not achieve positive Adjusted ROTCE for any of the three years in the performance period, the NEOs will forfeit the entire award. In this manner, even if we outperform compared to the comparator group, the performance share awards are at risk of complete forfeiture if we do not achieve a threshold level of performance on an absolute basis. For additional information, see “Performance Share Award Formula” beginning on page 70.74.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 91 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Misconduct Clawback Provisions
Misconduct Clawback |
Each incentive award granted to the NEOs, other than the cash incentive award granted to the NEOs other than the CEO, is subject to clawback provisions that allow the Committee to seek recovery of all unvested portions of the awards in the event there has been misconduct resulting in a violation of law or Company policy and the NEO committed the misconduct or failed in his or her responsibility to manage or monitor the applicable conduct or risks.
| |||||
The misconduct clawback provisions have been designed to apply broadly to a range of potential manifestations of misconduct at any level of the executive’s organization. The unvested portions of all applicable incentive awards are subject to recovery and at risk of complete forfeiture. In each case, the Committee will determine the amount of compensation to recover, allowing the Committee to calibrate each recovery to the facts and circumstances giving rise to the need for such recovery. In the event the Committee exercises these clawback provisions, the Company intends to disclose the aggregate amount that the Committee has determined to recover, so long as the underlying event has already been publicly disclosed in the Company’s filings with the SEC.
Financial Restatement Clawbacks
Financial Restatement Clawback
|
Certain performance share awards granted to the NEOs include clawback provisions that allow the Company to recover shares under the award following a financial restatement.
| |||||
The Financial Performance Share Awards granted to our executive officers include a clawback that is triggered in the event that the Company issues a restatement of its financial statements, or announces within three years after the vesting of an award that it expects to issue a restatement. If an executive would have been entitled to fewer shares on the vesting date under the restated financial statements, the executive may be required to return to the Company the excess shares awarded to him or her or, in the event he or she has sold or otherwise transferred the shares, he or she may be required to return the net proceeds from the sale or transfer.
|
|
The Committee considers a number of factors in making compensation decisions with respect to the NEOs. The Committee relies on a range of objective data including Company performance data, peer comparator group performance data, historical pay information, data on specific market practices and trends, stockholder feedback, and other relevant points of information to inform its business judgment.
Use of Outside Consultants for NEO Compensation
The Committee engages FW Cook to assist in the design of the CEO compensation program. FW Cook assists the Committee in a number of ways, including proposing and evaluating a peer comparator group, gathering relevant compensation data from the peer group, and discussing relevant market trends and context and developing recommendations on possible plan designs. See the discussion under “Compensation Committee Consultant” beginning on page 41 for additional information about FW Cook.
The Chief Human Resources Officer and other members of the Company’s Human Resources department assist the CEO in developing compensation recommendations for the NEOs other than the CEO for the Committee’s consideration. The Human Resources department typically uses multiple surveys as sources of market compensation data. FW Cook also provides additional market reference points that the Committee and the Independent Directors use when evaluating NEO compensation, and other outside consultants provide information to the Human Resources department regarding market practices, trends, and research reports. The Human Resources department is responsible for analyzing the information obtained from the outside consultants and presenting it to the CEO, who considers the information and makes his compensation recommendations for the NEOs to the Committee and the Independent Directors.
92 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
A consultant from FW Cook is present at Committee meetings during which CEO and NEO compensation is discussed and provides market data as well as an independent perspective regarding CEO and NEO compensation practices. FW Cook has no other engagement with, and performs no other services for, Capital One other than the services described above. See the discussion under “Compensation Committee Consultant” beginning on page 41 for additional information about FW Cook.
Peer Group to Determine Level and Components of Compensation
In order to attract, retain, and motivate top executive talent and non-employee directors consistent with our compensation program objectives, the Committee reviews data annually from a group of peer companies that are similar in size, business, and industry asto the Company. These organizations are intended to represent the marketplace of companies with which Capital One competes for business and for executive talent. The compensation data from the peer group is used to inform the Committee’s determination of the structure and the total compensation target values of the compensation program for the NEOs other than the CEO and the total level of compensation for the CEO. The peer group is reviewed each year and adjusted, as appropriate, so that the peer group companies reflect Capital One’s competitive environment. The Committee examines pay practices and data for the peer group companies as a source of benchmarking data to assess the competitiveness of our compensation levels and pay components. As part of this analysis, a consultant from FW Cook presents a comprehensive report to the Committee that highlights the size, scope, and performance information from the peer companies across a variety of metrics and presents recommendations for changes to the peer group, as applicable. The Committee specifically considers the Company’s percentile rank versus peer comparator companies across the following financial metrics:
∎ Revenue
∎ Assets
∎ Market value
∎ Net income available to common stockholders
∎ U.S. deposits
∎ Loans held for investment
∎ Diluted EPS growth | ∎ Adjusted ROA
∎ Tier 1 common capital ratio
∎ Charge-off rate
∎ Ratio of stock price to tangible book value
∎ Ratio of stock price to earnings
∎ TSR |
|
|
After reviewing this information, the Committee recommends a final peer comparator group to the Independent Directors for approval. In 2020,The peer comparator group is reviewed each year and adjusted, as appropriate, so that the size, scope, performance, and business focus of the peer group was expanded to add sevencomparator companies to the peer group utilized for 2020. The Committee and Independent directors determined to expand the peer group to add diversified financial institutions and payment companies to (i) reflect Capital One’s competitive environment, (ii) mitigate market data volatility, due to the current small sample size, (ii)(iii) recognize the Company’s focus on technological innovations in the banking industry, and (iii)(iv) position the Company near the median with regard to the size of the companies in the group. TheFor 2021, the peer comparator group approved inwas the same group as 2020 includesand included the following companies:
∎ Ally | ∎ Goldman Sachs | ∎ Regions Financial | ||
∎ American Express | ∎ J.P. Morgan Chase | ∎ Synchrony | ||
∎ Bank of America Corporation | ∎ | ∎ Truist Financial | ||
∎ Citigroup | ∎ Morgan | ∎ U.S. Bancorp | ||
∎ Discover Financial Services | ∎ | ∎ | ||
∎ Fifth Third Bancorp | ∎ PNC Financial Services | ∎ Wells Fargo & Company |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 93 |
* Indicates a company added to the peer group in 2020.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
The Committee and the Independent Directors believe that this peer group reflects the competitive environment for the Company, particularly the performance and business focus of the companies in the peer group and the competition for executive talent. As of December 31, 2020,2021, Capital One was positioned at or near the median of the peer comparator group in terms of total assets, loans, deposits, revenues, and net income, and market value.income.
Peer Group to Determine Settlement of Performance Share Awards
For both the Financial Performance Shares and the TSR Performance Shares, the Company’s performance on each metric is assessed over the three-year period relative to the Performance Share Peers. See “Performance Share Award Peer Group” on page 7074 for additional information.
In addition to considering market data from our peer comparator group (when available), the Committee also conducts an annual comprehensive review of tally sheets for the CEO and each NEO which reflect all components of compensation and include total compensation and potential payouts. Each tally sheet summarizes multiple components of current and historical compensation, as well as the potential value of post-termination arrangements.compensation. The tally sheets assist with the Committee’s understanding of the historical context that is relevant to current compensation decisions, such as the CEO and each NEO’s unrealized equity value. The tally sheets also help the Committee assess the potential downstream consequences of its decisions, such as the potential value to be received by the CEO and each NEO upon separation due to a change of control, retirement or other termination scenarios.
Other Compensation Arrangements
Pension and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans
Capital One does not have any active pension plans for the NEOs. In 2020,2021, each of our NEOs participated in Capital One’s VNQDCP, which is a voluntary, non-qualified deferred compensation plan that restores participating NEOs, excluding the CEO, to the level of savings they would have achieved if they had not been impacted by IRSInternal Revenue Service limits governing our qualified 401(k) plan. It also allows the NEOs, excluding the CEO, to defer additional pre-tax compensation in order to save for retirement. The CEO participates in the VNQDCP on a non-voluntary basis, as the deferred cash portion of his year-end incentive is mandatorily deferred in the VNQDCP for three years. Capital One periodically reviews pension and other deferred compensation programs and practices at our peer comparator companies and across the financial services industry. We also review changes in the legal and regulatory environment pertaining to retirement programs.
|
|
Details of the VNQDCP can be found under “Capital One’s Voluntary Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Programs” beginning on page 99.106.
Capital One typically does not enter into defined term employment agreements with the NEOs in order to maintain maximum flexibility in establishing separation terms at the appropriate time and considering their current circumstances. The Committee retains full discretion to approve employment agreements on an exception basis and has done so for exceptional circumstances in the past. None of the current NEOs have an employment agreement.
Each NEO currently employed by the Company is a party to an agreement providing certain benefits if the executive’s employment terminates in connection with a change of control, as well as compensation and benefits protections during the two-year period following the change of control.
94 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
The change of control agreements define compensation and benefits payable to NEOs in certain merger and acquisition scenarios. The Committee believes these agreements provide the NEOs with some certainty and allow the NEOs to remain neutral and consider a full range of strategic decisions that are focused on maximizing stockholder value. The change of control agreements are also intended to allow Capital One’s businesses to operate with minimal disruption in the event of a change of control by providing each NEO with an incentive to remain in his or her leadership role up to and beyond the transaction date. In addition to compensation and benefits protections during a two-year protection period after a change of control, the NEOs are entitled to severance benefits under the agreements if their employment is actually terminated as a result of (or in anticipation of) certain merger and acquisition scenarios.
Both eligibility for participation and the structure of payments under these agreements are designed to be aligned with market practice in the banking and financial services industry. Our program is designed so that our stockholders are not faced with disproportionate severance costs that may impair potential merger opportunities. In addition, our change of control agreements for executive officers do not provide for excise tax “gross-up” payments.
Projections of potential payouts to the NEOs under these agreements are included in the total compensation tally sheets reviewed by the Committee on an annual basis. Although the potential change of control payouts do not necessarily impact annual decisions on NEO pay, reviewing this information allows the Committee to fully understand the downstream implications of its decisions and the resulting impact to the Company and its stockholders. Additional details regarding these agreements can be found under “Payments Under Certain Termination Scenarios” beginning on page 102.109.
Post-Employment Compensation Practices
The CEO has no employment or severance arrangement with the Company other than the change of control agreement as described above. If an NEO, excluding the CEO, separates from Capital One, he or she is entitled to receive the amounts set forth in the Company’s Executive Severance Plan, which provides for a payment of up to 30% of the NEO’s then-current total target compensation plus a pro-rated severance bonus based on the NEO’s target cash incentive in the event of involuntary termination without cause due to restructuring. Additional benefits include partially subsidized health, dental, and vision benefits for a period of up to 18 months through COBRA, and term life continuation and outplacement services for a period of up to one year following separation. The Committee may exercise its discretion in approving additional amounts in light of all relevant circumstances, including the NEO’s term of employment, past accomplishments, reasons for separation from the Company, potential risks and the NEO’s willingness to restrict his or her future action(s), such as through an agreement not to compete or solicit the Company’s customers or associates. In addition, following a separation from Capital One, certain equity-based awards will continue to vest according to their original terms, as described under “Payments Under Certain Termination Scenarios” beginning on page 102.
|
|
109.
Capital One has entered into agreements with certain NEOs that contain restrictive covenants related to confidentiality, non-competition, non-solicitation, and ownership of work product. For additional information, see “Restrictive Covenants” beginning on page 101.108.
Upon retiring from the Company, associates, including the NEOs, are generally entitled to receive certain retiree medical benefits, including subsidized medical benefits for qualified individuals. In addition, certain equity-based awards will continue to vest according to their original terms, as described under “Payments Upon Retirement” on page 103.110.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 95 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Other Aspects of Executive Compensation
Stock Ownership and Retention Requirements
Consistent with their responsibilities to our stockholders, the executive officers are required to maintain a significant financial stake in the Company. To this end, the CEO and the other NEOs must own shares of Capital One stock with a fair market value of at least the following (“Stock Ownership Requirement”):
Role | Ownership | Post-Termination Ownership Requirement | ||||||
CEO | $10.5 million | $5.25 million | ||||||
Other NEOs and Executive Officers | 3x annual cash salary | 1.5x annual cash salary |
Given that the CEO’s compensation program does not include a base salary, his Stock Ownership Requirement is based on an amount established annually by the Committee and the Independent Directors. Beginning in 2020, the CEO’s Stock Ownership Requirement was increased to an amount equal to six multiplied by $1.75 million, or $10.5 million. In addition, the CEO and all other NEOs are required to continue to hold 50% of their Stock Ownership Requirement for one year following termination, retirement, or ceasing to serve as an executive officer, except in case of termination by death, disability, or in connection with a change of control. The Committee and the Independent Directors believe that these stock ownership requirements have increased the alignment of CEO and all other NEO compensation with stockholder interests.
Ownership requirements may be fulfilled using the following shares:
∎ | Shares owned without restriction |
∎ | Unvested restricted stock |
∎ | Unvested stock-settled RSUs |
∎ | Shares acquired through the 2002 Associate Stock Purchase Plan |
∎ | Shares owned through the Capital One Stock Fund in Capital One’s 401(k) plan |
Unexercised stock options and unvested performance share awards may not be used to fulfill ownership requirements.
The Committee reviews the guidelines and monitors the CEO’s and the other NEOs’ compliance with them. New executive officers are given five years from the date of promotion to or appointment as an executive officer to comply with the Stock Ownership Requirements. In the event that an executive officer is not in compliance with these requirements, the Committee has the right to take action, including reducing the executive officer’s compensation. The CEO and all other NEOs are currently in compliance with this requirement.
The Company has stock retention requirements for certain equity awards made to the CEO and the other NEOs. With respect to awards of performance shares and stock-settled RSUs that vest (i) during an executive’s term of employment with Capital One, or (ii) as applicable, prior to the first anniversary of such executive’s separation from Capital One, each executive must hold 50% of the after-tax net shares acquired (“Retained Shares”) for a period of one year after the acquisition date of the shares. In addition, for performance shares and stock-settled RSUs granted after January 2021, the Company requires that Retained Shares continue to be held beyond the one-year period until the CEO and the other NEOs’ Stock Ownership Requirement, as described above, is met. These stock ownership and retention requirements apply to all of our executive officers.
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section V - |
Prohibition of Hedging, Speculative Trading Activities, and Pledging
As part of the commitment by Capital One’s leadership team to maintain public confidence in the long-term growth of Capital One’s stock, Capital One maintains a policy prohibiting hedging and speculative trading activities. Specifically, the policy prohibits certain individuals from engaging in short sales, hedging transactions, or speculative trading in derivative securities of Capital One stock. The policy applies to all Capital One directors, officers (as defined under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)Act), and together with Capital One directors, “Control Group Members”), and associates who (i) serve at the Senior Vice President level or above, (ii) report directly to a Control Group Member, or (iii) are otherwise determined by Capital One’s General Counsel to be an “insider.” The policy applies to all shares of Capital One stock held by those persons covered by the policy, regardless of whether the stock was granted as compensation by Capital One or is otherwise held directly or indirectly. Capital One also prohibits its Control Group Members from using Capital One securities, including common stock, in a margin account or pledging Capital One securities as collateral for a loan.
Capital One strives to maintain equity grant practices that demonstrate high standards of corporate governance. Annual incentive awards generally are approved by the Committee and the Independent Directors (or by authority delegated to the Chief Human Resources Officer for certain associates who are not executive officers) at regularly scheduled meetings in the first quarter of each year. The date of grant is the actual date on which the Committee approves the awards. The Committee may grant awards of restricted stock, RSUs, stock options, or other equity awards outside of the annual incentive cycle. The Committee has delegated authority to the CEO to award restricted stock and to the Chief Human Resources Officer to award stock-settled and cash-settled RSUs (but not options or other equity awards) to associates who are not executive officers, subject to a maximum amount of $2 million for any associate in any one year with an aggregate $50 million annual limit. These awards are designed to be used for new hires and for special programs designed by management to incentivize, retain, and reward current associates of the Company. The Committee reviews all grants made by delegation at least once per year.
With respect to awards of stock options, the exercise price is always the Fair Market Value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. Under the terms of our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, “Fair Market Value” is equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The Company does not seek to time equity grants to take advantage of material non-public information, and in no event is the grant date set to a date that is prior to the date of approval.
The Committee carefully considers the tax impacts of its compensation programs on the Company, as well as on its executives. To maintain flexibility in compensating executive officers, the Committee does not require all compensation to be paid or awarded in a tax-deductible manner. However, it has been the Committee’s intent to maximize tax deductibility to the extent reasonable and consistent with the Company’s overall executive compensation objectives.
Prior to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “TCJA”), Section 162(m) of the IRC exempted “qualified performance-based compensation” from the deduction disallowance generally required by Section 162(m). The TCJA repealed this exemption, such that most forms of performance-based compensation paid to covered executive officers in excess of $1 million will not be deductible going forward, with certain exceptions. The Committee reserves the right to modify compensation that was initially intended to be exempt from Section 162(m) if it determines that such modifications are consistent with Capital One’s business needs.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section IVVI - Named Executive Officer Compensation
2021 Summary Compensation Table
The Summary Compensation Table below provides information about compensation for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, 2019 and 20182019 for the NEOs. As discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on page 54,57, our executive compensation program is heavily weighted towards equity-based and at-risk elements of compensation. Under SEC rules, equity-based compensation is reported in the Summary Compensation Table below in the year in which it is awarded, which may not correlate to the year for which it is paid.
With respect to the compensation reported below for our CEO:
∎ |
|
∎ | Amounts shown in the table below for the CEO for |
∎ | Amounts shown in the “Stock Awards” column for |
With respect to the compensation reported below for the NEOs other than the CEO:
∎ | In 2021, 2020, and 2019, base salary comprised approximately 20% of total target compensation and a cash incentive comprised approximately 25% of total target compensation. |
∎ |
|
Amounts shown in the table below also include performance shares and stock-settled RSUs |
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section VI - Named Executive Officer Compensation |
Amounts paid to the CEO and the other NEOs in 20202021 for other compensation and benefit programs are listed under the “Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” and “All Other Compensation” columns. The details of these program amounts are provided in the footnotes to the table:
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary(1) | Bonus(2) | Stock Awards(3) | Change in Pension Value and Non- Qualified Deferred Earnings(4) | All Other Compensation(*) | Total | |||||||
Richard D. Fairbank Chairman, CEO and President(5)
|
2020 |
$— | $3,000,000 | $16,750,159 | $4,148 | $365,664 | $20,119,971 | |||||||
2019 | $— | $3,000,000 | $4,550,031 | $6,028 | $149,733 | $7,705,792 | ||||||||
2018 | $— | $4,200,000 | $12,985,071 | $4,894 | $143,831 | $17,333,796 | ||||||||
R. Scott Blackley Chief Financial Officer(6)(7)
| 2020 | $1,119,923 | $1,353,000 | $2,887,120 | $— | $345,857 | $5,705,900 | |||||||
2019 | $1,044,231 | $1,509,950 | $2,750,053 | $— | $217,437 | $5,521,671 | ||||||||
2018 | $988,462 | $1,500,000 | $2,976,666 | $— | $216,596 | $5,681,724 | ||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III Chief Enterprise Services Officer and Chief of Staff to the CEO(6)
| 2020 | $1,144,846 | $1,383,000 | $2,509,295 | $— | $214,576 | $5,251,717 | |||||||
2019 | $1,070,423 | $1,544,450 | $2,866,022 | $— | $313,129 | $5,794,024 | ||||||||
2018 | $1,039,538 | $1,564,800 | $3,288,208 | $— | $212,101 | $6,104,647 | ||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer President, Card(6)(8)
| 2020 | $1,130,769 | $1,376,000 | $3,024,027 | $402 | $217,675 | $5,748,873 | |||||||
2019 | $993,654 | $1,438,650 | $2,987,794 | $51 | $198,083 | $5,618,232 | ||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik President, Financial Services(6)
| 2020 | $1,126,154 | $1,360,000 | $2,899,074 | $— | $222,089 | $5,607,317 | |||||||
2019 | $1,052,423 | $1,518,000 | $3,096,509 | $— | $352,656 | $6,019,588 | ||||||||
2018 | $1,021,539 | $1,537,200 | $3,478,589 | $— | $209,062 | $6,246,390 |
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus(1) | Stock Awards(2) | Change in Pension Value and Non- Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(3) | All Other (*) | Total | |||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank Chairman and CEO(4) | 2021 | $— | $4,550,000 | $15,817,843 | $3,540 | $86,170 | $20,457,553 | |||||||||
2020 | $— | $3,000,000 | $16,750,159 | $4,148 | $365,664 | $20,119,971 | ||||||||||
2019 | $— | $3,000,000 | $4,550,031 | $6,028 | $149,733 | $7,705,792 | ||||||||||
Andrew M. Young Chief Financial Officer(5)(6) | 2021 | $894,815 | $1,687,500 | $604,534 | $— | $179,450 | $3,366,299 | |||||||||
2020 | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | ||||||||||
2019 | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | ||||||||||
R. Scott Blackley Former Chief Financial Officer(5)(7) | 2021 | $233,046 | $— | $2,973,210(8) | $— | $21,750 | $3,228,006 | |||||||||
2020 | $1,119,923 | $1,353,000 | $2,887,120 | $— | $345,857 | $5,705,900 | ||||||||||
2019 | $1,044,231 | $1,509,950 | $2,750,053 | $— | $217,437 | $5,521,671 | ||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik President, Financial Services(5) | 2021 | $1,136,231 | $2,139,822 | $3,283,589 | $— | $469,069 | $7,028,711 | |||||||||
2020 | $1,126,154 | $1,360,000 | $2,899,074 | $— | $222,089 | $5,607,317 | ||||||||||
2019 | $1,052,423 | $1,518,000 | $3,096,509 | $— | $352,656 | $6,019,588 | ||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer President, Card(5) | 2021 | $1,218,462 | $2,311,110 | $3,024,020 | $295 | $244,368 | $6,798,255 | |||||||||
2020 | $1,130,769 | $1,376,000 | $3,024,027 | $402 | $217,675 | $5,748,873 | ||||||||||
2019 | $993,654 | $1,438,650 | $2,987,794 | $51 | $198,083 | $5,618,232 | ||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III Chief Enterprise Services Officer and Chief of Staff to the CEO(5) | 2021 | $1,155,538 | $2,175,822 | $3,041,144 | $— | $228,788 | $6,601,292 | |||||||||
2020 | $1,144,846 | $1,383,000 | $2,509,295 | $— | $214,576 | $5,251,717 | ||||||||||
2019 | $1,070,423 | $1,544,450 | $2,866,022 | $— | $313,129 | $5,794,024 |
(1) |
|
The amount shown in this column for Mr. Fairbank in |
The amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair value of performance shares, stock-settled RSUs, and cash-settled RSUs granted to the NEOs, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of performance shares included in this column assumes a payout at the target performance level. The amount shown for Mr. Fairbank for 2019 reflects a change to the structure of his compensation program that moved the grant of performance shares from the beginning of the performance year to after the end of the performance year resulting in the transition year of 2019 containing no performance share awards. The grant date fair value for the 2021 TSR Performance Shares granted to Mr. Fairbank is determined by multiplying the target number of shares by a valuation using a Monte Carlo simulation, which determined a grant date fair value of $115.20 per share (102.26% of the Company’s closing stock price on the grant date). The valuation was based on a Monte Carlo simulation using the following assumptions: (i) expected volatility based on the historical stock price price volatility of the Company and the implied volatility of the Company’s exchange-traded options (42.98%); (ii) expected risk-free interest rate based on the U.S. Treasury rates as of the grant date (0.17%); and (iii) the length of the remaining performance period as of the grant date (2.9 years). See footnote 2 to the |
The amounts shown in this column represent the change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated pension benefits for Messrs. Fairbank and Wassmer under the Cash Balance Pension Plan and the Excess Cash Balance Plan. |
Mr. Fairbank’s compensation for |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 99 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section VI - Named Executive Officer Compensation |
settled RSU portion of his year-end incentive opportunity for 2019 was granted in January 2020 and is included in the table above for 2020. See “CEO Compensation by Performance Year” beginning on page |
For NEOs other than the CEO and the former CFO, compensation for |
| (6) |
|
(7) | Mr. Blackley |
(8) |
|
All other compensation for the NEOs consists of the following: |
Name | Auto(a) | Travel and | Health Screening(b) | Security | Company Contributions to Defined Contribution Plans(c) | Insurance(d) | Other(e) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Named Executive Officer | Auto(a) | Health Screening(b) | Security(c) | Company Contributions to Defined Contribution Plans(d) | Insurance(e) | Other(f) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank | $0 | $0 | $2,924 | $318,584(f)(h) | $0 | $24,045 | $20,111 | $— | $2,260 | $6,710 | $— | $39,300 | $37,900 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew M. Young | $19,016 | $— | $— | $149,674 | $4,260 | $6,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. Scott Blackley | $42,874 | $0 | $3,275 | $113,223(h) | $175,065 | $6,420 | $5,000 | $— | $— | $— | $21,750 | $— | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | $23,405 | $2,870 | $13,289 | $184,500 | $14,505 | $230,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | $30,030 | $3,300 | $— | $198,300 | $6,420 | $6,318 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | $25,204 | $0 | $0 | $2,727(g) | $178,725 | $6,420 | $1,500 | $27,769 | $— | $4,274 | $187,500 | $7,745 | $1,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | $25,310 | $0 | $3,300 | $0 | $177,825 | $6,240 | $5,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | $26,108 | $0 | $946 | $1,200(g) | $175,815 | $13,020 | $5,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | The cost of these benefits is determined on an annual basis and includes, as applicable, annual car lease or car service, automobile service fees, and other related miscellaneous expenses (such as fuel and maintenance). Mr. Fairbank does not participate in the Company-provided automotive benefit. Mr. |
(b) | Represents cost attributable to the annual physical program where executives have the opportunity to receive a comprehensive health screening once a year. |
(c) | Represents aggregate cost to the Company for home security services provided to executives. |
(d) | Represents Company contributions under qualified (401(k)) and non-qualified deferred compensation programs and other supplemental executive retirement benefits. The maximum 401(k) match for calendar year |
Represents life insurance premiums paid on behalf of the executives. |
Represents contributions made by Capital One to charitable organizations chosen by the CEO |
2021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
|
|
|
The Grants of Plan-Based Awards table provides details on equity incentive plan awards granted in 2020,2021, including cash-settled RSUs, performance shares, and stock-settled RSUs. The columns reporting “Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards,” “All Other Stock Awards” and “All Other Option Awards” relate to Capital One’s equity-based incentives awarded to the NEOs.
2020 Grants to CEO
For 2020, awards granted to the CEO consist of performance shares granted in January 2020 as part of the CEO’s 2019 compensation program and (i) cash-settled RSUs granted in January 2020 for 2019 performance and (ii) cash-settled RSUs granted in January 2020 for the 2020 performance year representing 9% of the CEO’s total compensation for 2020.
Performance Shares
The actual number of shares earned and issued with respect to performance shares will be based on the Company’s D+TBV and Adjusted ROTCE (each as defined on page 69 under “Performance Share Award Metrics”)
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section VI - Named Executive Officer Compensation |
Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards,” “All Other Stock Awards,” and “All Other Option Awards” relate to Capital One’s equity-based incentives awarded to the NEOs.
2021 Grants to CEO
For 2021, awards granted to the CEO consist of Financial Performance Shares and TSR Performance Shares (each as defined on page 72 under “Performance Share Awards”) granted in February 2021 as part of the CEO’s 2020 compensation program and (i) cash-settled RSUs granted in February 2021 for 2020 performance and (ii) cash-settled RSUs granted in February 2021 for the 2021 performance year, representing 6.4% of the CEO’s total compensation for the 2021 performance year.
Performance Shares
The actual number of shares earned and issued with respect to Financial Performance Shares will be based on the Company’s D+TBV and Adjusted ROTCE (each as defined on page 73 under “Performance Share Award Metrics”) over the three-year period from January 1, 20202021 through December 31, 2022,2023, relative to the Performance Share Peers (as defined on page 6)74). In addition, the total value delivered at vesting will be reduced if the Company’s Adjusted ROTCE for one or more fiscal years completed during the performance period is not positive, no matter how well the Company performs relative to the Performance Share Peers.
The actual number of shares earned and issued with respect to TSR Performance Shares will be based on the Company’s TSR (as defined on page 74 under “Performance Share Award Metrics”) over the three-year period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023, relative to the Performance Share Peers.
See “2020“2021 CEO Compensation Components” beginning on page 6771 for more details on the 20202021 performance share awards. Dividend equivalents are accrued on the performance shares at the same time as dividends are paid out to the Company’s other stockholdersholders of shares of Capital One’s common stock and are paid out as additional shares only on the performance shares that actually vest based on the results certified by the Committee.
Restricted Stock Units
Cash-settled RSUs were granted in JanuaryFebruary 2021 for 2020 for 2019 performance, and cash-settled RSUs were granted in January 2020February 2021 for the 20202021 performance year. The cash-settled RSUs vest in full on February 15, 20232024 and settle in cash based on the average closing price of the Company’s common stock for the fifteen15 trading days preceding the vesting date. Dividend equivalents are accrued on the cash-settled RSUs at the same time as dividends are paid to the Company’s other stockholdersholders of shares of Capital One’s common stock and are paid at the time of vesting, adjusted for performance-based vesting results. See “2020“2021 CEO Compensation Program”Program and Components” beginning on page 6570 for more details on the 20202021 cash-settled RSU awards.
20202021 Grants to NEOs (other than the CEO)
For 2020,2021, the awards granted to NEOs other than the CEO consist of performance sharesFinancial Performance Shares and stock-settled RSUs granted in January 2020February 2021 for the 20192020 performance year.
Performance Shares
The actual number of shares earned and issued with respect to performance sharesFinancial Performance Shares will be based on the Company’s D+TBV and Adjusted ROTCE over the three-year period from January 1, 20202021 through December 31, 2022,2023, relative to the Performance Share Peers. In addition, the total value delivered at vesting will be reduced if the Company’s Adjusted ROTCE for one or more fiscal years completed during the performance period is not positive, no matter how well the Company performs relative to the Performance Share Peers. See “2020“2021 CEO Compensation Components” beginning on page 6771 for more details on the 20202021 performance share awards. Dividend equivalents are accrued on the performance shares at the same time as dividends are paid out to the Company’s other stockholdersholders of shares of Capital One’s common stock and are paid out as additional shares only on the performance shares that actually vest based on the results certified by the Committee.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 101 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section VI - Named Executive Officer Compensation |
Stock-Settled Restricted Stock Units
The stock-settled RSUs vest in three equal annual installments beginning on February 15 of the year after the date of grant. Dividend equivalents are accrued on the stock-settled RSUs at the same time as dividends are paid to the Company’s other stockholdersholders of shares of Capital One’s common stock and are paid at the time of vesting, adjusted for performance-based vesting results.
The annual awards of stock-settled RSUs (as well as cash-settled RSUs for the CEO) reported below are also subject to performance-based vesting provisions that are associated with Core Earnings. As a result, the total number of shares delivered at vesting will be reduced if the Company does not achieve certain performance thresholds during the three-year vesting period. See “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” beginning on page 8490 for more details on the performance-based vesting provisions.
Name
| Award Type
| Date of
| Estimated Future Payouts Under
| All Other
| Grant Date
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold
| Target
| Maximum
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank | Financial Performance Shares(2) | 2/4/2021 | 0 | 79,887 | 119,831 | — | $9,000,069 | |||||||||||||||||||||
TSR Performance Shares(3) | 2/4/2021 | 0 | 26,629 | 39,944 | — | $3,067,661 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash-Settled RSUs(4) | 2/4/2021 | — | — | — | 17,753 | $2,000,053 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash-Settled RSUs(5) | 2/4/2021 | — | — | — | 15,534 | $1,750,060 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew M. Young | Financial Performance Shares(2)(6) | — | — | — | — | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Settled RSUs | 2/4/2021 | 0 | — | — | 5,366 | $604,534 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
R. Scott Blackley | Financial Performance Shares(2) | 2/4/2021 | 0 | 14,395 | 21,593 | — | $1,621,741 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Settled RSUs | 2/4/2021 | — | — | — | 11,996 | $1,351,469 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | Financial Performance Shares(2) | 2/4/2021 | 0 | 15,898 | 23,847 | — | $1,791,069 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Settled RSUs | 2/4/2021 | — | — | — | 13,248 | $1,492,520 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | Financial Performance Shares(2) | 2/4/2021 | 0 | 14,641 | 21,962 | — | $1,649,455 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Settled RSUs | 2/4/2021 | — | — | — | 12,201 | $1,374,565 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | Financial Performance Shares(2) | 2/4/2021 | 0 | 14,724 | 22,086 | — | $1,658,806 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Settled RSUs | 2/4/2021 | — | — | — | 12,270 | $1,382,338 |
Name
| Award Type
| Date of
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
All Other Awards: Number of Shares of
| Grant Date of Stock
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold
| Target
| Maximum
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank | Performance Shares(2) |
| 1/30/2020 |
| 0 | 127,239 | 190,859 | — | $ | 13,000,009 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash-Settled RSUs(3) |
| 1/30/2020 |
| — | — | — | 19,576 | $ | 2,000,080 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash-Settled RSUs(4) |
| 1/30/2020 |
| — | — | — | 17,129 | $ | 1,750,070 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
R. Scott Blackley | Performance Shares(2) |
| 1/30/2020 |
| 0 | 15,413 | 23,120 | — | $ | 1,574,746 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Settled RSUs |
| 1/30/2020 |
| — | — | — | 12,845 | $ | 1,312,374 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | Performance Shares(2) |
| 1/30/2020 |
| 0 | 13,396 | 20,094 | — | $ | 1,368,669 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Settled RSUs |
| 1/30/2020 |
| — | — | — | 11,164 | $ | 1,140,626 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | Performance Shares(2) |
| 1/30/2020 |
| 0 | 16,144 | 24,216 | — | $ | 1,649,432 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Settled RSUs |
| 1/30/2020 |
| — | — | — | 13,454 | $ | 1,374,595 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | Performance Shares(2) |
| 1/30/2020 |
| 0 | 15,477 | 23,216 | — | $ | 1,581,285 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Settled RSUs |
| 1/30/2020 |
| — | — | — | 12,898 | $ | 1,317,789 |
|
(1) | Date on which awards were approved by the Committee and the Independent Directors and granted to the NEOs. |
(2) | The grant date fair values for the |
(3) | The grant date value, based on the closing price of common stock on the date of grant as reported by the NYSE Composite Transaction Tape, for the TSR Performance Shares granted to Mr. Fairbank if the maximum level of performance is achieved is $4,500,091. See footnote 2 to the 2021 Summary Compensation Table above for additional information regarding the grant date fair value for the TSR Performance Shares granted to Mr. Fairbank. |
(4) | Grant of cash-settled RSUs after the end of the performance year, representing a portion of Mr. Fairbank’s |
Grant of cash-settled RSUs at the beginning of the performance year, representing a portion of Mr. Fairbank’s |
(6) | Mr. Young did not receive Financial Performance Shares in 2021, as he was not an executive officer during the 2020 performance year. |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Option Awards
| Stock Awards
| |||||||||||||||
Name
| Number of Shares
| Value Realized on Exercise(1)
| Number of Shares
| Value Realized on
| ||||||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank | 1,167,699 | $57,387,881 | 182,022 | $15,845,180 | ||||||||||||
R. Scott Blackley | — | $— | 31,192 | $2,896,362 | ||||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | 32,603 | $1,261,084 | 34,587 | $3,285,246 | ||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | 13,784 | $409,660 | 29,364 | $2,841,694 | ||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | — | $— | 33,145 | $3,165,326 |
Section VI - Named Executive Officer Compensation |
2021 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
Option Awards
| Stock Awards
| |||||||||||||||
Name
| Number of Shares
| Value Realized on
| Number of
| Value Realized on
| ||||||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank | 359,909 | $41,874,534 | 145,384 | $18,662,992 | ||||||||||||
Andrew M. Young | — | $— | 3,900 | $459,225 | ||||||||||||
R. Scott Blackley | — | $— | 28,633 | $3,549,110 | ||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | 51,095 | $2,992,147 | 32,538 | $4,038,757 | ||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | — | $— | 28,743 | $3,553,785 | ||||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | 94,287 | $6,811,072 | 30,058 | $3,729,547 |
(1) | The value realized is the pre-tax value of the shares (market price less the exercise price) received. |
(2) | The value realized for awards, other than certain cash-settled RSUs and performance shares, is the pre-tax value of the number of shares multiplied by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the vesting date, as reported by the NYSE Composite Transaction Tape. For performance shares, the value realized also reflects the accrued dividends paid out as additional shares as of the date the performance share award results were certified by the Committee. Except for cash-settled RSUs that were vested and released in connection with tax withholding on |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 103 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section VI - Named Executive Officer Compensation |
2021 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table
Name | Option Awards(1) | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable | Option Exercise Price(2) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested(3) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights that Have Not Vested | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights that Have Not Vested(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank | 1/31/2012 | 100 | — | $45.75 | 1/30/2022 | — | $— | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2013 | 325,985 | — | $56.32 | 1/30/2023 | — | $— | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2014 | 108,944 | — | $70.96 | 1/29/2024 | — | $— | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/29/2015 | 115,812 | — | $74.96 | 1/28/2025 | — | $— | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/4/2016 | 106,973 | — | $63.73 | 2/3/2026 | — | $— | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/2/2017 | 81,486 | — | $86.34 | 2/2/2027 | — | $— | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | 21,094(4) | $3,060,528 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | 33,891(4) | $4,917,245 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | 19,363(4) | $2,809,378 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | 16,943(4) | $2,458,260 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 190,859(5) | $27,691,732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/4/2021 | — | — | $— | — | 17,753(4) | $2,575,783 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/4/2021 | — | — | $— | — | 15,534(4) | $2,253,828 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/4/2021 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 119,831(5) | $17,386,280 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/4/2021 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 39,944(5) | $5,795,475 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew M. Young | 1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | 1,329(6) | $192,825 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | 2,898(6) | $420,471 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/4/2021 | — | — | $— | — | 5,366(6) | $778,553 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | 1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | 5,822(6) | $844,714 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | 0 | $— | 29,970(7) | $4,348,347 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | 8,599(6) | $1,247,629 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | 0 | $— | 23,216(5) | $3,368,409 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/4/2021 | — | — | $— | — | 13,248(6) | $1,922,152 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/4/2021 | — | — | $— | — | 0 | $— | 23,847(5) | $3,459,961 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | 1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | 5,618(6) | $815,116 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 28,917(7) | $4,195,568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | 8,970(6) | $1,301,457 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 24,216(5) | $3,513,499 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/4/2021 | — | — | $— | — | 12,201(6) | $1,770,243 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/4/2021 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 21,962(5) | $3,186,467 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | 2/2/2017 | 27,955 | — | $86.34 | 2/2/2027 | — | $— | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | 5,389(6) | $781,890 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 27,739(7) | $4,024,652 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | 7,443(6) | $1,079,905 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 20,094(5) | $2,915,438 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/4/2021 | — | — | $— | — | 12,270(6) | $1,780,254 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/4/2021 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 22,086(5) | $3,204,458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section VI - |
|
Option Awards(1) | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
| Grant Date
| Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable
| Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable
| Option Exercise Price(2)
| Option Expiration Date
| Number of Shares or Not Vested
| Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested(3)
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights that Have Not Vested
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights that Have Not Vested(3)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank | 1/31/2012 | 360,009 | — | $45.75 | 1/30/2022 | — | $— | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2013 | 325,985 | — | $56.32 | 1/30/2023 | — | $— | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2014 | 108,944 | — | $70.96 | 1/29/2024 | — | $— | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/29/2015 | 115,812 | — | $74.96 | 1/28/2025 | — | $— | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/4/2016 | 106,973 | — | $63.73 | 2/3/2026 | — | $— | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/2/2017 | 81,486 | — | $86.34 | 2/2/2027 | — | $— | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/1/2018 | — | — | $— | — | 23,147(4) | $2,288,081 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/1/2018 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 116,983(5) | $11,563,770 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | 21,417(4) | $2,117,070 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | 34,268(4) | $3,387,392 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | 19,576(4) | $1,935,088 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | 17,129(4) | $1,693,202 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 190,859(6) | $18,866,412 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. Scott Blackley | 2/1/2018 | — | — | $— | — | 1,967(8) | $194,438 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/1/2018 | — | — | $— | — | 3,723(7) | $368,019 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/1/2018 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 13,029(5) | $1,287,917 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | 10,341(7) | $1,022,208 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | — | $0 | 27,920(6) | $2,759,892 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | 12,845(7) | $1,269,728 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 23,120(6) | $2,285,412 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | 1/30/2014 | 29,964 | — | $70.96 | 1/29/2024 | — | $— | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/29/2015 | 31,903 | — | $74.96 | 1/28/2025 | — | $— | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/4/2016 | 32,420 | — | $63.73 | 2/3/2026 | — | $— | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/2/2017 | 27,955 | — | $86.34 | 2/2/2027 | — | $— | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/1/2018 | — | — | $— | — | 2,340(8) | $231,309 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/1/2018 | — | — | $— | — | 4,024(7) | $397,772 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/1/2018 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 14,084(5) | $1,392,203 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | 10,777(7) | $1,065,306 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 29,097(6) | $2,876,238 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | 11,164(7) | $1,103,561 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 20,094(6) | $1,986,292 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | 2/1/2018 | — | — | $— | — | 2,081(8) | $205,707 | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/1/2018 | — | — | $— | — | 3,581(7) | $353,982 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/1/2018 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 12,534(5) | $1,238,986 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | 11,235(7) | $1,110,580 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 30,333(6) | $2,998,417 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | 13,454(7) | $1,329,928 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 24,216(6) | $2,393,752 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | 2/4/2016 | 28,633 | — | $63.73 | 2/3/2026 | — | $— | — | $— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/2/2017 | 22,462 | — | $86.34 | 2/2/2027 | — | $— | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/1/2018 | — | — | $— | — | 2,305(8) | $227,849 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/1/2018 | — | — | $— | — | 4,349(7) | $429,899 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/1/2018 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 15,222(5) | $1,504,695 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | 11,644(7) | $1,151,009 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2019 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 31,437(6) | $3,107,547 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | 12,898(7) | $1,274,967 | — | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/30/2020 | — | — | $— | — | — | $— | 23,216(6) | $2,294,902 |
|
|
(1) | Stock options granted generally have time-based vesting schedules, are exercisable upon vesting and vest earlier upon the optionee’s termination of employment for death, disability, or, beginning with awards granted in 2015, termination by Capital One without cause or by the individual for “good reason” within two years following (or in anticipation of) a change of control of Capital One. |
(2) | For stock options, the exercise price is equal to the closing price of common stock on the date of grant as reported by the NYSE Composite Transaction Tape. |
(3) | Market value is based on the closing price of a share of Capital One’s common stock on the last trading day of |
(4) | A portion of the award is subject to vest following the first and second anniversary of the grant date in connection with required tax-related withholdings made by the Company on behalf of the executive; the remaining shares vest in full on February 15 after the third anniversary of the date of grant. The awards are subject to performance-based vesting provisions (see “Performance-Based Vesting Provisions” beginning on page |
(5) |
|
Represents the maximum number of shares the executive may receive under the performance share awards granted. The actual number of shares an executive receives under a performance share award is dependent on the Company’s performance over the applicable three-year performance period and may range from 0% to 150% of target. The value reported excludes dividend equivalents accrued with respect to performance shares which are paid in shares at the time the underlying performance shares are issued, and only with respect to the number of shares that actually vest. The Committee will certify the performance of the Company over the applicable performance period by March 15 after the third anniversary of the grant. |
Awards vest one-third annually beginning on February 15 after the first anniversary of the date of grant. Awards are subject to performance-based vesting provisions (see “Performance-Based Vesting Provisions” beginning on page |
|
Capital One Pension Benefit Programs
Capital One does not currently maintain a pension benefit program. Prior to November 1995, Capital One offered a Cash Balance Pension Plan (“CBPP”) and an Excess Cash Balance Plan (“Excess CBPP”) to all full-time salaried associates and certain executive officers. Both of these programs were frozen in December 1995; however, interest continues to accrue on plan balances on a quarterly basis for the CBPP and on a monthly basis for the Excess CBPP. The CBPP interest rate changes annually, based on the average yield of five-year U.S. Treasury Securities for the month of October of the prior plan year (1.53%(0.36% for 2020)2021). The Excess CBPP interest rate changes monthly based on the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate (3.69%(3.30% annual average for 2020)2021).
Messrs. Fairbank and Wassmer participated in these programs. The estimated annual payouts upon retirement in the CBPP and the Excess CBPP as of December 31, 2020,2021, are $2,448.24$2,578.92 and $8,546.88,$9,266.64, respectively, for Mr. Fairbank, and $531.36$581.40 and $0, respectively, for Mr. Wassmer. As of December 31, 2020,2021, the “Present Value of Accumulated Benefit” for Mr. Fairbank for both plans is equal to his account balance because Mr. Fairbank has attained the normal retirement age of 65 and so is assumed to retire immediately under the actuarial valuation assumptions. Since Mr. Fairbank is assumed to retire as of the measurement date, the future interest rate does not apply. Because Mr. Wassmer has not yet attained age 65, the future interest rate was applied to his “Present Value of Accumulated Benefit” calculation. The account in each plan is distributed after any separation from service. Distribution options from the CBPP plan are lump sum (eligible for rollover to another qualified plan or personal IRA) or an annuity option. The Excess CBPP will be distributed in the same form as the CBPP, as a lump sum (not eligible for rollover) or as an annuity. Since the CBPP and Excess CBPP are account-based defined benefit plans, years of service are not tracked.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 105 |
Name | Plan Name(1) | Present Value of Accumulated | Payments During Last | |||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank | CBPP | $ | $— | |||||||||
Excess CBPP | $ | $— | ||||||||||
Andrew M. Young | — | $— | $— | |||||||||
R. Scott Blackley | — | $— | $— | |||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | — | $— | $— | |||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | CBPP | $6,329 | $— | |||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | — | $— | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| $— | |||||||||||
(1) | In November 1995, Capital One amended the CBPP and the Excess CBPP to eliminate further pay-based credits to participants as of December 31, 1995 and to provide that there would be no new participants in such plans on or after January 1, 1996. Interest continues to be credited on plan balances on a quarterly (CBPP) or monthly (Excess CBPP) basis. |
(2) | The amounts shown are the present value of the accrued benefit determined by our external benefits provider, using similar actuarial assumptions and the measurement date used for financial accounting purposes. |
(3) | Consistent with the measurement date used for financial disclosure for the pension plans, the amounts for each year are determined as of a December 31, |
Capital One’s Voluntary Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Programs
Capital One offers a VNQDCP to eligible associates. In 2020,2021, our NEOs, excluding our CEO, could elect to contribute up to 50% of the cash portion of their respective base salaries and up to 90% of their cash incentive on a tax-deferred basis to the VNQDCP. Messrs. Blackley, LaPrade, Wassmer, Yajnik, and YajnikYoung participated in the program in 2020.2021. In 2020,2021, 100% of the CEO’s deferred cash bonus was mandatorily deferred for three years under the VNQDCP and will be paid in a lump sum in the first quarter of 2023.2024. In addition to participant deferrals, Capital One makes contributions under the VNQDCP. Company contributions vest immediately when posted to the VNQDCP.
Participants in the VNQDCP have the option to direct their individual investments daily among the following ten different investment offerings made available by the plan:plans, which posted the corresponding returns for 2021: Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund Class Y3 (-1.2%),Mercer US Large Cap Equity Fund Class Y3 (23.8%), Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund Class Y3 (24.4%), Mercer Non-US Core Equity Fund Class Y3 (11.9%), Fidelity Investments Money Market Government Portfolio - Institutional Class (0.0%), Dodge and Cox Balanced Fund (19.3%), Fidelity 500 Index Fund - Institutional Premium Class (28.7%), Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (12.4%), Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (7.8%), and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund.Fund (-1.8%). In 2020,2021, the VNQDCP had total investment earnings of $42,852,528.63.$65,945,640.92.
Distributions under the VNQDCP may be made to participants according to the schedule for distribution that they elect in accordance with plan terms. Distributions can occur based upon the following events: termination of employment (including for retirement), death, disability, in-service distribution election, or change of control. The distribution schedules available under the plan include lump sum and, in the case of retirement, five-, ten-, or fifteen-year annual installments.
Prior to December 31, 2005, Capital One offered its executives an Excess Savings Plan (“ESP”). The plan was frozen as of December 31, 2005: no additional participants have been permitted to enter the plan, and no compensation has since been taken into account after this date. Messrs. Fairbank, LaPrade, Wassmer, Yajnik, and Yajnik Young
106 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section VI - Named Executive Officer Compensation |
participated in the ESP, and returns on these investments are reported for 2020.2021. Effective January 1, 2008, the ESP was merged into the VNQDCP, and participants in the ESP have the option to direct their individual investments among the same offerings as the VNQDCP.
Name | Plan Name | Executive Contributions in Last FY(1) | Registrant Contributions in Last FY(2) | Aggregate Earnings in Last FY(3) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions | Aggregate Balance at Last FYE(4) | ||||||||||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank | VNQDCP | $3,000,000 | $— | $267,700 | $5,714,540 | $10,310,939 | ||||||||||||||||
ESP | $— | $— | $254,869 | $— | $1,146,116 | |||||||||||||||||
2003 Performance Share Award(5) | $— | $— | $11,175,283 | $— | $35,065,351 | |||||||||||||||||
Andrew M. Young | VNQDCP | $65,904 | $127,924 | $163,365 | $— | $1,129,635 | ||||||||||||||||
ESP | $— | $— | $(23) | $— | $1,944 | |||||||||||||||||
R. Scott Blackley | VNQDCP | $19,670 | $0 | $(20,791) | $1,501,468 | $— | ||||||||||||||||
ESP | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | |||||||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | VNQDCP | $11,362 | $162,750 | $639,574 | $— | $3,867,730 | ||||||||||||||||
ESP | $— | $— | $105,099 | $— | $531,436 | |||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | VNQDCP | $12,185 | $176,550 | $301,699 | $— | $2,272,247 | ||||||||||||||||
ESP | $— | $— | $(2,820) | $— | $243,043 | |||||||||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | VNQDCP | $11,555 | $165,750 | $1,233,039 | $— | $6,095,466 | ||||||||||||||||
ESP | $— | $— | $194,399 | $— | $874,189 | |||||||||||||||||
Name
| Plan Name
| Executive
| Registrant in Last FY(2)
| Aggregate
| Aggregate
| Aggregate
| ||||||
Richard D. Fairbank | VNQDCP | $3,000,000 | $— | $1,041,479 | $3,768,368 | $12,757,778 | ||||||
ESP | $— | $— | $140,941 | $— | $891,248 | |||||||
2003 Performance Share Award(5) | $— | $— | $(981,221) | $— | $23,890,068 | |||||||
R. Scott Blackley | VNQDCP | $11,199 | $153,690 | $(86,457) | $— | $1,463,214 | ||||||
ESP | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | |||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | VNQDCP | $11,448 | $157,350 | $811,100 | $— | $4,686,755 | ||||||
ESP | $— | $— | $107,501 | $— | $679,790 | |||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | VNQDCP | $11,308 | $156,450 | $168,733 | $— | $1,785,986 | ||||||
ESP | $— | $— | $11,569 | $— | $245,863 | |||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | VNQDCP | $11,261 | $154,440 | $750,113 | $— | $3,055,648 | ||||||
ESP | $— | $— | $70,870 | $— | $426,337 | |||||||
(1) | Reflects executive contributions made for |
(2) | Company contributions are also included in the |
(3) | Includes earnings on total assets in the VNQDCP and the ESP. Earnings under the VNQDCP and ESP were not above market and therefore are not reported in the Summary Compensation Table. |
(4) | All the amounts shown in this column, other than earnings on deferred compensation, were included in compensation amounts reported in the current or prior years for those executives that were NEOs in the applicable year and in the amounts required to be reported pursuant to the then applicable rules. Of these balances, the following amounts were reported in the Summary Compensation Tables in prior-year proxy statements (to the extent that the |
(5) | Includes the value of 241,680 shares of Capital One’s common stock earned on March 31, 2007 in connection with performance shares that were granted to Mr. Fairbank in December 2003. Delivery of these shares is deferred until the end of Mr. Fairbank’s employment with the Company. Mr. Fairbank neither acquired these shares nor realized any value from these shares in |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 107 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control
Overview
The disclosure in the table below illustrates payouts that the NEOs could receive under certain hypothetical termination scenarios. Mr. Blackley voluntarily terminated his employment with the Company as of March 1, 2021, and, as a result, the disclosure below applies only with respect to the actual circumstances of his termination. Actual circumstances resulting in the departure of an NEOour other NEOs cannot be predicted and may differ from the assumptions used in the information outlined below. The Company has adopted plans providing certain standards governing NEO separation payments (reflected in the table below) in order to protect the Company’s interests in the event of an acquisition, as well as to provide competitive benefits to senior executives.
The Committee reviews each executive officer’s separation on a case-by-case basis and exercises its business judgment, with the approval of the Independent Directors, to customize the terms of such separations in consideration of the relevant circumstances, including:
∎ | The reasons for the separation |
∎ | Market competitive practices for comparable separation scenarios |
∎ | Potential benefits to the Company, such as retaining its competitive advantage, maintaining a positive reputation internally and externally, and preserving its ability to recruit highly talented executives |
|
|
∎ | The executive’s tenure and contributions to the Company’s success |
∎ | The executive’s willingness to provide legal waivers and/or enter into agreements not to compete with the Company or to solicit the Company’s associates or customers |
∎ | The resulting impact of the separation terms on the Company and its stockholders |
Capital One maintains a competitive advantage in part through the intellectual property developed and utilized by our senior executives. Capital One has asked certain NEOs to enter into various agreements that contain restrictive covenants related to confidentiality, non-competition, non-solicitation, and ownership of work product, as described below.
Non-Competition Agreements
Messrs. Blackley, Wassmer, Yajnik, and YajnikYoung have entered into non-competition agreements with the Company pursuant to which they may be restricted as to what competitive services they may provide to an entity following separation from Capital One.
Messrs. BlackleyYajnik and YajnikYoung have entered into non-competition agreements with the Company which provide for the following in exchange for the NEO complying with non-competition restrictions for up to two years following an involuntary termination, other than for cause, death, or disability: payment equal to 15% of the NEO’s total target compensation for each year of enforcement and up to 18 months of subsidized health insurance premiums under COBRA if the NEO is eligible and elects such coverage, subject to certain terms and conditions. The payments are made in two lump sums,sums: the first following termination and the second upon successful completion of the enforcement period. In the event of a voluntary termination, the previously described payments are typically made for the second year of enforcement only for agreements with a two-year enforcement period.
108 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section VI - Named Executive Officer Compensation |
Mr. Wassmer has entered into a non-competition agreement with the Company that establishes non-competition restrictions for up to two years following an involuntary termination without cause, and up to five years following a voluntary termination or an involuntary termination with cause. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any non-competition restrictions that apply in Canada or the United Kingdom are limited to one year after termination. The non-competition agreement provides that, subject to its terms, Mr. Wassmer will receive: payment equal to 15% of his total target compensation for each eligible year of the first and second years of his non-competition period; payment equal to 20% of his total target compensation for each eligible year of the third through fifth years of his non-competition period; and up to 18 months of subsidized health insurance premiums under COBRA if he is eligible and elects such coverage, subject to certain terms and conditions. In the event of a termination of employment by Capital One for any reason other than death, disability, or cause, the non-compete payments for the first two years are made in two lump sums, the first following termination and the second upon successful completion of the second year. Further, in such scenario, any additional payments for any eligible year of the third through fifth years of the non-competition period would be paid after successful completion for each of those years, respectively. In the event of a voluntary termination of employment, Mr. Wassmer would be eligible for payments only for the second through fifth years of his non-competition period. There are no payments under the non-competition agreements if benefits are payable under a change of control agreement. See “Change of Control” below for information regarding Change of Control Agreements applicable to the NEOs. In addition, payments related to the non-competition agreement are separate from any severance payments that may be made upon the NEO’s departure. However, severance payments are typically offset in part by payments related to the non-competition agreement so that total payment amounts are consistent with the severance program’s intent. For Mr. Wassmer, only the payments for years one and two of his non-competition period offset any amounts payable to him under any severance plan or arrangement.
|
|
Confidentiality, Work Product, and Non-Solicitation of Employee Agreement
Messrs. Blackley, Wassmer, Yajnik, and YajnikYoung are parties to confidentiality, work product, and non-solicitation of employee agreements. The confidentiality provisions of these agreements generally provide that at all times during and following employment with the Company, these NEOs may not use for personal benefit or the benefit of others, or divulge to others, any of Capital One’s confidential information, except as expressly authorized by Capital One or required by legal process. These agreements also provide that for a period of two years following separation from Capital One, these NEOs shall not directly or indirectly solicit or induce any associate of Capital One to become employed by any person or entity engaged in competition with Capital One, and shall not directly or indirectly solicit or induce any associate of Capital One to end his or her employment based on confidential information these NEOs learned about the associate while they were employed by Capital One.
Payments Under Certain Termination Scenarios
Upon separation from the Company, the NEOs, regardless of the reason for termination, receive certain earned, but previously unpaid, payments, such as accrued but unused vacation pay and amounts earned and vested under the Company’s qualified and non-qualified retirement programs. In addition, cash-settled RSUs granted to NEOs, other than the CEO, after the end of a performance year continue to vest according to the original provisions of such grants upon separation for any reason other than cause or as soon as practicable following a “double trigger” change of control (as discussed below).
Voluntary Termination
An NEO, other than the CEO, who voluntarily terminates employment with Capital One may receive payments related to non-competition covenants (described above, if applicable) and any contractual payments to which the NEO may otherwise be entitled. In addition, the NEO has the ability following separation to exercise vested but unexercised options for three months following voluntary termination.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 109 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section VI - Named Executive Officer Compensation |
Involuntary Termination Without Cause
An NEO, other than the CEO, whose employment with Capital One is terminated involuntarily, for performance or job elimination, is entitled to receive the amounts set forth in the Company’s Executive Severance Plan in exchange for executing a release of claims against the Company. For 2020,2021, potential payments under the Executive Severance Plan were 30% of total target compensation, plus a severance bonus based on such NEO’s target cash incentive in the event of termination due to restructuring. Additional benefits include healthcare continuation subsidy under COBRA, continued coverage through broad-based and executive life insurance programs, outplacement services, and any contractual payments to which the NEO may otherwise have been entitled. If an NEO’s Non-Competition Agreement is enforced, cash payments under the Executive Severance Plan, other than the severance bonus, will be offset by any cash amounts paid under their respective Non-Competition Agreement, and the NEO will be eligible for an additional payment of up to 90% of the severance payments in exchange for executing a release of claims against the Company.
Generally, performance shares granted to NEOs prior to 2019 will vest on a pro rata basis based on actual Company performance during the performance period if an involuntary termination without cause occurs during the performance period, while performance shares granted to NEOs in 2019 and 2020 will vest in full, based on actual Company performance, subject to the NEO’s execution of a release of claims against the Company. Stock-settled RSUs granted to NEOs will continue to vest if an involuntary termination without cause occurs, subject to the NEO’s execution of a release of claims against the Company. In addition, NEOs have the ability following separation to exercise vested but unexercised options for two years. If a NEO’s employment with Capital One is terminated as a result of death or disability, the NEO’s unvested stock options, RSUs and performance shares will vest in full based on target Company performance.
|
|
As with all executives who are eligible for retirement, NEOs who retire from Capital One may receive the following amounts: payments related to non-competition covenants as if they had terminated voluntarily (described above); coverage through the executive life insurance program (at a reduced benefit); any contractual payments to which he or she may otherwise be entitled; and, for Messrs. Fairbank and Yajnik, who became eligible to retire on or before December 31, 2012, partially subsidized participation in retiree medical coverage (including dependents as applicable).
Upon retirement, all RSUs continue to vest according to their original terms based on actual performance, which, for stock-settled RSUs granted during or after 2012, also includes performance-based vesting provisions. In addition, performance shares granted to NEOs will continue to vest after retirement. For stock options, the executive has until the expiration of the option term to exercise vested but unexercised options.
Termination for Cause
Generally, an NEO whose employment with Capital One is terminated for cause receives no additional benefits but is required to comply with any applicable restrictive covenants related to confidentiality, non-competition, non-solicitation of associates or customers, and ownership of work product, as described above. In addition, if terminated for cause, the NEOs have the ability following separation to exercise vested but unexercised options for three months.
Change of Control
Each NEO is a party to an agreement (a “Change of Control Agreement”) that provides for certain payments in the event his or her employment is terminated within two years following (or within one year prior to but in anticipation of) a change of control of Capital One, either involuntarily without cause or voluntarily for good reason. Amounts payable in each of these scenarios are outlined below.
Pursuant to the agreements, a “change of control” occurs if one or more of the following events take place: (i) an acquisition of 20% or more of Capital One’s common stock or the combined voting power of the voting securities of Capital One by a person or group, (ii) certain changes in the majority of the Board, (iii) consummation of a
110 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section VI - Named Executive Officer Compensation |
reorganization, merger, share exchange or consolidation or similar transaction, sale of all assets or the acquisition of another company, except where all or substantially all of Capital One’s stockholders receive 50% or more of the stock of the resulting company, at least a majority of the board of directors of the resulting company were incumbent Board members, and no person owns 20% or more of the resulting company who did not own such stock immediately before the business combination, or (iv) approval by stockholders of a complete liquidation or dissolution of Capital One. In the event of a change of control, we do not provide for excise tax gross-up payments. In addition, all equity awards granted to the NEOs require a so-called “double trigger” for accelerated vesting in connection with a change of control. Upon a change of control, all equity awards continue to vest according to their original schedule. The vesting of such awards only accelerates if a named executive officer is involuntarily terminated without cause or voluntarily terminates for good reason within the two years following a change of control.
Termination for Cause in Connection with a Change of Control
NEOs terminated involuntarily for cause following a change of control receive no additional benefits except with regard to options, which allow NEOs to exercise vested but unexercised options for three months following a termination for cause.
|
|
Voluntary Termination with Good Reason or Involuntary Termination Without Cause in Connection with a Change of Control
In the event of a voluntary termination with good reason or an involuntary termination without cause, the potential payments that the NEOs could receive under certain termination scenarios are based on a percentage of total target compensation. For the CEO, the potential payments are based on a multiple of his notional salary and year-end incentive opportunity. If a change of control of Capital One had occurred as of December 31, 2020,2021, then following a voluntary termination with good reason or involuntary termination without cause, an NEO would have received certain benefits as outlined below:
The CEO would be entitled to receive:
∎ | A lump-sum payment of 2.5 times the sum of his current notional salary and the “Highest Annual Bonus,” which is the highest of (i) the target annual bonus for the year in which the change of control occurs (or the mid-point if no target is established), (ii) the target annual bonus for the year immediately before the year the change of control occurs (or midpoint if no target is established), or (iii) the annual bonus paid or payable for the most recently completed fiscal year |
∎ | The cash value, prorated through the date of termination, of the Highest Annual Bonus |
An NEO other than the CEO would be entitled to receive:
∎ | A lump-sum payment of 112.5% of the highest of (i) the NEO’s current total target compensation, (ii) the NEO’s total target compensation for the prior year, or (iii) the NEO’s actual total compensation for the prior year |
∎ | The cash value, prorated through the date of termination, of the current year’s target cash incentive |
The CEO and each NEO would also be entitled to receive:
∎ | An amount equal to the employer contributions under the Company’s qualified and non-qualified retirement, healthcare, and life insurance programs for 2.5 years, as well as access to such healthcare and life insurance plans for the NEO (and dependents as applicable) |
∎ | Service credit from 2.5 years for purposes of determining vesting under any supplemental or excess defined contribution plan and eligibility under any applicable retiree medical plan |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 111 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section VI - Named Executive Officer Compensation |
∎ | Outplacement services of up to $30,000 |
∎ | Any contractual payments to which the NEO may otherwise have been entitled |
|
|
Name | Type of Termination | Cash Severance(1) | Retirement Plan Contributions(2) | Acceleration and Continuation of Equity Awards(3) | Continuation of Medical/ Welfare Benefits(4) | Excise Tax Gross Up(5) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank(6) | Voluntary Termination(7) | $— | $— | $51,990,535 | $747,000 | $— | $52,737,535 | |||||||||||||||||||
Involuntary Termination | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement | $— | $— | $51,990,535 | $747,000 | $— | $52,737,535 | ||||||||||||||||||||
For Cause Termination | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control(8) | $13,021,509 | $— | $51,990,535(9) | $311,637 | $— | $65,323,681 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew M. Young | Voluntary Termination | $675,000 | $— | $— | $— | $— | $675,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Involuntary Termination | $3,690,000 | $— | $1,391,848 | $14,251 | $— | $5,096,099 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||
For Cause Termination | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control(8) | $6,197,737 | $— | $1,391,848(9) | $— | $— | $7,589,585 | ||||||||||||||||||||
R. Scott Blackley(10) | Voluntary Termination | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | |||||||||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | Voluntary Termination(7) | $874,500 | $— | $11,607,490 | $586,000 | $— | $13,067,990 | |||||||||||||||||||
Involuntary Termination | $4,781,100 | $— | $11,607,490 | $10,000 | $— | $16,398,590 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement | $874,500 | $— | $11,607,490 | $586,000 | $— | $13,067,990 | ||||||||||||||||||||
For Cause Termination | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control(8) | $7,930,608 | $462,013 | $11,607,490(9) | $177,157 | $— | $20,177,268 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | Voluntary Termination | $4,725,000 | $— | $— | $— | $— | $4,725,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Involuntary Termination | $5,166,000 | $— | $11,287,422 | $16,406 | $— | $16,469,828 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||
For Cause Termination | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control(8) | $8,484,293 | $496,570 | $11,287,422(9) | $152,946 | $— | $20,421,231 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | Voluntary Termination(7) | $— | $— | $10,536,436 | $465,000 | $— | $11,001,436 | |||||||||||||||||||
Involuntary Termination | $3,261,000 | $— | $10,536,436 | $10,000 | $— | $13,807,436 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement | $— | $— | $10,536,436 | $465,000 | $— | $11,001,436 | ||||||||||||||||||||
For Cause Termination | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | ||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control(8) | $7,989,670 | $469,526 | $10,536,436(9) | $169,612 | $— | $19,165,244 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name | Type of Termination | Cash Severance(1) | Retirement Plan Contributions(2) |
Acceleration and of Equity Awards(3) | Continuation of Medical/ Welfare Benefits(4) | Excise Tax Gross Up(5) | Total | |||||||
Richard D. Fairbank(6) |
Voluntary Termination
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
| |||||||
Involuntary Termination
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
| ||||||||
Retirement
|
$—
|
$—
|
$33,909,899
|
$792,000
|
$—
|
$34,701,899
| ||||||||
For Cause Termination
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
| ||||||||
Change of Control(7)
|
$20,905,094
|
$—
|
$33,909,899(8)
|
$273,979
|
$—
|
$55,088,972
| ||||||||
R. Scott Blackley |
Voluntary Termination
|
$811,200
|
$—
|
$194,438
|
$—
|
$—
|
$1,005,638
| |||||||
Involuntary Termination
|
$4,435,560
|
$—
|
$7,321,721
|
$16,414
|
$—
|
$11,773,695
| ||||||||
Retirement
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
| ||||||||
For Cause Termination
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
| ||||||||
Change of Control(7)
|
$7,483,794
|
$437,992
|
$7,321,721(8)
|
$154,757
|
$—
|
$15,398,264
| ||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III |
Voluntary Termination
|
$—
|
$—
|
$231,309
|
$—
|
$—
|
$231,309
| |||||||
Involuntary Termination
|
$3,042,000
|
$—
|
$7,232,855
|
$16,414
|
$—
|
$10,291,269
| ||||||||
Retirement
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
| ||||||||
For Cause Termination
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
| ||||||||
Change of Control(7)
|
$7,613,761
|
$447,149
|
$7,232,855(8)
|
$167,264
|
$—
|
$15,461,029
| ||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer |
Voluntary Termination
|
$4,125,000
|
$—
|
$205,707
|
$—
|
$—
|
$4,330,707
| |||||||
Involuntary Termination
|
$4,511,000
|
$—
|
$7,656,921
|
$16,234
|
$—
|
$12,184,155
| ||||||||
Retirement
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
| ||||||||
For Cause Termination
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
| ||||||||
Change of Control(7)
|
$4,740,044
|
$444,897
|
$7,656,921(8)
|
$149,225
|
$—
|
$12,991,087
| ||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik |
Voluntary Termination
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
| |||||||
Involuntary Termination
|
$4,456,810
|
$—
|
$7,975,020
|
$10,000
|
$—
|
$12,441,830
| ||||||||
Retirement
|
$814,950
|
$—
|
$7,975,020
|
$600,000
|
$—
|
$9,389,970
| ||||||||
For Cause Termination
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
| ||||||||
Change of Control(7)
|
$7,522,564
|
$439,868
|
$7,975,020(8)
|
$175,829
|
$—
|
$16,113,281
|
(1) | Represents cash amounts paid for severance or in relation to enforcement of non-competition covenants as described under “Restrictive Covenants” on page |
(2) | Represents the value of projected contributions to retirement plans during the severance period. |
(3) | Represents the value of equity where vesting is accelerated or continued by the triggering event. For stock options, this represents the in-the-money value on December 31, |
(4) | Represents the value of potential payments made on the executive’s behalf for continuation of medical and welfare benefits during the non-competition or severance period, as applicable. Includes programs such as medical, dental, insurance, outplacement services, and related benefits. Only includes programs that are specific to the NEOs; does not include the value of programs generally available to all associates upon separation from the Company. |
|
|
(5) | NEOs are not eligible for excise tax gross-ups. |
112 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section VI - Named Executive Officer Compensation |
(6) | Mr. Fairbank receives no regular base salary. For |
(7) | A voluntary termination not for cause would constitute a retirement for each of Messrs. Fairbank, LaPrade, and Yajnik, as each of these NEOs was eligible for retirement as of December 31, 2021. |
(8) | Represents potential payments and benefits upon change of control for involuntary termination without cause or voluntary termination for good reason. “Acceleration and Continuation of Equity Awards” represents the value of equity where vesting is accelerated upon change of control, assuming, where applicable, that all performance metrics have been achieved at their target level. |
Unvested equity awards will be treated in a similar manner to a termination of an NEO’s employment following a termination of employment due to death or disability. |
(10) | Due to the voluntary termination of Mr. Blackley’s employment with the Company as of March 1, 2021, all termination and change of control scenarios with the exception of voluntary termination are not applicable. |
The table above is intended to reflect potential payments to NEOs across a range of potential separation scenarios, assuming the change of control or separation occurred on December 31, 2020.2021. The amounts shown in the table do not include accrued salary and vacation pay as of the date of termination, and payments and benefits that are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to salaried associates generally upon termination of employment or retirement. The NEOs are also eligible to receive certain pension benefits and certain qualified and non-qualified deferred compensation amounts upon termination. These amounts are outlined in the 20202021 Pension Benefits Table on page 99106 and the 20202021 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 100,107, respectively, and are not included in the table above.
Estimated Ratio of CEO Compensation to Median Employment Compensation
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the ratio of the annual total compensation, calculated in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K (“Annual Total Compensation”) of our median employee and the Annual Total Compensation of our CEO, Richard D. Fairbank.
For 2020,2021, our last completed fiscal year:
∎ | The Annual Total Compensation of our median employee was |
∎ | The Annual Total Compensation of Mr. Fairbank was |
Accordingly, the ratio of Mr. Fairbank’s Annual Total Compensation to the median employee’s Annual Total Compensation was 241252 to 1. This ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.
ToIn determining our median employee for 2021, in accordance with SEC rules we have concluded that it would be appropriate to: (i) rely on the process we undertook in 2020 to identify the median employee (as described in our 2021 Proxy Statement), because we usedbelieve that since the following methodology2020 determination, there has been no change in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that would significantly impact our pay ratio; and (ii) substitute the median employee for 2020 with another similarly compensated employee for 2021 because the 2020 median employee was promoted in July 2021.
We determined the 2020 median compensated employee of our global employee population of 52,781 as of October 1, 2020 (the “Determination Date”) by comparing a consistently applied material assumptions, adjustmentscompensation measure consisting of salary, wages (including overtime), bonuses and estimates:commissions paid to our employees over the twelve-month period preceding the Determination Date (the “Estimated Compensation”). Based on the Estimated Compensation of each employee, we identified a cohort of 61 employees consisting of the employee with the median Estimated Compensation value and the 30 employees above and 30 employees below that employee (“The Median Cohort”).
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
| 113 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
|
We then removed 11 employees from the Median Cohort who appeared to bear anomalous characteristics (such as participation in non-U.S. compensation programs, a hire date during the fiscal year, or separation prior to the end of the fiscal year) that could significantly distort the pay ratio calculation, and then identified the median employee from the remaining employees in the Median Cohort.
The SEC’s rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s Annual Total Compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section V - Equity Compensation Plans
Section VII - Equity Compensation Plans
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2020,2021, with respect to our equity compensation plans under which shares of Capital One common stock are authorized to be issued.
Number of securities
| Weighted-average
| Number of securities compensation securities
| Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | |||||||
Plan Category | (a) | (b) | (c) | (a) | (b) | (c) | ||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) | 7,760,739(2) | $63.91 | 17,906,365(3) | 7,144,533(2) | $67.92 | 25,487,319(3) | ||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | 33,712(4) | $— | —(5) | 24,340(4) | $— | —(5) | ||||||
Total | 7,794,451 | $63.91 | 17,906,365 | 7,168,873 | $67.92 | 25,487,319 | ||||||
(1) | The following plans have been approved by Capital One stockholders and are currently in effect: the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2002 Associate Stock Purchase Plan. |
(2) | Excludes purchase rights accruing under the 2002 Associate Stock Purchase Plan. Includes |
(3) | Represents |
(4) | Represents outstanding RSUs under the 1999 Directors Plan, which was terminated in April 2009. |
(5) | There are no shares available for future issuance under the equity compensation plans not approved by security holders. |
The 1999 Directors Plan was adopted by the Board on April 29, 1999, and terminated on April 28, 2009, although certain grants remain outstanding that were awarded under the plan. The plan authorized a maximum of 825,000 shares of Capital One’s common stock for the grant of non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, and RSUs to members of the Board who were not otherwise employed by Capital One or any subsidiary of Capital One at the time an award was granted. The plan is administered by the Board, which retains the right to cancel any awards outstanding under the plan in exchange for a cash payment equal to any such award’s value as of the cancellation date. No shares are available for issuance under this plan other than shares subject to outstanding equity awards under the plan, which are solely in the form of RSUs.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section VI - Security Ownership
Section VIII - Security Ownership
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
Based on Schedule 13D and 13G filings submitted to the SEC, Capital One is aware of the following beneficial owners of more than 5% of Capital One’s outstanding common stock. All percentage calculations are based on the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding on December 31, 2020,2021, which was 458,972,202.413,858,537.
Name and Address
| Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned
|
Percent of Class
| ||
Dodge & Cox(1) 555 California Street, 40th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104
| 50,103,507 | 10.92% | ||
The Vanguard Group(2) 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355
| 34,164,343 | 7.44% | ||
BlackRock, Inc.(3) 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055
| 33,349,330 | 7.27% | ||
FMR LLC(4) 245 Summer Street Boston, MA 02210
| 28,406,879 | 6.19% | ||
Name and Address
| Number of Shares of
| Percent of Class
| ||||||
BlackRock, Inc.(1) 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 | 34,093,510 | 8.24% | ||||||
The Vanguard Group(2) 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355 | 32,936,595 | 7.96% | ||||||
Dodge & Cox(3) 555 California Street, 40th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 | 32,790,861 | 7.92% | ||||||
Capital World Investors(4) 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90071 | 22,078,839 | 5.33% | ||||||
(1) | Based on a Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. |
(2) | Based on a Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. |
(3) | Based on a Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. |
(4) | Based on a Schedule 13G filed on February |
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Section VIII - Security Ownership |
Security Ownership of Directors and Named Executive Officers
The following table lists the beneficial ownership of Capital One’s common stock as of February 4, 2021,9, 2022, by our directors, the NEOs in this proxy statement, and all directors and executive officers as a group. All percentage calculations are based on the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding on February 4, 2021,9, 2022, which was 458,793,322.411,630,607.
Except as otherwise indicated below, each director or executive officer had sole voting and dispositive power for the shares of common stock in the table.
Name | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
| Stock- Settled RSUs(2) | Total(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Stock that May Be Acquired within 60 Days(1) | Total Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Class | |||||||||||||||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank | 3,402,873 | 1,340,889 | 4,743,762 | 1.03% | 0 | 4,743,762 | ||||||||||||||||||
R. Scott Blackley | 15,896 | — | 15,896 | * | 38,905 | 54,801 | ||||||||||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | 26,301 | 122,242 | 148,543 | * | 38,235 | 186,778 | ||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | 66,770 | 0 | 66,770 | * | 40,471 | 107,241 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | 83,849 | 51,095 | 134,944 | * | 42,139 | 177,083 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ime Archibong(4) | — | — | — | * | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Aparna Chennapragada | 0 | 7,066 | 7,066 | * | — | 7,066 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ann Fritz Hackett | 20,656 | 48,986 | 69,642 | * | — | 69,642 | ||||||||||||||||||
Peter Thomas Killalea | 0 | 11,776 | 11,776 | * | — | 11,776 | ||||||||||||||||||
Eli Leenaars | 0 | 5,655 | 5,655 | * | — | 5,655 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pierre E. Leroy | 0 | 47,986 | 47,986 | * | — | 47,986 | ||||||||||||||||||
François Locoh-Donou | 0 | 5,223 | 5,223 | * | — | 5,223 | ||||||||||||||||||
Peter E. Raskind | 2,000 | 33,242 | 35,242 | * | — | 35,242 | ||||||||||||||||||
Eileen Serra | 0 | 3,265 | 3,265 | * | — | 3,265 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mayo A. Shattuck III | 1,589 | 64,071 | 65,660 | * | — | 65,660 | ||||||||||||||||||
Bradford H. Warner | 140 | 42,210 | 42,350 | * | — | 42,350 | ||||||||||||||||||
Catherine G. West | 0 | 19,233 | 19,233 | * | — | 19,233 | ||||||||||||||||||
Craig Anthony Williams(5) | — | — | — | * | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (28 persons) | 3,926,714 | 2,097,951 | 6,024,665 | 1.31% | 438,815 | 6,463,480 | ||||||||||||||||||
Name | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
| Stock- Settled RSUs(2) | Total(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Stock that May Be Acquired within 60 Days(1) | Total Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank | 3,584,523 | 980,880 | 4,565,403 | 1.11% | — | 4,565,403 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew M. Young | 3,250 | — | 3,250 | * | 17,180 | 20,430 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. Scott Blackley | 21,398 | — | 21,398 | * | — | 21,398 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | 28,854 | — | 28,854 | * | 37,755 | 66,609 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | 65,169 | — | 65,169 | * | 38,729 | 103,898 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | 20,300 | 27,955 | 48,255 | * | 35,859 | 84,114 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ime Archibong | — | 1,654 | 1,654 | * | — | 1,654 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Christine Detrick(4) | — | 646 | 646 | * | — | 646 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Fritz Hackett | 20,655 | 50,265 | 70,920 | * | — | 70,920 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter Thomas Killalea | — | 13,055 | 13,055 | * | — | 13,055 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eli Leenaars | — | 6,934 | 6,934 | * | — | 6,934 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
François Locoh-Donou | — | 6,502 | 6,502 | * | — | 6,502 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter E. Raskind | 2,000 | 24,096 | 26,096 | * | — | 26,096 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eileen Serra | — | 4,544 | 4,544 | * | — | 4,544 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mayo A. Shattuck III | 8,965 | 50,265 | 59,230 | * | — | 59,230 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bradford H. Warner | 140 | 43,489 | 43,629 | * | — | 43,629 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catherine G. West | — | 20,512 | 20,512 | * | — | 20,512 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Craig Anthony Williams | 243 | 1,654 | 1,897 | * | — | 1,897 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (26 persons)(5) | 3,903,444 | 1,332,003 | 5,235,447 | 1.27% | 468,135 | 5,703,582 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
* | Less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock. |
(1) | This amount includes shares underlying stock options that are exercisable within 60 days after February |
(2) | RSUs held by our officers and which are settled in an equivalent number of shares of our common stock upon vesting. Represents unvested stock-settled RSUs as of February |
(3) | The amount includes the aggregate total of the “Total Beneficial Ownership” column and the “Stock-Settled RSUs” column. |
(4) |
|
(5) |
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
Section VIII - Security Ownership |
Some of the shares shown in the preceding table are subject to deferred delivery or not held directly by the director or executive officer. Below is a table showing the number of shares subject to such restriction or not held directly by the director or executive officer.
Name | RSUs for Which Delivery of Stock Is Deferred | Stock Held by, or Tenant in Common with, Family Member, Trust or Partnership | RSUs for Which Delivery of Stock Is Deferred | Stock Held by, or Tenant in Common with, Family Member, Trust or Partnership | ||||||||||||||
Richard D. Fairbank | 241,680 | — | 241,680 | 67,350 | ||||||||||||||
Andrew M. Young | — | 59 | ||||||||||||||||
R. Scott Blackley | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | — | 26,135 | ||||||||||||||||
Frank G. LaPrade, III | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Michael J. Wassmer | — | 17,758 | ||||||||||||||||
Sanjiv Yajnik | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Ime Archibong | — | — | 1,654 | — | ||||||||||||||
Aparna Chennapragada | 7,066 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Christine Detrick | 646 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Ann Fritz Hackett | 48,986 | 5,006 | 50,265 | 5,005 | ||||||||||||||
Peter Thomas Killalea | 11,776 | — | 13,055 | — | ||||||||||||||
Eli Leenaars | 5,655 | — | 6,934 | — | ||||||||||||||
Pierre E. Leroy | 47,986 | — | ||||||||||||||||
François Locoh-Donou | 5,223 | — | 6,502 | — | ||||||||||||||
Peter E. Raskind | 22,817 | — | 24,096 | — | ||||||||||||||
Eileen Serra | 3,265 | — | 4,544 | — | ||||||||||||||
Mayo A. Shattuck III | 48,986 | — | 50,265 | — | ||||||||||||||
Bradford H. Warner | 42,210 | 140 | 43,489 | 140 | ||||||||||||||
Catherine G. West | 19,233 | — | 20,512 | — | ||||||||||||||
Craig Anthony Williams | — | — | 1,654 | — | ||||||||||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (28 persons) | 504,883 | 73,380 | ||||||||||||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (26 persons)(1) | 465,296 | 102,979 |
(1) | Includes beneficial ownership of Capital One’s common stock by one former executive officer who ceased to serve as an executive officer as of March 1, 2022. |
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that Capital One’s executive officers and directors, and persons that beneficially own more than 10% of Capital One’s common stock, file certain reports of beneficial ownership of the common stock and changes in such ownership with the SEC and provide copies of these reports to Capital One. As a matter of practice, members of our staff assist our executive officers and directors in preparing initial ownership reports and reporting ownership changes and typically file these reports on their behalf. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms in our possession and written representations furnished to us, we believe that in 2021 each reporting person complied with these filing requirements, except as described below. Mr. Shattuck filed a late Form 4 to report a stock option exercise of Capital One common stock, and Timothy Golden, Capital One’s Principal Accounting Officer, filed an amended Form 4 to report the grant of a restricted stock unit award of Capital One common stock that had inadvertently been excluded from the initial Form 4, in each case due to an administrative error by the Company. Additionally, in 2021, Mr. Williams did not file accurate or timely Section 16 reports with respect to holdings and transactions of Capital One common stock held in a managed investment account maintained by Mr. Williams with an investment advisor who had discretion to make individual investment decisions in the accounts. On March 11, 2022, he filed an amended Form 3 and a Form 4. Mr. Williams’s unreported holdings and trading activity involved a total of 74 shares of Capital One common stock (four reports and six transactions total).
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Section VIIIX - Compensation Committee Report
All members of the Compensation Committee participated in the review and discussion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) with management. Based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement.
The Compensation Committee: |
Ann Fritz Hackett Peter Thomas Killalea Eli Leenaars
|
The foregoing Report of the Compensation Committee shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or filed with the SEC and is not incorporated by reference into any of Capital One’s previous or future filings with the SEC, except as otherwise explicitly specified by Capital One in any such filing.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
AUDIT MATTERS |
Section X - Proposal 3: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Item 3 on Proxy Card)
The Audit Committee, pursuant to authority granted to it by the Board, is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of Capital One’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee evaluates the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance, and independence at least annually and periodically considers whether to continue to retain our current independent registered public accounting firm or engage another firm. In connection with applicable partner rotation requirements, the Audit Committee and its Chair are involved in considering the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm’s new lead partner and concurring/reviewing partner. Additionally, Capital One adheres to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) relating to the rotation of partners engaged in Capital One’s audit by the independent registered public accounting firm.
For 2022, the Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young as Capital One’s independent registered public accounting firm. Ernst & Young has served in this role since 1994. The members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of Ernst & Young as Capital One’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of Capital One and its stockholders.
The Board is submitting this proposal to the vote of the stockholders as a matter of good corporate governance. If stockholders do not ratify the selection of Ernst & Young, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment of Ernst & Young as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in our stockholders’ best interests.
The fees billed for professional services provided by Ernst & Young for fiscal years 2021 and 2020 are shown in the following table:
Fees (dollars in millions)
| 2021
| 2020
| ||||||
Audit Fees | $12.04 | $13.34 | ||||||
Audit-Related Fees | $1.69 | $1.36 | ||||||
Tax Fees | $0.00 | $0.00 | ||||||
All Other Fees | $0.00 | $0.00 | ||||||
Description of Fees
“Audit Fees” include fees for the audit of our annual financial statements, the review of unaudited interim financial information included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and services that normally would be provided by the registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements and that generally only the independent registered public accounting firm can provide. In addition to fees for an audit or review in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, this category contains fees for comfort letters, statutory and subsidiary audits, consents, and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC. “Audit-Related Fees” include fees related to assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and traditionally are performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, such as: compliance testing and reporting; internal control reviews; attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation; and agreed upon procedure reports. “Tax Fees” include fees for corporate and subsidiary tax compliance services. “All Other Fees” include fees for services that are not defined as Audit, Audit-Related, or Tax and are not specifically prohibited by the SEC.
120 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
AUDIT MATTERS |
Section X - Proposal 3: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
Audit Committee Fee Approval Procedures
The Audit Committee is responsible for approving all fees and terms of engagement for audit, audit-related, and permissible non-audit services provided by Ernst & Young. The Audit Committee has reviewed the fees paid to Ernst & Young and has considered whether the fees paid for non-Audit services are compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young’s independence. The Audit Committee also adopted policies and procedures to approve services provided by Ernst & Young in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and rules of the SEC promulgated thereunder. These policies and procedures involve annual pre-approval by the Audit Committee of the types of services to be provided by Capital One’s independent registered public accounting firm and fee limits for each type of service on both a per engagement and aggregate level. Any service engagements that exceed these pre-approved limits must be submitted to the Audit Committee for specific pre-approval. If the actual expenditure for pre-approved services is anticipated to exceed, or exceeds, the pre-approved cost levels by more than $50,000, the incremental amount requires separate approval by the Audit Committee. In 2021, all of the Audit and Audit-Related Fees and related services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the policies and procedures described above. Under the policy adopted by the Audit Committee, Tax Fees are limited to 25% of combined Audit and Audit-Related Fees, and services that would fall under the category “All Other Fees” are prohibited.
One or more representatives of Ernst & Young are expected to be present at the 2022 Annual Stockholder Meeting. They will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.
***
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as Capital One’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2022.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 121 |
AUDIT MATTERS |
Section VIIIXI - Audit Committee Report
Roles and Responsibilities of the Audit Committee
In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its obligations with respect to the items listed in “Committee Responsibilities” on page 40. Our Audit Committee is composed of fivesix Board members. Our Board has determined that all Audit Committee members are independent under Capital One’s Director Independence Standards, which have been adopted by the Board as part of Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. Each member of the Audit Committee is “financially literate” in the judgment of the Board. TheNo member of the Audit Committee met 11 times in 2020.simultaneously serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies, including that of Capital One.
Audit Committee Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee has implemented procedures to enable it to devote the attention it deems appropriate to each of the matters assigned to it under its charter, including candid communications with management and Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”), Capital One’s independent registered public accounting firm, to discuss new auditing standards and emerging audit-related issues. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee met a total of 11 times during 2020.2021. Pursuant to Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and applicable law, the Audit Committee is comprised solely of independent directors.
Required Communications with Ernst & Young
In discharging its oversight responsibility throughout the year, the Audit Committee proactively engaged with management and Ernst & Young on matters relating to Capital One financial reporting. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed Capital One’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020,2021, and the assessment of the effectiveness of Capital One’s internal control over financial reporting, with management and Ernst & Young. The Audit Committee has also discussed with Ernst & Young the matters required to be discussed under the applicable standardsrequirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.Board and the SEC. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding Ernst & Young’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Ernst & Young their independence from Capital One.
Audit Committee Recommendations
Based on its review and discussions with management and Ernst & Young, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors the inclusion of the audited financial statements in Capital One’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020,2021, for filing with the SEC.
The Audit Committee: | Bradford H. Warner (Chair and Audit Committee Financial Expert) | |
Eli Leenaars (Audit Committee Financial Expert) | ||
| ||
Eileen Serra (Audit Committee Financial Expert) | ||
Catherine G. West Craig Anthony Williams |
The foregoing Report of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or filed with the SEC and is not incorporated by reference into any of Capital One’s previous or future filings with the SEC, except as otherwise explicitly specified by Capital One in any such filing.
|
|
Section IX - Election of Directors
(Item 1 on Proxy Card)
All of Capital One’s directors are elected at each annual meeting of stockholders and hold such office until the next annual meeting of stockholders, and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Each nominee is a current Board member who was elected by stockholders at the 2020 Annual Stockholder Meeting, other than Ime Archibong and Craig Anthony Williams, who were appointed to the Board effective February 26, 2021, and were recommended to the Governance and Nominating Committee by Spencer Stuart, a third-party director search firm. Each nominee has consented to serve a one-year term. Information about the proposed nominees for election as directors is set forth under “Biographies of Director Nominees” beginning on page 20 of this proxy statement.
In the event a nominee becomes unable to serve or for good cause will not serve as a director, the Board may designate a substitute as a nominee or reduce the size of the Board. If the Board designates a substitute nominee, proxies will be voted for the election of such substitute. As of the date of this proxy statement, the Board has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve as a director.
The nominees for election this year are:
| ||
***
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” each of these director nominees.
|
|
Section X - Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(Item 2 on Proxy Card)
The Audit Committee, pursuant to authority granted to it by the Board, is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of Capital One’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee evaluates the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and independence at least annually and periodically considers whether to continue to retain our current independent registered public accounting firm or engage another firm. In connection with applicable partner rotation requirements, the Audit Committee and its Chair are involved in considering the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm’s new lead partner and concurring/reviewing partner. Additionally, Capital One adheres to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) relating to the rotation of partners engaged in Capital One’s audit by the independent registered public accounting firm.
For 2021, the Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young as Capital One’s independent registered public accounting firm. Ernst & Young has served in this role since 1994. The members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of Ernst & Young as Capital One’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of Capital One and its stockholders.
The Board is submitting this proposal to the vote of the stockholders as a matter of good corporate governance. If stockholders do not ratify the selection of Ernst & Young, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment of Ernst & Young as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in our stockholders’ best interests.
The fees billed for professional services provided by Ernst & Young for fiscal years 2020 and 2019 are shown in the following table:
Fees (dollars in millions)
| 2020
| 2019
| ||
Audit Fees | $13.34 | $13.10 | ||
Audit-Related Fees | $1.36 | $1.28 | ||
Tax Fees | $0.00 | $0.00 | ||
All Other Fees | $0.00 | $0.00 | ||
Description of Fees
“Audit Fees” include fees for the audit of our annual financial statements, the review of unaudited interim financial information included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and services that normally would be provided by the registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements and that generally only the independent registered public accounting firm can provide. In addition to fees for an audit or review in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, this category contains fees for comfort letters, statutory and subsidiary audits, consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC. “Audit-Related Fees” include fees related to assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and traditionally are performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, such as: compliance testing and reporting; internal control reviews; attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation; and agreed upon procedure reports. “Tax Fees” include fees for corporate and subsidiary tax compliance services. “All Other Fees” include fees for services that are not defined as Audit, Audit-Related or Tax and are not specifically prohibited by the SEC.
|
|
Audit Committee Fee Approval Procedures
The Audit Committee is responsible for approving all fees and terms of engagement for audit, audit-related and permissible non-audit services provided by Ernst & Young. The Audit Committee has reviewed the fees paid to Ernst & Young and has considered whether the fees paid for non-Audit services are compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young’s independence. The Audit Committee also adopted policies and procedures to approve services provided by Ernst & Young in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and rules of the SEC promulgated thereunder. These policies and procedures involve annual pre-approval by the Audit Committee of the types of services to be provided by Capital One’s independent registered public accounting firm and fee limits for each type of service on both a per engagement and aggregate level. Any service engagements that exceed these pre-approved limits must be submitted to the Audit Committee for specific pre-approval. In 2020, all of the Audit and Audit-Related Fees and related services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the policies and procedures described above. Under the policy adopted by the Audit Committee, Tax Fees are limited to 25% of combined Audit and Audit-Related Fees, and services that would fall under the category “All Other Fees” are prohibited.
One or more representatives of Ernst & Young are expected to be present at the 2021 Annual Stockholder Meeting. They will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.
***
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as Capital One’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2021.
|
|
Section XI - Advisory Approval of Capital One’s 2020 Named Executive Officer Compensation
(Item 3 on Proxy Card)
We are offering to our stockholders a non-binding advisory vote to approve our 2020 named executive officer compensation, pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act. While the vote is non-binding, the Board of Directors values the opinions that stockholders express through their votes and in any additional dialogue. The Board of Directors will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions.
As discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on page 54, our Board of Directors generally has provided compensation programs for the CEO and the other NEOs that are competitive with the market, performance-based and transparent and that align with our stockholders’ interests over multiple time horizons. Our CEO’s and other NEOs’ compensation programs generally have consisted primarily of performance-based incentive opportunities, including multiple types of equity instruments with multi-year vesting schedules. The ultimate value of these equity-based awards is subject to Capital One’s sustained performance over time, both on an absolute basis and relative to our peers.
For 2020, approximately 84% of the CEO’s total compensation is equity-based and at-risk to the performance of the Company’s stock price, and 100% of his compensation is deferred for a three-year period. As discussed under “NEO Compensation” beginning on page 79, under the 2020 NEO compensation program applicable to our other NEOs, approximately 55% of total compensation was provided through equity-based vehicles which were all at-risk based on the performance of the Company’s stock price and subject to vesting over multiple time horizons.
Additional information relevant to your vote can be found under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on pages 54 to 91 and “Named Executive Officer Compensation” section on pages 92 to 106.
We ask for your approval of the following resolution:
“Resolved, that Capital One’s stockholders hereby provide their advisory approval of the 2020 Named Executive Officer compensation as disclosed pursuant to the rules of the SEC in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table, the other compensation tables and the related notes and narratives in this proxy statement.”
The Board of Directors has resolved to hold annual advisory votes to approve executive compensation. Accordingly, the next advisory vote to approve executive compensation will occur at the 2022 Annual Stockholder Meeting, unless the Board of Directors modifies its policy on the frequency of holding such advisory votes.
***
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” approval, on an advisory basis, of our 2020 Named Executive Officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement.
|
|
Section XII - Approval and Adoption of the Capital One Financial Corporation Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan
(Item 4 on Proxy Card)
Overview
In 2004 the Board of Directors adopted the Capital One Financial Corporation 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”), which was approved by the Company’s stockholders at the annual meeting of stockholders held on April 29, 2004. The 2004 Plan was subsequently resubmitted for approval, and approved, by stockholders, at the annual meetings held on April 27, 2006, April 23, 2009 and May 1, 2014 in order to increase the number of shares available for issuance under the 2004 Plan and to make certain other changes as detailed in the respective proxy statement proposals for stockholder approval. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved and adopted the Fourth Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan effective as of January 1, 2018 to make certain non-material changes. The Fifth Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan was submitted for approval, and subsequently approved, by stockholders at the annual meeting held on May 2, 2019 to account for changes to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
On February 4, 2021, the Compensation Committee adopted, subject to stockholder approval, an amended and restated version of the 2004 Plan (the “Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan”) to (1) extend the duration of the 2004 Plan so that it will terminate ten (10) years following the date of the 2021 Annual Stockholder Meeting, and (2) increase the share reserve under the 2004 Plan by 12 million shares from 55 million shares to 67 million shares. In addition, the Compensation Committee approved certain non-material changes to the 2004 Plan that are not subject to stockholder approval in order to align the 2004 Plan with current market practice to reduce liberal share recycling and to include “double trigger” change of control provisions, as described in greater detail below, and as reflected in the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan, which is provided in its entirety as Appendix B to this proxy statement. The Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan will be approved by stockholders if a majority of the votes cast by stockholders on the proposal are voted in favor of the proposal. NYSE rules governing equity compensation plans treat abstentions as “votes cast.” Accordingly, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. However, broker non-votes are not considered “votes cast” and thus will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.
If the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan is not approved by our stockholders, the Fifth Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan will remain in effect in its current form, and we will continue to be able to grant equity incentive awards under the Fifth Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan until its expiration, subject to the current 2004 Plan Share reserve. However, the current 2004 Plan Share reserve is not sufficient to cover the awards anticipated to be granted beginning in 2022 and therefore we would not be able to maintain our current equity granting practices.
Specifically, the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan makes the following changes that are subject to stockholder approval:
|
|
The 2004 Plan, amended as of May 1, 2014, created a reserve of 55 million shares of Capital One common stock (each a “Share,” collectively, the “Shares”). The 2004 Plan Share reserve is not sufficient to cover the awards anticipated to be granted beginning in 2022 and therefore we are asking for stockholders to approve an increase of 12 million Shares in the 2004 Plan’s Share reserve at this time.
The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors believe that compensating Capital One executives and associates with equity awards encourages the creation of long-term stockholder value and the delivery of consistent medium- and long-term results.
|
|
Summary of Material Provisions of the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan
The material terms of the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan are summarized below and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan, which is provided as Appendix B to this proxy statement. Because this is a summary, it may not contain all the information that you may consider important, and thus, we encourage you to read the full text of the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan.
Types of Awards
Awards under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan may be in the form of: (i) cash-based awards; (ii) options, which may be incentive stock options, as defined in the Code (“ISOs”) (which are tax advantageous for the participant but with respect to which Capital One does not receive a deduction) or non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”); (iii) stock appreciation rights (“SARs”); (iv) restricted stock; (v) restricted stock units (“RSUs”); (vi) performance shares; (vii) performance units; (viii) annual incentive pool awards; or (ix) other stock-based awards (“Other Stock-Based Awards”) (collectively, “Awards”).
Duration of the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan
The Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan was amended and restated as of January 1, 2021 (the “Restatement Effective Date”) and will become effective upon stockholder approval. Unless terminated sooner as provided therein, the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan will terminate on May 6, 2031, which is ten (10) years from the 2021 Annual Stockholder Meeting being held on May 6, 2021. After the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan is terminated, no new Awards may be granted under the 2004 Plan. Awards previously granted will remain outstanding in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan and as specified under the applicable grant agreement.
Shares Available for Awards
The total number of Shares available for issuance under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan, subject to adjustment in accordance with certain anti-dilution provisions described below, is proposed to be increased by 12 million Shares, from an aggregate amount of 55 million Shares to an aggregate amount of 67 million Shares.
Shares covered by an Award will only be counted as used under the authorized Shares set forth in the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan to the extent they are actually issued and delivered to a participant or such participant’s designated transferee and are not forfeited by the participant and returned to Capital One. Any Shares that are related to Awards which terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation, or otherwise without the issuance of Shares, which are forfeited by the participant to Capital One (including pursuant to performance based vesting conditions), which are settled in cash in lieu of Shares, or which (subject to the 2004 Plan’s prohibition on repricing, cashing out or exchanging out of the out-of-the-money stock options or stock appreciation rights) are exchanged with the Compensation Committee’s permission prior to the issuance of Shares for Awards not involving the issuance or delivery of Shares, will be available again for grant under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan. The Compensation Committee has approved additional limitations on share usage as specified in Section 4.2(b) of the 2004 Plan, in order to align the terms of the 2004 Plan with the Company’s current practice. As approved, the following Shares covered by an Award are counted as used under the authorized Shares under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan and may not be added to the maximum number of Shares that may be issued:
|
|
|
|
|
Except to the extent otherwise required by applicable law or stock exchange rules, the maximum number of Shares available for issuance under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan will not be reduced to reflect any dividends or dividend equivalents that are reinvested into additional Shares or credited as additional restricted stock, RSUs, performance shares, or Other Stock-Based Awards. The Shares available for issuance under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan may be authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.
Annual Award Limits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments in Authorized Shares
In the event of any corporate event or transaction (including, but not limited to, a change in the Shares or the capitalization of Capital One), such as a merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, separation, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, split up, spin-off, or other distribution of stock or property of Capital One, combination of Shares, exchange of Shares, dividend in kind, extraordinary cash dividend or other like change in capital structure or distribution to stockholders of Capital One, or any similar corporate event or transaction, the Compensation Committee, in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of participants’ rights under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan, will substitute or adjust, as applicable, the number and kind of Shares that may be issued under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan or under certain Awards, the number and kind of Shares subject to outstanding Awards, the exercise or grant price applicable to outstanding Awards, the annual award limits described above and other value determinations applicable to outstanding Awards. The Compensation Committee will also make appropriate adjustments or modifications in the terms of any Awards to reflect such corporate events or transactions, including the modification of performance goals and performance periods. Subject to applicable law, the Compensation Committee is also authorized to issue new Awards or assume awards granted under plans of other entities in connection with any merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock or reorganization upon such terms and conditions it deems appropriate.
|
|
Administration
The Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will have full and exclusive discretionary power to do all things that it determines to be necessary or appropriate in connection with the administration of the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan, including, without limitation: (a) to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan and to define terms not otherwise defined therein; (b) to determine which persons are eligible for Awards granted thereunder and the timing of any such Awards; (c) to prescribe and amend the terms of the Award agreements, to grant Awards and determine the terms and conditions thereof; (d) to establish and verify the extent of satisfaction of any performance goals or other conditions applicable to the grant, issuance, retention, vesting, exercisability, settlement or recoupment of any Award; (e) to prescribe and amend the terms of or form of any document or notice required to be delivered to Capital One by participants under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan; (f) to determine the extent to which adjustments are required pursuant to the terms of the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan; (g) to interpret and construe the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan, any rules and regulations thereunder and the terms and conditions of any Award granted thereunder, and to make exceptions to any such provisions if the Compensation Committee, in good faith, determines that it is appropriate to do so; (h) to approve corrections in the documentation or administration of any Award; and (i) to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan.
The Compensation Committee may delegate to one or more of its members or other members of the Board of Directors or to one or more officers or management committees of Capital One (including its subsidiaries and affiliates) or to one or more agents or advisors such duties or powers as it may deem advisable, and the Compensation Committee or any person to whom it has delegated duties or powers as aforesaid may employ one or more persons to render advice with respect to any responsibility the Compensation Committee or such person may have under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan. In addition, the Compensation Committee may, by resolution, authorize one or more officers or management committees of Capital One to do one or more of the following on the same basis as can the Compensation Committee: (a) designate employees to be recipients of Awards; and (b) determine the type, number of Shares subject thereto and all other terms and conditions of any such Awards; provided, however, (i) the Compensation Committee may not delegate such responsibilities to any such officer or management committee for Awards granted to a director, an employee that is considered an Insider (as defined in the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan); (ii) the resolution providing such authorization sets forth the total number of Shares that may be subject to Awards such officer(s) or management committee(s) may grant and any other limitations on the delegated authority that the Compensation Committee may deem appropriate or advisable; and (iii) the officer(s) or management committee(s) must report periodically to the Compensation Committee regarding the nature and scope of the Awards granted pursuant to the authority delegated in the manner and at such times as requested by the Compensation Committee.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law and subject to Capital One’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Restated Bylaws, neither Capital One nor any member of the Compensation Committee will be liable for any action, omission or determination of the Compensation Committee relating to the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan or any Award, and Capital One will indemnify and hold harmless each member of the Compensation Committee and each other person to whom any duty or power relating to the administration or interpretation of the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan or any Award has been delegated against any cost or expense (including counsel fees) or liability (including any sum paid in settlement of a claim with the approval of the Compensation Committee) arising out of any such action, omission or determination relating to the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan or any Award.
The Compensation Committee may enter into agreements with third parties, on such terms and conditions as it determines, pursuant to which such third parties may issue Awards to the participants in lieu of Capital One’s issuance thereof or assume the obligations of Capital One under any Awards previously issued by Capital One.
Eligibility
All employees of Capital One, its affiliates and its subsidiaries and members of the Board are eligible to be granted Awards under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan. Certain individual consultants, agents, advisors and independent contractors who render services to Capital One (“Third Party Service Providers”) are
|
|
also eligible to participate in the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan. As stated above, the basis for participation in the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan is the Compensation Committee’s decision to select, in its sole discretion, participants from among those eligible. The approximate number of individuals eligible to be granted Awards under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan as of December 31, 2020 were 51,985 employees, 11 non-management directors and 26,800 Third Party Service Providers, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, there were no Third Party Service Providers with outstanding awards under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan.
In lieu of making Awards directly to employees, directors or Third Party Service Providers, the Compensation Committee may make Awards under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan through or to a trust or other funding vehicle which then makes Awards to participants or which issues interests in Awards held by it to participants, on such terms and conditions as determined by the Compensation Committee.
General Terms and Conditions of Awards
In general, and subject to the terms and provisions of the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan (including those described below), Awards may be granted to participants on such dates, in such form and number and upon such terms and conditions (including the effect, if any, of a Change of Control, death, Disability or Retirement (as each such term is defined in the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan)) as determined from time to time by the Compensation Committee. Each Award granted will be evidenced by an Award agreement that will specify such terms and conditions. In addition, each participant’s Award agreement will set forth the extent to which the participant will have the right to exercise, retain or receive an Award or to have such Award vest or pay out, as applicable, following the termination of such participant’s employment with, or provision of services to, Capital One, its affiliates or subsidiaries, as the case may be.
Except as otherwise provided in the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan, in a participant’s Award agreement or as otherwise determined at any time by the Compensation Committee, no Award granted under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.
The Compensation Committee may specify in an Award agreement that the participant’s rights, payments and benefits with respect to an Award will be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture or recoupment upon the occurrence of certain specified events, in addition to any otherwise applicable vesting or performance conditions. Failure by a participant to comply with any of the terms and conditions of the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan or any Award agreement will be grounds for the cancellation and forfeiture of such Award.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. The Compensation Committee may grant to a participant Shares of restricted stock and/or RSUs. RSUs are similar to Shares of restricted stock except that no Shares are actually awarded to the participant on the date of grant. The Shares of restricted stock and/or the RSUs granted to a participant under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan will not be transferable until the end of the applicable period of restriction established by the Compensation Committee (and in the case of RSUs until the date of delivery of Shares or other payment), or upon earlier satisfaction of any other conditions as specified by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will impose such other conditions and/or restrictions on any Shares of restricted stock or RSUs as it may deem advisable, including a requirement that the participant pay a stipulated purchase price for each Share of restricted stock or each RSU, restrictions based upon achievement of performance goals, service-based restrictions and/or restrictions under applicable laws or under the requirements of any stock exchange or securities market upon which such Shares are listed or traded. For the avoidance of doubt, imposing restrictions based upon the achievement of performance goals will not result in Shares of restricted stock or RSUs being converted to performance shares or performance units for purposes of the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan, including for purposes of the annual award limits described above.
Generally, Shares of restricted stock will become freely transferable by the participant after all conditions and restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied or lapse (including satisfaction of applicable tax withholding obligations) and RSUs will be settled in cash, Shares or a combination of cash and Shares, as the Compensation Committee determines.
To the extent permitted by law, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee and set forth in an Award agreement, participants holding Shares of restricted stock will be granted the right to exercise full voting
|
|
rights and to receive all dividends and other distributions paid with respect to those Shares during the period of restriction, while recipients of RSUs will not be granted such rights, dividends or distributions during the period of restriction, except as specifically determined by the Compensation Committee and as permitted by law.
Performance Units and Performance Shares. The Compensation Committee may grant performance units and/or performance shares to participants under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan in such amounts and upon such terms as the Compensation Committee determines. Each performance unit will have an initial value that is established by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant and each performance share will have an initial value equal to the fair market value of a Share on the date of grant. In addition to any non-performance terms set forth by the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee will set performance goals which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will determine the value and/or number of performance units or performance shares to be paid out to participants. In accordance with the Award agreements, participants will be entitled to payment, in the form of cash and/or Shares, equal to the value and number of applicable performance units and performance shares earned by participants over the designated performance period following the end of such performance period.
Options.The Compensation Committee may grant to a participant the right to purchase Shares in such amounts and upon such terms as the Compensation Committee determines (including in satisfaction of Capital One’s obligations pursuant to options with reload features granted under the prior stock incentive plans), subject to the following restrictions. An option may be granted as an ISO or as a non-qualified stock option, as determined by the Compensation Committee and as set forth in any applicable Award agreement. The exercise price per Share will be determined by the Compensation Committee and may be at, above or indexed to, the fair market value of a Share on the date of grant; provided that, in no event will the exercise price per Share be less than 100% of the fair market value of a Share on the date of grant. Options granted under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan will vest and become exercisable at such time and upon such terms and conditions as may be determined by the Compensation Committee; provided that no option will be exercisable later than the tenth (10th) anniversary of its date of grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, options granted to participants outside of the United States may have a term of greater than ten (10) years.
The purchase price for the Shares as to which an option is exercised will be paid to Capital One in full at the time of exercise (i) in cash or its equivalent; (ii) in Shares having a fair market value equal to the aggregate exercise price for the Shares being purchased and satisfying such other requirements as may be imposed by the Compensation Committee; (iii) partly in cash and partly in such Shares; (iv) by a cashless (broker-assisted) exercise; or (v) by any other method approved or accepted by the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee may impose such restrictions on any Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an option granted under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation, minimum holding period requirements, restrictions under applicable federal securities laws, under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which such Shares are then listed and/or traded, or under any blue sky or state securities laws applicable to such Shares.
The Compensation Committee is not permitted to grant options containing, or amend options previously granted to include, reload features providing for the automatic grant of options with respect to the number of already owned Shares delivered by the participant to exercise options.
SARs. The Compensation Committee may grant to a participant an SAR independent of an option or in tandem with an option or designated portion thereof at the time the related option is granted or at any time prior to the exercise or cancellation of the related option. The grant price of an SAR that is either granted independently of any options or the exercise of which does not require the forfeiture of any rights under a related option (a “Freestanding SAR”) will be determined by the Compensation Committee; provided that, in no event will the grant price per Share be less than 100% of the fair market value of a Share on the date of grant. The grant price of an SAR that is granted in connection with a related option and the exercise of which requires the forfeiture of the right to purchase Shares under the related option (a “Tandem SAR”) will be equal to the exercise price of the related option.
The term of an SAR granted under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan will be determined by the Compensation Committee; provided that no SAR will be exercisable later than the tenth (10th) anniversary of the date of its grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, SARs granted to participants outside of the United States may have a term of greater than ten (10) years.
122
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Freestanding SARs may be exercised upon the terms and conditions as imposed by the Compensation Committee and Tandem SARs may only be exercised with respect to all or part of the Shares subject to the related option upon the surrender of the right to exercise the equivalent portion of the related option.
Upon the exercise of an SAR, the participant will be entitled to receive, with respect to each Share to which such SAR relates, an amount in cash and/or Shares, as the case may be, equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of a Share on the date of exercise over (ii) the grant price of the SAR. The Compensation Committee may impose such restrictions on any Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an SAR granted under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation, a requirement that the participant hold the Shares received upon exercise of an SAR for a specified period of time.
Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards. The Compensation Committee may grant cash-based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards to participants, in such amounts and upon such terms and conditions as the Compensation Committee may determine. Other Stock-Based Awards may include Awards designed to comply with or take advantage of the applicable local laws of jurisdictions outside of the United States.
Each cash-based Award will specify a payment amount or payment range and each Other Stock-Based Award will be expressed in terms of Shares or units based on Shares, each as determined by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may also establish any performance goals with respect to cash-based Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards, in which case the number and/or value of cash-based Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards that will be paid out to the participant will depend on the extent to which the performance goals (and any other non-performance terms and conditions) are met. Payment with respect to a cash-based Award or Other Stock-Based Award will be made in accordance with the terms of the Award, in cash and/or Shares as determined by the Compensation Committee.
Performance-Based Compensation. The Compensation Committee may grant Awards to participants that are subject to performance goals upon which the grant, payment or vesting of an Award may occur. The performance goals will be set at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and can include, but are not limited to, the following performance measures, either individually, alternatively, or in any combination, applied to either Capital One as a whole or to a business unit or subsidiary or affiliate or any combination thereof, either individually, alternatively or in any combination, and measured either annually or cumulatively over a period of years, on an absolute basis or relative to a pre-established target, to previous years’ results or to a designated comparison group, in each case as specified by the Compensation Committee: net earnings or net income (before or after taxes); earnings per share; net sales growth; net operating profit; return measures (including, but not limited to return on assets, capital, equity or sales); cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow, free cash flow, and cash flow return on capital); cash flow per share; earnings before or after taxes, interest, depreciation and/or amortization; gross or operating margins; productivity ratios; share price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and total stockholder return); expense targets or ratios; charge-off levels; revenue growth; deposit growth; margins; operating efficiency; operating expenses; economic value added; improvement in or attainment of expense levels; improvement in or attainment of working capital levels; debt reduction; capital targets; consummation of acquisitions, dispositions, projects or other specific events or transactions; and any other performance goal that the Compensation Committee deems appropriate.
The Compensation Committee may provide for accelerated vesting of any Award based on the achievement of performance goals pursuant to the performance measures set forth by the Compensation Committee with respect to such Award.
The Compensation Committee will determine whether, with respect to a performance period, the applicable performance goals have been met with respect to a given participant and, if they have, to so certify and ascertain the amount of the applicable Award. The Compensation Committee may provide in any such Award that any evaluation of performance may include or exclude any of the following events that occurs during a performance period: (a) asset write-downs, (b) litigation or claim judgments or settlements, (c) the effect of changes in tax laws, accounting principles or regulations, or other laws or provisions affecting reported results, (d) any reorganization and restructuring programs, (e) extraordinary, unusual, and/or nonrecurring items of gain or loss as defined under United States generally accepted accounting principles for the applicable year, (f) mergers, acquisitions or divestitures, and (g) foreign exchange gains and losses.
|
|
Annual Incentive Pool Awards. The Compensation Committee may designate employees who are eligible to receive a monetary payment in any plan year based upon a percentage of an incentive pool equal to the greater of (i) 3% of Capital One’s Consolidated Operating Earnings for the plan year, (ii) 20% of Capital One’s Operating Cash Flow for the plan year, and (iii) 5% of Capital One’s Net Income for the plan year (as each such term is defined in the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan). The Compensation Committee will allocate an incentive pool percentage to each participating employee for each plan year; provided that the incentive pool percentage for any one participant may not exceed 50% of the total pool, the sum of the incentive pool percentages for all participants cannot exceed 100% of the total pool and the monetary payment for any one participant may not exceed $10,000,000. As soon as possible following the determination of the incentive pool for a plan year, the Compensation Committee will calculate each participant’s portion of the incentive pool based upon the percentage established at the beginning of the plan year. The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to adjust incentive pool downwards and provide for such other terms as it feels necessary or appropriate.
Dividend Equivalents. The Compensation Committee may grant dividend equivalents to any participant based on the dividends declared on Shares that are subject to any Award. Such dividend equivalents may be awarded or paid in the form of cash, Shares, restricted stock, RSUs or a combination thereof and will be determined by such formula and at such time and be subject to such accrual, forfeiture or payout restrictions or limitations as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion.
Deferrals. The Compensation Committee may permit or require a participant to defer his or her receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of Shares that would otherwise be due to such participant by virtue of the lapse or waiver of restrictions with respect to Shares of restricted stock or RSUs, or the satisfaction of any requirements or performance goals with respect to performance shares, performance units, cash-based Awards, Other Stock-Based Awards and annual incentive pool Awards. If any such deferral is required or permitted, the Compensation Committee will establish rules and procedures for such payment or Share delivery and any notional earnings to be credited on such deferred amounts, provided that in the case of any Award intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation,” as such term was defined in Section 162(m) of the Code on December 21, 2017, such earnings will be in compliance with Code Section 162(m).
Amendment, Modification, Suspension and Termination; No Repricings. The Compensation Committee may, at any time, alter, amend, modify, suspend or terminate the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan and any Award agreement in whole or in part; provided, however, that no amendment of the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan or an Award will be made without stockholder approval if stockholder approval is required by law, regulation, or stock exchange rule. Furthermore, other than in connection with a change in Capital One’s capitalization, the Compensation Committee will not, without stockholder approval, reduce the exercise price or grant price of a previously awarded option or SAR and, at any time when the exercise price or grant price of the previously awarded option or SAR is above the fair market value of a Share, the Compensation Committee will not, without stockholder approval, cancel and re-grant or exchange such option or SAR for cash or a new Award with a lower (or no) exercise price or grant price or take any other action that would be considered a repricing for purposes of United States generally accepted accounting principles or any applicable stock exchange rule.
No termination, amendment, suspension or modification of the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan or an Award agreement will materially adversely affect any Award previously granted under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan without the written consent of the participant holding such Award. The Compensation Committee may, however, terminate any Award previously granted and any Award agreement relating thereto in whole or in part upon payment of certain consideration (as set forth in the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan) or, in the case of options only, thirty (30) days after an acceleration of exercisability.
The Compensation Committee may authorize the repurchase of any Award by Capital One at any time for such price and on such terms and conditions as the Compensation Committee may determine, provided that without the prior approval of Capital One’s stockholders, the Compensation Committee may not permit the repurchase by Capital One of options or SARs with an exercise price or grant price, respectively, above the fair market value of the Shares at the time of such repurchase. The Compensation Committee may make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the performance criteria included in, Awards in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring
|
|
events affecting Capital One or the financial statements of Capital One or of changes in applicable laws, regulations or accounting principles, whenever the Compensation Committee determines that such adjustments are appropriate in order to prevent unintended dilution or enlargement of the benefits to be made available under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan.
Successors. All obligations of Capital One under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan with respect to Awards granted thereunder will be binding on any successor to Capital One, whether the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of Capital One.
Tax Withholding. Capital One may deduct or withhold, or require the participant to remit to Capital One, any taxes due as a result of or in connection with the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan or any Award. Participants may elect, or the Compensation Committee may require, the withholding of Shares to satisfy the participant’s withholding obligations.
Change of Control.The Committee may provide in an Award agreement for provisions relating to a Change of Control, including acceleration of the exercisability, vesting or settlement of, or the lapse of restrictions or deemed satisfaction of performance objectives with respect to, an Award; provided that, in addition to any other conditions provided for in the Award agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
Participants Based Outside of the United States. In order to comply with the laws in other jurisdictions in which Capital One, its affiliates or its subsidiaries operate or have employees, directors or Third Party Service Providers, the Compensation Committee will have the power to (i) determine which affiliates and subsidiaries will be covered by the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan, (ii) determine which employees, directors and Third Party Service Providers outside of the United States are eligible to participate in the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan, (iii) modify the terms and conditions of any Award granted to participants outside of the United States to comply with foreign laws, (iv) establish subplans and modify exercise procedures and other terms and procedures, to the extent such actions may be necessary or advisable and (v) take any action that it deems advisable to obtain approval or comply with any necessary local government regulatory exemptions or approval.
New Plan Benefits. Because benefits under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan will depend on the Compensation Committee’s actions and the fair market value of the Shares at various future dates, it is not possible to determine the benefits that will be received by directors, executive officers and other employees if the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan is approved by stockholders. As of December 31, 2020, the closing price of Capital One common stock was $98.85 per share.
Equity Compensation Plan Information.For the information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act, see “Equity Compensation Plans” on page 107.
|
|
Material Tax and Other Considerations Relating to the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan
Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a summary description of the federal income tax consequences generally arising with respect to Awards granted pursuant to the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan. The discussion is intended solely for general information and does not make specific representations to any Award recipient. A recipient’s particular situation may be such that some variation of the basic rules is applicable to him or her. In addition, the federal income tax laws and regulations frequently have been revised and may be changed again at any time. Therefore, each recipient is urged to consult a tax advisor before exercising any award or before disposing of any shares acquired under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan both with respect to federal income tax consequences as well as any foreign, state or local tax consequences.
The grant of an option or SAR will create no tax consequences for the participant or Capital One. A participant will not generally recognize taxable income upon exercising an ISO (except that the alternative minimum tax may apply). Upon exercising an option other than an ISO, the participant must generally recognize ordinary income equal to the excess of the fair market value of the freely transferable and nonforfeitable Shares acquired on the date of exercise over the exercise price. Upon exercise of an SAR, the participant must generally recognize ordinary income equal to the cash or the fair market value of the freely transferable and nonforfeitable Shares received.
Upon a disposition of Shares acquired upon exercise of an ISO before the end of the applicable ISO holding periods, the participant must generally recognize ordinary income equal to the lesser of (i) the fair market value of the Shares at the date of exercise of the ISO minus the exercise price, or (ii) the amount realized upon the disposition of the ISO Shares minus the exercise price. Otherwise, a participant’s disposition of Shares acquired upon the exercise of an option (including an ISO for which the ISO holding periods are met) generally will result in capital gain or loss measured by the excess of the sale price over the participant’s tax basis in such Shares (the tax basis generally being the exercise price plus any amount previously recognized as ordinary income in connection with the exercise of the option).
Capital One generally will be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the amount recognized as ordinary income by the participant in connection with an option or SAR. Capital One generally is not entitled to a tax deduction relating to amounts that represent a capital gain to a participant. Accordingly, Capital One will not be entitled to any tax deduction with respect to an ISO if the participant holds the Shares in satisfaction of the ISO holding periods prior to disposition of the Shares.
With respect to Awards other than options and SARs involving the issuance of Shares or other property that is restricted as to transferability and subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the participant must generally recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the Shares or other property received at the first time the Shares or other property become transferable or no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, whichever occurs earlier. Under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan, a participant may be permitted or required to elect to be taxed at the time of receipt of Shares or other property rather than upon lapse of restrictions on transferability or substantial risk of forfeiture, but if the participant subsequently forfeits such Shares or property, the participant would not be entitled to any tax deduction, including as a capital loss, for the value of the Shares or property on which he or she previously paid tax. In such case, the participant must file any such election with the Internal Revenue Service within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the Shares or other property. Capital One generally will be entitled to a deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income recognized by the participant.
With respect to Awards other than options and SARs granted under the Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Plan that result in the payment or issuance of cash or Shares or other property that is either not restricted as to transferability or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the participant must generally recognize ordinary income equal to the cash or the fair market value of Shares or other property received. Any deferral of the time of payment or issuance will generally result in the deferral of the time the participant will be liable for income taxes with respect to such payment or issuance. Capital One generally will be entitled to a deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income recognized by the participant. However, pursuant to Code Section 162(m), compensation paid to covered executive officers in excess of $1 million will generally not be deductible.
|
|
Awards that are granted, accelerated or enhanced upon the occurrence of a change of control may give rise, in whole or in part, to “excess parachute payments” within the meaning of Code Section 280G and, to such extent, will be non-deductible by Capital One and subject to a 20% excise tax by the participant.
***
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal to approve and adopt the Capital One Financial Corporation Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
Section XIIIXII - Other Business
As of the date of this proxy statement, we know of no business that will be presented for consideration at the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting other than the items referred to above. If other matters are properly brought before the meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy card will vote such proxy at their discretion.
Capital One’sOur Annual Report, including consolidated financial statements, is being furnished along with this proxy statement to Capital One’sour stockholders of record. The Annual Report does not constitute a part of the proxy soliciting material.A copy of the Form 10-K may be obtained without charge at the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting, at our website at www.capitalone.com under “Investors” then “Financials” then “SEC Filings,” or by contacting our Investor Relations department at Capital One’s address set forth above in the section “How to Contact Us” on page 50.51. The Form 10-K, which is filed with the SEC, may also be obtained at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Stockholder Proposals for 2023 Annual Stockholder Meeting
To be considered for inclusion in the proxy materials for Capital One’s 2022our 2023 Annual Stockholder Meeting, stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and stockholder director nominations submitted pursuant to the proxy access provisions of our Bylaws must be received by Capital One’sour Corporate Secretary at the address set forth above in the section “How to Contact Us” on page 50,51, no later than November 24, 202121, 2022 (and in the case of proxy access director candidates no earlier than October 25, 2021)22, 2022).
In the case of director nominations submitted pursuant to the proxy access provisions of our Bylaws, these deadlines are based on the 150th day and 120th day, respectively, before the one-year anniversary of the date that the Proxy Statement for the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting was first sent to stockholders (which date, for purposes of our Bylaws, is March 24, 2021)21, 2022). Stockholders submitting proposals pursuant to Rule 14a-8 or submitting proxy access director candidates must also satisfy other procedural and qualification requirements set forth in Rule 14a-8 and our Bylaws, respectively. The submission of a stockholder proposal or proxy access nomination does not guarantee that it will be included in our proxy statement.
Under our Bylaws, if you wish to present a stockholder proposal other than pursuant to Rule 14a-8 or nominate a director candidate other than pursuant to our proxy access Bylaw provisions, then to be timely for consideration at Capital One’s 2022our 2023 Annual Stockholder Meeting, you must give proper written notice of such proposal and of such nomination to the Corporate Secretary no earlier than January 6, 2022,5, 2023, and no later than February 5, 2022.4, 2023. If Capital One’s 2022our 2023 Annual Stockholder Meeting is held on a date that is not within 30 days before or 60 days after May 6, 2022,5, 2023, the anniversary date of this year’s Annual Stockholder Meeting, notice must be delivered no earlier than the 120th day prior to such annual stockholder meeting and no later than the later of the 90th day prior to such meeting or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Your notice must include the information specified in our Bylaws concerning the proposal or nominee. Our Bylaws set forth the information that must be furnished to the Corporate Secretary in order for any such notice to be proper. A copy of our Bylaws may be obtained from the Corporate Secretary at Capital One’s address set forth above in the section “How to Contact Us” on page 50.51.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
| | 123
|
OTHER MATTERS |
Section XIVXIII - Frequently Asked Questions
Why did I receive a Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials?
Pursuant to rules of the SEC, we are furnishing the proxy materials to certain of our stockholders via the Internet instead of mailing printed copies. This process allows us to expedite our stockholders’ receipt of proxy materials, lower the costs of printing and mailing the proxy materials, and reduce the environmental impact of Capital One’s 2021our 2022 Annual Stockholder Meeting. Accordingly, on March 24, 2021,21, 2022, we began sending our stockholders a Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”). If you received a Notice, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request one. The Notice provides instructions on how to access the proxy materials for the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting via the Internet, how to request a printed set of proxy materials and how to vote your shares.
What is the purpose of the proxy materials?
The Board is providing you these materials in connection with the solicitation by the Board of proxies to be voted at the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting. All stockholders who held shares of Capital One common stock as of the close of business on the Record Date, March 10, 2021,9, 2022, are entitled to attend the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting and to vote on the items of business outlined in this proxy statement. Whether or not you choose to attend the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting, you may vote your shares via the Internet, by telephone, or by mail.
How do I access the proxy materials?
The Notice provides instructions regarding how to view the proxy materials for the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting online. As explained in greater detail in the Notice, to view the proxy materials and to vote, you will need to visit www.proxyvote.com and have available the control number(s) contained in your Notice.
How do I request paper copies of the proxy materials?
You may request paper copies of the 20212022 proxy materials by following the instructions at www.proxyvote.com, by
calling 1-800-579-1639 or by sending an e-mail to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com.
What is the difference between a record holder and a holder of shares in street name?
You are a record holder if you hold shares of Capital One common stock directly in your name through Capital One’sour transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
If you hold shares of Capital One common stock through a broker, bank, trust, or other nominee, then you are a holder of shares in street name. As a result, you must instruct the broker, bank, trust, or other nominee about how to vote your shares. Under the rules of the NYSE, if you do not provide such instructions, the firm that holds your shares will have discretionary authority to vote your shares only with respect to “routine” matters, as described below.
Can I attend the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting?
In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and after careful consideration, the Board has determined to hold a virtual annual meeting in order to facilitate stockholder attendance and participation by enabling stockholders to participate from any location and at no cost.
To participate in the virtual meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice, proxy card or voting instruction form. The meeting webcast will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. Online check-in will begin at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time, and you should allow ample time for the check-in procedures. If you experience technical difficulties during the check-in process or during the meeting please call 1-844-986-0822 (U.S.) or 1-303-562-9302 (International) for assistance.
We are committed to ensuring that stockholders will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. You will be able to attend the meeting online, vote your shares electronically, and submit questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/COF2021.COF2022. We will
124 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
OTHER MATTERS |
Section XIII - Frequently Asked Questions |
try to answer as many stockholder-submitted questions as time permits that comply with the meeting rules of conduct. However, we reserve the right to edit profanity or other inappropriate language, or to exclude questions that are not pertinent to meeting matters or that are otherwise inappropriate. If we receive substantially similar questions, we may group such questions together and provide a single response to avoid repetition.
|
|
Am I entitled to vote?
You are entitled to vote if you were the record holder of shares of Capital One common stock as of the Record Date. All stockholders of record are entitled to one vote per share of common stock held for each nominee for director and for each matter submitted for a vote at the meeting.
If you hold your shares of Capital One common stock in street name, you may instruct your broker regarding voting your shares using the same methods described below under “How do I vote?”
How many votes can be cast by all stockholders?
A total of 456,630,057405,670,159 votes, consisting of one vote for each share of Capital One common stock issued and outstanding on the Record Date.
By Internet
Before the meeting, you may vote via the Internet by going to www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions on the screen. Have your Notice, proxy card (for record holders), or voting instruction form (for holders of shares in street name) available when you access the web page.
During the meeting, you may vote electronically by following the instructions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/COF2021.COF2022. Have your Notice, proxy card, or voting instruction form available when you access the virtual meeting web page.
By Telephone
If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials, you may vote by telephone by calling the toll-free telephone number on the proxy card (1-800-690-6903),
which is available 24 hours a day, and following the prerecorded instructions. Have your proxy card available when you call. If you hold your shares in street name, follow the voting instructions you receive from your broker, bank, trustee, or other nominee.
By Mail
If you received your proxy materials by mail, you may vote by mail by completing the enclosed proxy card, dating and signing it, and returning it in the postage-paid
envelope provided or returning it to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Vote Processing, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. If you hold your shares in street name, follow the voting instructions you receive from your broker, bank, trustee, or other nominee.
Time for Voting Your Shares by Internet, by Telephone, or by Mail Before the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting
You may vote via the Internet or by telephone until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 5, 2021.4, 2022. If you vote by mail, your proxy card or voting instruction form, as applicable, must be received by May 5, 2021.4, 2022. If you own shares of Capital One through the Capital One Associate Savings Plan (Capital One Stock Fund) or Hibernia Corporation Supplemental Stock Plan, see “How do I vote my 401(k) shares?” below for more information.
What if I hold my shares in street name and I do not provide my broker, bank, trustee, or other nominee with instructions about how to vote my shares?
You may instruct your broker, bank, trustee, or other nominee on how to vote your shares using the methods described above. If you do not vote via the Internet or by telephone and do not return your voting instructions to the firm that holds your shares prior to the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting, the firm has discretion to vote your shares only with respect to Item 23 (ratification of selection of independent registered public accounting firm), which is considered a “routine” matter under NYSE rules. All other items to be voted on at the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting are not considered “routine” matters, and the firm that holds your shares will not have discretionary authority to vote your shares for these Items if you do not provide instructions using one of the methods described
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 125 |
OTHER MATTERS |
Section XIII - Frequently Asked Questions |
above. Therefore, you are encouraged to return your voting instructions so that your shares are voted for non-routine matters at the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting. If you hold shares in several accounts, you must provide voting instructions for each account to authorize all of your shares to be voted.
How do I vote my 401(k) shares?
If you own shares of Capital One through the Capital One Associate Savings Plan (Capital One Stock Fund) or Hibernia Corporation Supplemental Stock Plan, you may vote the number of shares equivalent to your interest in the Capital One Stock Fund as credited to your account on the Record Date. You will
|
|
receive instructions on how to vote your shares via e-mail from Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”). The trustee of the Capital One Associate Savings Plan and the Hibernia Corporation Supplemental Stock Plan will vote your shares in accordance with your duly executed instructions if they are received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 3, 2021.2, 2022. If you do not send instructions, the trustee will not vote the share equivalents credited to your account.
Can I revoke my proxy or change my vote?
Yes, you may revoke any proxy that you previously granted or change your vote by:
∎ | submitting another timely vote via the Internet, by telephone, or by mailing a new proxy card or voting instruction form; |
∎ | attending the virtual |
∎ | if you are a record holder, giving written notice of revocation to the Corporate Secretary, Capital One Financial Corporation, 1600 Capital One Drive, McLean, VA 22102. |
Your new vote or revocation in advance of the meeting must be submitted in accordance with the time frames above under “Time for Voting Your Shares By Internet, By Telephone, or By Mail Before the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting.”
What constitutes a quorum?
A quorum of stockholders is necessary to transact business at the 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting. A quorum exists if the holders of a majority of the voting power of Capital One’s outstanding shares entitled to vote generally in the election of directors are present online at the virtual 20212022 Annual Stockholder Meeting or represented by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted in determining if there is a quorum, but neither will be counted as votes cast.
What is a broker non-vote?
Under NYSE rules, if you hold your shares in street name and you do not submit voting instructions to the firm that holds your shares, the firm has discretionary authority to vote your shares only with respect to “routine” matters. For non-routine matters, which include every item to be voted on other than Item 23 (ratification of selection of independent registered
public accounting firm) the firm that holds your shares will not have discretion to vote your shares. This is called a “broker non-vote.”
Who will count the vote?
Votes will be tabulated by Broadridge. The Board has appointed a representative of American Election Services, LLC to serve as the Inspector of Elections.
Will a list of stockholders be made available?
Capital OneWe will make a list of stockholders available electronically on the virtual meeting website during the meeting for those attending the meeting, and for ten days prior to the meeting, by sending a request by email to investor.relations@capitalone.com.investorrelations@capitalone.com.
How much did the solicitation cost?
Capital OneWe will pay the costs of the solicitation. We have retained Morrow Sodali to assist us in the solicitation of proxies for an aggregate fee of $12,500, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. In addition to Capital One soliciting proxies via the Internet, by telephone, and by mail, our directors, officers, and associates may solicit proxies on our behalf, without additional compensation.
126 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
OTHER MATTERS |
Section XIII - Frequently Asked Questions |
What is “householding?”“householding”?
Under SEC rules, a single package of Notices may be sent to any household at which two or more stockholders reside if they appear to be members of the same family unless contrary instructions have been received. Each stockholder continues to receive a separate Notice within the package. This procedure, referred to as “householding,” reduces the volume of duplicate materials stockholders receive and reduces mailing expenses. Stockholders may revoke their consent to future householding mailings or enroll in householding by contacting Broadridge toll free at 1-866-540-7095 or by writing to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes
Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. Capital OneWe will deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the proxy materials to any stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy was delivered. Stockholders who wish to receive a separate set of proxy materials now should contact Broadridge at the same phone number or mailing address.
|
|
What vote is necessary to approve each item and what are the Board’s recommendations?
The following table sets forth the voting requirements for each proposal being voted at the meeting and the Board’s recommendations.
Item | ||||||||
| Matter to Be Voted On | Board
| Voting Requirement | |||||
1. | Election of | FOR |
| Each candidate will be elected as a director of Capital One if a majority of the votes cast in his or her election is voted in favor of such election.
| ||||
2. |
Named Executive Officer compensation | FOR | This item will be approved if a majority of the votes cast on the proposal are voted in favor of the proposal.
| |||||
3. |
Ratification of
| FOR | This item will be approved if a majority of the votes cast on the proposal are voted in favor of the proposal.
| |||||
|
|
|
Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered “votes cast” and thus do not have an effect on the outcome of the vote as to Items 1, 2, and 3. With respect to Item 4, NYSE rules governing equity compensation plans treat abstentions as “votes cast.” Accordingly, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. However, broker non-votes are not considered “votes cast” and thus will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the proposal.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 127 |
OTHER MATTERS |
Appendix A -– Information Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Our Compensation Committee believes that certain measures not defined by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), including adjusted diluted earnings per share, adjusted operating efficiency ratio, adjusted efficiency ratio, return on average tangible common equity, and tangible book value per common share, help investors and users of our financial information to understand the effect of adjusting items on our selected reported results and provide alternate measurements of our performance. In addition, these non-GAAP measures are reviewed by the Compensation Committee and the other independent members of our Board of Directors as part of their assessment of the Company’s performance. While certain of our non-GAAP measures are widely used by investors, analysts, and bank regulatory agencies to assess the capital position of financial services companies, they may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures reported by other companies. The following tables present reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to the applicable amounts measured in accordance with GAAP.
Table 1: Reconciliation of Diluted Earnings Per Share (“EPS”), Efficiency Ratio Metrics, and Operating Efficiency Ratio
Year Ended December 31,
| Year Ended December 31,
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except per share data and as noted) | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted diluted EPS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders (GAAP) | $11,965 | $2,375 | $5,192 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legal reserve activity, including insurance recoveries | 100 | 313 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.K. Payment Protection Insurance customer refund reserve (“U.K. PPI Reserve”) | — | (36) | 212 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cybersecurity Incident expenses, net of insurance | — | 27 | 38 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial allowance build on acquired Walmart portfolio | — | — | 84 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Walmart launch and related integration expenses | — | — | 211 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges | — | — | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted net income (loss) available to common stockholders before income tax impacts (non-GAAP) | 12,065 | 2,679 | 5,765 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax impacts | (24) | (22) | (81) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities | — | (2) | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selected income statement data: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted net income (loss) available to common stockholders (non-GAAP) | $12,041 | $2,655 | $5,681 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding (in millions) (GAAP) | 444.2 | 458.9 | 469.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted diluted EPS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted EPS (GAAP) | $26.94 | $5.18 | $11.05 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impact of adjustments noted above | 0.17 | 0.61 | 1.04 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted diluted EPS (non-GAAP) | $27.11 | $5.79 | $12.09 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders (GAAP) |
| $2,375 |
|
| $5,192 |
|
| $5,710 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted efficiency ratio: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expense (GAAP) | $16,570 | $15,056 | $15,483 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legal reserve activity, including insurance recoveries |
| 313 |
|
| — |
|
| 170 |
| (100) | (313) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.K. Payment Protection Insurance customer refund reserve (“U.K. PPI Reserve”) |
| (36) |
|
| 212 |
|
| 99 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cybersecurity Incident expenses, net of insurance |
| 27 |
|
| 38 |
|
| — |
| — | (27) | (38) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial allowance build on acquired Walmart portfolio |
| — |
|
| 84 |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Walmart launch and related integration expenses |
| — |
|
| 211 |
|
| — |
| — | — | (211) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.K. PPI Reserve | — | — | (72) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| — |
|
| 28 |
|
| 34 |
| — | — | (27) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net gains on the sales of exited businesses |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (615) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted non-interest expense (non-GAAP) | $16,470 | $14,716 | $15,135 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted net income (loss) available to common stockholders before income tax impacts (non-GAAP) |
| $2,679 |
|
| $5,765 |
|
| $5,398 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax impacts |
| (22) |
|
| (81) |
|
| (139) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities |
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| (3) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted net income (loss) available to common stockholders (non-GAAP) |
| $2,655 |
|
| $5,681 |
|
| $5,256 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding (in millions) (GAAP) |
| 458.9 |
|
| 469.9 |
|
| 483.1 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted EPS (GAAP) |
| $5.18 |
|
| $11.05 |
|
| $11.82 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impact of adjustments noted above |
| 0.61 |
|
| 1.04 |
|
| (0.94) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted diluted EPS |
| $5.79 |
|
| $12.09 |
|
| $10.88 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio metrics: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expense (GAAP) |
| $15,056 |
|
| $15,483 |
|
| $14,902 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legal reserve activity, including insurance recoveries |
| (313) |
|
| — |
|
| (170) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cybersecurity Incident expenses, net of insurance |
| (27) |
|
| (38) |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Walmart launch and related integration expenses |
| — |
|
| (211) |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.K. PPI Reserve |
| — |
|
| (72) |
|
| (44) |
|
128 | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
Appendix A - Information Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures |
Year Ended December 31,
| Year Ended December 31,
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except per share data and as noted) | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net revenue (GAAP) | $30,435 | $28,523 | $28,593 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.K. PPI Reserve | — | (36) | 140 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| — |
|
| (27) |
|
| (45) |
| — | — | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net gains on the sales of exited businesses |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (23) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefit as a result of tax methodology change on rewards costs |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted net revenue (non-GAAP) | $30,435 | $28,487 | $28,734 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted non-interest expense (non-GAAP) |
| $14,716 |
|
| $15,135 |
|
| $14,620 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio(1) (GAAP) | 54.44% | 52.79% | 54.15% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impact of adjustments noted above | (32) bps | (113) bps | (148) bps | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) | 54.12% | 51.66% | 52.67% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted operating efficiency ratio: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expense (GAAP) | $13,699 | $13,446 | $13,209 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legal reserve activity, including insurance recoveries | (100) | (313) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cybersecurity Incident expenses, net of insurance | — | (27) | (38) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Walmart launch and related integration expenses | — | — | (211) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.K. PPI Reserve | — | — | (72) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges | — | — | (27) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted operating expense (non-GAAP) | $13,599 | $13,106 | $12,861 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net revenue (GAAP) |
| $28,523 |
|
| $28,593 |
|
| $28,076 |
| $30,435 | $28,523 | $28,593 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.K. PPI Reserve |
| (36) |
|
| 140 |
|
| 58 |
| — | (36) | 140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| — |
|
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
| 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net gains on the sales of exited businesses |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (606) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefit as a result of tax methodology change on rewards costs |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted net revenue (non-GAAP) |
| $28,487 |
|
| $28,734 |
|
| $27,530 |
| $30,435 | $28,487 | $28,734 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating efficiency ratio(2) (GAAP) | 45.01% | 47.14% | 46.20% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impact of adjustments noted above | (33) bps | (113) bps | (144) bps | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted operating efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) | 44.68% | 46.01% | 44.76% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio(1) (GAAP) |
| 52.79% |
|
| 54.15% |
|
| 53.08% |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impact of adjustments noted above |
| (113) bps |
|
| (148) bps |
|
| 3 bps |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) |
| 51.66% |
|
| 52.67% |
|
| 53.11% |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted operating efficiency ratio: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expense (GAAP) |
| $13,446 |
|
| $13,209 |
|
| $12,728 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legal reserve activity, including insurance recoveries |
| (313) |
|
| — |
|
| (170) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cybersecurity Incident expenses, net of insurance |
| (27) |
|
| (38) |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Walmart launch and related integration expenses |
| — |
|
| (211) |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.K. PPI Reserve |
| — |
|
| (72) |
|
| (44) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| — |
|
| (27) |
|
| (45) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net gains on the sales of exited businesses |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (23) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefit as a result of tax methodology change on rewards costs |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted operating expense (non-GAAP) |
| $13,106 |
|
| $12,861 |
|
| $12,446 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted net revenue (non-GAAP) |
| $28,487 |
|
| $28,734 |
|
| $27,530 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating efficiency ratio(2) (GAAP) |
| 47.14% |
|
| 46.20% |
|
| 45.33% |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impact of adjustments noted above |
| (113) bps |
|
| (144) bps |
|
| (12) bps |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted operating efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) |
| 46.01% |
|
| 44.76% |
|
| 45.21% |
|
(1) | Efficiency ratio is calculated based on total non-interest expense for the period divided by total net revenue for the period and reflects as-reported results in accordance with GAAP. |
(2) | Operating efficiency ratio is calculated based on operating expense for the period divided by total net revenue for the period and reflects as-reported results in accordance with GAAP. |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
| 129 |
Appendix A - Information Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures |
Table 2: Reconciliation of Return On Average Tangible Common Equity and Tangible Book Value Per Common Share
(Dollars in millions, except per share data and as noted) | Year Ended December 31, 2020 Reported Results | Year Ended December 31, 2019 Reported Results | Year Ended December 31, 2018 Reported Results | Year Ended December 31, 2021 Reported Results | Year Ended December 31, 2020 Reported Results | Year Ended December 31, 2019 Reported Results | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangible Common Equity (Period-End) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders’ equity |
| $60,204 |
|
| $58,011 |
|
| $51,668 |
| $61,029 | $60,204 | $58,011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangible assets(1) |
| (14,809) |
|
| (14,932) |
|
| (14,941) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets(1) | (14,907) | (14,809) | (14,932) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncumulative perpetual preferred stock |
| (4,847) |
|
| (4,853) |
|
| (4,360) |
| (4,845) | (4,847) | (4,853) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangible common equity |
| $40,548 |
|
| $38,226 |
|
| $32,367 |
| $41,277 | $40,548 | $38,226 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangible Common Equity (Average) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders’ equity |
| $58,201 |
|
| $55,690 |
|
| $50,192 |
| $62,556 | $58,201 | $55,690 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangible assets(1) |
| (14,875) |
|
| (14,927) |
|
| (15,017) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets(1) | (14,805) | (14,875) | (14,927) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncumulative perpetual preferred stock | �� | (5,247) |
|
| (4,729) |
|
| (4,360) |
| (5,590) | (5,247) | (4,729) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangible common equity |
| $38,079 |
|
| $36,034 |
|
| $30,815 |
| $42,161 | $38,079 | $36,034 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selected performance metrics: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average tangible common equity(2) |
| 6.24% |
|
| 14.37% |
|
| 18.56% |
| 28.39% | 6.24% | 14.37% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangible book value per common share (period-end)(3) |
| $88.34 |
|
| $83.72 |
|
| $69.20 |
| $99.74 | $88.34 | $83.72 |
(1) | Includes impact of related deferred taxes. |
(2) | Return on average tangible common equity (“ROTCE”) is a non-GAAP measure calculated based on |
(3) | Tangible book value per common share is a non-GAAP measure calculated based on tangible common equity divided by common shares outstanding. |
|
|
Appendix B - Capital One Financial Corporation Sixth Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
SIXTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
Article 1. Establishment, Purpose and Duration
1.1 Establishment. The Company established, effective as of April 29, 2004, an incentive compensation plan to be known as the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (hereinafter referred to as the “Plan”), as set forth in this document, as it may be amended from time to time. The Plan is hereby amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2021 (the “Restatement Effective Date”).
The Plan permits the grant of Cash-Based Awards, Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares, Performance Units, Annual Incentive Pool Awards, and Other Stock-Based Awards.
This amendment and restatement of the Plan shall become effective upon shareholder approval and shall remain in effect as provided in Section 1.3 hereof.
1.2 Purpose of the Plan. The purpose of the Plan is to promote the interests of the Company and its shareholders by strengthening the Company’s ability to attract, motivate, and retain Associates, Directors and Third Party Service Providers of the Company, its Affiliates and Subsidiaries upon whose judgment, initiative, and efforts the financial success and growth of the business of the Company largely depend, and to provide an additional incentive for such individuals through stock ownership and other rights that promote and recognize the financial success and growth of the Company and create value for shareholders.
1.3 Duration of the Plan. Unless sooner terminated as provided herein, the Plan shall terminate May 6, 2031. After the Plan is terminated, no new Awards may be granted but Awards previously granted shall remain outstanding in accordance with their applicable terms and conditions and the Plan’s terms and conditions.
Article 2. Definitions
Whenever used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below, and when the meaning is intended, the initial letter of the word shall be capitalized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 3. Administration
3.1 General. The Committee shall be responsible for administering the Plan, subject to this Article 3 and the other provisions of the Plan. The Committee may employ attorneys, consultants, accountants, agents, and other persons, any of whom may be an Associate or Third Party Service Provider, and the Committee, the Company, and its officers and Directors shall be entitled to rely upon the advice, opinions, or valuations of any such persons. All actions taken and all interpretations and determinations made by the Committee shall be final and binding upon Participants, the Company, and all other interested persons.
3.2 Authority of the Committee. Subject to the express provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have full and exclusive discretionary power to do all things that it determines to be necessary or appropriate in connection with the administration of the Plan, including, without limitation: (a) to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to this Plan and to define terms not otherwise defined herein; (b) to determine which persons are eligible for Awards granted hereunder and the timing of any such Awards; (c) to prescribe and amend the terms of the Award Agreements, to grant Awards and determine the terms and conditions thereof; (d) to establish and verify the extent of satisfaction of any performance goals or other conditions applicable to the grant, issuance, retention, vesting, exercisability, settlement or recoupment of any Award; (e) to prescribe and amend the terms of or form of any document or notice required to be delivered to the Company by Participants under this Plan; (f) to determine the extent to which adjustments are required pursuant to Section 4.4; (g) to interpret and construe the Plan, any rules and regulations under the Plan and the terms and conditions of any Award granted hereunder, and to make exceptions to any such provisions if the Committee, in good faith, determines that it is appropriate to do so; (h) to approve corrections in the documentation or administration of any Award; and (i) to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan.
3.3 Delegation. Subject to this Article 3, the Committee may delegate to one or more of its members or other members of the Board or to one or more officers or management committees of the Company, and/or its Subsidiaries and Affiliates or to one or more agents or advisors such duties or powers as it may deem advisable, and the Committee or any person to whom it has delegated duties or powers as aforesaid may employ one or more persons to render advice with respect to any responsibility the Committee or such person may have under the Plan. In addition, the Committee may, by resolution, authorize one or more officers or management committees of the Company to do one or more of the following on the same basis as can the Committee: (a) designate Associates to be recipients of Awards; and (b) determine the type, number of Shares subject thereto and all other terms and conditions of any such Awards; provided, however, (i) the Committee shall not delegate such responsibilities to any such officer or management committee for Awards granted to a Director or an Associate that is considered an
|
|
Insider; (ii) the resolution providing such authorization sets forth the total number of Shares that may be subject to Awards such officer(s) or management committee(s) may grant and any other limitations on the delegated authority that the Committee may deem appropriate or advisable; and (iii) the officer(s) or management committee(s) shall report periodically to the Committee regarding the nature and scope of the Awards granted pursuant to the authority delegated in the manner and at such times as requested by the Committee.
3.4 No Liability; Indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted from time to time by applicable law, subject to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Restated Bylaws (as each may be amended from time to time), neither the Company nor any member of the Committee shall be liable for any action, omission, or determination of the Committee relating to the Plan or any Award, and the Company shall indemnify and hold harmless each member of the Committee and each other person to whom any duty or power relating to the administration or interpretation of the Plan or any Award has been delegated against any cost or expense (including counsel fees) or liability (including any sum paid in settlement of a claim with the approval of the Committee) arising out of any such action, omission or determination relating to the Plan or any Award.
3.5 Third Party Agreements. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan (including without limitation Section 21.11 hereof), the Committee may enter into agreements with third parties pursuant to which such third parties may issue Awards to the Participants in lieu of the Company’s issuance thereof or assume the obligations of the Company under any Awards previously issued by the Company, in any case on such terms and conditions as may be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.
3.6 Determination of Termination of Employment or Service. The Committee shall have the authority to determine in its discretion whether a Participant’s placement by the Company, an Affiliate or a Subsidiary on military or sick leave or other authorized leave of absence will be considered a termination of employment or services as a Director or Third Party Service Provider or a continuation of the employment or service relationship.
In addition, the Committee shall have the authority to determine whether to treat the service of a Participant who ceases to be an Associate but continues to be a Director or Third Party Service Provider as a continuation of Participant’s employment relationship or as a termination of employment for purposes of the Plan or any outstanding Award.
Unless the Committee determines otherwise, if a Participant is employed by, or provides services as a Third Party Service Provider to, an entity that ceases to be an Affiliate or a Subsidiary as the result of a corporate event or transaction, for purposes of any Award under the Plan, such Participant shall be deemed to have had his or her employment or services as a Third Party Service Provider terminated by the Company, its Affiliates and Subsidiaries at the time of such cessation.
Article 4. Shares Subject to the Plan and Maximum Awards
4.1 Number of Shares Available for Awards. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.4 herein:
|
|
4.2 Share Usage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 Annual Award Limits. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.4 herein, the following limits (each an “Annual Award Limit,” and, collectively, “Annual Award Limits”) shall apply to grants of such Awards under the Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 Adjustments in Authorized Shares. In the event of any corporate event or transaction (including, but not limited to, a change in the shares of the Company or the capitalization of the Company) such as a merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, separation, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, split up, spin-off, or other distribution of stock or property of the Company, combination of Shares, exchange of Shares, dividend in kind, extraordinary cash dividend or other like change in capital structure or distribution (other than normal cash dividends) to shareholders of the Company, or any similar corporate event or transaction, the Committee, in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of Participants’ rights under the Plan, shall appropriately substitute or adjust, as applicable, the number and kind of Shares that may be issued under the Plan or under particular forms of Awards, the number and kind of Shares subject to outstanding Awards, the Option Price or Grant Price applicable to outstanding Awards, the Annual Award Limits, and other value determinations applicable to outstanding Awards.
The Committee shall also make appropriate adjustments in the terms of any Awards under the Plan to reflect or related to such corporate events or transactions, changes or distributions and to modify any other terms of outstanding Awards, including modifications of performance goals and changes in the length of Performance Periods. The determination of the Committee as to the foregoing adjustments, if any, shall be conclusive and binding upon Participants, the Company, and all other interested persons.
Subject to the provisions of Article 17, without affecting the number of Shares reserved or available hereunder, the Committee may authorize under the Plan the issuance of Awards or the assumption of awards granted under plans of other entities in connection with any merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, or reorganization upon such terms and conditions as it may deem appropriate, subject to compliance with the ISO rules under Section 422 of the Code, where applicable, and any other applicable laws or stock exchange rules.
Article 5. Eligibility and Participation
5.1 Eligibility. Individuals eligible to participate in the Plan include all Associates and Directors. Third Party Service Providers are also eligible to participate in the Plan.
5.2 Actual Participation. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee may, from time to time, select from all eligible individuals those to whom Awards shall be granted and shall determine, in its sole discretion, the nature of, any and all terms permissible by law, and the amount of each Award.
5.3 Trusts and Other Funding Vehicles. Notwithstanding any other provision herein (including without limitation Section 21.11), in lieu of making Awards directly to Associates, Directors or Third Party Service Providers under the Plan, the Committee may make Awards under the Plan through or to a trust or other funding vehicle which in turn makes Awards to Participants or which issues interests in Awards held by it to Participants, in any case on such terms and conditions as may be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.
Article 6. Stock Options
6.1 Grant of Options. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, Options may be granted to Participants in such number, and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion; provided that ISOs may be granted only to eligible Associates of the Company or of any parent or subsidiary corporation (as permitted by Code Section 422 and the regulations thereunder). Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the Committee shall not grant Options containing, or amend Options previously granted to include, reload features providing for the automatic grant of Options with respect to the number of already owned Shares delivered by the Participant to exercise Options. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee may grant Options in satisfaction of the Company’s obligation to issue stock options pursuant to stock options with reload features granted under the Prior Plans.
|
|
6.2 Award Agreement. Each Option grant shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Option Price, the maximum duration of the Option, the number of Shares to which the Option pertains, the conditions upon which an Option shall become vested and exercisable (including the effect, if any, of a Change of Control, death, Disability or Retirement), the Date of Grant and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine. The Award Agreement also shall specify whether the Option is intended to be an ISO or a NQSO.
6.3 Option Price. The Option Price for each grant of an Option shall be as determined by the Committee and shall be specified in the Award Agreement. The Option Price may include (but not be limited to) an Option Price based on one hundred percent (100%) of the FMV of the Shares on the Date of Grant, an Option Price that is set at a premium to the FMV of the Shares on the Date of Grant, or is indexed to the FMV of the Shares on the Date of Grant, with the index determined by the Committee, in its discretion; provided, however, the Option Price must be at least equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the FMV of the Shares on the Date of Grant.
6.4 Duration of Options. Each Option granted to a Participant shall expire at such time as the Committee shall determine at the time of grant; provided, however, that the Committee may extend the term of any Option that would otherwise expire at a time when the Participant is not permitted by applicable law or Company policy to exercise such Option; and provided, further, no Option shall be exercisable later than the tenth (10th) anniversary of its Date of Grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for Options granted to Participants outside the United States, the Committee has the authority to grant Options that have a term greater than ten (10) years.
6.5 Limitations on Grant of Incentive Stock Options.
|
|
6.6 Exercise of Options. Options granted under this Article 6 shall be exercisable at such times and be subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Committee shall in each instance approve, which terms and restrictions need not be the same for each grant or for each Participant.
6.7 Payment. Options granted under this Article 6 shall be exercised by the delivery of a notice of exercise to the Company or an agent designated by the Company in a form specified or accepted by the Committee, or by complying with any alternative procedures which may be authorized by the Committee, setting forth the number of Shares with respect to which the Option is to be exercised, accompanied by full payment for the Shares.
A condition of the issuance of the Shares as to which an Option shall be exercised shall be the payment of the Option Price. The Option Price of any Option shall be payable to the Company in full either: (a) in cash or its equivalent; (b) by tendering (either by actual delivery or attestation) previously acquired Shares having an aggregate Fair Market Value at the time of exercise equal to the Option Price; (c) by a combination of (a) and (b); (d) a cashless (broker-assisted) exercise in accordance with procedures approved by the Committee; or (e) any other method approved or accepted by the Committee in its sole discretion.
|
|
Subject to any governing rules or regulations, as soon as practicable after receipt of written notification of exercise and full payment (including satisfaction of any applicable tax withholding), the Company shall deliver to the Participant evidence of book entry Shares, or upon the Participant’s request, Share certificates in an appropriate amount based upon the number of Shares purchased under the Option(s).
Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, all payments under all of the methods indicated above shall be paid in United States dollars.
6.8 Restrictions on Share Transferability. The Committee may impose such restrictions on any Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an Option granted under this Article 6 as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation, minimum holding period requirements, restrictions under applicable federal securities laws, under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which such Shares are then listed and/or traded, or under any blue sky or state securities laws applicable to such Shares.
6.9 Termination of Employment or Service. Each Participant’s Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to exercise the Option following termination of the Participant’s employment or provision of services as a Director or Third Party Service Provider to the Company, its Affiliates and/or Subsidiaries, as the case may be. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Options issued pursuant to this Article 6, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
6.10 Transferability of Options.
|
|
6.11 Notification of Disqualifying Disposition. If any Participant shall make any disposition of Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of an ISO under the circumstances described in Section 421(b) of the Code (relating to certain disqualifying dispositions), such Participant shall notify the Company of such disposition within ten (10) days thereof.
6.12 Substituting SARs. Regardless of the terms of any Award Agreement, the Committee shall have the right to substitute SARs for outstanding Options granted to any Participant, provided the substituted SARs call for settlement by the issuance of Shares, and the terms of the substituted SARs and economic benefit of such substituted SARs are at least equivalent to the terms and economic benefit of the Options being replaced.
Article 7. Stock Appreciation Rights
7.1 Grant of SARs. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, SARs may be granted to Participants at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee. The Committee may grant Freestanding SARs, Tandem SARs, or any combination of these forms of SARs.
|
|
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, the Committee shall have complete discretion in determining the number of SARs granted to each Participant and, consistent with the provisions of the Plan, in determining the terms and conditions pertaining to such SARs. Any SAR granted in connection with an Option may be granted at the same time as its related Option is granted or at any time prior to the exercise, expiration or cancellation of its related Option.
The Grant Price for each grant of a Freestanding SAR shall be determined by the Committee and shall be specified in the Award Agreement. The Grant Price may include (but not be limited to) a Grant Price based on one hundred percent (100%) of the FMV of the Shares on the Date of Grant, a Grant Price that is set at a premium to the FMV of the Shares on the Date of Grant, or is indexed to the FMV of the Shares on the Date of Grant, with the index determined by the Committee, in its discretion; provided, however, the Grant Price must be at least equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the FMV of the Shares on the Date of Grant. The Grant Price of Tandem SARs shall be equal to the Option Price of the related Option.
7.2 SAR Agreement. Each SAR shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Grant Price, the term of the SAR, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine (including the effect, if any, of a Change of Control, death, Disability or Retirement).
7.3 Term of SAR. The term of a SAR granted under the Plan shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion; provided, however, that the Committee may extend the term of any SAR that would otherwise expire at a time when the Participant is not permitted by applicable law or Company policy to exercise such SAR; provided, further, except as determined otherwise by the Committee and specified in the SAR Award Agreement, no SAR shall be exercisable later than the tenth (10th) anniversary of its Date of Grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for SARs granted to Participants outside the United States, the Committee has the authority to grant SARs that have a term greater than ten (10) years.
7.4 Exercise of Freestanding SARs. Freestanding SARs may be exercised upon whatever terms and conditions the Committee, in its sole discretion, imposes, including a requirement that a Freestanding SAR be exercised only at the same time as a related Option.
7.5 Exercise of Tandem SARs. Tandem SARs may be exercised with respect to all or part of the Shares subject to the related Option upon the surrender of the right to exercise the equivalent portion of the related Option. A Tandem SAR may be exercised only with respect to the Shares for which its related Option is then exercisable.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, with respect to a Tandem SAR granted in connection with an ISO: (a) the Tandem SAR will expire no later than the expiration of the underlying ISO; (b) the value of the payout with respect to the Tandem SAR may be for no more than one hundred percent (100%) of the difference between the Option Price of the underlying ISO and the Fair Market Value of the Shares subject to the underlying ISO at the time the Tandem SAR is exercised; and (c) the Tandem SAR may be exercised only when the Fair Market Value of the Shares subject to the ISO exceeds the Option Price of the ISO.
7.6 Payment of SAR Amount. Upon the exercise of a SAR, a Participant shall be entitled to receive payment from the Company in an amount determined by multiplying:
|
|
At the discretion of the Committee, the payment upon SAR exercise may be in cash, Shares, or any combination thereof, or in any other manner approved by the Committee in its sole discretion. The Committee’s determination regarding the form of SAR payout shall be set forth in the Award Agreement pertaining to the grant of the SAR; provided, however, that the Committee may reserve the right to determine the form of such payout at any time subsequent to the grant, at which time it will give notice to the Participant.
7.7 Termination of Employment or Service. Each Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to exercise the SAR following termination of the Participant’s employment with or provision of services as a Director or Third Party Service Provider to the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with Participants, need not be uniform among all SARs issued pursuant to the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
|
|
7.8 Nontransferability of SARs. Except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s Award Agreement or otherwise at any time by the Committee, no SAR granted under the Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Further, except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s Award Agreement or otherwise determined at any time by the Committee, all SARs granted to a Participant under the Plan shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Participant. With respect to those SARs, if any, that are permitted to be transferred to another person, references in the Plan to exercise of the SAR by the Participant or payment of any amount to the Participant shall be deemed to include, as determined by the Committee, the Participant’s permitted transferee.
7.9 Other Restrictions. The Committee shall impose such other conditions and/or restrictions on any Shares received upon exercise of a SAR granted pursuant to the Plan as it may deem advisable or desirable. These restrictions may include, but shall not be limited to, a requirement that the Participant hold the Shares received upon exercise of a SAR for a specified period of time.
Article 8. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
8.1 Grant of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Shares of Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Units to Participants in such amounts as the Committee shall determine. Restricted Stock Units shall be similar to Restricted Stock except that no Shares are actually awarded to the Participant on the Date of Grant.
8.2 Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. Each grant of Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Unit shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Period(s) of Restriction, the number of Shares of Restricted Stock or the number of Restricted Stock Units granted, the Date of Grant, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine (including the effect, if any, of a Change of Control, death, Disability or Retirement).
8.3 Transferability. Except as provided in the Plan or an Award Agreement, the Shares of Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Units granted herein may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated until the end of the applicable Period of Restriction established by the Committee and specified in the Award Agreement (and in the case of Restricted Stock Units until the date of delivery of Shares or other payment), or upon earlier satisfaction of any other conditions, as specified by the Committee, in its sole discretion, and set forth in the Award Agreement or otherwise determined at any time by the Committee. All rights with respect to the Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Units granted to a Participant under the Plan shall be available during his or her lifetime only to such Participant, except as otherwise provided in an Award Agreement or at any time by the Committee.
8.4 Other Restrictions. The Committee shall impose such other conditions and/or restrictions on any Shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units granted pursuant to the Plan as it may deem advisable including, without limitation, a requirement that Participants pay a stipulated purchase price for each Share of Restricted Stock or each Restricted Stock Unit, restrictions based upon the achievement of specific performance goals, service-based restrictions on vesting following the attainment of the performance goals, service-based restrictions, and/or restrictions under applicable laws or under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which such Shares are listed or traded, or holding requirements or sale restrictions placed on the Shares by the Company upon vesting of such Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units.
To the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee, if such certificates are issued at the time of grant, the Company may retain the certificates representing Shares of Restricted Stock in the Company’s possession until such time as all conditions and/or restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied or lapse.
Except as otherwise provided in this Article 8, Shares of Restricted Stock covered by each Restricted Stock Award shall become freely transferable by the Participant after all conditions and restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied or lapse (including satisfaction of any applicable tax withholding obligations), and Restricted Stock Units shall be settled in cash, Shares, or a combination of cash and Shares as the Committee, in its sole discretion shall determine.
|
|
8.5 Certificate Legend. In addition to any legends placed on certificates pursuant to Section 8.4, if certificates are issued at the time of grant, each such certificate representing Shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the Plan may bear a legend such as the following or as otherwise determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.
The sale or transfer of shares of common stock represented by this certificate, whether voluntary, involuntary, or by operation of law, is subject to certain restrictions as set forth in the Capital One Financial Corporation 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, and in the associated Award Agreement. A copy of the Plan and such Award Agreement may be obtained from Capital One Financial Corporation.
8.6 Voting and Dividend Rights. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee and set forth in a Participant’s Award Agreement, to the extent permitted or required by law, as determined by the Committee, Participants holding Shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder shall be granted the right to exercise full voting rights, and to receive all dividends and other distributions paid, with respect to those Shares during the Period of Restriction. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee and set forth in a Participant’s Award Agreement, any such dividend shall be paid in cash within a reasonable time after dividends are paid to the Company’s other stockholders. With respect to any Restricted Stock Units granted hereunder, a Participant shall have no such voting or dividend rights during the Period of Restriction, unless otherwise determined by the Committee and set forth in a Participant’s Award Agreement.
8.7 Termination of Employment or Service. Each Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to retain Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Units following termination of the Participant’s employment with or provision of services as a Director or Third Party Service Provider to the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units issued pursuant to the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
8.8 Section 83(b) Election. The Committee may provide in an Award Agreement that the Award of Restricted Stock is conditioned upon the Participant making or refraining from making (or otherwise give the Participant the choice of making) an election with respect to the Award under Section 83(b) of the Code. If a Participant makes an election pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code concerning a Restricted Stock Award, the Participant shall be required to file promptly a copy of such election with the Company.
Article 9. Performance Units and Performance Shares
9.1 Grant of Performance Units and Performance Shares. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Performance Units and/or Performance Shares to Participants in such amounts and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine.
9.2 Value of Performance Units and Performance Shares. Each Performance Unit shall have an initial value that is established by the Committee at the time of grant. Each Performance Share shall have an initial value equal to the Fair Market Value of a Share on the Date of Grant. In addition to any other non-performance terms included in the Award Agreement (including the effect, if any, of a Change of Control, death, Disability or Retirement), the Committee shall set performance goals in its discretion which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will determine the value and/or number of Performance Units or Performance Shares, as the case may be, that will be paid out to the Participant.
9.3 Earning of Performance Units and Performance Shares. Subject to the terms of the Plan, after the applicable Performance Period has ended, the holder of Performance Units or Performance Shares, as the case may be, shall be entitled to receive payout on the value and number of the applicable Performance Units or Performance Shares earned by the Participant over the Performance Period, to be determined as a function of the extent to which the corresponding performance goals have been achieved and any other non-performance terms met.
9.4 Form and Timing of Payment of Performance Units and Performance Shares. Payment of earned Performance Units and Performance Shares shall be as determined by the Committee and as evidenced in the Award Agreement. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may pay earned Performance Units and Performance Shares in the form of cash, in Shares or other Awards (or in a combination thereof) equal to the value of the earned Performance Units or Performance Shares, as the case may be, at the
|
|
close of the applicable Performance Period, or as soon as practicable after the end of the Performance Period. Any Shares may be granted subject to any restrictions deemed appropriate by the Committee. The determination of the Committee with respect to the form of payout of such Awards shall be set forth in the Award Agreement pertaining to the grant of the Award.
9.5 Termination of Employment or Service. Each Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to retain Performance Units and/or Performance Shares following termination of the Participant’s employment with or provision of services as a Director or Third Party Service Provider to the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Awards of Performance Units or Performance Shares issued pursuant to the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
9.6 Nontransferability. Except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s Award Agreement or otherwise at any time by the Committee, Performance Units and Performance Shares may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Further, except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s Award Agreement or otherwise determined at any time by the Committee, a Participant’s rights under the Plan shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Participant.
Article 10. Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards
10.1 Grant of Cash-Based Awards. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Cash-Based Awards to Participants in such amounts and upon such terms as the Committee may determine.
10.2 Other Stock-Based Awards. The Committee may grant other types of equity-based or equity-related Awards not otherwise described by the terms of the Plan (including the grant or offer for sale of unrestricted Shares) in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions, as the Committee shall determine. Such Awards may involve the transfer of actual Shares to Participants, or payment in cash or otherwise of amounts based on the value of Shares and may include, without limitation, Awards designed to comply with or take advantage of the applicable local laws of jurisdictions other than the United States.
10.3 Value of Cash-Based and Other Stock-Based Awards. Each Cash-Based Award shall specify a payment amount or payment range as determined by the Committee. Each Other Stock-Based Award shall be expressed in terms of Shares or units based on Shares, as determined by the Committee. In addition to any other non-performance terms included in the Award Agreement (including the effect, if any, of a Change of Control, death, Disability or Retirement), the Committee may establish performance goals in its discretion. If the Committee exercises its discretion to establish performance goals, the number and/or value of Cash-Based Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards that will be paid out to the Participant will depend on the extent to which the performance goals (and any other non-performance terms) are met.
10.4 Payment of Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards. Payment, if any, with respect to a Cash-Based Award or an Other Stock-Based Award shall be made in accordance with the terms of the Award, in cash, Shares or a combination of both, as the Committee determines.
10.5 Termination of Employment or Service. The Committee shall determine the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to receive Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards or to have such Awards vest or pay out, as applicable, following termination of the Participant’s employment with or provision of services as a Director or Third Party Service Provider to the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, such provisions may be included in an agreement entered into with each Participant, but need not be uniform among all Awards of Cash-Based Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards issued pursuant to the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
|
|
10.6 Nontransferability. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, neither Cash-Based Awards nor Other Stock-Based Awards may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Further, except as otherwise provided by the Committee, a Participant’s rights under the Plan, if exercisable, shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Participant. With respect to those Cash-Based Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards, if any, that are permitted to be transferred to another person, references in the Plan to exercise or payment of such Awards by or to the Participant shall be deemed to include, as determined by the Committee, the Participant’s permitted transferee.
Article 11. Performance Measures
11.1 Performance Measures. Generally, the performance goals upon which the grant, payment or vesting of an Award may occur (other than an Annual Incentive Pool Award awarded or credited pursuant to Article 12) shall be set at the discretion of the Committee, including, but not limited to, by reference to the following performance measures, either individually, alternatively or in any combination, applied to either the Company as a whole or to a business unit or Subsidiary or Affiliate or any combination thereof, either individually, alternatively or in any combination, and measured either annually or cumulatively over a period of years, on an absolute basis or relative to a pre-established target, to previous years’ results or to a designated comparison group, in each case as specified by the Committee:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Committee may also provide for accelerated vesting of any Award based on the achievement of performance goals pursuant to the performance measures specified in this Article 11.
11.2 Evaluation of Performance. The Committee will determine whether, with respect to a performance period, the applicable performance goals have been met with respect to a given participant and, if they have, to so certify and ascertain the amount of the applicable Award. The Committee may provide in any such Award that any evaluation of performance may include or exclude any of the following events that occurs during a Performance Period: (a) asset write-downs, (b) litigation or claim judgments or settlements, (c) the effect of changes in tax laws, accounting principles or regulations, or other laws or provisions affecting reported results, (d) any reorganization and restructuring programs, (e) Extraordinary Items for the applicable year, (f) mergers, acquisitions or divestitures, and (g) foreign exchange gains and losses.
Article 12. Annual Incentive Pool Awards
12.1 Establishment of Incentive Pool. The Committee may designate Associates who are eligible to receive a monetary payment in any Plan Year based on a percentage of an incentive pool equal to the greater of: (i) three percent (3%) of the Company’s Consolidated Operating Earnings for the Plan Year, (ii) twenty percent (20%) of the Company’s Operating Cash Flow for the Plan Year, or (iii) five percent (5%) of the Company’s Net Income for the Plan Year. At the beginning of the Plan Year, the Committee shall allocate an incentive pool percentage to each participating Associate for each Plan Year. In no event may (1) the incentive pool percentage for any one participating Associate exceed fifty percent (50%) of the total pool, (2) the sum of the incentive pool percentages for all participating Associates exceed one hundred percent (100%) of the total pool or (3) the monetary payment for any one participating Associate exceed $10 million.
12.2 Determination of Participating Associates’ Portions. As soon as possible after the determination of the incentive pool for a Plan Year, the Committee shall calculate each participating Associate’s allocated portion of the incentive pool based upon the percentage established at the beginning of the Plan Year. Each participating Associate’s Annual Incentive Pool Award then shall be determined by the Committee based on the participating Associate’s allocated portion of the incentive pool subject to adjustment in the sole discretion of the Committee. The Committee shall retain the discretion to adjust all such Annual Incentive Pool Awards downward and provide for such other terms as it feels necessary or appropriate (including the effect, if any, of a Change of Control, death, Disability or Retirement).
Article 13. Dividend Equivalents
In the discretion of the Committee, any Participant selected by the Committee may be granted dividend equivalents based on the dividends declared on Shares that are subject to any Award during the period between the date the Award is granted and the date the Award is exercised, vests, pays out or expires. Such dividend equivalents may be awarded or paid in the form of cash, Shares, Restricted Stock, or Restricted Stock Units, or a combination, and shall be determined by such formula and at such time and subject to such accrual, forfeiture, or payout restrictions or limitations as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. In no event shall dividend equivalents be granted with respect to Options or SARs. In addition, dividend equivalents granted with respect to Performance Shares or Performance Units shall not be distributed during the Performance Period or to the extent any such Award is otherwise unearned.
Article 14. Beneficiary Designation
Each Participant under the Plan may, from time to time, name any beneficiary or beneficiaries (who may be named contingently or successively) to whom any benefit under the Plan is to be paid in case of his or her death before he or she receives any or all of such benefit. Each such designation shall revoke all prior designations by the same Participant, shall be in a form prescribed by the Committee, and will be effective only when filed by the Participant in writing with the Company during the Participant’s lifetime. In the absence of any such designation, benefits remaining unpaid at the Participant’s death shall be paid to the Participant’s estate.
|
|
Article 15. Deferrals
The Committee may permit or require a Participant to defer such Participant’s receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of Shares that would otherwise be due to such Participant by virtue of the lapse or waiver of restrictions with respect to Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units, or the satisfaction of any requirements or performance goals with respect to Performance Shares, Performance Units, Cash-Based Awards, Other Stock-Based Awards and Annual Incentive Pool Awards. If any such deferral is required or permitted, the Committee shall, in its sole discretion, establish rules and procedures for such payment or Share delivery deferrals and any notional earnings to be credited on such deferred amounts.
Article 16. Rights of Participants
16.1 Employment; Services. Nothing in the Plan or an Award Agreement shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries, to terminate any Participant’s employment or service as a Director or Third Party Service Provider at any time or for any reason not prohibited by law, nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue his or her employment or service as a Director or Third Party Service Provider for any specified period of time.
Neither an Award nor any rights arising under the Plan shall constitute an employment contract with the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries and, accordingly, subject to Articles 3 and 17, the Plan and any Award hereunder may be terminated at any time in the sole and exclusive discretion of the Committee without giving rise to any liability on the part of the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries.
16.2 Participation. No individual shall have the right to be selected to receive an Award under the Plan, or, having been so selected, to be selected to receive a future Award.
16.3 Rights as a Shareholder. Except as otherwise provided herein, a Participant shall have none of the rights of a shareholder with respect to Shares covered by any Award until the Participant becomes the record holder of such Shares.
Article 17. Amendment, Modification, Suspension, and Termination
17.1 Amendment, Modification, Suspension, and Termination; No Repricings. Subject to Section 17.3, the Committee may, at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, modify, suspend, or terminate the Plan and any Award Agreement in whole or in part; provided, however, that no amendment of the Plan or an Award shall be made without shareholder approval if shareholder approval is required by law, regulation, or stock exchange rule. Furthermore, other than in connection with a change in the Company’s capitalization (as described in Section 4.4), the Committee shall not, without stockholder approval, reduce the Option Price or Grant Price of a previously awarded Option or Stock Appreciation Right and, at any time when the Option Price or Grant Price of the previously awarded Option or Stock Appreciation Right is above the Fair Market Value of a Share, the Committee shall not, without stockholder approval, cancel and re-grant or exchange such Option or Stock Appreciation Right for cash or a new Award with a lower (or no) Option Price or Grant Price or take any other action that would be considered a repricing for purposes of US generally accepted accounting practices or any applicable stock exchange rule.
17.2 Adjustment of Awards Upon the Occurrence of Certain Unusual or Nonrecurring Events. The Committee may make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the performance criteria included in, Awards in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events (including, without limitation, the events described in Section 4.4 hereof) affecting the Company or the financial statements of the Company or of changes in applicable laws, regulations, or accounting principles, whenever the Committee determines that such adjustments are appropriate in order to prevent unintended dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan. The determination of the Committee as to the foregoing adjustments, if any, shall be conclusive and binding upon Participants, the Company, and all other interested persons.
|
|
17.3 Awards Previously Granted.
|
|
Article 18. Withholding
18.1 Tax Withholding. The Company shall have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, and local taxes or similar charges, domestic or foreign, required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result of or in connection with the Plan or any Award.
18.2 Share Withholding. With respect to withholding required upon the exercise of Options or SARs, upon the lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units, or upon the achievement of performance goals related to Performance Shares, or any other taxable event arising as a result of or in connection with an Award granted hereunder, Participants may elect, subject to the approval of the Committee, or the Committee may require the Participant, to satisfy the withholding requirement, in whole or in part, by having the Company withhold Shares having a Fair Market Value on the date the tax withholding obligation is to be determined equal to the amount required to be withheld, using the applicable statutory withholding rate or, to the extent determined by the Committee or its delegate, in its sole discretion, another tax withholding rate not exceeding the maximum applicable rate. Any and all such Participant elections to withhold shall be irrevocable, made in writing, and signed by the Participant, and shall be subject to any restrictions or limitations that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate. Any and all such Committee requirements to withhold shall either be set forth in the Award Agreement or otherwise communicated to the Participant by notice subsequent to the time of grant and shall be subject to any restrictions or limitations that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.
|
|
Article 19. Change of Control
The Committee may provide in an Award Agreement for provisions relating to a Change of Control, including without limitation the acceleration of the exercisability, vesting or settlement of, or the lapse of restrictions or deemed satisfaction of performance objectives with respect to, an Award; provided that, in addition to any other conditions provided for in the Award Agreement: (a) any acceleration of the exercisability, vesting or settlement of, or the lapse of restrictions or deemed satisfaction of, performance objectives with respect to, an Award in connection with a Change of Control may occur only if (i) the Change of Control occurs and (ii) either (A) the employment of the Participant is terminated (as set forth in the Award Agreement) (i.e., “double-trigger”) or (B) the acquirer does not agree to the assumption or substitution of outstanding Awards; (b) with respect to any Award granted under the Plan that is earned or vested based upon achievement of performance objectives (included but not limited to Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units or Performance Shares), any amount deemed earned or vested in connection with a Change of Control or associated termination of employment shall be based upon the degree of performance attainment and/or the period of time elapsed in the performance period, as applicable, as of the applicable date, as determined in accordance with the Award Agreement; and (c) with respect to any Award that constitutes a nonqualified deferred compensation plan within the meaning of Section 409A(d) of the Code and provides for an accelerated payment in connection with a Change of Control (whether or not in conjunction with a termination of employment), Change of Control is defined in Section 2.10 within the meaning of Section 409A for purposes of such accelerated payment provision.
Article 20. Successors
All obligations of the Company under the Plan with respect to Awards granted hereunder shall be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company.
Article 21. General Provisions
21.1 Forfeiture Events.
|
|
|
21.2 Legend. The certificates or book entry for Shares may include any legend or coding, as applicable, which the Committee deems appropriate to reflect any restrictions on transfer of such Shares.
21.3 Gender and Number. Except where otherwise indicated by the context, any masculine term used herein also shall include the feminine, the plural shall include the singular, and the singular shall include the plural.
21.4 Severability. In the event any provision of the Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of the Plan, and the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included.
|
|
21.5 Requirements of Law. The granting of Awards and the issuance of Shares under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required.
21.6 Delivery of Title. The Company shall have no obligation to issue or deliver evidence of title for Shares issued under the Plan prior to:
|
|
21.7 Inability to Obtain Authority. The inability of the Company (after reasonable efforts) to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authority is deemed by the Company’s counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and/or sale of any Awards or Shares hereunder, shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue and/or sell such Awards or Shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained.
21.8 Investment Representations. The Committee may require any person receiving Shares pursuant to an Award under the Plan to represent and warrant in writing that the person is acquiring the Shares for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute such Shares.
21.9 Participants Based Outside of the United States. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in order to comply with the laws in other countries in which the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries operate or have Associates, Directors or Third Party Service Providers, the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall have the power and authority to:
|
|
|
|
|
Notwithstanding the above, the Committee may not take any actions hereunder, and no Awards shall be granted, that would violate applicable law.
21.10 Uncertificated Shares. To the extent that the Plan provides for issuance of certificates to reflect the transfer of Shares, the transfer of such Shares may be effected on a noncertificated basis, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange.
21.11 Unfunded Plan. Except as provided in Section 5.3 herein: (a) Participants shall have no right, title, or interest whatsoever in or to any investments that the Company, its Subsidiaries, and/or Affiliates may make to aid it in meeting its obligations under the Plan; (b) nothing contained in the Plan, and no action taken pursuant to its provisions, shall create or be construed to create a trust of any kind, or a fiduciary relationship between the Company and any Participant, beneficiary, legal representative, or any other person; (c) to the extent that any person acquires a right to receive payments from the Company, its Subsidiaries, and/or Affiliates under the Plan, such right shall be no greater than the right of an unsecured general creditor of the Company, a Subsidiary, or an Affiliate, as the case may be; and (d) all payments to be made hereunder shall be paid from the general funds of the Company, a Subsidiary, or an Affiliate, as the case may be and no special or separate fund shall be established and no segregation of assets shall be made to assure payment of such amounts except as expressly set forth in the Plan. The Plan is not subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
|
|
21.12 No Fractional Shares. No fractional Shares shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any Award. The Committee shall determine whether cash, Awards, or other property shall be issued or paid in lieu of fractional Shares or whether such fractional Shares or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.
21.13 Retirement and Welfare Plans. Neither Awards made under the Plan nor Shares or cash paid pursuant to such Awards will be included as “compensation” for purposes of computing the benefits payable to any Participant under the Company’s or any Subsidiary’s or Affiliate’s retirement plans (both qualified and non-qualified) or welfare benefit plans unless such other plan expressly provides that such compensation shall be taken into account in computing a participant’s benefit or except as the Committee may otherwise determine in its discretion.
21.14 Nonexclusivity of the Plan. Neither the adoption of the Plan nor the grant of any Award shall be construed as creating any limitations on the power of the Board or Committee to adopt such other compensation arrangements as it may deem desirable for any Participant.
21.15 No Constraint on Corporate Action. Nothing in the Plan shall be construed to: (a) limit, impair, or otherwise affect the Company’s or a Subsidiary’s or an Affiliate’s right or power to make adjustments, reclassifications, reorganizations, or changes of its capital or business structure, or to merge or consolidate, or dissolve, liquidate, sell, or transfer all or any part of its business or assets; or, (b) limit the right or power of the Company, a Subsidiary or an Affiliate to take any action which such entity deems to be necessary or appropriate.
21.16 Governing Law. The Plan and each Award Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, excluding any conflicts or choice of law rule or principle that might otherwise refer construction or interpretation of the Plan to the substantive law of another jurisdiction. Unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, recipients of an Award under the Plan are deemed to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the federal or state courts of Delaware to resolve any and all issues that may arise out of or relate to the Plan or any related Award Agreement.
|
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
1680 CAPITAL ONE DR. |
MCLEAN, VA 22102-3491 |
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
1680 CAPITAL ONE DR.
MCLEAN, VA 22102-3491
VOTE BY INTERNET
Before The Meeting - Go towww.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern TimeET on May 5, 20214, 2022 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern TimeET on May 3, 20212, 2022 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the websiteweb site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
During The Meeting - Go towww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/COF2021COF2022
You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have your proxy cardthe information that is printed in hand when you access the websitebox marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions to join the meeting and vote.instructions.
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Capital One in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern TimeET on May 5, 20214, 2022 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern TimeET on May 3, 20212, 2022 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. To be effective, your proxy card must be received by Broadridge not later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 5, 2021.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: | ||||
D73646-P62951-Z81181 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS |
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY |
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR each of the following nominees: | ||||||||||||
1. | Election of Directors | |||||||||||
| Nominees: | For | Against | Abstain | ||||||||
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
|
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||
|
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||
1d. Ann Fritz Hackett | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1e. Peter Thomas Killalea | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1f. Cornelis “Eli” Leenaars | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1g. François Locoh-Donou | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1h. Peter E. Raskind | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1i. Eileen Serra | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1j. Mayo A. Shattuck III | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
For | Against | Abstain | |||||||||||
1k. Bradford H. Warner | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||
1l. Catherine G. West | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||
1m. Craig Anthony Williams | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR management proposals 2 | |||||||||||||
2. | Advisory approval of Capital One’s 2021 Named Executive Officer compensation. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
3. | Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm of Capital One for | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before themeeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. | ||||||||||||||||||
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date | Signature (Joint Owners) | Date |
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Stockholder Meeting:
The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders/10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
D39371-P47186-Z78606D73647-P62951-Z81181
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION Annual Stockholder Meeting Thursday, May
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints Richard D. Fairbank and
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED BY THE STOCKHOLDER, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” ALL PORTIONS OF ITEMS (1), (2), and (3)
Continued and to be signed on reverse side
|